In an environment where Human Resources Information System (HRIS) projects serve as a key performance lever for Swiss companies with more than 50 employees, the challenge is to establish a rigorous requirements document ensuring openness, interoperability and reversibility, while limiting the risks of vendor lock-in, costly integrations and captive data.

By precisely structuring your needs around the Core HR, time & attendance, expense reporting, Applicant Tracking System (ATS), Learning Management System (LMS) and reporting modules, you can effectively weigh build versus buy decisions and lay a sustainable foundation for future evolution. This article details the essential elements to include in your Swiss HRIS requirements document in order to control your data and contracts, while planning an MVP trajectory with a rapid ROI.

Define an Open, Modular Functional Scope

The requirements document must cover all essential business components without resorting to a monolithic block. Each module—Core HR, time & attendance, expense reporting, recruitment, training, evaluations, workflows and reporting—must be capable of operating autonomously or in an integrated manner.

The Core HR scope encompasses employee management, contracts, positions and organizational charts. It serves as the single source of truth for all HR data, on which the other modules rely to ensure consistency and reliability.

The time & attendance functionality should include tracking of working hours, statutory leave and absences for illness or training, with flexible approval rules. This component must interface with a time clock or a third-party attendance system.

The expense reporting module should offer quick mobile entry, an approval workflow configured according to the organizational chart, and automated export to accounting. Speed and usability drive user adoption.

Core HR and Time Management Scope

The Core HR module must allow for historical archiving of contractual data, rights management and change traceability. Every change (promotion, departure, internal transfer) must be timestamped and auditable.

For work-time tracking, a configurable module that accommodates Swiss legal rules (part-time, overtime, compensatory rest) is essential. It should also record indirect project-related hours.

Seamless integration with external time-clock terminals ensures real-time synchronization of attendance and visibility of on-site or remote workforce availability.

Recruitment and Training

The Applicant Tracking System must manage the entire candidate lifecycle—from job postings to onboarding—while generating reports on recruitment time and application sources.

The Learning Management System should support e-learning content, scheduling of in-person sessions and skills tracking. Workflows for mandatory training must be automated.

Linking the ATS and LMS enables rapid identification of internal mobility paths, boosting employability and employee satisfaction.

Workflows, E-Signatures and Reporting

Validation workflows—hiring, departures, leave requests or expense claims—must be configurable by business function and hierarchy, with automated notifications.

Electronic signatures should be natively integrated, ensuring compliance with European and Swiss standards (eIDAS certificates, SuisseID) with timestamping and audit trails.

Analytical reporting must offer self-service HR dashboards, exportable in CSV or JSON. Key KPIs include turnover, average time to hire and absenteeism rate.

Example: A financial services firm in Romandy defined a modular HRIS scope, deploying Core HR and time management first, then adding the ATS. This phased approach reduced integration complexity by 30% and accelerated business-user adoption.

Ensure Data Interoperability and Portability

An API-first architecture and open standards are essential to avoid vendor lock-in and support future growth. Provisioning mechanisms, SSO protocols and open export formats enable smooth data flow between systems.

An API-first approach mandates the provision of RESTful or GraphQL endpoints for all HR entities, from employees to expense transactions. Each service must document its endpoints using OpenAPI.

The SCIM protocol ensures automatic provisioning and deprovisioning of user accounts in AD or Azure AD. Webhooks enable real-time reactions to HR events (hire, exit, transfer).

SSO via SAML or OpenID Connect centralizes authentication, reduces password management overhead and enhances security. Teams can enforce uniform 2FA or MFA policies.

API-First and SCIM Provisioning

The requirements document must specify CRUD API availability for each HR resource (employee, position, leave). Endpoints should support pagination, filtering and partial updates (PATCH).

SCIM 2.0 implementation is required to synchronize user accounts and groups with the corporate directory, ensuring that each user has appropriate rights without manual intervention.

Webhooks must cover critical events—new hire, role change, account deletion—so downstream systems (employee portal, document management, ERP) can respond immediately.

SSO (SAML/OIDC) and Directory Synchronization

Standardized SSO reduces user friction and strengthens access control. The requirements document should specify the use of SAML metadata or OpenID Connect discovery.

AD/Azure AD directory synchronization leverages existing groups for HRIS permissions management, avoiding manual profile duplication.

An identity broker can simplify the integration of external providers (vendor portal, third-party LMS) while centralizing security policies.

Open Formats and Data Migration

Exports must be available in CSV, JSON or Parquet, with a public schema and field documentation. These formats ensure accessibility without vendor dependency.

The migration plan should include a full initial data dump, followed by incremental synchronizations before cutover. Recovery time objectives must be defined in the SLA to prevent any HR blackout.

The requirements document must mandate a versioned data schema to anticipate structural changes and facilitate auditing.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Security, Compliance and Swiss-Sovereign Hosting

The HRIS handles highly sensitive personal data and must comply with the Swiss Federal Data Protection Act (DPA) 2023 and the GDPR for EU-based employees. Sovereign cloud hosting and encryption measures ensure data integrity, availability and confidentiality.

The new DPA 2023 requires data minimization, a processing register and defined retention periods. Sensitive HR or health data must receive enhanced protections.

The GDPR applies to any employee based in the EU or engaged by an EU member state. The requirements document must cover access, rectification and erasure rights via dedicated APIs or a self-service portal.

Swiss hosting with a provider certified to ISO 27001 or equivalent meets sovereignty and availability requirements. Data centers must be located in Switzerland or, under strict contractual terms, within the EEA.

Swiss DPA 2023 and GDPR for HR

The document must list categories of personal data (identity, contact details, contracts, sensitive data) and justify each processing activity. Legal retention periods must be clearly stated.

The processing register should be automatically populated by the HRIS, easing internal and external audits. Incident notification workflows must comply with legal deadlines (72 hours for GDPR).

GDPR rights (right to be forgotten, data portability, objection) require secure APIs or forms to respond within the 30-day statutory period.

Encryption, Logging and Access Control

The requirements document must mandate data encryption at rest (AES-256) and in transit (minimum TLS 1.3), with key management via an HSM or certified KMS.

Secure logging of access and critical actions (exports, schema changes, data deletions) must be immutable and retained according to a defined schedule.

Access rights must follow the principle of least privilege, with periodic recertification and automated approval workflows.

Reversibility Plan and Contracts

The technical reversibility plan must include a full data dump, schema delivery and restoration scripts, with contractual delivery timelines.

Commercial reversibility requires a penalty-free export clause and, if needed, source code escrow for bespoke components.

Contracts must define SLAs (uptime, MTTR, support) and penalties for non-compliance. Security commitments (ISO, SOC 2) should be annexed.

Example: A Swiss continuing education provider chose sovereign cloud hosting and added a quarterly export clause. After a DPA audit, the ability to deliver a complete data dump and detailed schema demonstrated full data control and reassured international partners.

Governance, Contracts and MVP Roadmap

Clear governance and contract commitments aligned with business strategy ensure project sustainability. An MVP roadmap prioritizing 3–5 high-ROI use cases validates the approach before expanding the scope.

The project governance should leverage personas and a RACI matrix defining responsibilities and stakeholders for each deliverable. A user-story backlog with acceptance criteria guides development and testing.

The integration matrix catalogs target systems (payroll, finance, document management, time clocks), data flows and tracking KPIs, facilitating coordination between IT, business and vendors.

The data migration plan includes a data quality audit, field mapping and cleansing scripts to ensure integrity at go-live.

Data Ownership and Open-Source Licensing

The requirements document must specify that the company retains ownership of HR data and that any custom development is transferred without restriction.

Open-source components should use permissive licenses (MIT, Apache 2.0). Any dependency on a restrictive license must be explicitly justified by a use case.

Custom code documentation and version control via Git ensure traceability and long-term maintainability.

SLAs, MTTR and Export Clauses

SLAs must cover availability (99.5%+), support response times (business hours or 24/7) and MTTR for each incident type.

Penalty-free export clauses and source-escrow options reinforce the project’s legal and technical security.

The requirements document should specify delivery milestones, acceptance procedures and success criteria (adoption rates, HR processing times, payroll error reduction).

MVP Strategy and Iterations

The MVP focuses on 3–5 critical use cases (hiring, leave management, basic reporting) to deliver value quickly and secure funding.

Quarterly sprints include backlog reviews, business demos and retrospectives to adjust priorities based on field feedback.

The total cost of ownership (TCO) covers build, run and ongoing enhancements, providing a clear financial outlook to anticipate future needs.

Example: A Swiss industrial group launched an MVP covering hiring, time tracking and minimal reporting in six weeks. After validating with pilot users, quarterly iterations added the ATS and training modules, while keeping the TCO on track.

Building an Open, Controlled and Reversible HRIS

A requirements document structured around a modular scope, API-first demands, interoperability standards and compliance guarantees helps you avoid vendor lock-in, secure your data and prepare for both technical and contractual reversibility.

Governance by personas and RACI, a user-story backlog, an integration matrix and an MVP roadmap ensure a fast, adaptable ROI trajectory. SLA, export and archiving clauses complete your investment protection.

Our experts support you at every stage—from strategic framing to open architecture—favoring proven open-source components and bespoke developments where they deliver a competitive edge.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

Agile transformation at scale is not just about adding more ceremonies and frameworks. It requires clear strategic alignment, a defined corporate culture and strong stakeholder commitment. To succeed, you need to co-create a shared vision, rely on executive sponsorship to remove obstacles, engage teams through multi-methodology orchestration (Design, Agile, DevOps) and manage value end-to-end.

This article offers a pragmatic roadmap, illustrated with real-world examples, to deploy agile at large scale while measuring concrete benefits in time-to-market, quality and customer satisfaction.

Align Strategic Vision and Co-Create the Approach

Embedding strategic vision at the heart of the transformation ensures coherence between business objectives and operational practices. Co-creating this vision fosters ownership and establishes a solid cultural foundation.

Definition and Importance of a Shared Vision

A shared vision outlines the desired future state of the organization and specifies the expected benefits for customers and internal teams. It serves as a compass to prioritize initiatives and make strategic trade-offs.

Without this clear trajectory, agile rollouts risk diverging across departments, creating redundant work and frustrations. An aligned roadmap prevents these pitfalls and unites stakeholders.

This vision should be articulated in terms of business value, customer experiences and key performance indicators. It is then broken down into measurable objectives shared by all operational teams.

Example: An industrial group organized co-creation workshops bringing together R&D, marketing and operations to define a product roadmap. This approach reduced the number of backtracks during prototyping phases by 30%, demonstrating the effectiveness of a shared vision in minimizing resource waste.

Cross-Functional Co-Creation Workshops

Co-creation workshops bring together business stakeholders, IT and end users to map requirements and prioritize initiatives. Each session employs concrete artifacts (user journeys, storyboards, prototypes) to make challenges tangible.

This approach fosters the establishment of a common language and the rapid identification of dependencies between teams. Participants leave with clear action plans and a sense of shared responsibility.

The key challenge is ensuring adequate representation of stakeholders and moderating discussions to avoid silos. An experienced facilitator ensures balanced participation and captures decisions in an accessible repository.

Communicating and Embedding the Vision

Once co-created, the vision must be disseminated through various channels: town halls, internal newsletters, collaboration platforms. Each communication is tailored to the target audience (executive leadership, operational teams, support).

Visual artifacts such as dynamic roadmaps or monitoring dashboards facilitate understanding and governance. They allow tracking transformation progress and adjusting the trajectory in real time.

Reiterating messages and maintaining transparency around success metrics reinforce buy-in. Sharing feedback and lessons learned should be valued to sustain engagement over time.

Secure Executive Sponsorship and Remove Obstacles

Executive sponsorship is the primary lever for unlocking resources and making trade-offs in case of conflicts. It also ensures coherence between strategic priorities and agile initiatives.

Role of Executive Sponsorship

The executive sponsor champions the transformation at the highest level of the organization. They ensure alignment with the overall strategy and maintain the stability of the setup during turbulent times.

Their support is demonstrated through swift decisions on budgets, hiring and priorities. They act as a catalyst to bring steering committees together and resolve major obstacles when they arise.

An engaged sponsor also serves as an internal and external ambassador, strengthening the project’s credibility with stakeholders and investors. Their communication inspires confidence and fosters buy-in.

Resource Allocation and Obstacle Removal

The sponsor approves the human, financial and technological resources needed to deploy agility at scale. They ensure teams have the right skills and recommended tools (open source, modular solutions).

In case of organizational or technical blockage, the sponsor acts as mediator, removes regulatory hurdles and negotiates trade-offs. This responsiveness is crucial to maintain the transformation pace.

A monthly steering committee, chaired by the sponsor, identifies risks quickly and implements mitigation plans. Formalizing this process reinforces discipline and best practices.

Agile Governance at the Executive Committee Level

Implementing agile governance involves introducing value review rituals, managing strategic backlogs and tracking KPIs. The executive committee relies on concise dashboards to oversee each scaled sprint.

This cross-functional governance integrates the IT department, business units, finance and security. It ensures decisions are made based on objective data and shared indicators, avoiding a two-speed gap between business and IT.

Transparency in governance processes builds trust and reduces friction. Every decision is documented and its impact continuously measured, providing a continuous improvement loop.

Example: A Swiss public institution established an agile executive committee with weekly project portfolio reviews. In six months, initiative approval times were reduced by 40%, demonstrating the effectiveness of value-oriented governance.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Engage Teams Through Multi-Methodology Orchestration

An approach combining Design Thinking, scaled agile and DevOps creates an environment where innovation and speed coexist. Methodology hybridization fosters adaptability based on the project context.

Integrating Design Thinking for True Customer-Centricity

Design Thinking places the end user at the center of the process and enables rapid prototyping to validate hypotheses. This reduces the risk of developing unnecessary or poorly targeted features.

Through co-creation workshops, teams uncover customers’ real needs, explore innovative solutions and prioritize high-impact features. The process is iterative and encourages rapid feedback.

Using MVPs (Minimum Viable Products) validated by real user tests accelerates learning and allows scope adjustments before large-scale rollout. This approach ensures greater customer satisfaction.

Adopting Agile at Scale

Scaling Agile beyond a single team involves synchronizing multiple teams on common cadences (PI cadences, Agile Release Trains or delivery trains). This requires a clear coordination mechanism and shared rituals.

Each program maintains a global backlog and interconnected team backlogs. Dependencies are identified upfront and managed in regular synchronization points, ensuring smooth delivery flows.

Communities of practice and thematic chapters facilitate skill development and the exchange of experiences. These sharing forums strengthen cohesion and spread best practices across the organization.

Implementing DevOps Practices

The DevOps culture promotes deployment automation, continuous integration and proactive monitoring. It breaks down barriers between development and operations, accelerating delivery cycles and incident resolution.

CI/CD pipelines, automated testing and immutable infrastructures ensure repeatable and safe deployments. Rapid feedback loops enable detecting and fixing anomalies before they reach end users.

Unified monitoring and real-time collaboration tools foster transparency and a coordinated incident response. This DevOps maturity becomes a lever for resilience and continuous performance.

Measure Impacts and Govern Value

Tracking business and technical metrics demonstrates the tangible benefits of agile transformation. Continuous value governance ensures investment optimization and systematic improvement.

Key Performance Indicators and ROI

The measured metrics include time-to-market, feature delivery rate, cost per iteration and user satisfaction rate. They serve as a basis for evaluating the profitability of agile initiatives.

Regular reporting aligned with strategic objectives ensures shared visibility between business and IT leadership. This facilitates decision-making and priority adjustments based on initial feedback.

Implementing interactive dashboards promotes transparency and team ownership. KPIs are reviewed quarterly to adapt governance based on market evolution and customer needs.

Reduced Time-to-Market and Enhanced Quality

Combining Agile and DevOps significantly reduces the time between design and production release. Iterative loops and automated testing ensure continuous quality improvement.

Defects detected early in the cycle are fixed swiftly, limiting non-quality costs and reinforcing stakeholder confidence. Customer feedback is integrated into each sprint, ensuring a quick response to emerging needs.

Tracking metrics such as Mean Time to Recover (MTTR) and first-time deployment success rate quantifies performance and reliability gains.

Value Governance and Continuous Improvement

Value governance relies on regular reviews of actual gains and optimization opportunities. Each iteration feeds an improvement backlog that informs future priorities.

Program-level and executive-level retrospectives enable capitalizing on successes and adjusting practices. The goal is to create a virtuous cycle of rapid delivery, customer feedback and continuous improvement.

Example: A Swiss financial services group implemented joint monitoring of business and IT metrics. This approach reduced the average deployment time of new offerings by 25% and increased perceived user quality, demonstrating the direct impact of value governance.

Embrace Agile at Scale for Sustainable Performance

To successfully achieve agile transformation at scale, it is essential to articulate a shared vision, secure engaged executive sponsorship, orchestrate multi-methodologies and establish lasting value governance. Each step should be guided by concrete metrics and tailored to the organization’s context with scalable, modular and secure solutions.

Whether you want to align your teams around a common path, remove strategic obstacles, boost innovation or rigorously measure benefits, our experts are here to support you in this tailored approach.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

Adopting a cloud ERP transforms data and business process management by offering a unified, real-time view. By removing on-premises constraints, organizations accelerate their multi-country deployments, optimize their total cost of ownership (TCO), and prepare to integrate AI/ML capabilities without initial overinvestment.

This approach offers instant scalability, enhanced security managed by the provider, and native interoperability with CRMs, analytics tools, and finance-HR-supply chain workflows. IT and operational leaders gain agility and can dedicate their resources to innovation instead of maintenance.

Flexibility and Scalability to Support Your Growth

The cloud removes technical barriers associated with on-premises infrastructure. Adding modules or users no longer requires CAPEX or lengthy provisioning cycles.

Instant Capacity Scaling Without Upfront Investment

In an on-premises environment, server capacity is fixed by the hardware purchased.

This pay-as-you-go billing model eliminates the need to anticipate and fund servers that are rarely used at full capacity. IT teams can thus respond more quickly to unexpected demands without resorting to emergency hardware purchases.

Business leaders benefit from consistent performance, even during critical operations such as the monthly financial close or the launch of a new product line. This agility makes you more responsive to competition and market changes.

Multi-Country and Multi-Currency Deployment in Record Time

Moving to the cloud enables ERP deployment across multiple jurisdictions without installing local infrastructure. Regional settings such as language, currency, and tax rules are configured from a centralized hub.

This approach shortens the time-to-market for international subsidiaries, reduces errors associated with multiple independent deployments, and ensures harmonized process governance.

Finance departments appreciate the instant data consolidation and automated intercompany reporting, without the need for custom developments for each country.

Case Study: A Rapidly Growing Swiss SME

An industrial Swiss SME migrated its on-premises ERP to a cloud solution to support its international ambitions. Without additional hardware investment, it activated two new European subsidiaries in less than six weeks.

This success demonstrates that a cloud ERP can support rapid growth while minimizing initial costs. Teams were able to focus on adapting specific processes rather than managing servers.

The feedback highlights the flexibility of this approach: each addition of a country or module was completed in a few clicks, paving the way for new market opportunities without technical barriers.

Security and Compliance Managed by the Provider

Advanced security protocols are provided by the vendor at no extra cost to your IT department. Compliance with GDPR and the new Swiss Federal Data Protection Act (nLPD) is built in natively.

Encryption and Strong Authentication

Data is transmitted and stored with end-to-end encryption using provider-managed keys. This protection covers databases, backups, and API communications.

Additionally, multi-factor authentication (MFA) ensures user identity even in the event of a compromised password. The IT department no longer needs to deploy third-party solutions, as these mechanisms are automatically included in the cloud platform.

Security officers gain peace of mind, knowing that industry best practices are continuously applied and updated without manual intervention.

Backup, High Availability, and Disaster Recovery

Cloud architectures provide high SLAs (often 99.9% availability) and automated backup mechanisms. Data is replicated across multiple geographic data centers to ensure service continuity.

In the event of a major incident, disaster recovery procedures execute without delay, minimizing downtime. Critical workflows, such as order processing or payroll, remain available to your teams and partners.

The IT department can monitor application health indicators in real time and trigger crisis plans without tying up internal resources on backup management.

Regulatory Compliance and Data Protection

Compliance with the GDPR and the new Swiss Federal Data Protection Act is ensured by built-in governance mechanisms: access logging, audit trails, and granular access rights management.

Internal controls, such as log reviews and retention policies, are configurable through dedicated interfaces. This enables you to demonstrate compliance during audits without manually generating extensive reports.

This framework also addresses sector-specific regulations (banking, healthcare, energy) and reduces the risk of severe penalties in case of non-compliance.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Interoperability and Seamless System Integration

A modern cloud ERP connects natively to CRMs, BI tools, and e-commerce platforms. Workflow automation eliminates functional silos.

Seamless Connection to CRM and Analytics Tools

Open APIs and out-of-the-box connectors enable synchronization of customer data, sales opportunities, and marketing performance. Sales and marketing teams operate from a single source of truth.

BI dashboards update automatically with operational data, without manual exports or complex gateways. Business leaders access key metrics, such as conversion rates or inventory levels, in real time.

This integration strengthens cross-team collaboration and enables faster, better-informed decisions aligned with overall strategy.

Automation of Finance-HR-Supply Chain Workflows

End-to-end processes—from purchase requisition to invoicing, including procurement management—run through configurable workflows. Approvals and controls execute automatically based on your business rules.

Finance teams accelerate their close cycle with automated bank reconciliations and journal entries. HR departments manage schedules and leave via an integrated portal, with automatic notifications to managers.

This process industrialization significantly reduces manual errors, frees up time for analysis, and improves employee and supplier satisfaction.

Preparing for AI/ML Integration

Modern cloud ERPs expose data streams to machine learning platforms via export pipelines and integrated data lakes. This prepares you for predictive use cases (maintenance, demand forecasting, anomaly detection) without heavy development.

Historical and real-time data feed AI models that adjust automatically. Data science teams benefit from standardized access to tables and metrics, without tedious manipulation.

This AI/ML readiness ensures your ERP not only manages the present but becomes a continuous innovation platform for future intelligent use cases.

Performance, Sustainability, and Cost Control

Cloud providers optimize the infrastructure for eco-efficient and measurable usage. Moving to the cloud reduces your IT footprint and overall TCO by 20 to 30%.

Performance Monitoring and Continuous Optimization

Native monitoring tools continuously measure CPU usage, latency, and transactional throughput. Proactive alerts enable capacity adjustments before any user impact.

Usage reports precisely indicate which modules are underutilized or require additional resources. This allows for precise ERP governance and lowers your cloud bill.

Continuous optimization, whether automated or guided, improves cost/performance and extends the lifespan of each component without sudden capacity spikes.

Reducing the IT Carbon Footprint

Resource pooling and data center consolidation by major providers decrease energy consumption per active instance. Data centers are often cooled and powered by renewable energy.

Moving to the cloud can reduce your digital carbon footprint by 40 to 60% compared to a poorly optimized on-premises operation. Workload carbon tracking is provided directly in management consoles.

This metric becomes an ESG lever and a talking point for boards and stakeholders concerned with corporate social responsibility.

Controlling TCO and Return on Investment

A cloud ERP offers modular billing: subscription per user, per module, or per transaction volume. You align your IT spending with actual usage, without surprise costs for licenses or updates.

The reduced deployment time shortens time-to-value: operational benefits are measurable within the first months, often delivering an ROI confirmed by productivity gains exceeding 15%.

Eliminating hardware refresh cycles and license renewals decreases recurring costs and simplifies multi-year budget planning.

Cloud ERP and Digital Transformation

Data centralization, instant scalability, built-in security and compliance, native interoperability, and reduced IT footprint are the pillars of a high-performing cloud ERP. Combined, these benefits pave the way for sustainable digital transformation and accelerated time-to-value. Whether you are evaluating or ready to migrate, Edana experts support you from process audit to deployment—covering solution selection, integration, change management, and governance. Together, we will build a custom, secure, and scalable cloud ERP ecosystem for tangible, measurable ROI.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

Developing an effective IT requirements specification is not just about compiling a wish list. It’s a decision-making tool that brings together senior management, business teams, and the IT department around a prioritized scope, measurable KPIs, and optimal security and compliance constraints.

In Switzerland, where data sovereignty and integration with the existing ecosystem are paramount, this document must lead to a concrete action plan ready for the build phase. Discover how to frame your project quickly and precisely, then execute without slippage through strategic workshops, a clear IT system mapping, testable user stories, and an agile governance model.

Defining Scope and Structuring Priorities

An IT requirements specification must clarify the strategic vision and use cases before listing features. It prioritizes a MoSCoW/MVP approach to align stakeholders on a relevant and immediately actionable scope.

Aligning Strategic Vision and Business Use Cases

The first step is to formalize the project vision through concrete use cases that describe interactions between users and the system. Each use case demonstrates a specific business value, whether it’s streamlining an internal process or enhancing the customer experience. This approach captures executives’ attention and justifies the expected return on investment.

In a recent construction sector project, the IT department structured the vision around a site progress tracking portal. The use cases highlighted a 40% reduction in approval times, demonstrating a tangible impact on site management.

By detailing each scenario, stakeholders identify key interactions and existing friction points. These insights feed into the requirements specification and ensure the solution addresses real needs rather than an unprioritized feature list.

Prioritization with MoSCoW and Defining the MVP

The MoSCoW method segments requirements into Must, Should, Could, and Won’t to prevent scope creep. This classification surfaces critical features and those that can be postponed. The IT department, business teams, and leadership then agree on a minimum viable product (MVP) for the launch phase.

An e-commerce SME defined the MVP as a shipment tracking module and a management dashboard. Features classified as Should or Could were scheduled for later releases. This decision enabled a first version to go live in three months without exceeding the budget.

This method limits deviation risks and makes the project more agile. Development focuses first on high-impact issues, while secondary enhancements are planned on the IT roadmap.

Defining Business KPIs and Security Constraints

Performance indicators are essential for measuring project success and guiding its evolution. They can include user satisfaction rates, reduced processing times, or increased revenue from new services. Each KPI must be clearly defined, measurable, and tied to a use case.

At the same time, compliance requirements such as GDPR, the Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection (FADP), and ISO 27001 certification are formalized in the specification. Data sovereignty stipulations are detailed: storage location, access rights, and encryption protocols.

These documented commitments protect the organization from legal and security risks. They also ensure alignment with Swiss best practices for managing sensitive data.

Structuring the Scoping Workshop and IT System Mapping

The scoping workshop unites stakeholders around a shared culture and a common ROI vision. Mapping systems and interfaces sheds light on dependencies and facilitates integration with the existing IT landscape.

Running the Strategic Workshop on Vision and ROI

The scoping workshop brings together the IT department, business leaders, and executive management to validate objectives, use cases, and the value model. Each participant presents their priorities, enabling operational and financial stakes to be balanced.

This session produces consensus on the roadmap and a short- and mid-term action plan. Estimated gains are quantified, ensuring a shared understanding of expected returns.

The collaborative format strengthens project ownership and minimizes later criticism. It also provides a solid foundation for drafting the requirements specification by ensuring all parties are engaged.

Mapping the IT System and Identifying Key Interfaces

A detailed map of the existing IT system identifies applications, databases, and data exchange flows. This overview reveals critical dependencies and integration points required for the new solution.

In a healthcare project, more than fifteen interfaces were cataloged between the ERP, CRM, and a specialized business application. The mapping exposed bottlenecks and enabled phased testing for each integration point, preventing startup delays.

This proactive analysis supports a gradual migration plan and end-to-end testing, significantly reducing the risk of production service interruptions.

Engaging Operational Teams and Defining Governance

Project governance is established during the scoping workshop. Roles and responsibilities are clarified: product owner, scrum master, architect, business liaisons. This agile model ensures rapid decision-making and smooth communication.

Regular synchronization points (daily stand-ups, sprint reviews) are scheduled from the outset to maintain alignment and adjust scope as needed. The iterative approach avoids the “waterfall tunnel” effect and provides continuous visibility into progress.

This collective commitment from the scoping phase builds trust and lays a solid foundation for execution without drift.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Writing Testable User Stories and Acceptance Criteria

User stories organize functional requirements into clear scenarios, promoting automated test creation. Acceptance criteria turn each story into a verifiable deliverable, ensuring quality and compliance.

Developing User Stories with a User-Centric Focus

Each user story follows the format “As a…, I want to…, so that…”. This structure directs development toward business value rather than a technical to-do list. It also facilitates prioritization and breakdown into concrete tasks.

The story-driven approach ensures a shared understanding of the requirement and fosters collaboration between developers, testers, and business teams, reducing the risk of misunderstandings.

Defining Precise Acceptance Criteria

Acceptance criteria list the conditions that must be met for a user story to be considered done. They cover functional aspects, performance, security, and compliance. Each criterion corresponds to a unit, integration, or end-to-end test.

This level of detail protects the project from functional drift and ensures that only compliant deliverables are deployed to production.

Ensuring Traceability and Test Automation

Each user story and its criteria are tracked in an agile project management tool, ensuring backlog transparency. Automated tests are linked to acceptance criteria to generate coverage and regression reports.

This integration between backlog management and CI/CD pipelines provides rapid feedback loops, which are essential for maintaining quality and accelerating delivery cycles.

Implementing an Agile Contract Model and Continuous Governance

The agile contract is structured around milestones based on tested and validated deliverables, with formalized acceptance criteria. Continuous governance through regular reviews keeps alignment and anticipates necessary adjustments.

Organizing Milestones and Validated Deliverables

The contractual schedule is organized into sprints or delivery phases, each culminating in a testable deliverable. Milestones are tied to staged payments, aligning financial incentives with quality and actual progress.

This model avoids rigid fixed-price commitments and allows adaptation based on user feedback and evolving needs.

Detailing Agile Governance Clauses

The contract includes rituals: monthly steering meetings, sprint reviews, and executive committees. Each meeting produces a formal report documenting decisions, risks, and action plans.

These clauses also outline the change management process, defining validation procedures and financial impact assessments. This transparency protects both parties from budgetary or functional overruns.

Contractualizing agile governance ensures a sustainable collaboration, builds trust, and maintains the demand for tangible results at each stage.

Monitoring Deliverables, Managing Risks, and Adjusting

Continuous oversight relies on key indicators: functional progress, deliverable quality, schedule adherence, and budget burn. These metrics are shared during steering committee meetings to inform decisions.

In a complex ERP/CRM integration project, weekly monitoring of indicators detected an early deviation on a critical interface. A remediation plan was launched immediately, limiting the impact on the overall schedule.

This proactive support anticipates risks and adjusts delivery cadence to ensure controlled execution that honors the initial commitments.

Turn Your Requirements Specification into a Performance Engine

A well-constructed requirements specification relies on MoSCoW/MVP prioritization, a unifying scoping workshop, detailed IT system mapping, testable user stories, and an agile contract model. This structured approach limits drift, secures timelines, and enhances quality.

It addresses Swiss challenges of data sovereignty and interoperability with the existing ecosystem while enabling rapid, reliable execution. By leveraging this rigor, organizations gain agility and visibility.

Our experts are ready to co-create an actionable requirements specification aligned with your business priorities and primed for the build phase.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In a hyperconnected industrial environment, responsiveness and precision become decisive factors for maintaining competitiveness. A Manufacturing Execution System (MES), interfaced with the Enterprise Resource Planning system (ERP) and powered by the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), delivers real-time insight into production, optimizes Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE), reduces scrap, and strengthens traceability.

This article offers a practical and strategic guide for plant managers, CIOs and digital transformation leaders. You will discover how to select a modular, scalable MES, which KPIs to monitor (OEE, cycle time, parts per million, downtime rate), and how to plan for predictive maintenance to ready your plant for Industry 4.0. Several case studies illustrate each key step.

Orchestrate Production in Real Time

A connected MES coordinates scheduling, quality monitoring and traceability in real time. It provides decision-makers and operators with a unified view of each production step, anticipating deviations and reallocating resources to improve OEE.

Scheduling and Resource Allocation

MES-driven scheduling automates the assignment of machines, operators and raw materials based on actual production priorities. Any change in customer orders is instantly reflected in the machine schedule, avoiding bottlenecks and minimizing downtime.

Thanks to advanced scheduling capabilities, plants can simulate multiple scenarios and choose the most cost-effective sequence, taking into account time constraints, operator skills and quality requirements. This modeling reduces the risk of underutilization and optimizes asset use.

By synchronizing the MES and ERP through dedicated middleware, any update to inventory or production planning is automatically propagated, limiting data-entry errors and ensuring precise resource allocation. This level of automation is a key lever for improving OEE.

Real-Time Operations Monitoring

A modern MES collects machine data (cycle time, throughput, downtime states) and displays it on dynamic dashboards. Operators receive immediate alerts in case of deviations, enabling rapid response without waiting for a daily report.

This continuous stream of indicators helps identify anomalies—such as pressure drops, abnormal heating times or dimensional deviations—before they generate scrap. Event logging facilitates trend analysis and the implementation of targeted action plans.

Bi-directional communication with the ERP ensures data consistency: any machine stoppage or quality rejection is automatically recorded and immediately impacts planning and inventory management, guaranteeing flawless traceability.

Reducing Scrap and Optimizing OEE

Inline quality monitoring (dimensional measurements, temperature, viscosity, etc.) integrated into the MES can trigger automatic adjustments or targeted inspections when deviations occur. These inline control mechanisms significantly reduce end-of-line rejects.

By simultaneously analyzing performance, quality and availability data, the MES calculates OEE for each machine and production area. The generated reports highlight loss sources (stoppages, slowdowns, defects), guiding teams toward effective corrective actions.

For example, a small mechanical manufacturing company deployed an open-source MES to manage three critical lines. In under six months, scrap rates fell by 18% and overall OEE rose from 62% to 78%, demonstrating the value of integrated, context-aware control.

Integrate ERP and IIoT for Industry 4.0

Combining MES, ERP and IIoT sensors creates a digital value chain where every data point feeds planning, quality and predictive maintenance. This convergence is the foundation of a smart, agile factory.

Bi-Directional ERP Integration

The custom API integration between the MES and ERP ensures consistency of production and logistics data. Work orders, bills of materials and inventory levels synchronize automatically, eliminating re-entries and information gaps.

In practice, every validated step in the MES updates the ERP: material consumption, machine times and quality variables are reported in real time, facilitating cost calculation and procurement management.

This unified approach enables end-to-end performance management—from raw-material supplier to delivery—ensuring financial and operational traceability without interruption.

Leveraging IIoT Sensors for Quality and Traceability

Connected sensors placed on production lines monitor critical parameters (pressure, temperature, vibration). These data streams are sent to the MES to validate each process phase. Exceeding a threshold can trigger an alert or an automatic shutdown.

Secure storage of these data in a hybrid database (on-premises and cloud) guarantees their longevity and simplifies audits. Edge computing reduces latency by processing data closer to the source.

For instance, on a pharmaceutical site subject to strict regulations, IIoT integration enabled continuous fermentation temperature tracking. Anomalies detected within ten minutes reduced scrap by 25%, demonstrating data’s impact on compliance and performance.

Predictive Maintenance to Safeguard Production Lines

Aggregating vibration data, machine hours and incident histories feeds learning models. The MES identifies early signs of failure using artificial intelligence and automatically schedules interventions, minimizing unplanned downtime.

This approach relies on open-source algorithms—avoiding vendor lock-in—and on a modular architecture that can incorporate new analytics modules as business needs evolve.

The result is an optimized maintenance program that lowers maintenance costs and extends asset life while ensuring maximum equipment availability.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Criteria for Choosing a Modular, Scalable MES

Selecting an MES goes beyond immediate features: modularity, operator UX and analytical capabilities determine its longevity and user adoption. These criteria ensure scalability and technical autonomy.

Modularity and No Vendor Lock-In

A modular architecture allows activation or replacement of modules without impacting the entire system. Each component—planning, quality, maintenance—can evolve independently according to your business priorities.

Prioritizing open-source building blocks and standard APIs ensures the freedom to switch vendors or develop new modules in-house, without technological constraints.

In practice, this approach reduces license costs and provides maximum flexibility—essential in a context where industrial processes evolve quickly.

Operator Experience and Dedicated UX

An effective MES must offer a clear interface designed for operators, with visual and audible alerts tailored to the noisy factory environment. Ease of use speeds adoption and minimizes data-entry errors.

Customizable screens, available on tablets or fixed terminals, facilitate navigation for operators and ensure faster training, reducing resistance to change.

For example, a building materials company implemented an MES with ergonomic dashboards that halved the training time for new operators, improving data reliability and consistency of the cleaning process.

Analytical Capabilities and Advanced Reporting

Built-in analytics should provide customizable reports, leveraging performance and quality data to identify trends and improvement opportunities.

An industrial data lake module—based on open-source technologies—allows storage of large data volumes and feeds high-frequency dashboards without prohibitive costs.

Guided data exploration and integrated predictive alerts enable proactive management, turning each data point into a driver of continuous innovation.

Essential KPIs for Measuring Performance and Gains

Tracking the right indicators—OEE, cycle time, parts per million (PPM), downtime rate—provides a clear view of friction points and achieved gains. These KPIs speak a common language across operations, IT and leadership.

OEE, Synthetic Performance Rate and Cycle Time

OEE combines availability, performance and quality of equipment into a single metric. An MES automatically calculates these three components based on machine times, actual throughput and compliant output volumes.

The Synthetic Performance Rate (SPR) is a simplified variant, useful for comparing different sites or lines and setting clear objectives for teams.

Cycle time, measured continuously, helps detect gaps between theoretical and actual performance, guiding targeted optimization actions and reducing bottlenecks.

Scrap Rate and Parts per Million (PPM)

The number of defective parts per million (PPM) remains a critical metric for demanding industries (pharmaceuticals, food). An MES logs every nonconformity, calculates PPM automatically and alerts when thresholds are exceeded.

This granular tracking enables root cause analysis (material, operator, machine) and the development of documented corrective action plans.

Complete traceability—from raw material batch to final product—simplifies audits and reinforces regulatory compliance.

Downtime Rate and Machine Cost

By measuring the frequency and duration of unplanned stoppages, the MES highlights the most vulnerable equipment, guiding maintenance priorities.

Machine cost calculation includes energy consumption, operator hours and production losses, providing a key financial metric for ROI-driven maintenance and optimization.

This detailed reporting justifies investments in IIoT sensors and analytics solutions, transforming maintenance from a cost center into a profitability driver.

Drive Your Production Toward Industrial Excellence

A MES connected to your ERP and IIoT orchestrates production in real time, improves OEE, rationalizes costs and ensures reliable traceability. Modularity, operator UX and advanced analytics ensure the system’s adaptability and longevity. By monitoring KPIs—OEE, cycle time, PPM and downtime rate—you turn data into concrete actions.

Our experts are ready to analyze your needs, define your MES roadmap and deploy an evolving, secure, ROI-focused solution. Whether you’re starting your digitalization journey or upskilling your plant, we support you from strategy to execution.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In a context where B2B companies face increasing regulatory constraints and growing performance demands, the choice of a CRM becomes a major strategic issue.

Should you adopt an off-the-shelf solution for its rapid deployment, or invest in a bespoke CRM that precisely aligns with your business processes and anticipates future volumes? Over a 3–5 year horizon, analyzing ROI and TCO, assessing customization debt, ensuring integration quality, and mastering data governance make all the difference. This guide offers a structured approach, illustrated by real-world examples from Switzerland, to inform the decisions of CEOs, COOs, CMOs, and IT managers—and turn your CRM into a true driver of growth and agility.

ROI and TCO: Evaluating Total Cost over 3–5 Years

ROI and TCO calculations must include direct and indirect costs over multiple years for an informed decision. Accounting for customization debt and avoided licensing fees enables an objective comparison between off-the-shelf and custom CRM solutions.

Analyzing ROI over a Multi-Year Cycle

Return on investment goes beyond immediate productivity gains. It also includes revenue impact, churn reduction, and savings generated by automating sales and marketing processes.

Over a 3–5 year period, you should project improvements in conversion rates and reductions in sales cycle length enabled by a tailored CRM. To build a solid business case addressing ROI and risks, see our guide to securing IT budget. Supported by data, each percentage point increase in conversion translates into net revenue gains.

Breaking Down TCO and Customization Debt

Total cost of ownership includes acquisition, hosting, maintenance, upgrades, and training. With an off-the-shelf solution, recurring license fees and ad-hoc extension costs can add up quickly. For a deep dive into hidden costs, consult our detailed analysis.

With a custom CRM, the initial technical debt becomes a flexible asset. Tailored developments don’t incur unexpected update fees because they adhere to an evolutive, well-documented architecture.

You should estimate customization debt by forecasting the cost of future enhancements. In regulated environments, each new requirement (GDPR, industry standards) generates development effort that must be budgeted from the outset.

Case Study: Swiss Financial Services Company

A mid-sized financial institution initially chose a standard CRM to save time. Soon, each major vendor update caused 20% annual IT budget overruns in adaptation costs.

By switching to a custom-built, modular CRM, the organization natively integrated its KYC compliance workflows and automated client follow-ups without additional license fees.

This experience shows that a higher upfront investment can be recouped in under two years thanks to the absence of extra licensing costs and faster rollout of regulatory updates.

Customization Debt and Vendor Lock-In

Highly customized off-the-shelf solutions create customization debt and lock in your ecosystem. A custom, open-source, modular approach minimizes vendor lock-in and safeguards your technological independence.

Sources of Customization Debt

Customization debt often arises when business needs aren’t met by a standard CRM’s native features. Each ad-hoc development, grafted on without considering platform evolution, increases complexity and maintenance costs. To learn how to control your technical debt, read our article on technical debt.

Impacts of Vendor Lock-In on Flexibility

Vendor lock-in occurs when your ecosystem relies heavily on proprietary features or proprietary connectors with ERP, marketing automation, or e-commerce platforms.

This lock-in limits migration options and forces reinvestment in the same ecosystem for each major upgrade. Your IT budget becomes captive, and the vendor gains pricing power over license fees and operational support.

A custom CRM built on open APIs and industry standards offers the freedom to switch providers, enrich the ecosystem with new modules, and distribute dependency risks.

Integrations and Data Governance

A high-performance CRM doesn’t operate in silos: it must integrate seamlessly with ERP, marketing automation, and e-commerce platforms. Data governance, compliant with GDPR and the Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection (FADP), ensures legal and secure use of customer information.

Connectivity with ERP and Marketing Automation

To centralize customer data, the CRM must exchange information in real time with ERP systems and marketing automation tools. Synchronization workflows automate updates of orders, invoices, and campaign activities.

In a regulated B2B environment, these integrations must handle high volumes and complex business rules, such as hierarchical approvals or segment-specific discount calculations.

A custom architecture lets you choose suitable connectors—based on data buses or lightweight ETLs—and ensures centralized control of data flows without creating a single point of failure.

GDPR Compliance and Access Security

Data governance requires archiving, anonymizing, or purging sensitive information according to legal retention periods and collected consents. Any CRM architecture must include a rights management module and an audit trail.

Encryption at rest and in transit, combined with fine-grained access control (RBAC), ensures only authorized teams access relevant data. In an incident, traceability simplifies audit responses and authority notifications.

In a custom solution, these security policies are designed from data extraction onward, avoiding costly and risky post-hoc compliance add-ons.

Practical Example: Swiss Healthcare Provider

A mid-sized care organization needed to protect patient records while synchronizing data with a marketing automation platform for targeted prevention campaigns.

The initial standard solution couldn’t automatically anonymize histories after a regulatory delay, exposing the organization to data protection authority alerts.

By developing custom connectors, the team automated bidirectional sync, integrated a GDPR rules engine, and implemented a compliance dashboard—reducing risk while maximizing campaign responsiveness.

Iterative Deployment and User Adoption

A custom CRM is built in phases: discovery, MVP, integrations, then scaling to drive adoption and secure the investment. Tracking KPIs like conversion rate, sales cycle length, and avoided licensing costs allows continuous roadmap adjustments.

Discovery and Prototyping Phase

The discovery phase maps sales, marketing, and customer service processes through cross-functional workshops and the creation of a functional prototype.

This prototype, typically delivered in a few sprints, validates key workflows and aligns stakeholders on the user experience and essential integrations. It minimizes drift risks and rework during full development.

Insights from this phase guide the definition of the MVP (Minimum Viable Product), prioritizing features with the highest impact on productivity and customer satisfaction while staying within the initial budget.

Iterative Development and MVP Deployment

The MVP bundles core modules: contact management, opportunities, sales pipeline, and real-time reporting. Each increment is delivered iteratively, on a two- to four-week cadence.

This Agile methodology allows rapid incorporation of user feedback, interface adjustments, and foresight into ERP or e-commerce portal integration needs without siloed thinking.

Modular code and automated test coverage ensure controlled scaling and a smooth transition from staging to production.

Adoption and Performance Management via KPIs

Deployment success is measured by team adoption and key metric evolution: feature usage rates, reduced sales cycle, increased cross-sell, and lower cost per lead.

Custom dashboards, accessible to sales and marketing managers, provide real-time visibility into the pipeline, lead sources, and automated campaign performance.

A continuous training program, coupled with Agile project governance, fosters ownership and prevents functional obsolescence—ensuring sustained ROI across the CRM ecosystem.

Make Custom CRM a Growth Lever

Over a 3–5 year horizon, choosing a CRM tailored to your business processes and regulated environment delivers lasting value in terms of ROI, controlled TCO, robust integrations, and compliance.

By adopting an iterative approach, minimizing customization debt, and ensuring secure data governance, you turn your CRM into a true accelerator of sales, marketing, and service productivity.

Our experts are ready to support you through every stage of your CRM evolution, from discovery to adoption and KPI management. Benefit from contextual guidance, open-source building blocks, an evolutive architecture, and a performance-driven approach.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In an environment where the success of a digital project hinges as much on strategic coherence as on operational efficiency, a well-crafted design brief becomes a differentiating asset. It serves as a compass to align product, UX, and marketing teams, while providing clear visibility to IT and business decision-makers.

By defining the scope, objectives, and constraints from the outset, it significantly reduces the risks of scope creep and rework. This practical guide outlines the key components of a functional and design brief, provides reusable templates, and offers tips for turning it into a “living document” that drives performance and customer satisfaction.

Preparing a Comprehensive Design Brief

A well-structured initial brief brings stakeholders together around a common vision. It reduces misunderstandings and secures the project’s subsequent phases.

Defining the Context and Challenges

The first step is to describe the project’s business and technical context. This involves recalling the current situation, identified obstacles, and strategic ambitions of the program. Framing each requirement within a concrete business goal prevents abstract or off-topic requests. This coordination relies on cross-functional teams.

Clearly presenting the context helps all stakeholders understand their priorities. It also highlights potential external factors such as regulatory obligations, budgetary timelines, or critical dependencies.

By providing an overarching view, this initial section limits last-minute adjustments during the design phase. Developers, designers, and marketers know exactly why each feature is requested.

Identifying Stakeholders and Roles

The brief lists key players: sponsors, IT decision-makers, UX leads, business representatives, and external agencies. Each role is defined by its responsibilities and level of authority. This prevents roadblocks during sprints caused by absences or conflicting priorities.

Mapping participants promotes transparency and accelerates validation cycles. By understanding the decision-making process, teams can anticipate feedback timelines and adjust their schedules accordingly.

This approach fosters a climate of trust and cross-team collaboration. Everyone understands their contribution to the overall project and the impact of each decision.

Initial Scope and Expected Deliverables

The functional and technical scope is described precisely: list of modules, services, interfaces, and priority use cases. Each deliverable is tied to a definition of done that includes expected quality and performance criteria.

Specifying a realistic scope minimizes the risk of overload and scope creep. It becomes easier to identify elements to exclude or defer to later phases, while ensuring a coherent minimum viable product (MVP).

By linking each deliverable to a success metric (adoption rate, processing time, user satisfaction), the brief steers teams toward concrete results rather than isolated technical outputs.

Example:

A Swiss SME in the logistics sector formalized its brief around the goal of reducing order processing times by 30%. By clearly defining which modules to revamp and which key metrics to track, it secured buy-in from its operational teams and IT department. This example shows how a clear scope facilitates decision-making between essential features and secondary enhancements.

Defining Measurable Objectives

SMART objectives and precise segmentation ensure the relevance of design decisions. They serve as a guiding thread for evaluating project success.

Setting SMART Objectives

Each objective is Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Time-bound. For example, “increase the contact form conversion rate by 15% within three months” clearly guides design and development efforts.

Measurable objectives eliminate vague interpretations and simplify reporting. They also prompt the definition of tracking tools (analytics, A/B testing, user feedback) from the discovery phase, aligning with the discovery phase.

KPI-based monitoring enhances team engagement. Everyone understands the success criteria and can adjust their deliverables accordingly.

Mapping the Target Audience

Persona descriptions include demographic characteristics, business needs, and digital behaviors. This segmentation helps prioritize features and guide UX/UI design.

A well-defined audience prevents feature bloat and ensures each screen and user journey addresses clearly identified needs.

The brief can incorporate existing data (traffic analysis, support feedback, internal studies) to bolster targeting credibility and enrich UX thinking.

Prioritizing Needs and Use Cases

Use cases are ranked by business impact and technical feasibility. A prioritization plan directs the sequence of sprints and releases.

This approach avoids spending resources on peripheral features before validating the most critical ones. It also ensures a controlled, progressive ramp-up.

Prioritization forms the basis of an evolving backlog, where each item remains tied to an objective or persona defined in the brief.

Example:

A public agency segmented its users into three profiles (citizens, internal staff, external partners) and set a single objective: reduce support calls by 20% through digitalizing dynamic FAQs. This brief clearly prioritized workflows and quickly measured the impact on helpdesk workload.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Scheduling Deliverables, Timelines, and Constraints

Pragmatic scheduling and acknowledging constraints ensure project feasibility. They prevent underestimated timelines and budget overruns.

Realistic Planning and Milestones

The project timeline is divided into phases (scoping, design, development, testing, production) with clearly identified milestones. Each phase has a target date and a responsible owner. This approach draws on meeting IT deadlines and budgets.

Buffers are built in to absorb unforeseen events and internal approvals. This ensures milestones remain credible and aren’t jeopardized by minor setbacks.

Visibility across the entire schedule facilitates cross-team coordination and sponsor communications. Everyone can track progress and anticipate resource needs.

Budget, Resources, and Skills

The brief includes a budget estimate by phase, broken down into design, development, testing, and project management. This granularity allows cost control and scope adjustments as needed.

Required skills are listed (UX, UI, front-end, back-end, QA) along with their level of involvement (full-time, part-time). This avoids bottlenecks and overly optimistic estimates.

Forecasting external resources (agencies, freelancers) is also covered, noting recruitment or contracting lead times to prevent delays at project launch.

Technical Constraints and Compliance

Constraints related to existing systems (architecture, APIs, ERP) are described to anticipate integration points. Open-source and modular choices are favored to ensure scalability and avoid vendor lock-in.

Regulatory obligations (GDPR, industry standards, accessibility) are specified to guide UX design and protect the final product’s compliance.

Consideration of production environments (hosting, CI/CD, security) ensures deliverables can be deployed without major adaptations at the end of the cycle.

Example:

A Swiss healthcare organization defined a quarterly schedule in its brief that included testing windows for their internal cloud infrastructure. They thus avoided version rollovers and ensured a secure deployment without disrupting daily operations.

Turning the Brief into a Living Tool

An interactive brief, updated collaboratively, becomes a dynamic reference. It anticipates scope creep and enhances client satisfaction.

Interactive Format and Co-creation

The brief is hosted in a collaborative tool where each stakeholder can comment and suggest adjustments. This co-creation method fosters document ownership.

It ensures that scope changes are validated promptly and avoids scattered email exchanges or outdated versions of the brief.

Co-creation also allows the integration of contextual insights gathered by marketing or support teams, enriching the understanding of user needs.

Scope Governance and Change Management

A quarterly steering committee reviews the scope and adjudicates change requests. Each new requirement is evaluated for its impact on schedule, budget, and quality.

Decision criteria are predefined in the brief: urgency, added value, technical feasibility, and strategic alignment. This ensures quick, transparent decision-making.

Tracking of changes is integrated into the backlog, with traceable requests, statuses, and owners. Sponsors can then justify every adjustment.

Acceptance Criteria and Feedback Loop

Each deliverable is subject to formal acceptance criteria, including performance indicators and user tests. Feedback is organized through sprint reviews or UX workshops.

A rapid feedback loop allows blocking issues to be resolved before production. Qualitative and quantitative inputs are centralized to inform the roadmap.

Transparency on progress and quality builds trust with internal and external clients. Teams rely on concrete evidence rather than opinions to guide improvements.

Transform Your Design Brief into an Efficiency Engine

A well-designed brief brings together context, SMART objectives, target audience, deliverables, schedule, constraints, and scope governance. By keeping it up to date through collaborative tools and steering committees, it becomes a living guide for all teams.

This approach prevents scope creep, accelerates time-to-market, and significantly reduces rework cycles. Organizations gain agility, transparency, and customer satisfaction.

Our experts are available to help you define and optimize your briefs, ensuring effective change management and stakeholder alignment from the design phase.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

SMS pumping attacks exploit the one-time password (OTP) delivery mechanisms to generate illicit revenues through commission sharing with operators, while causing telecom bills to skyrocket. Product, Security, and Growth teams face the challenge of balancing budget protection with preserving the user experience.

In this article, we outline a three-step approach 6 detect, block, replace 6 to reduce fraudulent OTP costs by 80 to 95% without harming conversion rates. We will first cover how to identify early warning signals and establish alert thresholds, then discuss defense-in-depth mechanisms, observability, and response plans, and finally explore authentication alternatives and contract governance.

Detecting the Attack and Setting Alert Thresholds

Understanding the SMS pumping revenue model is essential to distinguish legitimate use from large-scale fraud. Setting real-time cost and volume alerts enables teams to act before the budget is depleted.

SMS pumping relies on revenue sharing (“rev-share”) between the aggregator and mobile operators for each one-time password sent. Fraudsters exploit poorly monitored SMS routes, multiply requests, and pocket commissions for both delivery and response, sometimes sending thousands of messages per minute.

To spot these abuses, monitor the volumes of OTP requests and successes by country, by Autonomous System Number (ASN), and by route. A sudden spike in messages from an unusual geographic area or an abnormal rise in failure rates often indicates automated pumping attempts.

A financial services company recently discovered that one of its approved providers doubled its OTP deliveries to West African numbers in under ten minutes. Analysis showed that volume and cost threshold alerts, configured per destination, halted transactions before the budget was exhausted and without impacting regular customers.

Defense-in-Depth and Preserving the User Experience

Layering lightweight, adaptive controls limits fraud while maintaining a smooth journey for legitimate users. Each barrier should be calibrated based on risk profiles and measured via A/B testing.

Selective geo-blocking using a country allowlist and denylist is the first line of defense. You can allow OTP deliveries only from countries where your normal activity is established, while redirecting suspicious attempts to stricter mechanisms.

Velocity limits applied per IP address, device, or account are essential to block mass scripting. Adding an adaptive CAPTCHA like reCAPTCHA v3, tuned to risk scores, and a lightweight proof-of-work (a minor cryptographic computation) strengthens defenses without creating constant friction.

Finally, implementing OTP quotas over sliding windows and validating phone number formats adds another layer. Built-in provider protections, such as Vérify Fraud Guard, and destination-based circuit breakers provide additional resilience.

An online retailer implemented a multi-layered strategy combining weekly quotas, format validation, and adaptive CAPTCHA. Fraud dropped by 90% while conversion rates remained stable, demonstrating the effectiveness of graduated defenses.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Enhanced Observability and Operational Procedures

KPI-focused dashboards enable real-time visibility into one-time password costs and performance. Granular logging and incident runbooks ensure swift responses to anomalies.

It’s crucial to establish dashboards showing cost per registration, success rates, and number of OTP requests. These metrics, broken down by country, operator, and route, provide immediate insights into spending distribution and abnormal behaviors.

Detailed logging of the Mobile Country Code (MCC) and Mobile Network Code (MNC), device fingerprint, and user profile supports event correlation. Paired with anomaly detection tools, this logging triggers alerts once predefined thresholds are crossed.

Runbooks define clear procedures for incidents: contain the anomaly via targeted blocking, activate enhanced protections, analyze logs, and conduct a structured post-mortem. Each step assigns designated owners and timelines to maintain operational tempo.

A healthcare provider experienced a pumping spike on its patient portal. Thanks to real-time dashboards and a validated runbook, the team isolated the fraudulent route in under fifteen minutes and deployed targeted blocking rules, restoring normal service with no notable disruption.

Strengthening Authentication and Governance

Diversifying authentication methods by risk level reduces SMS dependency and exposure to pumping. A clear contractual framework with aggregators secures pricing and alert thresholds.

Email-based OTPs, time-based one-time passwords (TOTP) via dedicated apps, and magic links provide less exposed alternatives. High-risk users can be offered FIDO2 security keys or WebAuthn passkeys, while standard scenarios can use a simplified fallback flow.

It’s recommended to conduct A/B tests for each new option to measure its impact on conversion and fraud. This empirical approach lets you fine-tune the authentication mix and optimize your security-to-conversion ROI.

On the governance side, contracts with SMS aggregators should include rate caps, delivery thresholds by MCC/MNC, and automatic blocking provisions. Documenting an anti-fraud policy and training support and sales teams ensures clear understanding and consistent rule enforcement.

A mid-sized B2B services company renegotiated its SMS provider agreements to include an MCC-based block and budget alert tiers. This governance cut fraudulent requests by two-thirds by automatically adjusting routes without manual intervention.

Adopt a Three-Step Strategy to Tackle SMS Pumping

By combining early detection of subtle signals, defense-in-depth optimized for UX, and contextual authentication alternatives, you can significantly reduce SMS pumping costs. Fine-grained observability and clear runbooks ensure rapid incident response, while rigorous contract governance guarantees ongoing control.

Our open-source, modular experts are ready to tailor this checklist to your business context, co-create a 30/60/90-day action plan, and secure your OTP flows without compromising conversion.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

Before launching a digital project, the discovery phase is the essential architectural blueprint to align objectives, scope, UX and technology. Over 1 to 6 weeks depending on scale, this stage relies on interviews, market analysis, feature prioritization (MVP followed by subsequent releases), development of the Vision & Scope and wireframes, selection of an architecture and stack, and culminates in the creation of a detailed WBS along with cost and timeline estimates.

This process delivers a precise roadmap, a controlled budget and a preliminary evaluation of the service provider. The outcome: a faster, more predictable and measurable start, free of financial surprises and delays. This rigor reduces scope creep and development rework, and ensures technical feasibility is aligned with business needs.

Alignment of Objectives and Scope

Aligning business objectives and project scope from the outset ensures a clear, shared vision. This initial step helps mitigate the risk of scope creep and guarantees development that meets expectations.

Stakeholder Interviews and Analysis

The first phase involves meeting with decision-makers, key users and technical stakeholders. These interviews gather strategic goals and operational constraints from each department and uncover implicit expectations that could impact project scope.

Beyond business needs, existing processes and external dependencies are examined. This granular analysis maps information flows and highlights friction points. It also serves to document non-functional requirements such as security, performance and regulatory compliance.

The deliverable from this stage is a structured summary of expectations by role and priority. It becomes the common reference for all stakeholders, minimizing future misunderstandings and laying a solid foundation for the next phases.

Market Research and Benchmarking

Market research positions your project within its competitive and technological landscape. Experience feedback is collected, leaders and emerging innovations are identified, and this intelligence provides a strategic view of the digital environment.

The benchmark compares existing solutions’ features, strengths and weaknesses. It assesses the relevance of each option for your business objectives, guiding UX choices and setting design reference points.

Deliverables include a concise market trends report and a comparison matrix of offerings. These elements support investment decisions and align executive leadership around identified opportunities or threats.

Defining the Vision & Scope

The formalized Vision & Scope outlines the project’s overall ambition and its boundaries. The vision describes long-term goals, key performance indicators (KPIs) and expected benefits. The scope specifies what will be included or excluded in the initial phase.

Modules, interfaces and priority integrations are defined. This conceptual roadmap frames the functional and technical architecture, serving as reference for any later adjustments and ensuring consistency across deliverables.

For example, a public institution conducted a discovery phase to redesign its citizen portal. The Vision & Scope identified only three critical modules for the initial phase. This focus prevented a 40% scope expansion, contained costs and ensured on-time delivery.

Prioritization and Functional Design

Prioritizing critical features for the MVP enables rapid delivery of a testable product. Designing wireframes and planning subsequent releases creates a precise roadmap.

Feature Identification and Prioritization

This step involves listing all possible features and ranking them by business value. Each item is evaluated for its impact on the end user and its potential return on investment. A scoring method facilitates dialogue between business and technical teams.

High-impact features are isolated for the MVP, while others are assigned to later versions. This agile approach protects resources, ensures a speedy launch, limits scope creep and fosters structured iterations. The MVP focus accelerates validation and reduces risk.

For instance, a financial cooperative used this method for its mobile app. The analysis showed that three functions were sufficient to test internal adoption. Prioritization halved time-to-market, demonstrating the MVP’s effectiveness in a regulated context.

Wireframe and Prototype Development

The wireframes visually map the user journey and expected ergonomics. They establish screen structures before any graphic design choices. This iterative approach enables quick feedback and ensures consistent UX from the discovery phase onward.

The interactive prototype simulates navigation and validates critical flows. It allows stakeholders to test real-world scenarios without writing code. Adjustments at the prototype stage are far less costly than during development.

Associated documentation lists functional and technical elements by screen. It serves as a guide for designers, developers and testers, reducing misunderstandings and ensuring a smooth transition to development.

Release Plan and Roadmap

The release plan organizes future iterations based on priorities and technical dependencies. It establishes a realistic timeline for each module, taking into account the company’s strategic milestones. This long-term vision encourages resource preparation.

The roadmap incorporates testing, validation and deployment phases. It also specifies training and onboarding periods. This level of detail enables better anticipation of workloads and coordination between internal teams and external providers.

The final roadmap is shared at the steering committee. It acts as a trust-based agreement with executive leadership. Regular monitoring ensures continuous visibility on progress and any critical issues.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Technical Architecture and Stack Selection

Selecting a modular architecture and an appropriate stack safeguards the project’s future evolution. Clear technical documentation supports governance and simplifies maintenance.

Defining the Macro-Architecture

The macro-architecture maps the system’s main components and their interactions. It determines services, databases and external interfaces, providing an overall view to guide functional and technical decomposition decisions.

The modular approach favors microservices or separate business domains. Each block evolves independently, simplifying updates and minimizing global impact risks during changes. This modularity supports scalability.

The macro-architecture is validated through review workshops with architects, DevOps and security leads. Early collaboration anticipates operational and deployment constraints, preventing costly backtracking during development.

Selection of Open Source and Modular Technologies

The discovery phase includes a technical benchmark to identify the most suitable frameworks and languages. Open source solutions are preferred for their strong communities and longevity. This choice avoids vendor lock-in and guarantees future flexibility.

Evaluation criteria cover maintainability, performance and security. Scalability and compatibility with the existing ecosystem are also crucial. Modular stacks are favored to allow component replacement or upgrades without a full overhaul.

During its discovery phase, a retail brand opted for a Node.js and TypeScript architecture paired with an open API Gateway. This decision reduced the time to add new features by 40%, demonstrating the power of a well-tuned stack.

Governance and Technical Documentation

Technical documentation compiles all architecture decisions, API schemas and coding standards. It becomes the single reference for development and maintenance teams. Its quality directly influences new team members’ ramp-up speed.

A governance plan defines component owners, versioning rules and code review processes. This framework promotes code quality and consistency across modules and structures dependency update management.

Governance also includes periodic reviews to reassess technical choices. In case of a pivot or business evolution, it allows documentation updates and roadmap adjustments. This discipline ensures the project’s long-term viability.

Secure Software Lifecycle

An effective discovery phase aligned with your business objectives, scope, UX and technology stack creates a reliable foundation for any digital project. By combining interviews, market analysis, MVP prioritization, wireframes and a modular architecture, you achieve a clear roadmap and controlled budget. You limit scope creep, reduce rework and validate technical feasibility before committing to the build phase.

Our experts support CIOs, CTOs, digital transformation leaders and executive teams through this critical stage. They help structure your project, choose the optimal stack and establish effective governance. To learn how to reduce cost overruns, discover how to limit IT budget overruns.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In the healthcare sector, legacy software slows down clinical workflows and exposes patients and teams to operational and regulatory risks. Before making any decision, a structured audit maps documentation, features, code, and security to choose between maintenance, modernization, or replacement.

By focusing on critical systems—EHR, LIS, RIS, PACS, HIS, or telehealth platforms—this approach uncovers warning signs: sluggish performance, repeated outages, degraded user experience, rising costs, and limited integrations. At the end of the audit, a detailed, cost-estimated, clinically oriented MVP roadmap ensures uninterrupted care and lays the groundwork for AI-driven innovation.

Application Audit to Assess Your Healthcare Legacy System

A comprehensive audit documents and analyzes every layer of your medical application, from functional scope to code quality. It uncovers security and compliance risks and bottlenecks before any modernization project.

The first step is to inventory existing documentation, user flows, and use cases to understand the system’s actual usage. This mapping highlights critical features and poorly documented gaps.

Analyzing the source code, its dependencies, and test coverage helps estimate the technical debt and software fragility. Automated and manual reviews identify obsolete or overly coupled modules.

The final audit phase evaluates the system against regulatory requirements and interoperability standards (HL7, FHIR). It verifies operation traceability, log management, and the robustness of external interfaces.

Documentary and Functional Inventory

The inventory begins by collecting all available documentation: specifications, diagrams, user guides, and technical manuals. It reveals discrepancies between actual practices and official instructions.

Each feature is then categorized by clinical impact: patient record access, medication prescribing, imaging, or teleconsultation. This classification aids in prioritizing modules to preserve or refactor.

Feedback from clinical users enriches this assessment: response times, daily incidents, and manual workarounds indicate pain points affecting care quality.

Code Analysis and Security

Static and dynamic code analysis identifies vulnerabilities (SQL injections, XSS, buffer overflows) and measures modules’ cyclomatic complexity. These metrics guide the risk of regressions and security breaches.

Reviewing the build chain and the CI/CD pipeline verifies the automation of unit and integration tests. Lack of coverage or regular code reviews increases the risk of flawed deployments.

A Swiss regional hospital audit revealed that 40% of prescribing modules relied on an outdated framework, causing monthly incidents. The audit underscored the need to segment code to isolate critical fixes.

Compliance and Interoperability Assessment

LPD/GDPR and HIPAA requirements mandate strict controls over access, consent, and data retention. The audit checks role separation, cryptography, and session management.

HL7 and FHIR interfaces must guarantee secure, traceable exchanges. Evaluation measures FHIR profile coverage and the robustness of adapters for radiology or laboratory devices.

Fine-grained traceability, from authentication to archiving, is validated through penetration tests and regulatory scenarios. Missing precise timestamps or centralized logs poses a major risk.

Modernization Options: Maintain, Refactor, or Replace

Each modernization option offers advantages and trade-offs in cost, time, and functional value. The right choice depends on system criticality and the extent of technical debt.

Rehosting involves migrating infrastructure to the cloud without altering code. This quick approach reduces infrastructure TCO but yields no functional or maintainability gains.

Refactoring or replatforming restructures and modernizes code gradually. By targeting the most fragile components, it improves maintainability and performance while minimizing disruption risk.

When debt is overwhelming, rebuilding or replacing with a COTS solution becomes inevitable. This higher-cost option provides a clean, scalable platform but requires a migration plan that ensures uninterrupted service.

Rehosting to the Cloud

Rehosting transfers on-premise infrastructure to a hosted cloud platform, keeping the software architecture unchanged. Benefits include scalable flexibility and lower operational costs.

However, without code optimization, response times and application reliability remain unchanged. Patches stay complex to deploy, and the user experience is unaffected.

In a Swiss psychiatric clinic, rehosting cut server costs by 25% in one year. This example shows the approach suits stable systems with minimal functional evolution.

Refactoring and Replatforming

Refactoring breaks the monolith into microservices, redocuments the code, and introduces automated tests. This method enhances maintainability and lowers MTTR during incidents.

Replatforming migrates, for example, a .NET Framework application to .NET Core. Gains include higher performance, cross-platform compatibility, and access to an active community ecosystem.

A Swiss medical eyewear SME migrated its EHR to .NET Core, reducing clinical report generation time by 60%. This case demonstrates optimization potential without a full rewrite.

Rebuild and COTS Replacement

A complete rewrite is considered when technical debt is too heavy. This option guarantees a clean, modular foundation compliant with new business requirements.

Replacing with a medical-practice-oriented COTS product can suit non-critical modules like administrative management or billing. The challenge lies in adapting to local workflows.

A university hospital chose to rebuild its billing module and replace appointment management with a COTS solution. This decision accelerated compliance with tariff standards and reduced proprietary license costs.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Security, Compliance, and Interoperability: Regulatory Imperatives

Modernizing healthcare software must strictly adhere to LPD/GDPR and HIPAA frameworks while complying with interoperability standards. Security principles from OWASP and SOC 2 requirements should be integrated from the design phase.

LPD/GDPR compliance requires documenting every step of personal data processing. Anonymization, consent, and right-to-be-forgotten processes must be auditable and traceable.

HIPAA further tightens rules for health data. Multi-factor access controls, identifier obfuscation, and encryption at rest and in transit are verified during audits.

A medical imaging clinic implemented homomorphic encryption for DICOM exchanges. This example shows it’s possible to maintain confidentiality without hindering advanced imaging processing.

LPD/GDPR and HIPAA Compliance

Every personal data request must be logged with timestamp, user, and purpose. Deletion processes are orchestrated to ensure the effective destruction of obsolete data.

Separating environments (development, test, production) and conducting periodic access reviews control exfiltration risks. Penetration tests validate resistance to external attacks.

Implementing strict retention policies and monthly access statistics feeds compliance reports and supports audits by competent authorities.

HL7, FHIR Standards, and Traceability

HL7 adapters must cover v2 and v3 profiles, while FHIR RESTful APIs provide modern integration with mobile apps and connected devices.

Validating incoming and outgoing messages, resource mapping, and strategic error handling ensures resilient exchanges between EHR, LIS, and radiology systems.

An independent lab deployed a FHIR hub to centralize patient data. This example shows how automatic report interpolation speeds up result delivery.

OWASP and SOC 2 Standards

Incorporating OWASP Top 10 recommendations from the design phase reduces critical vulnerabilities. Automated code reviews and regular penetration tests maintain a high security level.

SOC 2 demands organizational and technical controls: availability, integrity, confidentiality, and privacy must be defined and measured by precise KPIs.

A telehealth provider achieved SOC 2 certification after implementing continuous monitoring, real-time alerts, and documented incident management processes.

Maximize Modernization with Clinical AI

Modernization paves the way for clinical AI services to optimize decision-making, patient flow planning, and task automation. It creates fertile ground for innovation and operational performance.

Decision support modules use machine learning to suggest diagnoses, treatment protocols, and early imaging alerts. They integrate seamlessly into clinician workflows.

Predictive models forecast admission peaks, readmission risks, and bed occupancy times, enhancing planning and reducing overload-related costs.

RPA automation handles reimbursement requests, appointment slot management, and administrative data entry, freeing up time for higher-value tasks.

Decision Support and Imaging

Computer vision algorithms detect anomalies in radiological images and provide automated quantifications. They rely on neural networks trained on specialized datasets.

Integrating these modules into existing PACS ensures seamless access without manual exports. Radiologists validate and enrich results through an integrated interface.

A telemedicine startup tested a brain MRI analysis prototype, cutting first-read time in half. This example illustrates accelerated diagnostic potential.

Patient Flow and Readmission Prediction

By aggregating admission, diagnosis, and discharge data, a predictive engine forecasts 30-day readmission rates. It alerts staff to adjust post-hospital follow-up plans.

Operating room and bed schedules are optimized using simulation models, reducing bottlenecks and last-minute cancellations.

A regional hospital tested this system on 6,000 records, improving forecast accuracy by 15% and increasing planned occupancy by 10%. This example demonstrates direct operational value.

Automation and RPA in Healthcare

Software robots automate repetitive tasks: entering patient data into the HIS, generating consent forms, and sending invoices to insurers.

Integration with the ERP and payment platforms creates a complete loop from invoice issuance to payment receipt, with anomaly tracking and automated reminders.

A clinical research center deployed RPA for grant applications. By eliminating manual errors, the process became 70% faster and improved traceability.

Modernize Your Healthcare Legacy Software for Safer Care

A thorough audit lays the foundation for a modernization strategy tailored to your business and regulatory needs. By choosing the right option—rehosting, refactoring, rebuild, or COTS—you enhance maintainability, performance, and security of your critical systems. Integrating LPD/GDPR, HIPAA, HL7/FHIR, OWASP, and SOC 2 requirements ensures compliant and reliable health data exchanges.

Enriching your ecosystem with clinical AI, predictive modules, and RPA multiplies operational impact: faster diagnostics, optimized planning, and administrative task automation. Key metrics—cycle time, error rate, MTTR, clinician and patient satisfaction—enable you to measure tangible gains.

Our experts help define your project vision and scope, establish a prioritized clinical MVP backlog, develop a disruption-free migration plan, and produce a detailed WBS with estimates. Together, let’s turn your legacy into an asset for faster, safer, and more innovative care.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert