Facing rapidly evolving markets and increasing demands for agility, performance, and resilience, many Swiss organizations today confront aging monolithic systems. These heavy, rigid codebases slow down development cycles and prevent fully leveraging the cloud’s potential. Redesigning a monolith into a modular cloud-native architecture therefore becomes a strategic imperative—not only to modernize IT infrastructure but also to accelerate time-to-market, control maintenance costs, and enhance the reliability of digital services.

When and Why Should You Refactor a Monolith?

Identifying the right time to initiate a redesign requires an accurate diagnosis of current limitations. Understanding the underlying business stakes helps prioritize the transition to a flexible, scalable architecture.

Technical Symptoms Revealing an Aging Monolith

Systematic regressions after each deployment and prolonged downtime are clear indicators that a monolith has reached its limits. When the slightest change to a feature triggers unexpected side effects, team agility suffers.

Testing and release processes become longer as dense code makes understanding internal dependencies difficult. Every release turns into a high-risk endeavor, often requiring freezes and rollbacks.

In a recent case, a Swiss retail company experienced a 30 % drop in IT productivity with each release cycle due to the lack of unit tests and the monolith’s complexity. A complete software refactor resolved the issue by enabling the implementation of modern, appropriate testing processes.

Business Impact and the Cost of Technical Debt

Beyond productivity impacts, technical debt manifests in exponential maintenance costs. Frequent fixes consume a disproportionate share of the IT budget, diverting resources from innovation projects.

This technical inertia can delay the launch of new features essential for responding to market changes. Over time, the company’s competitiveness weakens against more agile rivals.

For example, a Swiss industrial SME facing recurring budget overruns decided to isolate the most unstable components of its monolith to limit emergency interventions and contain support costs.

Post-Refactoring Objective

The aim of refactoring a monolithic software architecture into a cloud-native one is to decouple key functionalities into autonomous services, each able to evolve independently. This modularity ensures greater flexibility when adding new capabilities.

A containerized infrastructure orchestrated by Kubernetes, for instance, can automatically adjust resources based on load, ensuring controlled horizontal scalability and high availability.

Ultimately, the organization can focus its efforts on optimizing business value rather than resolving technical conflicts or structural bottlenecks.

Key Steps for a Successful Cloud-Native Refactor

A gradual, structured approach limits risks and facilitates the adoption of new paradigms. Each phase should rely on a clear plan, validated with both business and technical stakeholders.

Technical Audit and Functional Mapping of the Monolithic Software

The first step is to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the monolith: identify functional modules, critical dependencies, and fragile areas. This mapping is essential for developing a coherent decomposition plan.

The analysis also covers existing test coverage, code quality, and deployment processes. The goal is to accurately measure the level of technical debt and estimate the refactoring effort required via refactoring.

In a project for a Swiss financial institution, this audit phase revealed that nearly 40 % of the code lines were unused, paving the way for drastic simplification. This underscores how crucial this analysis phase is to ensure tailored refactoring efforts that fit the organization’s IT context.

Identifying Decomposable Modules as Services

Based on the mapping, teams pinpoint core features to isolate: authentication, catalog management, transaction processing, etc. Each module is treated as a potential microservice.

Priority criteria combining business impact and technical criticality are applied. Modules likely to deliver quick wins are addressed first, ensuring tangible results in early iterations.

For example, a Swiss insurance provider began by extracting its premium calculation engine, reducing testing times by 60 % and freeing up time for other initiatives.

Incremental Migration Plan

Migration is conducted in stages to maintain service continuity and mitigate risks. Each developed microservice is integrated progressively, with end-to-end tests validating interactions.

A parallel deployment scheme provides a transparent cutover, allowing the old monolith to act as a fallback until sufficient confidence is achieved.

This iterative approach was adopted by a Swiss logistics services company, which gradually decoupled its shipment tracking module without impacting daily operations.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Concrete Case Study

A field case illustrates how a progressive decomposition can transform an aging system into an agile ecosystem. The measurable benefits encourage continued pursuit of a cloud-native strategy.

Initial Context

An industrial provider had a 3-tier monolithic application that struggled to handle load spikes and generated frequent incidents during releases. Production lead times often exceeded a week.

The IT teams had to intervene manually for every configuration change, lengthening downtime and multiplying support tickets.

These constraints undermined customer satisfaction and delayed the rollout of new modules essential for meeting regulatory requirements.

Transformation and Progressive Decomposition

The first iteration extracted the user management engine into a separate, containerized, and orchestrated service. A second phase isolated the reporting module by adopting a dedicated database.

Each service was equipped with CI/CD pipelines and automated tests, ensuring functional consistency with every update. Deployment times dropped from several hours to a few minutes.

Traffic switching to the new microservices occurred gradually, ensuring service continuity and enabling immediate rollback in case of anomalies.

Results Achieved

After three months, production cycles were reduced threefold, while production incidents dropped by 70 %. Teams could focus on functional optimization rather than troubleshooting technical issues.

Scalability improved thanks to container elasticity: during peak periods, the user service automatically adjusts, preventing saturation.

This project also paved the way for future integration of advanced AI and data analytics modules without disrupting the existing infrastructure.

Advantages of a Cloud-Native Architecture Post-Refactoring

Adopting a cloud-native architecture unlocks adaptability and growth previously out of reach. Modularity and automation become genuine competitive levers.

On-Demand Scalability

Containers and Kubernetes orchestration enable instant scaling of critical services. Automatic resource allocation reduces operational costs while ensuring performance.

During traffic spikes, only the affected modules are replicated, avoiding resource overconsumption across the entire system.

A Swiss retailer observed a 40 % reduction in cloud infrastructure costs by dynamically adjusting its clusters during promotional campaigns.

Continuous Deployment and Reliability

CI/CD pipelines combined with automated tests offer unmatched traceability and deployment speed. Teams can deliver multiple times a day while controlling regression risk.

Incidents are detected upstream thanks to non-regression tests and proactive monitoring, ensuring a reliable user experience.

In the Swiss financial services sector, this approach halved the mean time to resolution for critical incidents.

Preparing for Future Challenges

Service independence facilitates the adoption of multi-cloud solutions or edge computing, depending on business needs and local constraints.

This flexibility paves the way for embedding AI, data lakes, or managed services without risking technological lock-in.

A Swiss telecommunications player is now preparing to deploy 5G and IoT functions on its fragmented architecture, leveraging the cloud-native approach to orchestrate millions of connections.

Transform Your Monolith into a Strategic Asset

Redesigning a monolith into a cloud-native architecture is neither a mere technical project nor a high-risk operation when carried out progressively and methodically. It relies on precise diagnostics, business prioritization, and an incremental migration plan combining automated testing with deployment automation.

The benefits are tangible: accelerated deployments, reduced incidents, controlled scalability, and the opening of new services. Each organization can thus turn its IT into a genuine competitive advantage.

Whatever stage you’re at in your modernization journey, our experts are ready to help you develop a tailored roadmap, ensuring a secure transition aligned with your business goals.

Discuss Your Challenges with an Edana Expert

Companies often rely on custom-developed business software to meet their specific needs. Over time, these solutions can become obsolete, difficult to maintain, and poorly suited to new business challenges. Faced with these issues, the question arises: is it better to renovate the existing system or start from scratch with a new solution? This article offers concrete criteria to guide this strategic decision: technical condition, usage patterns, technical debt, business stakes, and evolution constraints. It also outlines the key steps to plan a smooth transition, whether through refactoring or a complete overhaul.

Assessing the Technical and Functional State of the Existing Software

This step involves conducting an objective diagnosis of the current platform. It helps measure the gap between the software’s capabilities and the company’s real needs.

Architecture Analysis and Technical Debt

It entails examining the code structure, the languages used, module quality, and test coverage. A clean, modular architecture facilitates evolution, while a monolithic and undocumented structure increases regression risks.

Technical debt shows up as unstable or overly coupled components, outdated dependencies, and a lack of automated tests. Its accumulation can turn even a simple change into a major project.

For example, a Swiss industrial SME discovered during an audit that more than half of its libraries hadn’t been updated in two years. Maintenance accounted for 70 % of development time, severely limiting innovation.

Usage Mapping and User Feedback

Gathering feedback from operational teams and business managers reveals daily pain points. Some processes may have been bypassed or worked around via peripheral solutions.

Identifying the most used features and those generating the most incidents helps set priorities. Usage metrics (click rates, response times) provide objective indicators.

An e-commerce company, for example, had adapted its inventory management tool with ten in-house extensions, creating data inconsistencies. Systematic incident reports highlighted the urgency of rethinking these modules.

Identifying External Constraints and Dependencies

Business software often integrates with ERPs, CRMs, BI tools, or third-party cloud services. You need to list these connections to assess migration or refactoring complexity.

Internal and external APIs, data formats, and security rules impose technical constraints. Vendor lock-in or proprietary licenses can limit modernization options.

For instance, a healthcare provider used a proprietary authentication component. When support for this module ended, the organization faced security risks and a 30 % increase in licensing costs the following year.

Weighing the Benefits and Limits of Renovating the Software

Renovation preserves past investments while gradually modernizing the solution. However, it only makes sense if the technical foundation is sound.

Agility Gains and Controlled Costs

Targeted refactoring of critical components can restore flexibility and significantly reduce technical debt. Service modularization improves maintainability and accelerates deployments.

Unlike a full rebuild, renovation relies on the existing system, limiting initial costs. It can deliver quick wins in performance and user experience.

In one telecom company, the IT department isolated and refactored its billing modules, cutting production incidents by 40 % and speeding up invoice processing times.

Risk of Debt Accumulation and Evolution Limits

Each patch and new feature carries regression risks if the codebase remains complex. Technical debt may move instead of being resolved.

Major framework or database upgrades can reveal deep incompatibilities, requiring complex and costly fixes.

For example, a large industrial group recently attempted to migrate its development framework but had to suspend the project due to incompatibilities with its custom extensions, causing an 18-month delay.

Impact on Deployment Times and Security

Well-designed CI/CD pipelines enable frequent, safe deployments but require a robust test suite. Without prior refactoring, achieving satisfactory coverage is difficult.

Security vulnerabilities often stem from outdated dependencies or unsecure legacy code. Renovation must include upgrading sensitive components.

A Swiss financial institution discovered a critical vulnerability in its legacy reporting engine. Securing this module impacted the entire IT roadmap for six consecutive months.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

When Replacement Becomes Inevitable

Replacement is necessary when the existing platform can no longer meet strategic and operational objectives. It’s a more ambitious choice but often essential to regain agility and performance.

Technical Limits and Obsolescence

Outdated technologies, unsupported frameworks, and end-of-life databases are major technical blockers. They restrict innovation and expose the infrastructure to security risks.

An oversized monolith hinders scaling and makes updates cumbersome. Over time, maintenance effort outweighs business value.

For example, a retailer saw its mobile app overload during a traffic spike. The legacy platform couldn’t scale, forcing the group to develop a more scalable distributed solution. This shows that poorly anticipated software obsolescence can create real problems and slow down development.

Opportunities with a New Custom Solution

A full rebuild offers the chance to adopt a microservices architecture, integrate DevOps practices, and leverage modern open-source technologies. The ecosystem can then evolve continuously without a single vendor dependency.

Developing from scratch also allows you to rethink the UX, optimize data flows, and capitalize on AI or automation where the old software couldn’t.

Market Solution vs. In-House Development

Off-the-shelf solutions can be deployed quickly and come with mature support. They fit if business processes are standard and the vendor’s roadmap aligns with future needs.

In-house development ensures a precise fit with the organization’s specifics but requires strong project management and software engineering skills.

A Swiss energy group, for instance, compared a market ERP with a custom build for its consumption tracking. The custom solution won out due to specific regulatory needs and a ten-year ROI projection favoring its lower total cost of ownership.

Planning a Successful Software Transition

Whatever option you choose, a detailed roadmap minimizes risks and ensures progressive adoption. Planning must address both technical and human aspects.

Cohabitation Strategy and Phased Migration

Introducing a cohabitation phase ensures business continuity. Both systems run in parallel, synchronizing data to limit interruptions.

A module-by-module cutover provides visibility on friction points and allows adjustments before full production release.

Change Management and Team Training

Change management support includes defining internal champions, producing guides, and organizing hands-on workshops. These actions reduce the learning curve and foster buy-in.

Training sessions should cover new processes, solution administration, and common incident resolution. The goal is to build sustainable internal expertise.

Performance Monitoring and Feedback Loops

Defining key indicators (response time, error rate, user satisfaction) before implementation allows you to measure real gains. Regular reporting feeds steering committees.

Formalized feedback at each milestone fosters continuous learning and guides future iterations. It builds stakeholder confidence.

For example, it’s common to establish a quarterly post-go-live review committee. Each blocking issue can then be addressed before the next phase, ensuring a smooth transition.

Gain Agility and Performance by Rebuilding or Renovating Your Business Software

Renovating or replacing business software remains a strategic decision with lasting impacts on operational efficiency, security, and innovation. You should objectively assess technical condition, usage patterns, and constraints before selecting the most suitable path.

Regardless of the scenario, a planned transition—audit, roadmap, phased migration, and change management—determines project success. At Edana, our experts are at your disposal to help you ask the right questions and define the approach that best aligns with your business objectives.

Discuss Your Challenges with an Edana Expert

Having custom software is a first victory, but its long-term operation is often underestimated. Software maintenance breaks down into several areas—corrective, evolutionary, preventive—each addressing specific challenges to ensure the stability, competitiveness, and security of information systems. Without proper management and dedicated expertise, costs escalate, incidents multiply, and innovation capacity erodes. This article offers a clear overview of each type of maintenance, the risks associated with negligent implementation, and best practices for structuring an in-house or outsourced program, while granting flexibility and scalability to business applications.

What Is Corrective Maintenance and What Are Its Challenges?

Corrective maintenance restores an application’s functional and technical compliance after an incident. This phase aims to ensure service continuity and minimize operational impact.

Corrective maintenance covers the detection, analysis, and resolution of bugs encountered in production. It typically relies on a ticketing system and prioritization based on the severity of malfunctions. The goal is to reduce downtime and ensure a high-quality user experience.

Objectives of Corrective Maintenance

Fixing defects preserves the trust of users and stakeholders. By promptly restoring functionality, business processes remain uninterrupted, avoiding productivity losses or contractual penalties. Additionally, corrective maintenance contributes to continuous improvement by feeding recurring flaws back into future development cycles.

A clear incident-management process enhances traceability and measures the effectiveness of fixes. For each identified issue, an incident report structures the diagnosis, resolution steps, and validation tests. This rigor highlights vulnerable code areas and informs quality-reinforcement strategies.

By tracking indicators such as Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR) and the number of production rejects, teams can balance quick fixes against deeper refactoring. A paced release policy ensures that patches do not disrupt the overall roadmap while delivering the responsiveness business demands.

Process and Organization of Corrective Maintenance

Establishing a support center or service desk centralizes incident intake. Each ticket is reviewed, categorized, and then assigned to a developer or dedicated team. Clear governance defines priority levels according to system and user impact.

Tracking tools—such as ticket-management platforms—provide real-time visibility into the status of fixes. They also maintain a complete history, essential for analyzing trends and identifying the most vulnerable modules. Automated reports speed up decision-making in steering-committee meetings.

The use of continuous integration ensures that every fix is compiled, tested, and deployed in a controlled environment. CI/CD pipelines automate unit and integration tests, reducing regression risks. Close coordination between development and operations teams guarantees a smooth transition to production.

Risks of Inadequate Corrective Maintenance

Lack of a formalized process can lead to superficial incident analysis and short-term fixes. Teams focus on urgency at the expense of robustness, generating latent defects over time. Eventually, the system becomes unstable and prone to recurring outages.

Excessive resolution times degrade user satisfaction and may incur contractual penalties. In critical contexts, prolonged downtime can harm an organization’s reputation and competitiveness. Pressure to act quickly may push untested fixes into production, amplifying risk.

Moreover, failure to document fixes deprives new hires of a knowledge base and prolongs onboarding. Teams spend more time understanding incident history than preventing future malfunctions, creating a vicious cycle of overload and technical debt.

Example: A Swiss logistics SME experienced daily outages of its scheduling module due to untested fixes. Each incident lasted about three hours, causing delivery delays and customer dissatisfaction. After overhauling the support process and implementing a continuous integration pipeline, incident rates dropped by 70% within three months.

What Is Evolutionary Maintenance?

Evolutionary maintenance enriches functionality to keep pace with evolving business and technological needs. It extends application lifecycles while optimizing return on investment.

Evolutionary maintenance involves adding new features or adapting existing modules to address changes in the economic, regulatory, or competitive environment. It requires agile governance, frequent stakeholder collaboration, and prioritization based on added value.

Value Added by Evolutionary Maintenance

Introducing new capabilities helps maintain a competitive edge by aligning the application with strategic objectives. Evolutions may address regulatory compliance, automate manual tasks, or integrate third-party services, thereby boosting productivity and user experience.

Through short iterations, organizations can test business hypotheses and adjust developments based on user feedback. This approach reduces scope creep and ensures that each enhancement is genuinely adopted by operational teams.

By organizing the roadmap around business value, IT teams set a sustainable, measurable pace of change. Adoption and usage metrics for new features help refine priorities and maximize impact on revenue or service quality.

Prioritizing Business Enhancements

Cross-functional governance brings together the CIO office, business owners, and development teams to assess each proposed enhancement. Criteria include performance impact, usability, and strategic relevance. This collaborative approach prevents unnecessary development and fosters user buy-in.

Enhancements are scored by combining business value and estimated effort. Quick wins—high impact at moderate cost—are prioritized. Larger initiatives are planned over multiple sprints, ensuring a controlled, phased rollout.

Prototypes or proofs of concept can be built before full development to validate ideas and limit investment. This pragmatic method allows functional specifications to be refined before committing significant resources.

Governance and Tracking of an Evolutionary Project

A monthly steering committee reviews planned enhancements, approves milestones, and adjusts the roadmap based on feedback and unforeseen events. Key performance indicators (KPIs) track deadline compliance, business satisfaction, and budget adherence.

The backlog is managed transparently in an agile tool. Each user story is consistently documented with precise acceptance criteria. Sprint reviews validate deliverables and provide real-time visibility into project progress.

Finally, systematic documentation of evolutions simplifies future maintenance and team onboarding. Technical and functional specifications are archived and linked to their corresponding tickets, creating a lasting knowledge base.

Example: A Swiss retailer implemented a personalized recommendation module for its customer portal. With a biweekly release cycle and shared prioritization between IT and marketing, the feature went live in six weeks, driving a 15% increase in average basket value during the first three months.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

What Is Preventive Maintenance?

Preventive maintenance anticipates failures by monitoring and testing systems before any outage. This practice strengthens resilience and limits interruptions.

Preventive maintenance relies on a combination of monitoring, automated testing, and log analysis. It detects early signs of degradation—whether a blocked thread, CPU overload, or outdated component—before they affect production.

Benefits of Preventive Maintenance

By anticipating defects, organizations significantly reduce unplanned downtime. Maintenance operations can be scheduled outside critical business hours, minimizing user and business impact. This proactive approach boosts satisfaction and trust among internal and external customers.

Preventive maintenance also prolongs the life of infrastructure and associated licenses. Applying security patches and software updates promptly addresses vulnerabilities, reducing the risk of major incidents or exploited weaknesses.

Finally, regular tracking of performance indicators (server temperature, memory usage, error rates) provides a comprehensive view of system health. Configurable alerts trigger automatic interventions, reducing the need for constant manual monitoring.

Implementing Monitoring and Alerts

Deploying open-source (Prometheus, Grafana) or commercial monitoring tools offers real-time coverage of critical metrics. Custom dashboards consolidate essential information on a single screen, enabling rapid anomaly detection.

Setting up a conditional alerting system notifies the relevant teams as soon as a critical threshold is crossed. Alert scenarios cover both technical incidents and functional deviations, allowing immediate response before a bug escalates into a customer-facing issue.

Maintaining a technological watch on vulnerabilities (CVEs) and framework updates ensures the environment remains secure. Teams receive monthly reports on outdated dependencies and available patches for quick approval and controlled deployment.

Preventive Planning and Automation

Scheduled maintenance tasks—such as version-upgrade tests, database migrations, or backup verifications—are integrated into a dedicated roadmap. Frequency is defined according to component criticality and incident history.

Automating routine tasks (log rotation, backups, upgrade tests) frees teams to focus on higher-value work and ensures operation consistency. Deployment scripts managed in CI/CD pipelines execute these tasks in pre-production environments before any live rollout.

Periodic load and resilience tests simulate traffic spikes or partial outages. Results feed into contingency plans and guide infrastructure adjustments to prevent capacity shortfalls.

Example: A Swiss private bank implemented a set of automation scripts for its database updates and nightly backups. As a result, backup failure rates dropped by 90%, and data restorations now complete in under 30 minutes.

In-House or Outsourced Software Maintenance?

Choosing between an in-house team, an external provider, or a hybrid model depends on context and available resources. Each option has strengths and limitations.

In-house maintenance ensures close alignment with business units and deep contextual understanding. Outsourcing brings specialized expertise and resource flexibility. A hybrid model combines both to optimize cost, agility, and service quality.

Advantages of an In-House Team

An internal team has in-depth knowledge of business processes, priorities, and strategic objectives. It can respond rapidly to incidents and adjust developments based on user feedback. Proximity fosters efficient communication and knowledge retention.

In-house maintenance also secures key competencies and builds proprietary technical assets. Team members develop a long-term vision and deep expertise in your specific ecosystem, crucial for anticipating changes and safeguarding your application portfolio.

However, internal staffing can be costly and inflexible amid fluctuating workloads. Recruiting specialists for evolutionary or preventive maintenance can be lengthy and challenging, risking under- or over-capacity.

Benefits of an Outsourced Partnership

A specialized provider offers a broad skill set and cross-sector experience. They can quickly allocate resources to handle activity spikes or major incidents. This flexibility shortens time-to-market for fixes and enhancements.

Shared best practices and monitoring tools—garnered from multiple clients—strengthen the maturity of your maintenance setup. Providers often invest in ongoing training and tooling, benefiting their entire client base.

Outsourcing carries risks of reduced control and dependency if service commitments are not clearly defined. It’s essential to specify service levels, knowledge-transfer mechanisms, and exit terms upfront.

Hybrid Models for Optimum Balance

The hybrid model combines an internal team for coordination and business context with an external provider for technical capacity and expertise. This approach allows rapid resource adjustments to meet evolving needs while controlling costs.

A dedicated liaison ensures coherence between both parties and knowledge transfer. Governance processes clearly define responsibilities, tools, and escalation paths for each maintenance type.

Finally, the hybrid model supports progressive upskilling of the internal team through knowledge handovers and training, while benefiting from the specialist partner’s autonomy and rapid response.

Example: A Swiss industrial manufacturer formed a small in-house cell to oversee application maintenance and liaise with a third-party provider. This setup halved resolution times while optimizing costs during peak activity periods.

Ensure the Longevity of Your Software Through Controlled Maintenance

Corrective maintenance restores stability after incidents, evolutionary maintenance aligns applications with business goals, and preventive maintenance anticipates failures. Whether you choose an internal, outsourced, or hybrid arrangement, your decision should reflect available resources, required skills, and project scope. Agile governance, KPI tracking, and rigorous documentation ensure mastery of each maintenance facet.

A well-structured maintenance program protects your software investment, frees your teams to innovate, and secures business-critical services. At Edana, our experts are ready to help you define the strategy and implementation best suited to your environment.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In an environment where system interconnection has become strategic, companies are looking beyond off-the-shelf solutions to build data flows tailored to their specific challenges. Custom API integration meets this requirement by linking ERPs, CRMs, AI solutions, or business applications in a seamless and secure way. It enhances operational responsiveness, breaks down silos, and offers scalable flexibility in the face of rapid market changes. This article outlines the business benefits of such an approach, reviews the types of APIs commonly deployed, highlights pitfalls to avoid, and explains how to leverage specialized expertise to ensure your project’s success.

Why Custom API Integration Is Gaining Popularity

Custom API integration perfectly adapts your digital ecosystem to your business processes. It saves time and costs by maximizing data reuse and eliminating manual workarounds.

Increasing Complexity Context

When every department expects real-time information, manual exchanges between applications become a drag on agility. Companies rely on diverse tools—ERPs for resource management, CRMs for customer tracking, analytics platforms for decision-making—creating silos that undermine performance.

Rather than multiplying ad hoc interfaces, custom API integration centralizes connection points and unifies data governance. It ensures information consistency and drastically reduces errors caused by manual re-entry.

This foundation allows you to deploy new applications faster while delivering a consistent user experience, resulting in operational time savings and improved internal satisfaction.

API Impact on Operational Efficiency

By automating data flows between systems, you free your technical teams to focus on high-value tasks such as strategic analysis or feature innovation. Business teams no longer need to endure service interruptions to consolidate spreadsheets or generate manual reports.

Custom API integration also provides enhanced traceability: each call is logged, auditable, and subject to compliance rules. You gain precise monitoring of service usage and availability.

The result is better IT cost control and optimized business processes, reducing the number of incidents caused by data inconsistencies.

Example: Swiss E-Commerce

A Swiss e-commerce company wanted to improve coordination between its WMS (Warehouse Management System) and a third-party transport platform. CSV file exchanges caused processing delays and routing errors.

After an audit, a bespoke REST API was developed to synchronize inventory and shipping data in real time. Teams enjoyed a single interface to trigger, track, and confirm logistics operations.

Outcome: a 30% reduction in fulfillment times and an 18% drop in delivery errors, while providing consolidated visibility for management.

Common API Types and Solutions Integrated

Companies integrate ERP, AI, or accounting APIs to enrich their processes and gain agility. Solution choice depends on business objectives, leveraging standards to ensure scalability.

ERP APIs: SAP, Dynamics, and Open-Source Alternatives like Odoo or ERPNext

ERP systems manage all company resources: procurement, sales, inventory, and finance. SAP and Microsoft Dynamics 365 are often favored by large enterprises already invested in those ecosystems.

To avoid vendor lock-in and gain wider flexibility, many companies now choose open-source solutions such as Odoo or ERPNext, which offer modular ERP components. API integration in these contexts requires compliance with licensing terms and secure exchanges via OAuth2 or JWT.

In each case, implementing a dedicated abstraction layer ensures simplified future migration to other tools or major upgrades.

AI APIs: OpenAI, Azure AI, and More

AI is now embedded in business processes, from document analysis and recommendations to content moderation. OpenAI provides natural language processing APIs, while Azure AI offers a range of cognitive services (vision, translation, speech recognition).

A controlled integration ensures data protection compliance and quota management. It includes smart caching and asynchronous workflows to minimize response times and costs.

This modular approach allows rapid model iteration, use of cloud or on-premise components, and fine-grained control over training data lifecycle.

Accounting & CRM APIs: Bexio, Salesforce, Microsoft Dynamics

Accounting and CRM solutions are at the heart of customer interactions and financial management. Integrating an API between Bexio (or Sage) and a CRM such as Salesforce or Microsoft Dynamics provides a 360° view of the customer, from quote to payment.

The challenge lies in continuously synchronizing invoices, payments, and pipeline data while respecting internal approval processes and Swiss legal requirements.

An event-driven architecture (webhooks) reduces latency and ensures immediate record updates without overloading source systems.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Key Considerations for a Successful Integration

API integration goes beyond technical connections; it relies on clear governance and a scalable architecture. Mastery of security, performance, and documentation is essential to sustain the ecosystem.

API Governance and Exchange Security

Every API call must be authenticated, encrypted, and tied into an alerting process to detect anomalies. OAuth2 is commonly used for authorization, while TLS secures data in transit.

Additionally, regular certificate audits and automated renewals prevent outages due to expired keys. Throttling policies protect against accidental or malicious overloads.

Compliance with regulations such as GDPR and nLPD requires access traceability and data removal capabilities, which must be planned from the start.

Modular, Open-Source Architecture for Custom API Integrations

To avoid vendor lock-in, it’s advisable to develop an abstraction layer between your systems and third-party APIs. This façade allows swapping an ERP or AI solution for an open-source alternative without overhauling the entire ecosystem.

A microservices approach decouples key functions, simplifies versioning, and increases resilience: a failure in one service does not impact the entire flow.

Open-source tools benefit from large communities and regular updates, ensuring a secure, evolving foundation.

Testing, Documentation, and Change Management

API quality is also measured by the quality of its documentation. Swagger/OpenAPI portals detail each endpoint, data schema, and error code, accelerating team onboarding.

Unit, integration, and performance tests are automated via CI/CD pipelines to ensure that changes don’t break production flows. Sandbox environments validate scenarios without affecting end users.

Finally, a training plan and targeted communication support deployment, ensuring business and IT teams adopt the new processes.

API Interface Example: Swiss Industrial Manufacturer

An industrial machinery group wanted to connect its SAP ERP to a predictive analytics platform. Batch transfers via SFTP introduced a 24-hour lag in maintenance forecasts.

A GraphQL API was introduced to continuously expose production and IoT sensor data. The team defined extensible schemas and secured each request with role-based permissions.

The results were immediate: interventions are now scheduled in real time, unplanned downtime decreased by 22%, and monthly savings reached tens of thousands of francs.

How to Rely on a Specialized Agency for API Integration Success

Engaging experts in custom API integration ensures a fast, secure implementation tailored to your context. A contextualized, scalable approach maximizes your ROI and frees up your teams.

Contextual Approach and Ecosystem Hybridization

Each company has its own technology legacy and business constraints. An expert agency begins with an audit to map the existing landscape, identify friction points, and define a roadmap aligned with your strategic goals.

Hybridization involves combining robust open-source components with custom developments to leverage the strengths of each. This flexibility avoids an all-cloud or proprietary overlayer, reducing lock-in risk.

An agile, incremental delivery model enables rapid MVP launches followed by iterations based on user feedback.

Avoiding Vendor Lock-In and Planning for Scalability

A successful integration favors open standards (OpenAPI, JSON-LD, gRPC) and decoupled architectures. The agency sets up configurable gateways, allowing future replacement of an AI or ERP vendor without service disruption.

Load tests and failover scenarios ensure reliability under extreme conditions while preserving the flexibility to add new modules or partners.

This foresight lets you gradually expand your ecosystem by integrating new APIs without impacting critical existing flows.

ROI, Performance, and Business Alignment Drive an API Project

A custom API integration project is measured by its benefits: reduced processing times, fewer errors, faster time-to-market, and team satisfaction.

The agency defines clear KPIs from the start (performance metrics, response times, error rates) to track continuous improvement. Each delivery milestone is validated through a shared governance model, ensuring alignment with your business.

Over time, this approach builds a robust, adaptable ecosystem where each new integration leverages a consolidated foundation.

Specific API Connection Example: Swiss E-Health Solution

A digital health provider wanted to synchronize its CRM with a telemedicine module and a local payment API. Initial manual tests caused regulatory frictions and billing delays.

Our agency designed a central integration bus orchestrating calls to the CRM, e-health platform, and payment gateway. Business workflows were modeled to guarantee traceability and compliance with privacy standards.

The solution freed the internal team to focus on optimizing patient experience, while back-office operations were streamlined, improving billing and appointment scheduling.

Integrate Custom APIs to Accelerate Your Digital Performance

You now understand why custom API integration is a key lever to streamline your processes, break down silos, and boost your company’s competitiveness. ERP, AI, and accounting APIs illustrate a variety of use cases, while governance, security, and architecture mastery ensure project longevity.

Partnering with an expert agency like Edana delivers a contextualized, ROI-oriented, and scalable approach, avoiding vendor lock-in and simplifying every new connection. At Edana, our specialists support you from audit to production, turning your integration challenges into strategic advantages.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

Modern digital systems demand a level of responsiveness and flexibility that exceeds the capabilities of traditional architectures based on synchronous requests. Event-driven architecture changes the game by placing event streams at the heart of interactions between applications, services, and users. By breaking processes into producers and consumers of messages, it ensures strong decoupling, smooth scalability, and improved fault tolerance. For CIOs and architects aiming to meet complex business needs—real-time processing, microservices, alerting—event-driven architecture has become an essential pillar to master.

Understanding Event-Driven Architecture

An event-driven architecture relies on the asynchronous production, propagation, and processing of messages. It makes it easy to build modular, decoupled, and reactive systems.

Key Principles of Event-Driven

Event-driven is built around three main actors: producers, which emit events describing a state change or business trigger; the event bus or broker, which handles the secure transport and distribution of these messages; and consumers, which react by processing or transforming the event. This asynchronous approach minimizes direct dependencies between components and streamlines parallel processing.

Each event is typically structured as a lightweight message, often in JSON or Avro format, containing a header for routing and a body for business data. Brokers can offer various delivery guarantees: “at least once,” “at most once,” or “exactly once,” depending on atomicity and performance needs. The choice of guarantee directly impacts how consumers handle duplication or message loss.

Finally, traceability is another cornerstone of event-driven: each message can be timestamped, versioned, or associated with a unique identifier to facilitate tracking, replay, and debugging. This increased transparency simplifies compliance and auditability of critical flows, especially in regulated industries.

Decoupling and Modularity

Service decoupling is a direct outcome of event-driven: a producer is completely unaware of the identity and state of consumers, focusing solely on publishing standardized events. This separation reduces friction during updates, minimizes service interruptions, and accelerates development cycles.

The modularity naturally emerges when each business feature is encapsulated in its own microservice, connected to others only via events. Teams can deploy, version, and scale each service independently, without prior coordination or global redeployment. Iterations become faster and less risky.

By decoupling business logic, you can also adopt specific technology stacks per use case: some services may favor a language optimized for compute-intensive tasks, others I/O-oriented frameworks, yet all communicate under the same event contract.

Event Flows and Pipelines

In an event-driven pipeline, events flow in an ordered or distributed manner depending on the chosen broker and its configuration. Partitions, topics, or queues structure these streams to ensure domain isolation and scalability. Each event is processed in a coherent order, essential for operations like transaction reconciliation or inventory updates.

Stream processors—often based on frameworks like Kafka Streams or Apache Flink—enrich and aggregate these streams in real time to feed dashboards, rule engines, or alerting systems. This ability to continuously transform event streams into operational insights accelerates decision-making.

Finally, setting up a pipeline-oriented architecture provides fine-grained visibility into performance: latency between emission and consumption, event throughput, error rates per segment. These indicators form the basis for continuous improvement and targeted optimization.

Example: A bank deployed a Kafka bus to process securities settlement flows in real time. Teams decoupled the regulatory validation module, the position management service, and the reporting platform, improving traceability and reducing financial close time by 70%.

Why Event-Driven Is Essential Today

Performance, resilience, and flexibility demands are ever-increasing. Only an event-driven architecture effectively addresses these challenges. It enables instant processing of large data volumes and dynamic scaling of services.

Real-Time Responsiveness

Businesses now expect every interaction—whether a user click, an IoT sensor update, or a financial transaction—to trigger an immediate reaction. In a competitive environment, the ability to detect and correct an anomaly, activate dynamic pricing rules, or issue a security alert within milliseconds is a critical strategic advantage.

An event-driven system processes events as they occur, without waiting for synchronous request completion. Producers broadcast information, and each consumer acts in parallel. This parallelism ensures minimal response times even under heavy load.

The non-blocking scaling also maintains a smooth user experience, with no perceptible service degradation. Messages are queued if needed and consumed as capacity is restored.

Horizontal Scalability

Monolithic architectures quickly hit their limits when scaling for growing data volumes. Event-driven, combined with a distributed broker, offers near-unlimited scalability: each partition or queue can be replicated across multiple nodes, distributing the load among multiple consumer instances.

To handle a traffic spike—such as during a product launch or flash sale—you can simply add service instances or increase a topic’s partition count. Scaling out requires no major redesign.

This flexibility is coupled with pay-as-you-go pricing for managed services: you pay primarily for resources consumed, without provisioning for speculative peak capacity.

Resilience and Fault Tolerance

In traditional setups, a service or network failure can bring the entire functional chain to a halt. In event-driven, broker persistence ensures no event is lost: consumers can replay streams, handle error cases, and resume processing where they left off.

Retention and replay strategies allow you to rebuild a service state after an incident, reprocess new scoring algorithms, or apply a fix patch without data loss. This resilience makes event-driven central to a robust business continuity plan.

Idempotent consumers ensure that duplicate events have no side effects. Coupled with proactive monitoring, this approach prevents fault propagation.

Example: A major retailer implemented RabbitMQ to orchestrate stock updates and its alerting system. During a network incident, messages were automatically replayed as soon as nodes came back online, avoiding any downtime and ensuring timely restocking during a major promotion.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Choosing Between Kafka, RabbitMQ, and Amazon SQS

Each broker offers distinct strengths depending on your throughput needs, delivery guarantees, and cloud-native integration. The choice is crucial to maximize performance and maintainability.

Apache Kafka: Performance and Throughput

Kafka stands out with its distributed, partitioned architecture, capable of processing millions of events per second with low latency. Topics are segmented into partitions, each replicated for durability and load balancing.

Native features—such as log compaction, configurable retention, and the Kafka Streams API—let you store a complete event history and perform continuous processing, aggregations, or enrichments. Kafka easily integrates with large data lakes and stream-native architectures.

As open source, Kafka limits vendor lock-in. Managed distributions exist for simpler deployment, but many teams prefer to self-manage clusters to fully control configuration, security, and costs.

RabbitMQ: Reliability and Simplicity

RabbitMQ, based on the AMQP protocol, provides a rich routing system with exchanges, queues, and bindings. It ensures high reliability through acknowledgment mechanisms, retries, and dead-letter queues for persistent failures.

Its fine-grained configuration enables complex flows (fan-out, direct, topic, headers) without extra coding. RabbitMQ is often the go-to for transactional scenarios where order and reliability trump raw throughput.

Community plugins and extensive documentation make adoption easier, and the learning curve is less steep than Kafka’s for generalist IT teams.

Amazon SQS: Cloud-Native and Rapid Integration

SQS is a managed, serverless queuing service that’s up and running in minutes with no infrastructure maintenance. Its on-demand billing and availability SLA deliver a quick ROI for cloud-first applications.

SQS offers standard queues (at least once) and FIFO queues (strict ordering, exactly once). Integration with other AWS services—Lambda, SNS, EventBridge—simplifies asynchronous flows and microservice composition.

For batch processing, serverless workflows, or light decoupling, SQS is a pragmatic choice. For ultra-high volumes or long retention requirements, Kafka often remains preferred.

Example: An e-commerce company migrated its shipment tracking system to Kafka to handle real-time status updates for millions of packages. Teams built a Kafka Streams pipeline to enrich events and feed both a data warehouse and a customer tracking app simultaneously.

Implementation and Best Practices

The success of an event-driven project hinges on a well-designed event model, fine-grained observability, and robust governance. These pillars ensure the scalability and security of your ecosystem.

Designing an Event Model

Start by identifying key business domains and state transition points. Each event should have a clear, versioned name to manage schema evolution and include only the data necessary for its processing. This discipline prevents “bowling ball” events carrying unnecessary context.

A major.minor versioning strategy lets you introduce new fields without breaking existing consumers. Brokers like Kafka offer a Schema Registry to validate messages and ensure backward compatibility.

A clear event contract eases onboarding of new teams and ensures functional consistency across microservices, even when teams are distributed or outsourced.

Monitoring and Observability

Tracking operational KPIs—end-to-end latency, throughput, number of rejected messages—is essential. Tools like Prometheus and Grafana collect metrics from brokers and clients, while Jaeger or Zipkin provide distributed tracing of requests.

Alerts should be configured on partition saturation, error rates, and abnormal queue growth. Proactive alerts on average message age protect against “message pile-up” and prevent critical delays.

Centralized dashboards let you visualize the system’s overall health and speed up incident diagnosis. Observability becomes a key lever for continuous optimization.

Security and Governance

Securing streams involves authentication (TLS client/server), authorization (ACLs or roles), and encryption at rest and in transit. Modern brokers include these features natively or via plugins.

Strong governance requires documenting each topic or queue, defining appropriate retention policies, and managing access rights precisely. This prevents obsolete topics from accumulating and reduces the attack surface.

A centralized event catalog combined with a controlled review process ensures the architecture’s longevity and compliance while reducing regression risks.

Example: A healthcare company implemented RabbitMQ with TLS encryption and an internal queue registry. Each business domain appointed a queue owner responsible for schema evolution. This governance ensured GMP compliance and accelerated regulatory audits.

Make Event-Driven the Backbone of Your Digital Systems

Event-driven architecture provides the responsiveness, decoupling, and scalability modern platforms demand. By choosing the right technology—Kafka for volume, RabbitMQ for reliability, SQS for serverless—and adopting a clear event model, you’ll build a resilient, evolvable ecosystem.

If your organization aims to strengthen its data flows, accelerate innovation, or ensure business continuity, Edana’s experts are ready to support your event-driven architecture design, deployment, and governance.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

Faced with the rapid growth of digital usage and the increasing complexity of business and e-commerce applications, traditional front-end architecture often hits its limits. Deployment cycles lengthen, technical dependencies hinder innovation, and team coordination introduces bottlenecks. The Micro-Frontends approach offers front-end-scale modularization, allowing functional domains to be isolated, development cycles to accelerate, and side effects during updates to be minimized. This article defines the principles of Micro-Frontends, details their business and organizational benefits, and shares practical advice for building a scalable, secure, and ROI-driven front-end architecture.

Understanding the Concept and Challenges of Micro-Frontends

Micro-Frontends break down the interface into autonomous functional domains. This separation enables independent technical governance and continuous improvement without blockers.

Fundamental Principle of Micro-Frontends

The concept is based on splitting the front-end application into autonomous units, each responsible for a precise functional scope. Each Micro-Frontend can be developed, tested, and deployed independently of the rest of the ecosystem, thereby reducing regression risks. This granularity also facilitates updating underlying technologies without disrupting the entire platform.

Communication between these modules typically relies on clear integration contracts, ensuring the consistency of data and styles. Front-end containerization frameworks orchestrate the dynamic assembly of modules, providing a unified user experience. This approach favors responsibility isolation while retaining a seamless presentation layer for the end user.

Development team independence is reinforced because each module can evolve on its own lifecycle. Unit and integration tests are focused on a narrow scope, improving quality and shortening validation times. In case of a failure in one module, the impact is confined to its domain, preserving the overall stability of the application.

Organizational Decoupling and Collaboration

By splitting the interface into Micro-Frontends, each squad or agile team can focus on a specific functional area, such as the cart, search, or profile management. This autonomy reduces planning and task-assignment bottlenecks. Teams communicate via front-end API contracts, ensuring functional consistency without synchronizing every implementation detail.

Organizational decoupling also promotes the gradual adoption of new technologies. A team can experiment with a framework or version without directly impacting other modules. If the experiment succeeds, the same modular architecture can be extended to other domains, creating a virtuous cycle of innovation.

This structure also limits the risk of blockage during version upgrades. By isolating updates, testing and deployment phases become faster and safer. Rollback, when necessary, affects only a restricted part of the application, minimizing downtime and disruptions.

Technology Ecosystem and Standards

Several standards have emerged to orchestrate Micro-Frontends, whether through JavaScript containers, custom elements, or modular bundlers. Using Web Components or module federation makes each fragment compatible with the company’s overall strategy. Open-source solutions offer maximum flexibility and avoid vendor lock-in.

It is crucial to define, from the outset, a shared style guide and naming conventions to ensure interface uniformity. Design system libraries can be hosted separately but loaded dynamically by each Micro-Frontend. This discipline ensures visual consistency, even if each team uses a different build tool.

Implementing a lightweight orchestration layer capable of loading and isolating modules guarantees performance and security. A front-end orchestrator can manage versions, apply caching strategies, and monitor errors at the scale of each interface fragment.

Example: A Zurich-based e-commerce company fragmented its B2B portal into three distinct Micro-Frontends—account management, shipment tracking, and invoicing. Each module is deployed independently, reducing update times by 60% and decreasing post-deployment incidents by 30%.

Business and Organizational Benefits of Micro-Frontends

Micro-Frontends speed up time-to-market and reduce deployment risks. They optimize cross-team collaboration and improve code quality.

Agility and Reduced Time-to-Production

Functional isolation allows for delivering updates at the desired frequency without waiting for a global release. Teams focus on regular deliveries aligned with business priorities, increasing responsiveness to market opportunities.

Testing phases concentrate on the relevant scope, accelerating validation and reducing complex interactions between teams. In case of a malfunction, rollback concerns only the defective module, reducing service interruption time.

This approach promotes the implementation of dedicated CI/CD pipelines per module. Each Micro-Frontend has its own automated tests and deployment scenario, enhancing quality and lowering maintenance costs.

Risk Reduction and Managing Technical Debt

By limiting the size of each fragment, the code remains more readable and maintainable. Dependencies are managed per module, simplifying version upgrades and potential vulnerability resolution.

The decomposition reduces overall technical debt: each team can fix and modernize its scope without coordinating a complete application overhaul. Regression risks are confined to a specific area, facilitating incident management.

Security and performance audits are targeted module by module, offering granular and actionable insights. The ability to quickly patch a critical component strengthens the platform’s overall resilience.

Scalability and Performance at Scale

Micro-Frontends can be deployed on distinct content delivery networks or dedicated clusters, depending on load requirements. This facilitates scalability and server resource optimization.

Heavily used modules can benefit from aggressive caching strategies and specific CDNs, while less critical fragments remain on the main instance, optimizing infrastructure costs.

Example: A Geneva-based online retailer isolated its search engine and product pages as separate Micro-Frontends. Implementing dedicated caches and independent deployment allowed it to support a 4× traffic spike during a promotional period, without impacting general navigation.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Best Practices for Designing and Structuring Your Micro-Frontends

Rigorous design and clear integration contracts are essential. Governance and versioning ensure overall coherence and maintainability.

Choosing a Base Framework and Standardization

It is recommended to adopt a standard library or container to orchestrate modules and minimize technical discrepancies. The chosen framework must allow style and script isolation while supporting module federation.

The documentation for this container should outline build conventions, artifact formats, and loading strategies. A central repository or internal package can host common modules, such as interface components or business utilities.

By limiting technological variance, recruitment and team onboarding are simplified. Each new team finds a familiar technical foundation, accelerating ramp-up and contribution.

Defining the Integration Contract and Front-End APIs

Each Micro-Frontend communicates via messages, events, or front-end REST/GraphQL APIs, depending on business needs. Contracts must include message formats, data structures, and any JSON schemas.

It is imperative to version these contracts and ensure backward compatibility to avoid service disruptions. Automated integration tests guarantee that a module update does not impact others.

Contract specifications can be stored in a registry accessible to all teams, ensuring traceability and shared responsibility. Cross-code reviews enhance interface quality.

Governance, Versioning, and Lifecycle

Version management is based on a semantic scheme or one adapted to business constraints. Each deployment must be identifiable and traceable, enabling quick rollback in case of regression.

A dedicated CI/CD pipeline per module includes unit, integration, and non-regression tests. Quality indicators (test coverage, build time, loading performance) are measured and monitored continuously.

Regular reviews of front-end technical debt prevent obsolete code accumulation. Unused or redundant modules can be archived or merged, limiting the maintenance surface.

Integration and Scaling in a Modular Ecosystem

Progressive integration of Micro-Frontends limits the impact on existing structures. Controlled deployment strategies ensure stability and performance under high load.

Progressive Deployment Strategies

Feature-driven rollout (feature toggles) allows switching a module to active mode for a limited user group before a global release. This method reduces risks and provides rapid usage feedback.

The canary deployment, which exposes the new module to a limited percentage of sessions, facilitates early regression detection. Performance and stability metrics are compared between the old and new modules.

Rollback is automated as soon as an error threshold is exceeded. This responsiveness protects the user experience and ensures service-level commitments are met.

Monitoring and Observability

Each Micro-Frontend must report its own performance, load time, and JavaScript error metrics. This data is centralized in a monitoring tool to visualize the health of each module.

Alerts configured on key indicators (error rate, initial latency, response time) trigger automatic or manual corrective actions. Good observability coverage enables rapid identification of bottlenecks.

Front-end interaction logs and user traces provide precise diagnostics in case of incident. Correlated analysis across modules highlights impacted areas and accelerates remediation.

Managing Dependencies and Cross-Cutting Services

Shared libraries (frameworks, utilities, design systems) must be versioned and published as internal packages. Each Micro-Frontend declares its requirements and benefits from a centralized resolution mechanism.

Cross-cutting services, such as authentication or localization, are exposed via back-end micro-services, providing an independent and reusable layer. This organization reduces duplication and strengthens functional consistency.

Example: A French-speaking Swiss retailer integrated its product personalization spaces and payment modules as distinct Micro-Frontends. Seasonal-sale load increases were managed by provisioning each module separately, guaranteeing 99.9% availability.

Make Your Application Architecture a Competitive Advantage

Micro-Frontends offer a pragmatic path to modularize the interface, improve team responsiveness, and manage scaling. By isolating functional domains, they reduce regression risks, limit technical debt, and accelerate time-to-market.

Implementation requires clear definition of integration contracts, strict versioning governance, and dedicated CI/CD pipelines. Progressive deployment strategies and granular monitoring ensure stability and performance, even under heavy demand.

Your agility and scalability challenges can be met with a modular, evolutive, and secure front-end architecture. At Edana, our experts are at your disposal to assess your context, define the appropriate strategy, and support you towards a successful implementation.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In an environment of accelerated digitalization, many Swiss companies no longer settle for seeking solutions solely for their own use: they aim to design and market their own custom SaaS platform to address unmet needs in the market. The goal is no longer just to optimize internal operations but also to create a monetizable software solution capable of generating recurring revenue and becoming a standard in its sector.

Creating a SaaS product for sale means building a scalable, robust, and differentiating software solution grounded in real-world challenges. Very often, the publishing company is also the first user of its own solution—allowing it to validate the product under real conditions before making it available to other stakeholders.

Whether the objective is to meet specific internal requirements or to seize a commercial opportunity by launching a niche SaaS product, success depends on a clear vision of the target market, a scalable cloud architecture, and an agile, end-user–centered methodology. Here’s how to structure your SaaS project from conception to market launch.

Definition and Stakes of a Custom SaaS Platform

A custom SaaS platform is a cloud application built to address a precise set of business needs. Unlike generic market solutions, it is designed from the outset to offer a user experience perfectly tailored—whether for internal use… or to be offered to other companies on a subscription basis.

In a commercially oriented project, the SaaS platform becomes a standalone strategic product. It must combine functional value, technical performance, a viable business model, and scalability to attract future users while generating recurring revenue (subscription model, freemium, etc.).

Its design typically relies on a technical foundation combining proven open-source components and custom-developed modules to address specific business use cases. This hybrid approach delivers a solution that is robust, differentiating, and evolutive—adaptable to a given market or vertical sector.

For the company initiating such a project, developing a custom SaaS represents a dual lever:

• Internally, it optimizes key processes and strengthens operational efficiency;

• Externally, it turns that expertise into a monetizable and exportable product capable of creating a sustainable competitive advantage.

Fundamental Principles of SaaS

The Software as a Service (SaaS) model relies on a cloud architecture where users access an application via a browser or API without local installation. Hosting, maintenance, and updates are centralized, significantly reducing technical constraints for both the publisher and end customers.

For the publisher, this enables a seamless user experience while maintaining full control over performance, security, and feature evolution. The model also eases international deployment without requiring local infrastructure on the customer’s side.

A well-designed SaaS leverages multi-tenant architecture, allowing infrastructure sharing while isolating each client’s data. This reduces hosting costs, ensures resilience during peak loads, and supports a scalable economic model.

Moreover, the SaaS modular approach facilitates customization: each client can activate only the features they need without complicating the overall product. This is a key advantage for those wishing to create a vertical or niche SaaS offering, meeting a specific market segment’s expectations.

Finally, this model naturally relies on cloud elasticity: it adapts to user growth without massive hardware investments. This scalability lever is essential to evolve your SaaS gradually while controlling development and operational costs.

Why Develop a Custom SaaS Solution?

Although off-the-shelf market solutions are abundant, they often fall short when it comes to addressing specific business needs or delivering a differentiating value proposition. It is in these situations that developing a custom SaaS makes perfect sense—especially when aiming to launch a market-ready solution and turn an underserved sector need into a monetizable product.

Many companies identify gaps or constraints in their own operations that existing solutions don’t fully cover. By leveraging this firsthand knowledge, they can design a targeted SaaS product that precisely meets their sector’s expectations—and then offer it to other players in the same market.

Often, the publishing company becomes its solution’s first customer. This scenario enables the immediate launch of an MVP used internally, validating its robustness and optimizing it before external release. It’s a win-win approach: it improves internal processes while generating a new commercial asset.

Custom development also offers:

• Total control over functional scope, without unnecessary bloat;

• Fine-tuned UX customization to drive adoption;

• License cost optimization by removing generic modules you don’t need.

This is the ideal approach for creating a vertical or niche SaaS capable of standing out from generalist platforms by targeting a specific audience with the features they truly need.

Finally, by relying on open-source technologies and a modular architecture, the company retains strategic control over its product without depending on a third-party vendor. This enables it to evolve its solution in any direction—be it new vertical expansions, international rollout, or integration of complementary services—and to build a profitable, sustainable growth lever.

Case Study: From Internal Need to Successfully Marketed SaaS Product

A Swiss company specializing in medical-goods logistics noticed that most temperature-controlled delivery management solutions didn’t account for Swiss specifics (standards, traceability, hospital timing constraints). For its own operations, it decided to develop a custom SaaS solution capable of:

• Tracking transport conditions in real time (IoT, temperature alerts)

• Automating route planning according to health regulations

• Generating regulatory reports required in Switzerland and Europe

Once the MVP was in production and successfully used in its own workflows, the company realized other players—particularly SMEs and hospitals—faced the same constraints.

It gradually transformed its solution into a commercial SaaS platform, adopting a modular subscription model, a limited freemium offer, and premium support for institutional clients.

Tangible results:

• 25% reduction in internal logistics costs within the first year

• Recurring SaaS revenue representing 12% of turnover after 18 months

• Adoption by 7 external facilities in Romandy and 2 in Belgium

This case illustrates the power of SaaS as a strategic diversification lever: from a well-identified specific need, the company built a secure, profitable, exportable solution.

Business Advantages of a Custom SaaS in Switzerland

Developing a custom SaaS platform opens significant strategic and financial opportunities, especially when the solution is intended for commercialisation. Such a project creates new revenue streams, builds a differentiating technological asset, and enhances the company’s market appeal.

Scalability and On-Demand Performance

A well-designed SaaS architecture leverages cloud elasticity to automatically adapt to user growth and activity spikes. This is a key success factor when serving multiple clients simultaneously, ensuring performance, availability, and a smooth experience.

Technical modularity (via microservices or decoupled domains) allows continuous evolution of the platform without downtime or bloat. Each module can be developed, maintained, and scaled independently, simplifying roadmap management according to user feedback or market shifts.

Cost Optimization and Time-to-Market

Building a custom SaaS lets you prioritize features that truly matter to your target market and launch an MVP quickly. This agile approach tests user adoption, validates commercial viability, and then iterates swiftly.

By leveraging open-source components and a well-thought-out architecture, you reduce licensing costs and gain technological independence. This keeps expenditures under control while accelerating market entry. The overall budget remains aligned with short- and mid-term profitability goals.

SaaS Design Illustration: A Fintech Player

A Swiss startup wanted to launch a SaaS platform for subscription and recurring payment management in financial services. Available market solutions didn’t cover local specifics (VAT, Swiss payment gateways, regulatory risks).

By developing a custom SaaS, it was able to:

• Integrate Swiss gateways directly (TWINT, PostFinance, etc.)

• Customize business rules to local tax regulations

• Automate compliance processes

Six months after launch, the platform had won several clients in banking and insurance, reduced transaction costs by 15%, and secured its recurring revenue streams.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

The challenges related to the quality and longevity of enterprise applications now require a technology choice aligned with long-term strategy. Moving from JavaScript to TypeScript is not just a syntactic tweak: it directly affects the reliability, maintainability and total cost of ownership of your projects. By adopting TypeScript, you gain a formal framework to detect anomalies early, secure evolutions and limit technical debt. This technological commitment becomes a competitive asset by reducing interruptions and optimizing resources, while supporting a sustainable roadmap for your business applications. In this article, we explore the concrete benefits of TypeScript and its impact on enterprise performance at different levels.

Benefit 1: Enhanced Reliability through Static Typing

TypeScript’s static typing catches errors at compile time, preventing unexpected failures in production. It strengthens enterprise applications by ensuring data and interface consistency.

In an environment where every hour of downtime can cost tens of thousands of francs, preventing bugs before deployment is essential. TypeScript acts as a safety net by validating data contracts and limiting type-related errors, which are often the source of costly regressions.

Static Typing as a Build-Time Safety Net

The TypeScript compiler analyzes type declarations and flags data-structure mismatches during the build phase. This verification layer integrates seamlessly into your CI/CD pipelines, halting the delivery of non-compliant code and preserving the stability of preproduction environments.

With strict type constraints, every interface exposed by a module becomes a formal, documented and verifiable contract. Teams can evolve with confidence, knowing structural changes will be immediately validated by the compiler.

Compile-time alerts occur more frequently than production errors, but they’re also far less expensive to fix. Shifting the cost of correction from runtime to build time significantly improves the quality/cost ratio and reduces operational incidents.

Reduction of Runtime Errors

By integrating TypeScript, common cases of null or missing properties are caught at compile time. This automated vigilance limits anomalies such as unhandled exceptions or API inconsistencies that can paralyze critical business segments.

Developers also benefit from advanced code completion and navigation tools, speeding up data-flow comprehension and reducing error risk when implementing new features or fixes.

The initial effort invested in precise type definitions pays off as a more resilient codebase and a noticeable drop in production incidents, improving user satisfaction and business-team confidence.

Concrete Example: Geneva-Based Financial Institution

A mid-sized Geneva financial institution migrated part of its transaction back-office from JavaScript to TypeScript to reduce outages during peak loads. Before migration, uncontrolled data-structure changes caused service interruptions up to twice per quarter.

After adopting TypeScript, interfaces with external payment systems were formalized, and unit tests could target high-risk scenarios precisely. The result was an 80 % reduction in critical production anomalies in the first year.

This reliability gain allowed the IT team to focus on enhancing customer services rather than resolving incidents, while still meeting the financial sector’s regulatory requirements.

Benefit 2: Simplified Maintainability and Controlled Evolutions

The clarity and structure enforced by TypeScript’s typing simplify refactoring and speed up the onboarding of new team members. They ensure an evolving, readable architecture over the long term.

In enterprise environments where teams rotate and projects constantly evolve, managing technical debt becomes a major challenge. TypeScript provides living documentation and rigorous contract tracking, facilitating collaborative work and continuous updates.

Accelerated Onboarding and Strengthened Documentation

A typed codebase serves as living documentation: function signatures and object structures are explicit and accessible directly in the IDE. Newcomers grasp data flows and module dependencies more quickly.

This transparency reduces ramp-up time and minimizes errors from misinterpreting existing code. Support tickets drop, and team productivity stabilizes even amid high staff turnover.

Centralized type definitions also simplify coordination between front-end and back-end teams. Every dependency is documented, reducing asynchronous back-and-forth during implementation.

Targeted Refactorings and Modular Architecture

TypeScript encourages modular patterns: each module can export specific types, reinforcing responsibility isolation and limiting the impact of changes on the overall solution.

When a refactoring is required, the compiler highlights all usage points of affected types. Developers can accurately assess the scope and minimize regression risks.

This streamlined approach allows for the gradual integration of new technology stacks or architectural adaptations to support company growth, without accumulating hard-to-resolve technical debt.

Concrete Example: Basel Manufacturing Company

An industrial player in the canton of Basel, whose logistics-planning application was built in JavaScript, experienced high turnover in its IT team. New developers struggled to understand the architecture quickly and applied numerous temporary fixes.

After a progressive migration to TypeScript, the code structure became more predictable. Service contracts between modules were formalized, reducing friction between teams and stabilizing deployment cadence.

The improved maintainability resulted in a 30 % decrease in bug-fix time, allowing the team to refocus on optimizing business features.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Benefit 3: Fewer Production Bugs and Cost Optimization

By catching more anomalies before runtime, TypeScript minimizes emergency interventions and incident-related costs. It contributes to better control over your applications’ total cost of ownership.

Every minute spent diagnosing and fixing a production bug translates into direct costs (human resources, business impact) and indirect costs (loss of user trust, delays in the roadmap). TypeScript substantially reduces this risk.

More Reliable Tests and Increased Coverage

Static typing enhances unit and integration test quality. Mocks and stubs benefit from precise type definitions, ensuring each test scenario matches the structures expected in production.

Syntax or parameter-mismatch errors in tests are caught immediately, avoiding tedious debugging cycles and test-case adjustments. As a result, coverage can be increased without significant additional human effort.

CI/CD pipelines naturally incorporate TypeScript compilation, halting non-compliant test deliveries. The feedback loop shortens and prevents costly regressions in time and money.

Operational Footprint and Total Cost of Ownership

The initial effort for defining types quickly pays off through reduced support tickets and lower downtime. Technical teams spend less time on corrective maintenance and more on innovation.

Productivity gains are measurable: an internal audit at a Valais insurance group estimated a 25 % reduction in its bug-fix budget after one year of TypeScript use.

By limiting technical debt, TypeScript helps control the total cost of ownership (TCO) over several years, a key metric for financial management and IT steering committees.

Concrete Example: Valais Insurance Company

A Valais-based insurance firm centralized its microservices orchestration for claims in TypeScript. Before migration, unexpected incidents blocked case handling, incurring significant contractual penalties.

Once typed structures for event exchanges and data models were in place, parsing errors virtually disappeared. Teams no longer had to handle critical bugs urgently, achieving around a 20 % productivity gain.

ROI was deemed positive within the first year, thanks to lower operating costs and stabilized business processes.

Benefit 4: Consistent Full-Stack and Agility for Future Evolutions

TypeScript unifies front-end and back-end, delivering a homogeneous, modular ecosystem. It streamlines dependency management and boosts agility for functional evolutions.

By adopting TypeScript for Node.js, React, Next.js or Nest.js, you ensure language and tooling consistency across your stack. This uniformity shortens the learning curve and fosters cross-team skill sharing.

Seamless Front-end and Back-end Integration

Sharing types between client and server eliminates duplication and guarantees JSON exchange compliance. REST or GraphQL interfaces become synchronized contracts, reducing misalignment and mapping errors.

Full-stack teams can work on shared modules, promoting reuse and accelerating new feature delivery. This technological symmetry leads to faster deployments and lower costs associated with manual adaptations.

UI component and business-service libraries can be developed and tested in isolation, yet remain perfectly integrated into the global application thanks to shared typing.

Open-Source, Vendor-Neutral Ecosystem

TypeScript relies on proven open-source tools and benefits from an active community. Popular frameworks like Nest.js or Next.js provide modular patterns that enhance security and maintainability.

By avoiding vendor lock-in, you retain the freedom to evolve your stack, replace components or adopt new frameworks without overhauling your architecture. This flexibility is essential for tailoring your solution to specific business needs.

Integration with cloud services or CI/CD platforms remains smooth, as TypeScript compiles to standard JavaScript, ensuring maximum compatibility and frictionless deployment.

Concrete Example: Zurich Technology SME

A tech SME in Zurich standardized its entire platform—client front-end, internal APIs and batch workers—on TypeScript. Reusing types accelerated the development of new features while guaranteeing message compliance in a regulated context.

The teams observed a 40 % drop in discrepancies between specifications and implementations, reducing validation cycles and rollbacks during quarterly releases.

Full-stack consistency enhanced the SME’s agility and scalability, controlled maintenance costs and kept documentation consistently up to date.

Make TypeScript the Cornerstone of Your Digital Strategy

TypeScript is not a passing trend but a strategic lever to ensure the reliability, maintainability and cost control of your enterprise applications. By formalizing data contracts, reducing technical debt and unifying your stack, you mitigate risks and foster continuous innovation.

Regardless of your sector—finance, industry or services—Edana’s contextual experts support you in defining the best TypeScript integration for your architecture, respecting your constraints and roadmap. From the initial audit to upskilling your teams, we build modular, secure and scalable solutions.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

Innovation, quality, and productivity today rely on software systems often designed decades ago. Despite their proven robustness, these bespoke applications struggle to accommodate new requirements, expose the company to security vulnerabilities, and incur rising maintenance costs. Modernizing this entire stack without disrupting production lines or compromising manufacturing performance is a real challenge for CIOs and business leaders. This article offers a pragmatic roadmap based on stabilization, documentation, targeted modernization, and gradual integration. At every stage, the goal is to preserve operational continuity while preparing the industrial ecosystem for future demands.

Why Your Industrial Software Is Becoming a Drag on Performance

Legacy systems accumulate defects and vulnerabilities that slow down production. They weigh heavily on maintenance costs and limit operational agility.Their growing complexity creates a bottleneck for IT teams.

Obsolete Technologies and Technical Debt

Many factory software applications are still developed in Delphi, Cobol, or C++, languages now uncommon and difficult to evolve. This software obsolescence complicates the search for qualified talent and lengthens incident resolution times. When a vulnerability is identified, applying a patch may require a partial overhaul due to missing documentation or automated tests.

These inherited technological choices hinder the adoption of modern, high-performance solutions. Adding new features then becomes an obstacle course, where each modification demands rare expertise. As a result, teams spend more time stabilizing the existing system than innovating.

For example, a Swiss machine tool manufacturer relied on a C++-based MES over twenty years old. Each update took more than three weeks and exposed the production line to intermittent failures. This experience led them to fully document the legacy system before any modernization effort.

Security Flaws and Single-Expert Dependency

When all expertise resides in the mind of a single developer or longstanding contractor, security patches become critical. An unplanned departure can halt maintenance and leave the system exposed to attacks.

Unpatched vulnerabilities accumulate—backdoors, injection points, or unsupported third-party components. Even a minor incident can then paralyze the entire production, resulting in costly shutdowns and internal investigations.

The lack of redundancy in technical knowledge increases operational risk, as any unavailability of the key resource creates a true single point of failure.

Lack of Integration with Modern Tools

Factory software built fifteen or twenty years ago did not anticipate interfacing with ERPs, cloud platforms, or analytics solutions. The absence of standard APIs creates data silos and prevents real-time visibility of operations.

Without IoT or cloud integration, data collection relies on manual exports or homemade scripts, which are unreliable and hard to maintain. Reporting often remains static, lacking proactive alerts or history-based forecasting.

A Swiss materials processing company, for example, performed manual CSV exports each month to track quality metrics. This process took two days and was error-prone, delaying decision-making.

Typical Use Cases to Watch Closely

Certain critical applications deserve constant attention to avoid production stoppages. From inventory management to quality control modules, each workflow carries specific challenges.Prioritizing the identification of potential failure points before they occur is essential.

Production Management and Quality Control Software

These systems orchestrate machine scheduling, operator assignments, and batch traceability. Any latency or malfunction leads to chain delays.

Quality control integrated into these software solutions must be able to immediately trigger an alert to stop the line or isolate a non-compliant batch. Without this responsiveness, the risk of serial defects increases.

For instance, a measuring instrument manufacturer used an embedded QC module in its initial ERP but lacked dynamic thresholds. Any anomaly remained without automatic action, generating costly rejects until manual analysis at the end of the week.

Preventive Maintenance Systems

Planned maintenance relies on forecasting algorithms and machine data feedback. Static or disconnected software cannot anticipate failures or optimize maintenance flows.

A delayed update of the equipment monitoring system can lead to untimely interventions or, conversely, undetected breakdowns. The cost of an unexpected stoppage can amount to several thousand Swiss francs per hour.

Modern solutions integrate IoT sensors and generate automatic reports, reducing manual interventions and improving equipment availability rates.

Inventory and Logistics Management Tools

Tracking supplies, consumption, and turnover requires smooth data transfer between ERP, WMS, and production systems. A monolithic software can create information gaps.

Without real-time synchronization, some materials are either overstocked, tying up capital, or out of stock, halting production. The resource-to-need balance remains fragile.

A Swiss electronics manufacturer conducted a daily manual inventory. Faced with frequent discrepancies, it planned excessive orders, impacting its cash flow and causing delivery delays.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

What Makes Industrial Software So Unique (and Complex)

Industrial constraints demand near-continuous availability and strict standards. Architectures must account for highly specific hardware-software interfaces.Any planned or unplanned downtime can wipe out decades of productivity investment.

24/7 High Availability

Production lines cannot tolerate interruptions, even short ones. Every update must rely on failover or redundancy mechanisms to avoid downtime.

Unlike traditional web applications, an unavailable microservice can stop an entire manufacturing chain. Robustness and resilience are therefore at the core of the architecture.

Test environments must faithfully reproduce the production configuration to validate patches before deployment.

Inability to Halt Production for Updates

Unlike standard maintenance windows, workshops often lack downtime slots to deploy changes. Evolution must occur live, without shutting down.

Blue-green deployments or canary releases allow phased, reversible changes. This strategy limits risk but requires precise orchestration.

Poor synchronization can cause version mismatches and cascading blockages that are harder to fix in real time.

Machine Interfaces and Data Flow Specificities

Each piece of equipment embeds a protocol or fieldbus (Profinet, OPC UA, Modbus…). Data flows are often proprietary and do not support modern standards.

Interfacing requires developing custom adapters while ensuring latency and reliability meet workshop requirements.

A poorly managed conversion can cause machine parameter errors, resulting in scrap or mechanical failures.

Industry- and Sector-Specific Regulatory Compliance

Pharmaceutical, food, and aerospace industries must comply with specific ISO, FDA, or EN standards. Software must include tamper-proof records and comprehensive audit logs.

Each software change may require requalification or a new validation cycle. Traceability is not optional but a legal requirement.

Non-compliance can lead to sales bans, product recalls, or severe penalties.

Working with a Specialized Partner: A Methodology to Modernize Your Software Without Full Rewrites

Partnering with an industrial software specialist ensures a structured, step-by-step approach that minimizes risk. The goal is to extend and secure the existing system before considering a full rewrite.This approach avoids prolonged downtime and budget surprises.

Analysis and Securing of the Existing Software and Hardware Environment

The first step is mapping all systems, inventorying technologies, and assessing critical dependencies. A thorough audit identifies fragility points and vulnerabilities.

Automated escalation scenarios and targeted penetration tests ensure patches can be applied without causing regressions.

This diagnosis then feeds into a prioritized roadmap, aligning business risks with immediate technical actions.

Gradual Integration of Modern Interfaces (IoT, Cloud, API)

Adding an API layer enables legacy systems to communicate with cloud platforms, analytics solutions, or IoT sensors. This layer acts as a bridge without modifying the core application.

Connectors can be deployed in parallel and validated on specific production segments before being rolled out across all lines.

This provides a gradual upskilling in new technologies without interrupting existing services.

Partial Version Upgrades and Modular Rewrite

Rather than overhauling the entire software, modular modernization first targets functionalities with the highest added value or risk. Each module can be extracted and rewritten as an open-source microservice.

This hybrid strategy preserves the validated functional scope and limits impacts on production schedules. It maximizes code reuse and accelerates adoption.

Over time, the system transforms into an ecosystem of independent, scalable, and maintainable components.

Long-Term Support and Product Vision

A lasting partnership includes performance monitoring, functional evolution, and obsolescence management. Rather than a one-off project, it becomes a product-driven approach to anticipate future needs.

Agile governance, involving CIOs, business stakeholders, and the service provider, ensures regular reviews and constant priority reassessment.

This collaborative framework offers the flexibility to adjust budgets, schedules, and resources according to results and emerging challenges.

Modernize Your Industrial Software in a Controlled and Sustainable Way

Obsolete industrial software is not inevitable. By stabilizing the existing system, documenting every element, and modernizing in a targeted way, you can combine operational continuity with progressive innovation. Integrating open interfaces and applying modular version upgrades form the foundation of a resilient architecture.

Agile approaches and partnering with an expert ensure a clear path, without jeopardizing production lines or causing unforeseen budget impacts.

At Edana, our experts support Swiss industrial companies through this transition, from the initial audit to the ongoing evolution of their software ecosystems.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert