In a context where the supply chain is becoming the backbone of industrial and commercial companies, inventory management is no longer just a matter of warehouse counting. It’s about orchestrating a connected ecosystem driven by reliable data and automated processes.

A smart integration between ERP, CRM, e-commerce, WMS, and MES lays the foundation for real-time visibility, end-to-end traceability, and controlled replenishment. This approach ensures a resilient supply chain that can react to demand fluctuations and optimize storage costs without creating informational silos.

Data Centralization: The Foundation of Real-Time Visibility

Data centralization enables real-time tracking of all inventory flows. It eliminates silos and information gaps between different applications.

Why Real-Time Visibility Is Crucial

For a CIO or COO, having a unified view of stock levels across all channels (manufacturing, distribution, retail) is essential to anticipate stockouts and optimize procurement. Without consolidated data, each department works with divergent figures, leading to redundant orders or delivery delays.

This visibility relies on the continuous synchronization of databases: the ERP records warehouse movements, the WMS specifies locations, and the MES reports material consumption in production. When these systems share a common data repository, decision-makers can take immediate actions, such as adjusting forecasts or triggering purchase orders.

Moving from a batch approach, where inventory is updated at the end of the day, to real-time updates revolutionizes a company’s responsiveness. Teams manage inventory as strategic levers and reduce costs associated with product carrying.

Designing a Centralized Data Architecture

The data architecture should rely on a data warehouse or an event bus that captures every transaction from the ERP, WMS, or MES. Information is standardized and historized to feed dashboards and analytical algorithms.

To ensure reliability and performance, middleware or microservices dedicated to flow orchestration are often used. These components maintain data consistency by managing replicas, version conflicts, and transformation rules applicable to each business domain.

Finally, implementing standardized APIs makes it easier to add new solutions (CRM, e-commerce, marketplaces) without disrupting the existing ecosystem. This modularity allows for on-demand scaling based on needs and helps avoid vendor lock-in.

Real-Life Example: A Manufacturing Company

A mid-sized manufacturing company centralized its inventory data through a real-time synchronization platform. Previously, the ERP served as the single source, while the WMS and MES operated in disconnected modes.

The new architecture consolidated all stock movements into a data lake enriched with a business rules engine. The result: the company reduced inventory discrepancy detection time by 30% and cut stockouts on critical lines by 20%.

This case demonstrates that a well-designed data infrastructure is the cornerstone of an agile and transparent supply chain, capable of supporting growth ambitions without increasing storage costs.

Comprehensive Traceability: Batches, Serial Numbers, and Essential Quality Control

Fine-grained product traceability, from batch to serial number, ensures compliance with industry standards and control over quality risks. It also serves as a value driver for audits and customer service.

Traceability Requirements in Modern Industry

Pharmaceutical, food, and high-tech sectors require precise tracking of components and production stages. Each batch or serial number must be traceable back to its manufacturing, receipt, and shipping context.

Without this granularity, product recalls or non-conformities become costly: production stoppages, withdrawal of entire batches, internal investigations. Traceability then equates to financial and reputational risks.

Upstream, the MES and WMS record the digital footprint of items (barcode scans, RFID). This data, fed into the ERP, triggers quality workflows and generates automatic alerts when critical thresholds are reached.

Enhancing Quality Through Digital Traceability

Comprehensive traceability must link every physical movement to a software or human action. Quality modules (QMS) incorporate mandatory checkpoints: inspections, tests, validations, and documented anomalies.

This information is historized within the ERP and accessible via a collaborative portal. R&D, production, and logistics teams have unified access to view a batch’s complete history, including certificates and document revisions.

This digital transparency reduces response times during external audits and facilitates proactive non-conformity management, while also strengthening downstream customer traceability.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

IT System Integrations for a Unified Supply Chain

Weaving together information systems eliminates friction points and ensures process consistency. Robust integration is at the heart of a connected supply chain.

ERP and CRM: A Partnership for Demand Management

The ERP manages inventory and purchasing, while the CRM consolidates customer data and sales forecasts. Without synchronization, orders confirmed in the CRM don’t update stock levels, exposing the company to unfulfilled promises.

A bidirectional connection allows for instant adjustment of product availability and improves customer satisfaction. Automated workflows trigger supplier order creation as soon as replenishment thresholds are met.

Finally, sales history, enriched with customer feedback and CRM indicators, refines consumption forecasts to reduce inventory volatility.

WMS and MES: Streamlining Logistical Execution

The WMS orchestrates warehouse movements, while the MES controls production work centers. When these two worlds communicate in real time, material flows are optimized based on production rates and planning priorities.

MES work orders incorporate WMS inventory data to ensure production only starts when the required components are available. Conversely, the WMS forecasts finished-goods inventory and organizes storage locations.

This exchange prevents bottlenecks, reduces wait times, and maximizes resource utilization.

Multi-System Orchestration and Unified Throughput

Beyond application pairs, a central orchestrator manages end-to-end events. It oversees order validation, slot assignments, batch scheduling, and shipping, ensuring consistency at every stage.

This middleware standardizes exchange formats (EDI, XML, JSON) and provides ready-to-use connectors. It also secures flows through robust protocols (OAuth2, JWT) and encryption of sensitive data.

By adopting this approach, the company benefits from a supply chain managed as a unified whole, minimizing manual interventions and interface errors.

Replenishment Automation and AI: Making the Supply Chain Intelligent

Supplier order automation reduces costs and stockout risks. AI, combined with historical and external data, refines forecasts and dynamically adjusts stock levels.

Automating Replenishment to Simplify Management

Replenishment rules configured in the ERP automatically trigger purchase orders as soon as stock reaches a critical threshold. No-code or low-code workflows manage these orders based on pricing conditions, supplier lead times, and minimum lot sizes.

This automation reduces repetitive tasks and allows purchasing teams to focus on negotiation and supplier relationships, rather than manual purchase order issuance.

By orchestrating these flows through a rules engine, the company ensures consistency with its procurement policy and minimizes inefficient purchasing impulses.

Dynamic Forecasting Powered by AI

Machine learning algorithms leverage sales history, promotions, seasonal factors, and external signals (weather, market trends) to create robust forecasts. These models continuously improve through feedback on actual discrepancies.

Integrated into the ERP or a dedicated platform, they recommend stock level adjustments before a demand spike occurs. Early alerts help secure sourcing and prevent both stockouts and overstocking.

AI becomes the supply chain co-pilot, combining analytical precision with real-time adaptability.

The Key Role of the Integration Partner

A supply chain transformation project relies on the provider’s ability to tailor the ERP, connect existing systems, and develop the necessary automations. Every company has a unique context and requires a customized approach.

The partner integrates open-source or proprietary solutions based on objectives, ensuring a modular and scalable architecture. They secure data, facilitate updates, and train internal teams.

This contextual expertise ensures project success, avoids vendor lock-in, and maximizes long-term return on investment.

Optimize Your Supply Chain for Greater Resilience

Intelligent inventory management is built on data centralization, fine-grained traceability, robust IT system integrations, and AI-driven automation. These components provide real-time visibility, reduce carrying costs, and anticipate demand fluctuations.

For our clients, this approach has reduced stockouts, streamlined processes, and improved overall supply chain performance. Our experts support every stage, from auditing to implementation, including custom development and training.

To turn your supply chain into a strategic asset, discuss your challenges with an Edana expert:

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In a climate where Swiss SMEs and mid-sized enterprises are aiming to modernize their information systems, the choice of an ERP is not limited to the dichotomy of “open source” versus “proprietary.” It is, above all, about ensuring technological freedom, integration capability, and long-term cost control.

Despite their reputation, proprietary solutions often lock companies into costly, inflexible vendor lock-in. By contrast, open source ERPs provide auditable code, advanced modularity, and a dynamic ecosystem. They form the ideal foundation for a modern, evolving, and resilient IT architecture that can meet future challenges.

Strategic Stakes in Choosing an ERP

Choosing an ERP defines your company’s digital and business roadmap for the coming decade. Operational performance, agility, and cost control depend directly on this decision.

Impact on Agility and Responsiveness

An SME’s ability to respond to market fluctuations hinges on its ERP’s capacity to adapt quickly to new processes. In shifting regulatory or competitive environments, each hour saved on an adjustment translates into a tangible competitive advantage.

For example, a Swiss SME in the food industry had to completely overhaul its traceability process in response to new regulation. Its open source ERP enabled the development of a dedicated module within weeks, whereas a proprietary solution would have led to months of customization negotiations and higher licensing fees.

This experience illustrates that technical flexibility immediately translates into better alignment with business requirements and reduced deployment times for every functional update.

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Management

Beyond the initial acquisition cost, the total cost of ownership (TCO) includes licensing, maintenance, CapEx vs. OpEx models, upgrades, and support fees.

Proprietary ERPs impose increasing annual fees, often indexed to the number of users or managed revenue.

For example, a financial services company in Switzerland found that 70% of its ERP budget traditionally went to licensing and maintenance contracts. After migrating to an open source solution, those funds were reinvested in automating business processes, improving customer satisfaction, and return on investment.

This case demonstrates that reducing TCO is not just about cutting expenses but reallocating them to generate greater value.

Alignment with Business Strategy

An ERP must reflect a company’s specific processes, not the other way around. When the tool imposes itself, internal strategy often bends to preconfigured choices, causing inefficiencies and frustration.

Open source solutions, thanks to their modular nature, allow the creation of bespoke workflows that perfectly match organizational practices. This contextual adaptation increases user adoption and eases change management.

Vendor Lock-In or Technological Freedom?

Proprietary ERPs often bind companies to a predetermined roadmap and rising license costs. They limit integration capabilities and increase the risk of structural dependency.

Hidden Costs of Licensing and Updates

Initial licenses represent only a fraction of the total expenditure. Each major version, additional module, or extra user generates additional costs. These amounts quickly become difficult to predict and budget for.

Moreover, annual maintenance contracts—required to retain access to patches and new features—accumulate over the years and can amount to up to 20% of the software’s initial cost each year.

Mandated Roadmap and Feature Updates

Proprietary vendors follow their own roadmap, driven by commercial and technological strategies. Specific client needs are not always prioritized, even for significant market segments.

Without the option to modify the code directly, companies often must wait for a vendor to incorporate certain enhancements or pay expensive customization services to obtain the needed functionality.

Restrictions on Third-Party Integration

Proprietary ERPs typically offer proprietary APIs that are often incomplete or subject to restrictive access levels. Integrating third-party solutions (CRM, WMS, BI, e-commerce) becomes a heavy process, generating costs and delays.

In contrast, open source ERPs usually publish open, documented interfaces that are updated alongside the core code. This greatly facilitates connecting with other software components and building hybrid architectures.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Open Source: A Catalyst for Innovation and Security

The majority of technological advances—API-first, microservices, DevOps, cloud-native—originate today in the open source ecosystem. This dynamism provides companies with mature, secure, and agile tools to build their IT systems.

Code Auditability and Robustness

Full access to the source code allows companies to audit, fix, and enhance every component without delay. This transparency strengthens security, as any vulnerability can be quickly identified and resolved by the community or internal teams.

Open source ERPs benefit from a global base of users and experts. Security patches are typically available shortly after a critical flaw is discovered, reducing exposure windows.

Collaborative Ecosystem and Continuous Updates

Open source communities share innovations, best practices, and fixes through public channels. This collective effort accelerates the development of new features and ensures constant evolution of the solutions.

Unlike the fixed release cycles of proprietary vendors, open source updates can be published at any time, allowing companies to promptly benefit from optimizations or patches.

API-First and Microservices for a Modern Architecture

Modern open source ERPs are built on API-first principles, facilitating the orchestration of microservices. This approach ensures that each feature can be deployed, scaled, and maintained independently.

Microservices also support a “headless” strategy, where the ERP backend delivers data to various frontends (mobile apps, web portals, IoT), without technology or version constraints.

A distribution sector player restructured its open source ERP into microservices to separate billing, inventory management, and customer tracking processes.

This example highlights the power of decomposed, open API-based architectures to support scalability and flexibility.

Modular Architectures and Seamless Integration

Open source ERPs form the ideal base for composable, headless, and cloud-native architectures. They facilitate custom extensions and connections to the entire IT ecosystem.

Composable ERP and Headless Approach

The ERP becomes a set of autonomous services exposing APIs, rather than a single monolithic application. Each service (accounting, CRM, logistics) can be used independently or in combination, as needed.

This headless approach offers the freedom to choose or develop front-end interfaces tailored to specific business needs, while maintaining a robust, standardized core.

Custom Extensions and Scalability

Most open source ERPs provide extension mechanisms in the form of modules or plugins. Each extension can be developed, tested, and deployed independently, ensuring precise control over functional impact.

By isolating business additions in dedicated modules, it becomes possible to update the ERP core without fear of disruption. This independence eases version upgrades and guarantees solution longevity.

Connectivity with CRM, MES, WMS, and BI

Open source ERPs natively integrate connectors to the main categories of business software. If a standard connector doesn’t exist, the documentation and widespread REST APIs make it easy to build bridges.

This level of interoperability enables real-time synchronization of customer data, work orders, inventory, and performance metrics. For example, a manufacturing company linked its open source ERP to a specialized MES solution, automating reporting without manual data entry.

Towards a Sovereign ERP: Technological Freedom and Sustainable Agility

An open source ERP offers the independence needed to build an IT system aligned with your processes, capable of evolving without vendor constraints and integrating with your entire ecosystem.

Our experts support you in defining your ERP architecture, integrating business modules, implementing microservices, and orchestrating your IT system using a middleware approach. We ensure you get a scalable, secure solution aligned with your long-term objectives.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In project-based environments, every industrial project is unique, with continuously evolving specifications and costs that can fluctuate as studies progress. Business managers, CIOs and executive teams must coordinate engineering, procurement, production and quality departments without a consolidated, real-time view.

This growing complexity renders Excel sheets and siloed solutions obsolete—sources of errors and margin loss. To secure profitability and ensure predictable delivery times, implementing a purpose-built software platform is essential. It synchronizes resources, costs, schedules and traceability, while offering the flexibility needed to handle unforeseen events and frequent specification adjustments.

Challenges of Project-Centric Industrial Management

Project-centric management requires synchronizing heterogeneous workflows and controlling the variability inherent in each project. The stakes include product complexity, specification fluidity and cross-functional team coordination.

Customized Product Complexity

Project-based initiatives often involve designing bespoke machines or assemblies, with precise technical characteristics and tight tolerances. Even a minor modification can have a major impact on costs and schedules.

To manage effectively, teams need a single source of truth that consolidates data sheets, bills of materials and CAD versions in real time. Without it, reference or versioning errors can lead to scrap, rework and delivery delays.

Component traceability—from supplier to assembly—is crucial to meet regulatory requirements and ensure final product compliance. A late-detected defect can incur significant non-quality costs and harm the company’s reputation.

The chosen tools must be modular enough to handle complex data sheets and easily integrate updates from engineering, without creating additional information silos.

Evolving Specifications and Agility

Often, specification documents are incomplete at project kick-off or amended mid-way by clients. This variability demands constant adjustment of schedules and budget estimates.

Example: an SME specializing in custom modular conveyor systems had to recalculate costs four times in three months due to ergonomic adjustments. This case shows that manual management with Excel can produce up to an 18% margin variance and obscure real budget consumption.

A modern platform tracks every change, automatically recalculates quotes and alerts stakeholders when variance thresholds are crossed. It thus safeguards client relationships and streamlines decision-making.

Responsiveness becomes a competitive advantage when backed by a solution that continuously monitors the profitability of tasks affected by specification changes.

Cross-Team Coordination and Accountability

Project-based work involves diverse stakeholders: engineering, procurement, production, subcontractors and quality. Each generates critical data that must be consolidated and synchronized.

Without a centralized platform, exchanges via email, spreadsheets and PDFs lead to duplicates, obsolete versions and bottlenecks. Managers waste precious time reconciling information with a standard ERP system.

Shared visibility reduces friction, clarifies responsibilities and accelerates incident resolution. Every stakeholder knows exactly what to do and in what sequence, with up-to-date documents and versions.

Automated workflows ensure that critical tasks (reordering, approvals, testing) are triggered immediately after each update, eliminating redundant manual steps.

Limits of Generic Tools and Fragmented Solutions

Spreadsheets and isolated specialized solutions no longer suffice for real-time project tracking. The lack of automation and consolidation introduces error risks, delays and cost overruns.

Risks of Excel Spreadsheets

Excel remains a go-to tool in industrial SMEs for managing costs, schedules and inventory. Yet every new use case quickly spawns more tabs and complex formulas that are hard to maintain.

Data entry or copy-paste errors, and version conflicts between users, are common and can lead to decisions based on incorrect information, directly impacting project profitability.

Moreover, auditing modification histories is labor-intensive, complicating traceability in case of client disputes or post-delivery non-conformities.

Finally, scalability is limited: a single Excel file can’t efficiently handle hundreds of line items, dozens of concurrent projects and multiple production sites.

Silos and Lack of Consolidated View

Many companies use multiple applications: an ill-fitting ERP, a CRM system, a manufacturing execution system (MES), a document management system and niche tools for each function. These components operate in silos, without native data exchange.

Every manual transfer between systems adds a control step and a risk of inconsistency. Dashboards become outdated by the time they are generated.

Information consolidation then requires weekly or monthly reconciliation efforts—too late to enable preventive margin or schedule adjustments.

An integrated platform eliminates these data breaks and provides a single source of truth, ensuring all departments rely on the same operational data.

Limited Visibility and Reactive Management

With fragmented tools, management remains reactive: budget or schedule deviations are detected only after they have already impacted production.

Key performance indicators lack reliability, making it impossible to anticipate bottlenecks or resource needs.

The absence of real-time dashboards prevents per-project margin tracking, forcing managers to spend time manually creating reports.

Consequently, strategic decision-making is slowed and the company loses agility—critical in a market where responsiveness is key.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Benefits of a Modern Platform for Managing Your Industrial Projects

An integrated suite (project ERP, PLM, industry modules or a custom solution) synchronizes costs, resources and schedules. It provides full traceability and reliable dashboards to protect margins and minimize risks.

Cost and Resource Synchronization

A modern platform unites procurement, manufacturing, time tracking and material consumption data in a single database. Margin calculations remain live, even when volumes or rates change.

Traceability and Quality Control

Integrating PLM and quality tracking in the same repository ensures each production lot links to its specification document, revision indices and compliance certificates.

In case of non-conformity, the defect triggers an automated correction workflow, assigning responsibilities and generating audit-ready reports.

Example: a Swiss metal-parts workshop reduced customer returns by 45% by connecting its PLM module to a project ERP. This case illustrates the direct impact of digital traceability on perceived quality and customer satisfaction.

Continuous monitoring of non-conformance rates quickly identifies high-risk suppliers or processes, enabling targeted improvement plans.

Dashboards and Key Indicators

Configurable dashboards provide a concise view of project progress, margins and risks. KPIs update automatically with each business transaction.

CIOs and operations directors adjust priorities using dynamic filters: by project, site or product family.

Cash flow forecasts tied to projects are accessible in a few clicks, integrating invoicing schedules, down payments and supplier payments for comprehensive financial reporting.

Key Role of the Systems Integrator for Successful Transformation

The integrator models your project workflows, connects the CAD/PLM, CRM, supply chain and document management ecosystems, then deploys dashboards tailored to your KPIs. Their expertise in open-source technologies and hybrid architectures ensures an evolving, secure solution without vendor lock-in.

Project Workflow Modeling

The first step is mapping your business processes: from order intake to final acceptance, each phase is formalized into automated workflows.

This defines required approvals, maximum durations and precise responsibilities for every project stage. Business rules are encoded directly into the platform’s logic.

A contextual approach avoids unnecessary layers: the integrator selects or develops only the modules aligned with your practices and desired automation level.

Simulating these workflows before go-live ensures rapid adoption and minimizes post-deployment adjustments.

Application Ecosystem Integration

The value of a project-centric solution lies in continuous data exchange with CAD/PLM tools, CRM, supply chain systems and document management via REST APIs.

The integrator implements standard connectors (event buses) or develops custom API integration when off-the-shelf components don’t cover all requirements.

This integration guarantees data consistency: every change in a source system instantly reflects in the management repository.

Service interruptions are planned and controlled, and historical data migrations are executed with robust scripts validated by automated tests.

Reliable Dashboards for Margin and Risk Management

The integrator configures scalable dashboards, accessible on desktop and mobile, so each decision-maker sees the indicators relevant to their scope.

KPIs cover actual margin, profitability forecasts, task progress and perceived quality for a 360° project overview.

Threshold-based alerting mechanisms (margin, delay, non-conformity) trigger notifications and resolution workflows.

This proactive approach turns operational data into informed decisions, reducing financial and technical risks.

Digitalizing Project-Centric Management for Profitability and Scalability

Automating and centralizing project-centric management provides full transparency across your projects, from feasibility to delivery.

Cost synchronization, instant access to specifications and real-time monitoring bolster margin predictability and operational performance.

Our experts guide you through workflow modeling, ecosystem integration and deployment of reliable dashboards. They combine open-source building blocks and custom development to create an evolving solution free from vendor lock-in.

Ready to secure the profitability of your industrial projects and gain agility?

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

The choice between a Cloud ERP and an on-premise ERP goes far beyond mere hosting—it shapes the very structure of your information system (IS) and influences your ability to innovate and evolve.

For an SME or mid-market Swiss company, this decision must rest on a thorough analysis of business customization requirements, security needs, existing integrations, internal expertise, and future scalability. In this article, we outline the key criteria to guide your thinking, drawing on real-life examples from anonymous Swiss organizations to help you design a resilient, scalable IS architecture.

Choosing the Right ERP Model

The ERP model you select determines the future of your IS. It should be based on a precise assessment of your customization, architectural, and flexibility requirements.

Business Customization and Tailoring

Customization is often a decisive factor for companies with specific business processes. A standard Cloud ERP may limit adaptation, whereas an on-premise solution typically offers greater freedom to develop bespoke modules. You should evaluate the vendor’s capacity to support these extensions and the cost of each iteration.

Moreover, a standard ERP can suffer from functional overload, resulting in complex interfaces and processes that don’t match your needs. Conversely, excessive on-premise customization—without careful management of technical debt—can hinder maintenance and future upgrades.

Example: A Swiss SME in technical equipment manufacturing chose a Cloud solution with a REST-customizable module. This approach allowed them to integrate R&D workflows rapidly without burdening their internal infrastructure. It shows that even in the Cloud, a modular architecture can meet specific business demands while minimizing the risk of functional overload.

IS Architecture and Scalability

A Cloud ERP relies on a shared or dedicated infrastructure managed by a third-party provider, ensuring transparent scaling thanks to cloud elasticity.

For high-growth companies or those subject to pronounced seasonality, the ability to scale rapidly is crucial. A well-sized Cloud environment automatically adjusts resources, whereas an on-premise setup must anticipate demand and provision hardware before peaks.

Example: A logistics services provider in central Switzerland had under-provisioned its on-premise cluster to handle a sudden doubling of transaction volumes. After multiple performance incidents, the team migrated part of its ERP to a private cloud, proving that native cloud elasticity can be decisive in maintaining service continuity and user experience.

Vendor Lock-In and Long-Term Flexibility

Dependency on a single vendor or host is often greater in a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) model than on-premise. Cloud licenses may include complex reversibility clauses and high exit costs, complicating future migration to another provider or a hybrid architecture.

However, a poorly secured or heavily proprietary on-premise system can also lead to lock-in. The ideal approach is to adopt open standards and robust APIs to minimize these risks, regardless of the chosen model.

Example: A financial services group initially adopted a SaaS ERP with proprietary connectors. Facing rising costs and evolution constraints, it negotiated a shift to a hybrid platform—outsourcing some cloud components while keeping critical modules on-premise. This case highlights the importance of anticipating contractual clauses and planning an exit strategy from the selection phase.

ERP Security and Compliance

Security and compliance dictate the level of protection required. Data sovereignty and access management requirements vary by industry.

Security Requirements and Risk Management

The public cloud relies on the provider’s security measures, including data encryption at rest and in transit, application firewalls, and intrusion detection systems. These mechanisms benefit from economies of scale and dedicated security teams. However, the client remains responsible for configuration and access supervision.

In an on-premise model, security responsibility falls entirely on your internal teams or the infrastructure service provider. While this offers granular control, it demands specialized skills and regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Example: A private Swiss clinic migrated its ERP to an on-premise environment certified to ISO 27001 in order to manage patient data encryption and maintain full firewall control. This approach demonstrated that, in healthcare, data traceability and sovereignty are paramount—even if in-house management increases operational workload.

Compliance and Data Residency

Server location is a regulatory requirement in certain sectors, notably finance, healthcare, and the public sector. A Cloud ERP hosted in Switzerland or the European Union can meet data residency constraints, while an on-premise solution guarantees on-site geographic location by default.

You must verify the provider’s certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2, etc.) and ensure backup and restore processes comply with downtime objectives and retention requirements.

Example: A Swiss public-sector affiliate selected a Cloud ERP hosted exclusively in Switzerland to meet public procurement standards. The data center’s certifications streamlined compliance validation and reduced internal audits. This example underscores the importance of traceability and certification in regulated supply chains.

Access and Identity Management

Integration with SAML, OAuth, or Active Directory is as crucial in the Cloud as it is on-premise. It ensures single sign-on and fine-grained user access while centralizing rights management.

Cloud vendors often provide managed Identity and Access Management (IAM) services with role controls, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and connection audit features. On-premise, you must implement or maintain these services within your own environment.

Example: A Swiss technology company already had a centralized on-site IAM policy. When migrating its ERP to the Cloud, it extended its internal directory to the cloud via a secure proxy. This seamless integration showed that internal expertise and enterprise tools can secure access regardless of ERP location.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Internal Resources and ERP Governance

Your ERP’s success also depends on internal resources and governance. Leading an ERP project requires meticulous planning and the right skill sets.

IT Skills for On-Premise Management

An on-premise ERP demands a team capable of managing servers, storage, networking, OS updates, and the hypervisor. Lacking these skills, maintenance becomes a major risk to availability.

The Cloud, by contrast, delegates infrastructure management to the provider. IT teams can then focus on functional configuration, integration, and business process optimization.

Example: A small Swiss environmental services company had a limited IT team. After choosing an on-premise ERP, it had to hire a system administrator, which delayed the project by six months and generated unexpected costs. This case illustrates how understaffing can jeopardize an on-premise deployment.

Ongoing Operations and Maintenance

Whichever model you choose, an ERP demands a structured maintenance plan: version management, upgrade testing, backups, and disaster recovery. In the Cloud, some tasks are automated by the vendor, but update validation remains the client’s responsibility.

On-premise, each patch must be prevalidated in a test environment to avoid production regressions. This process can become cumbersome without an agile organization.

Example: A Swiss spare-parts distributor implemented an automated runbook for its Cloud updates, reducing test and deployment time by 40%. This practice demonstrated that CI/CD automation isn’t limited to bespoke applications—it applies equally to a SaaS ERP.

Project Governance and User Adoption

ERP success hinges on involving business stakeholders from the outset. A cross-functional steering committee—including IT, business units, and the vendor—ensures priorities are validated and change resistance is anticipated.

Training, super-user development, and internal support are essential to drive adoption and effective use of features.

Example: A Swiss logistics provider structured its Cloud ERP project around monthly workshops with business leaders. The rollout adhered to the original timeline, achieved an 85% immediate adoption rate, and captured field feedback for subsequent enhancements. This approach demonstrates the power of agile, collaborative governance.

ERP Integration and Innovation

Integration with your ecosystem and anticipation of innovations are critical. ERP, CRM, BI, IoT, and AI must converge toward a coherent vision.

CRM and E-Commerce Integration

A Cloud ERP often provides native connectors to major CRM systems and e-commerce platforms, enabling real-time exchange of customer data, orders, and inventory. On-premise integrations may require middleware development or an enterprise service bus.

The quality of these interfaces directly affects sales process responsiveness and customer satisfaction. Open APIs and clear documentation are key selection criteria.

Example: A Swiss retailer implemented an on-premise ERP tied to its e-commerce platform via an open-source event bus. This architecture orchestrated asynchronous order, inventory, and billing flows, proving that modularity and open standards ensure reliable, scalable exchanges even on-premise.

Advanced BI and Reporting

ERP-aggregated data can feed a data warehouse or a SaaS BI platform. A Cloud model eases connectivity, whereas on-premise may require internal ETL processes and instance management.

Real-time analytics, self-service BI, and interactive dashboards are now strong expectations. Verify synchronization ease, analytics license costs, and data lake scalability.

Example: A Swiss engineering firm selected a Cloud ERP and enabled a direct connector to its Azure Data Lake. Business teams now access consolidated metrics in a few clicks, reducing monthly report preparation time by 30%. This case highlights the benefit of a full-Cloud architecture for accelerating data-driven decision-making.

Scalability and Emerging Technologies

A modern ERP must interface with AI, machine learning, and IoT management tools. The Cloud often offers managed services that integrate natively, whereas on-premise may require containers and Kubernetes orchestrators to deploy predictive models.

The ability to deploy technological extensions without a full ERP overhaul is a major innovation lever. Evaluate the vendor’s roadmap strategy and the open-source community to anticipate these developments.

Example: A Swiss connected-equipment manufacturer enriched its on-premise ERP with an IoT module based on a hybrid cloud platform. Sensor data is routed via an MQTT broker to a cloud microservice, which returns predictive analytics to the local ERP. This example illustrates how a hybrid model leverages both Cloud and on-premise technologies complementarily.

Choose the ERP Model That Unleashes Your Growth

In summary, the choice between Cloud, on-premise, or hybrid ERP extends beyond hosting: it encompasses business customization, security, integrations, internal skills, and the ability to leverage future innovations. Your approach should always be contextual, favoring open source, open standards, and a modular architecture to limit vendor lock-in.

Regardless of your environment, we recommend building a comprehensive total cost of ownership (TCO) analysis—including direct and indirect costs—and planning governance and skill requirements for ongoing operations. This ensures a resilient, scalable solution aligned with your performance and long-term objectives.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

Implementing or replacing an ERP is a major challenge for Swiss SMEs and mid-market companies: it’s not just about deploying software, but rethinking the architecture of processes, data, and governance.

Yet budget overruns most often occur before a single line of code is written: poor scoping, insufficient anticipation of integrations, underestimating the human impact, and lax governance rules. This article highlights the seven common mistakes that drive ERP costs through the roof and explains how to avoid them from the analysis phase onward, by adopting a comprehensive and structured approach.

Unclear Functional Scoping and Insufficient Governance

Undefined boundaries open the door to scope creep and costly mid-project adjustments. Fragmented project governance undermines rapid decision-making and budget control.

Lack of a Precise Requirements Document

Without a formalized document, business needs remain implicit and open to interpretation. Technical and functional teams may diverge on which features to develop, leading to partial or unsuitable deliverables.

This imprecision generates successive clarification requests, back-and-forth between consultants and users, and ultimately lengthens validation timelines. Every unplanned request adds specification, development, and testing costs.

An initial audit process—including cross-functional workshops with the CIO, business units, and executive management—yields a comprehensive ERP requirements document. Although this step requires upfront effort, it significantly limits scope changes and subsequent overruns.

Fragmented Project Governance

A steering committee spread across too many stakeholders leads to decision delays and unclear trade-offs. Informal or irregular steering meetings lack the responsiveness needed to address deviations quickly.

Sometimes, the roles of sponsor, functional lead, and project manager remain vague, each keeping their own priority list. This confusion creates priority clashes and delays in resolving issues and adjustments.

Establishing clear governance with a small steering committee and well-defined roles helps remove blockers faster. An experienced partner can structure the committee and facilitate meetings to safeguard both budget and timeline.

Poorly Defined Objectives and KPIs

When success indicators aren’t set from the start, it’s impossible to measure the project’s real progress. Vague or overly general metrics (e.g., “global user satisfaction”) fail to reflect productivity gains or cost reductions.

This lack of benchmarks often lets budget overruns slip by without early warnings. Some vendors may bill extra hours or extend the testing phase without the sponsor noticing.

By defining precise KPIs during the analysis phase (order processing time, accounting error rate, financial close duration), decision-makers can track the real impact of each milestone and trigger corrective actions before costs accumulate.

Poorly Anticipated Integrations and Mismanaged IT Ecosystem

Interface and API costs are often underestimated and can account for up to 40% of the total budget. Neglecting IT system mapping hides critical interconnections and hidden dependencies.

No System Landscape Documentation

Many companies treat the ERP as an isolated project without inventorying existing solutions (CRM, e-commerce, BI, WMS). This lack of a holistic view prevents anticipation of data flows and synchronization needs.

Without system mapping, teams discover missing interfaces or incompatible data formats mid-project, forcing on-the-fly connector development. Each unplanned connector incurs specification, development, and testing hours.

Conducting an initial IT audit that details all services, databases, and APIs allows you to plan necessary integrations from day one and accurately estimate their technical and functional effort.

Underestimated APIs and Connectors

To meet tight deadlines, some projects assume provided APIs are ready to use. In reality, documentation may be incomplete, performance unsatisfactory, or quotas too restrictive.

Without load testing and authentication protocol checks, technical teams encounter bottlenecks and reliability issues during acceptance testing. Late-requested fixes inflate the budget.

A quick prototyping and integration testing phase upfront validates API robustness and identifies tuning needs before embarking on large-scale development. Consult our REST API guide to structure your tests.

Neglected Cloud and On-Premises Compatibility

Some Swiss SMEs and mid-market companies still maintain on-premises servers for sovereignty or compliance reasons while implementing a SaaS ERP. Latency, security, or VPN issues may surface post-deployment.

This situation triggers unplanned adjustments: network upgrades, firewall configuration, gateway creation, or even additional server installations—each billed outside the original estimate.

Aligning cloud and on-premises architecture during the analysis phase, with network performance and security rule evaluations, avoids these hidden costs and ensures seamless synchronization between environments. Learn more about cloud migration.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Ignoring Organizational Impact and Cultural Change

The “human” side of an ERP project weighs as much as the technical side: resistance to change, neglected training, and unredesigned business processes hinder adoption. Without rigorous support, users resist abandoning their old tools.

Insufficient Team Training

Training only administrators and leaving end users to fend for themselves leads to misuse errors and recurrent support requests. Each help desk call becomes a billable ticket or overloads the internal hotline.

Conversely, a role-based training plan (business, support, IT) ensures progressive skill development. Hands-on sessions and tutorial videos help flatten the learning curve.

Investing in post-go-live support, with a designated business referent, reduces operational errors and stabilizes adoption rates in the first weeks of operation.

Underestimated User Resistance

Employees attached to their routines often view the ERP as added complexity. If they’re not involved in functional decisions, they resist new processes and create unauthorized workarounds.

This leads to duplicate entries, manual reconciliations, and data discrepancies—undermining the ERP’s core goal of centralizing information.

Engaging key users in needs-assessment workshops builds buy-in and uncovers blockers before deployment, minimizing rework after go-live.

Absent Communication and Change Management

A single announcement about a “new tool” isn’t enough to rally the organization. Impacts on roles, responsibilities, and processes must be explained in a structured way.

Without an internal communication plan (targeted emails, intranet posts, newsletters, business champions), employees ignore the new solution’s benefits or mistrust the project’s true purpose.

Developing a change plan with a communication schedule and appropriate channels fosters trust. Feedback loops allow adjustments to the deployment and reduce resistance.

Thinking of the ERP as a Global Platform

Limiting the ERP to basic configuration without considering data, compliance, and the broader ecosystem encourages costly customizations and temporary fixes. An ERP is not an isolated module but the heart of a hybrid architecture.

Overemphasis on Standard Features

Selecting an ERP for its functional richness without assessing integration capability with business tools often decouples processes from the information system.

Companies taking this approach end up relying on manual entries and Excel exports to fill gaps, incurring extra license fees and re-entry labor.

A combined technical and business analysis conducted before solution selection identifies key processes to automate and integration needs, limiting overruns linked to custom development.

Uncontrolled Customizations

Customizing to match existing practices may seem appealing, but each change creates a unique maintenance path. Future updates become unknown variables that risk breaking custom code.

Projects that overindulge in customization must budget for testing and redevelopment at each ERP upgrade, significantly increasing total cost of ownership (TCO).

Adopting a modular extension strategy (microservices, open-source plugins) isolates business logic while keeping the ERP core upgradable without side-effects.

Neglecting Swiss Compliance Requirements

Swiss tax, social, and VAT rules evolve regularly, and some international ERP solutions don’t natively support these specifics. Emergency workarounds create ad hoc scripts and substitute tables.

These nonstandard adaptations break with every legislative change or ERP version update, requiring corrective development or production downtime for patches.

Integrating local regulatory constraints from the analysis phase—through ongoing legal and tax monitoring—enables selection of a compliant core or planning for complementary modules maintained by a stable open-source ecosystem.

Turn Your ERP Project into a Performance Lever

A successful ERP project relies less on software choice and more on solid scoping, integration anticipation, proactive change management, and tight governance. By defining a precise scope, mapping the IT ecosystem, supporting teams, and adopting a modular architecture compliant with Swiss regulations, companies control their budget and maximize ROI.

The Edana experts are ready to conduct the initial audit, design a precise functional specification, and implement governance tailored to your business challenges. With our contextual, open-source, and scalable approach, you can deploy a robust, flexible, and secure ERP—without financial surprises.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In the Swiss watch industry, mastering production complexity and striving for excellence go hand in hand. IT managers, business leads, and executive teams contend with a fragmented supply chain, multi-level bills of materials, and stringent traceability and quality requirements. A specialized watchmaking ERP, coupled with custom integrations (PLM, MES, CAD, B2B e-commerce, precious materials management), becomes the digital backbone to unify workflows, subcontracting, inventory, and finances.

Beyond technology, rigorous business scoping and a flexible technical architecture are essential to align the solution with watchmaking processes. This approach secures profit margins, reduces errors, and accelerates innovation cycles.

Challenges in Watch Manufacturing

Watch manufacturing relies on a fragmented supply chain, multi-level bills of materials, and absolute traceability requirements. Together, these challenges complicate flow synchronization, precious materials tracking, and quality control at every stage.

Fragmented Supply Chain

The watch supply chain involves numerous specialized small suppliers (gears, balance springs, cases, straps), often spread across regions. Each partner holds niche expertise, making lead times and coordination highly sensitive to disruptions.

This fragmentation demands granular order-status tracking and precise procurement management to avoid stockouts or excess inventory, especially when precious metals like gold or platinum are involved. Without a unified view, teams risk relying on manual processes and disparate spreadsheets.

For example, a mid-sized Swiss manufacturer operating with ten external workshops faced variable receipt times and high logistics costs. Implementing an ERP purchasing module standardized replenishment lead times and reduced scheduling variances by 20%, demonstrating the impact of centralized coordination on delivery reliability.

Complex Bills of Materials

A watch movement can comprise several hundred components, assembled according to multi-level BOM structures. Each mechanical, electronic, or aesthetic subassembly requires specific tracking and distinct configuration rules.

Manual BOM management increases the risk of errors during production order preparation and invoicing, particularly for custom or limited-edition models. A tailored ERP must automatically reproduce the exact structure of the final product and its variants.

Without a digital conductor, R&D and production teams may work from outdated lists, leading to costly rework and delays. BOM automation ensures consistency of technical drawings and simplifies real-time design change integration.

Traceability and Quality Requirements

Traceability is both a regulatory and commercial imperative: every component must be traceable back to its origin, complete with quality certificates and workshop inspections. This absolute requirement covers both precious materials and high-precision parts.

An effective ERP logs every stock movement, quality check, and assembly step, linking batch numbers, serial numbers, and material weights. Non-conformity reports are attached to these records to facilitate internal and external audits.

Implementing an automated audit trail reduces compliance deviations and speeds up quality-report closure. It protects brand reputation and strengthens partner and end-customer confidence.

ERP at the Heart of the Watchmaking Digital Ecosystem

A modern ERP centralizes production, subcontracting, inventory, quality, after-sales service, and finance on a single platform. When integrated with PLM, MES, CAD, and e-commerce, it provides a unified view and granular control of business processes.

PLM Integration and Project Management

The PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) system manages design versions, approvals, and prototyping cycles. Connecting a PLM system to the ERP ensures automatic updates of BOMs and production files as soon as a drawing is approved.

This synchronization reduces manual handoffs, eliminates version errors, and offers transparent change-request tracking. Project managers can then control development timelines and assess the impact of adjustments on costs and component availability.

In one case, an independent Swiss watchmaker synchronized its open-source PLM with its ERP via dedicated APIs. This link delivered design data instantly into the production plan and cut new-series ramp-up time by 30%, demonstrating the effectiveness of seamless integration in speeding time-to-market.

MES Integration and Production Tracking

The MES (Manufacturing Execution System) collects real-time production-line data: assembly times, final inspections, machine performance. The ERP ingests these inputs to adjust schedules, allocate resources, and calculate actual costs.

This coherent loop between ERP and MES enables precise capacity planning, prevents bottlenecks, and enhances quality through immediate feedback on shop-floor defects.

By integrating traceability data from the MES, the ERP can trigger control or rework actions whenever an out-of-tolerance parameter is detected, ensuring continuous compliance of produced batches.

CAD Interface, Precious Materials Management, and B2B E-Commerce

The CAD interface feeds the ERP with geometric data and material specifications, facilitating cut-planning and generating weight-accounts for gold, silver, or rare alloys.

Meanwhile, opening an integrated B2B e-commerce channel allows distributors and retailers to place secure orders, with automated stock and contract-pricing management.

This convergence delivers a seamless multi-site sales experience and guarantees transaction traceability, whether supplying components or selling finished timepieces.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Ensuring a Flexible Technical Architecture and Precise Business Scoping

The success of a watchmaking ERP depends on rigorous business scoping and a modular technical architecture. Weight-accounts, serialization, multi-level BOMs, and complex orders require bespoke and scalable configuration.

Scoping Watchmaking Processes

An initial scoping phase aligned with business flows identifies the requirements of each department: R&D, purchasing, production, quality, after-sales service, and finance. This collaborative work prevents over-configuration or missing features.

Workshops then detail specific use cases—engraving, stone-setting, assembly—to translate each step into clear, optimized ERP workflows.

This exercise ensures the ERP mirrors effective existing practices while introducing improvements to reduce manual tasks and strengthen traceability.

Configuring Traceability and Weight Records

Managing precious materials relies on certified weight-accounts integrated into the ERP to track consumption and prevent losses. Every transaction is weighed and logged, from ingot cutting to final setting.

Component serialization assigns a unique number to each critical part, linked to its batch and quality checks. The ERP must handle these data across multiple sites and BOM levels without compromising performance.

A limited-edition jewelry e-commerce company implemented this setup for its gold cases and straps. Accurate weight-accounts reduced material variances by 15%, demonstrating the value of precise consumption tracking to safeguard product costs.

Modularity and Scalability of the Architecture

To avoid vendor lock-in, the ERP is deployed on a public or private cloud architecture, with micro-services dedicated to each functional domain. This modularity simplifies adding or updating a module without impacting the entire platform.

Open APIs guarantee interfacing with new tools (predictive analytics, IoT, BI) and ensure ecosystem longevity, even as standards evolve or providers change.

This technical flexibility, combined with a contextual approach, allows fine-tuning the ERP for future needs, whether scaling up for a new collection or opening to new sales channels.

Securing Margins and Accelerating Innovation

A successful digital transformation secures margins, reduces errors, and provides real-time operational visibility. It frees up time for innovation, shortens R&D cycles, and improves responsiveness to market and retailer demands.

Cost Optimization and Waste Reduction

Centralizing data in the ERP pinpoints cost drivers: materials, machine hours, quality interventions, and rework. By analyzing these metrics, leadership can negotiate better purchasing terms and adjust processes to minimize waste.

Reducing inventory discrepancies and production rejects directly boosts unit margin. Automated alerts notify teams as soon as loss thresholds are breached, triggering rapid corrective actions.

By optimizing precious material stock levels and scheduling production orders based on actual demand, the ERP limits tied-up capital and secures the profitability of watch series.

Real-Time Visibility and Agile Management

Integrated dashboards in the ERP offer a consolidated view of key metrics: overall equipment effectiveness, failure rates, subcontractor performance, and delivery times. Decision-makers thus have reliable data to swiftly re-prioritize.

Automated alerting features detect subcontracting delays or quality deviations at the first sign, enabling immediate escalation to the right stakeholders and prompt corrective measures.

This responsiveness strengthens project control and improves on-time delivery rates—a notable competitive advantage in a demanding market.

Accelerating Innovation Cycles

By relieving teams of manual tasks and automating data capture, the ERP frees R&D and production resources. Engineers can focus on developing new movements or finishes, rather than on data entry.

CI/CD integrations and rapid-prototyping modules linked to the PLM accelerate design iterations. Each concept is virtually tested and then simulated in the ERP before industrial launch, shortening validation cycles.

The digital platform becomes a true virtual “laboratory,” allowing experimentation with new materials, components, or value-added services without tying up workshops or disrupting ongoing production.

Turn Watchmaking Complexity into a Competitive Advantage

Implementing a tailored watchmaking ERP, supported by thorough business scoping and a flexible architecture, addresses supply chain, BOM, and traceability challenges. PLM, MES, CAD, and e-commerce integrations unify flows and secure every stage of the product lifecycle. Finally, automation, real-time visibility, and predictive analytics accelerate innovation cycles and protect margins in a sector where Swiss exacting standards signify excellence.

As retailer and market expectations continually evolve, our experts guide you from process audit to IT system integration and automation. Together, we orchestrate a scalable, open-source, and modular ERP solution designed to endure and adapt to your ambitions.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

Investing in an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system often represents a complex and costly undertaking that can have a lasting impact on a company’s budget and resources. However, by adopting a rigorous approach to evaluating return on investment (ROI) before, during and after implementation, this project can become an engine for competitiveness and growth.

An in-depth analysis incorporates both direct expenses (licenses, infrastructure, configuration) and hidden costs (training, maintenance, Total Cost of Ownership drift), while measuring operational and organizational gains. This comprehensive approach ensures a controlled deployment and delivers tangible benefits, whether through improved productivity, reduced errors or real-time access to key information.

Anticipate Direct and Hidden Costs to Safeguard the Investment

An accurate estimate of both direct and indirect costs provides a solid foundation for assessing the ERP’s overall ROI. Without a complete view of expenses, budget overruns and schedule delays can set in from the earliest project phases.

Map Critical Business Processes

The first step is to catalog the organization’s key activities and measure their weight in terms of time and resources, as explained in our article How to Limit IT Budget Overruns.

An industrial SME operating in precision engineering completed an exhaustive mapping of its workshops and after-sales department before selecting any solution. This approach revealed duplicate entry of work orders that accounted for 18% of operators’ time.

This example demonstrates that a precise understanding of workflows is essential to dimension the ERP solution correctly and negotiate tailored options, thus avoiding unnecessary configuration costs.

Identify Hidden Costs

Beyond licenses and technical implementation, recurring expenses often arise during training, maintenance and version upgrades. User training alone can represent up to 25% of the total budget.

Managing updates and patches also incurs both internal (staff hours) and external (service provider) costs. Without anticipation, these unforeseen charges can significantly inflate the TCO.

Documenting all hidden expenses over a three- to five-year horizon provides a more reliable view of the forecasted budget and serves as a reference for financial steering.

Assess Operational Benefits

To measure ROI, expected gains must be quantified: reduced processing times, fewer billing errors, improved production line fill rates, etc.

The finance department of a public institution quantified a 30% reduction in variances between forecasts and actuals thanks to an integrated budgeting module. This improvement directly translated into better resource allocation and a 12% drop in emergency costs.

This example illustrates that clearly defined indicators from the outset enable precise ROI calculation and help justify the project to senior management.

Measure and Adjust ROI Throughout the Project

Ongoing ERP project management, via performance indicators, prevents budgetary and technical drift. Regular monitoring of variances between forecasts and actuals ensures proactive adaptation and TCO control.

Implement Key Performance Indicators

Appropriate KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) are defined for each phase: milestone adherence, configuration progress rate, expenditures versus budget, and stakeholder satisfaction levels.

Tracking these indicators through a dashboard accessible to decision-makers enables rapid detection of delays and cost overruns. This visual management facilitates decision-making and real-time priority adjustments.

Monitor TCO Drift

The Total Cost of Ownership encompasses all costs over the system’s lifecycle, including updates, maintenance and user support. Close financial monitoring highlights variances against initial estimates.

Quarterly reviews involving the CIO, management control and the service provider allow budget recalibration and corrective actions in case of drift.

This collaborative model ensures the project remains aligned with business objectives and adheres to the financial framework defined during strategic planning.

Adapt in Real Time

During rollout, business needs may evolve: new processes, shifted priorities or regulatory constraints. The ERP project must remain flexible to incorporate these adjustments without upsetting the budget balance.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Analyze Tangible Outcomes and Post-Deployment Adjustments

Post-implementation evaluation allows comparison of actual gains against initial objectives and correction of any persistent gaps. A detailed audit after go-live uncovers additional optimizations and maximizes long-term ROI.

Post-Implementation Audit

Once the system is operational, it is essential to conduct a comprehensive audit of covered processes, data flows and usage of key modules. Discover also our 12-step UX/UI audit.

User Feedback and Adoption

End-user feedback is a major success indicator. Satisfaction surveys and discussion workshops help measure adoption, identify obstacles and plan targeted training actions.

In an ERP project for a logistics services company, only 60% of users had adopted the new transport planning module one month after go-live. Accelerated training sessions and interactive guides quickly raised this rate to 90%.

This tangible increase in adoption delivered an estimated 20% productivity gain in planning workflows.

Continuous Optimization

ROI is not limited to initial deployment: a high-performing ERP requires regular adjustments and enhancements. Biannual reviews enable the integration of new features, automation of manual tasks and improvement of data quality.

Ensure the Sustainability and Scalability of Your ERP

ERP success depends as much on a modular, open-source architecture as on a change management strategy. Agile governance and an evolution roadmap guarantee long-term viability and ongoing profitability.

Choose a Modular Architecture

Selecting an ERP solution based on independent modules minimizes the risk of bottlenecks and simplifies updates. Each component can evolve without impacting the entire system.

Open-source components combined with custom developments offer the flexibility to meet specific business requirements while avoiding vendor lock-in. To learn more, read our article on Hexagonal Architecture and Microservices: A Winning Duo for Scalable Software.

A hybrid infrastructure that integrates standard functionality and dedicated microservices promotes long-term scalability and adaptability.

Change Management Support

The human factor remains critical. A structured adoption plan, with business champions, tailored training and interactive resources, ensures rapid and lasting team uptake.

Regular communication, sponsor involvement and recognition of achieved benefits encourage engagement and reduce resistance to change.

Formal feedback loops allow continuous adjustments to training and support, maximizing the use of the new platform.

Evolution Roadmap and Innovations

To fully leverage the ERP, it is essential to include the project in an innovation roadmap: integration of complementary modules, data exploitation for decision intelligence and automation of repetitive tasks.

Establishing performance indicators for digitalized processes helps prioritize high-impact business enhancements.

This long-term vision transforms the ERP into an evolving foundation capable of supporting organizational growth and seizing new strategic opportunities.

Turn Your ERP into a Sustainable Performance Lever

A holistic ROI approach—from cost anticipation to post-deployment audits, through ongoing management and modular architecture—ensures a profitable and adaptable ERP. Evaluating operational benefits and accounting for hidden costs prevents unwelcome surprises and optimizes every project phase. To discover the advantages of a Cloud ERP, consult our Cloud ERP Guide.

CIOs, IT managers, CEOs, project leads and COOs, our experts are at your disposal to support you in evaluating your ERP ROI and implementing a sustainable, high-performance system. Benefit from tailored insights and pragmatic assistance at every step of your transformation.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

Electronic invoicing is rolling out rapidly across Europe, driven by initiatives such as ViDA, Peppol, and increasingly stringent business-to-government (B2G) mandates. While Switzerland has not yet imposed it, its companies will sooner or later be involved in fully digitalized cross-border exchanges.

Beyond mere compliance, the strategic challenge is to anticipate this shift to ensure interoperability, secure VAT management, optimize Procure-to-Pay and Order-to-Cash cycles, and avoid any disruption in commercial relations with the European Union. This article details the applicable standards, their concrete impacts, and best practices to prepare your organization for this digital transformation.

Regulatory Evolution and European Standards

European regulations now mandate electronic invoicing for public procurement and are preparing to extend e-invoicing in business-to-business (B2B) settings. ViDA, Peppol, and national initiatives converge towards a harmonized framework that facilitates exchanges among member states.

ViDA and the B2G Directive

ViDA, or Variations in Digital Tenders, is the official standard format for electronic invoicing in European Union public procurement. It requires contracting authorities to accept only e-invoices in UBL or CII formats, ensuring uniform data flows.

For suppliers, this means adopting a specific format and implementing secure channels. Non-compliant invoices are systematically rejected, leading to severe payment delays and penalties from public authorities.

Since early 2023, several EU countries have doubled the frequency of their compliance checks, underscoring the growing importance of ViDA. The regular updates to the European framework require companies to maintain a regulatory and technical monitoring plan.

Peppol: Pan-European Network

The Peppol network (Pan-European Public Procurement OnLine) has become the preferred channel for exchanging electronic invoices between public and private entities. It is built on a certified access-point infrastructure, ensuring security and traceability.

Each company can connect to Peppol via a service provider, without geographic constraints. Exchanges then pass through brokers who validate format compliance and secure transmission.

Beyond public procurement, Peppol is gradually extending to B2B transactions. Several European states now encourage its use as the de facto standard to accelerate digitalization and reduce administrative costs.

National B2B Initiatives

In addition to B2G mandates, several countries are deploying national electronic invoicing portals for B2B. Italy and France, for example, have imposed their own platforms to centralize VAT and combat fraud.

These national portals require suppliers to register, adopt a proprietary format, or use an API to submit invoices. Failure to comply leads to automatic financial penalties.

The trend is toward unifying these initiatives under the Peppol model, but the pace varies by country. This diversity highlights the need for Swiss companies to monitor country-specific developments and maintain technological flexibility.

Illustrative Example

An industrial components manufacturer had to respond to a public tender in Spain. The absence of a dedicated Peppol module in their invoicing system led to automatic rejection of the electronic invoices sent.

This setback highlighted the importance of multichannel capability and the need to integrate ViDA and Peppol formats from the design stage of the information system. The company then developed a modular gateway, ensuring compliance regardless of the target national portal.

Concrete Impacts on Compliance and Transactions

The adoption of e-invoicing in Europe changes VAT handling, strengthens traceability, and imposes strict system interoperability. Swiss companies must anticipate these impacts to avoid payment delays, double data entry, and fiscal non-compliance.

Regulatory Compliance and VAT Harmonization

Electronic invoicing requires companies to report VAT in real time or near-real time, depending on the country. Automated checks cross-referencing public invoicing data significantly reduce leeway for errors.

To meet these requirements, accounting systems must generate certified electronic ledgers and produce detailed financial reporting for each transaction. VAT calculation must also adapt to each country’s specific rules (reduced rates, exemptions, thresholds).

In the absence of suitable tools, companies risk late corrections, tax penalties, or even in-depth audits. Manual double-entry processes prove too slow and error-prone.

System Interoperability

The proliferation of formats (UBL, CII, Factur-X, national format) makes exchanges complex without an aggregation and conversion gateway. Each incoming invoice may require prior normalization before integration into the ERP or accounting system.

Companies must therefore implement universal connectors or rely on specialized cloud platforms. These solutions ensure support for multiple schemas while maintaining a unified flow to internal systems.

This interoperability becomes a key performance factor. Poor integration can result in dedicated teams handling exceptional invoices, increasing costs and slowing payment cycles.

Flow Security and Operational Continuity

E-invoicing relies on secure channels and certificates to guarantee document authenticity and integrity. Implementing TLS protocols and electronic signatures is often mandatory.

Incident management (rejection, return, format error) must be anticipated with automated escalation workflows. Without these measures, an invoice stuck in a technical failure can block payment for weeks.

It is therefore crucial to monitor and alert in real time on the exchange status, as well as to maintain redundancy in access points to ensure resilience against outages or network updates.

Illustrative Example

A logistics service provider experienced a payment freeze from several major German accounts after the introduction of a national B2B portal. Invoices, although issued, were not recognized by the portal’s validator.

This situation revealed the lack of end-to-end testing before production roll-out. The company then chose a hybrid e-invoicing platform capable of simulating and validating submissions to each country, ensuring flow continuity.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Anticipating the Transformation of Procure-to-Pay and Order-to-Cash Processes

Automating Procure-to-Pay and Order-to-Cash cycles is essential to reduce costs and accelerate payments. Electronic invoicing becomes the central element of these processes, ensuring traceability and automated reconciliation.

Procure-to-Pay Automation

Procure-to-Pay covers the entire journey, from purchase requisition to purchase order issuance and invoice receipt. E-invoicing allows automatic matching between invoice and order.

Once the invoice is received, the system verifies quantities, amounts, and contractual terms without manual intervention. Discrepancies are flagged via an exception management workflow, reducing errors and speeding up approval.

Eliminating manual data entry lowers the error rate and frees procurement and accounting teams for higher-value tasks, such as supplier terms analysis or contract negotiations.

Digitalizing Order-to-Cash

In Order-to-Cash, invoice generation is synchronized with the order management and logistics systems. E-invoicing ensures each shipment produces a document compliant with the client’s required format.

The client automatically receives the invoice through a secure channel or via Peppol, accelerating acceptance and accounting entry. Invoice creation times often drop from several days to a few hours.

Payment tracking also becomes smoother. Thanks to standardized references, bank reconciliations are performed automatically, reducing manual follow-ups and improving working capital.

Electronic Archiving and Traceability

Certified electronic archiving is mandatory to ensure the legal validity of invoices. Systems must guarantee document integrity, availability, and readability throughout the statutory retention period.

Associated metadata (send date, recipient, validation status) are indexed to facilitate searches and expedite audits. A robust archiving system significantly reduces response times during tax inspections.

The traceability of invoice versions, approvals, and follow-ups provides evidence of compliance at each stage, minimizing the risk of disputes and adjustments.

Illustrative Example

A distributor automated its Order-to-Cash cycle with an e-invoicing platform connected to its ERP. Invoices issued to French and Dutch clients complied with both national portals without manual adaptation.

This automation reduced payment times from 18 to 10 days and eliminated data entry errors. The company thus improved its cash flow and strengthened customer satisfaction.

Choosing the Right Platform or ERP for a Competitive Advantage

Integrating a modern ERP or a custom platform harmonizes electronic invoicing flows and anticipates regulatory changes. The goal is to deploy a scalable, secure, and modular solution to capture long-term performance gains.

Integration Criteria for a Modern ERP

An ERP should offer a native e-invoicing module or a flexible API to connect to Peppol, eBill, and national portals. It must automatically handle incoming and outgoing formats and provide a centralized dashboard.

The ability to deploy updates without service interruption is essential. A good ERP offers independent microservices for invoicing, accounting, and workflow management, ensuring operational continuity.

Open-source compatibility or freedom from vendor lock-in must be verified to safeguard the investment and adapt to future regulatory obligations.

Custom Platform and E-Invoicing Connectivity

A custom platform can be built around open-source components and dedicated APIs to support ViDA, Peppol, and eBill formats. This approach offers high flexibility to tailor business workflows.

Embedded reporting modules should allow tracking of key indicators: rejection rates, average processing times, VAT summaries by country, and usage statistics by subsidiary.

From-scratch development, combined with proven components, ensures a solution aligned with internal processes and adaptable to strategic priorities.

Adaptation to Regulatory Changes

An e-invoicing project must include continuous regulatory monitoring and an automated mechanism to update XML or EDIFACT schemas. The ability to respond within days is a real competitive advantage.

Project teams should be multidisciplinary, combining business experts, architects, and compliance specialists to anticipate new fiscal requirements and technical standards.

With a modular backbone, each new obligation (format, signature, reporting) can be deployed without a complete solution overhaul, reducing costs and time-to-market.

Turn Electronic Invoicing into a Competitive Leverage

The rise of electronic invoicing in Europe is not just a regulatory constraint but an opportunity to optimize your financial processes, secure cross-border exchanges, and boost agility. By mastering the ViDA and Peppol standards, automating your Procure-to-Pay and Order-to-Cash cycles, and choosing a scalable ERP or custom platform, you ensure both growth and compliance.

Our experts, combining open-source, modular architectures, and agile governance, are at your disposal to support you in this strategic endeavor. Whether you need a maturity audit, ERP integration, or dedicated platform development, we tailor each solution to your business challenges.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In a Medtech environment where ISO 13485, FDA 21 CFR and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) standards intersect, medical device traceability stands out as an essential compliance and safety requirement. Incomplete or fragmented traceability can lead to large-scale recalls, substantial regulatory fines, or even incidents that endanger patients’ lives.

Faced with the growing complexity of multi-site flows, batches, series and subcontractors, manual management quickly reaches its limits. Only a centralized digital architecture—combining a modernized ERP, industry-specific modules, API integrations, bespoke automations and an MES/PLM—ensures bidirectional tracking from raw material → product → customer, real-time updates and audit-ready compliance at all times.

Medtech Standards and Risks of Fragmented Traceability

Medical devices operate under stringent standards (ISO 13485, FDA 21 CFR, GMP) that require exhaustive traceability at every stage of production and distribution. Fragmented or manual management of this traceability is no longer sufficient and exposes manufacturers to large-scale recalls, regulatory sanctions and patient safety risks.

Evolution of Regulatory Requirements

ISO 13485 and FDA 21 CFR demand precise tracking of raw materials, components and manufacturing steps. Each batch must be traceable from its origin to the end customer, with documentation kept fully up to date. Health authorities continuously strengthen their inspections, requiring formal proof of every stock movement, process change and quality test.

Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) add requirements for environmental conditions, equipment qualification and operator training. Even a single lapse can lead to production license suspensions. Large-scale device recalls now trigger in-depth audits and hefty financial penalties.

The proliferation of international regulatory frameworks complicates compliance for multi-country operators. Without a digital solution that adapts workflows to each regulation, the risk of human error rises significantly, leaving companies vulnerable during inspections or post-market investigations.

Risks Related to Recalls and Sanctions

A poorly orchestrated product recall can cost tens of millions of Swiss francs, not to mention the damage to brand reputation. Rapid identification and localization of affected batches are crucial to limit the scope and duration of a recall. An error in the customer list or batch scope can expand the recall’s reach and drive up logistical costs.

Regulatory authorities evaluate not only device quality but also the ability to respond effectively to non-compliance. Unclear or incomplete market withdrawal procedures can result in legal actions and fines of several hundred thousand Swiss francs. The pressure on quality and legal teams becomes intense.

The absence of a digitized, easily accessible history complicates root cause analysis and the implementation of sustainable corrective measures. Reaction time becomes a critical variable, and each hour lost can increase risks to patients and worsen the company’s financial and regulatory position.

Impacts on Patient Safety

Inadequate traceability can conceal a component defect or production contamination. Without real-time visibility, identifying non-conforming batches relies on laborious audits—often too late to prevent clinical incidents.

Medical device incidents can incur tragic human costs beyond financial losses. An unanticipated failure may lead to postoperative infections, surgical complications or interrupted treatments, undermining prescriber and regulator trust. To optimize this process, discover our guide on laboratory information management systems (LIMS).

Example: In a Swiss SME manufacturing catheters, spreadsheet-based traceability delayed identification of a batch contaminated by non-compliant raw material. The targeted recall could only be executed after three weeks of investigation, prolonging patients’ exposure to infection risk. This example shows how manual traceability compromises both safety and responsiveness.

Complexity of Flows and Limits of Manual Management

The proliferation of production sites, subcontractors and packaging lines renders manual traceability obsolete and a source of critical errors. Dispersed documents, standalone spreadsheets and redundant data entries fail to provide reliable tracking or a unified operational view.

Multiplicity of Sites and Batches

Medtech companies often operate multiple sites for production, sterilization or assembly. Each site generates flow data that must be reconciled daily with headquarters, creating misalignments and inconsistencies. To leverage Industry 4.0, a centralized approach is indispensable.

Manual processes involve file exchanges, email reminders and repeated data entry. These practices increase the risk of duplicates and transcription errors. A simple spreadsheet version mismatch can result in expired or untested batches reaching the market, with serious compliance and safety consequences.

Without a centralized system, consolidating information for an audit or compliance report can take days or even weeks. Quality and production teams spend significant time searching for and validating data, at the expense of proactive risk analysis and continuous improvement.

Managing Subcontractors

Medical device manufacturers frequently outsource critical steps such as molding, packaging or sterilization. Each subcontractor uses its own tools and data formats, complicating aggregation into a global system. Restricted or delayed data transfer increases uncertainty about component status and batch progress. To ensure smooth communication, custom API development is essential.

Quality managers must conduct multiple checks and follow-ups, often without clear visibility on in-transit stocks or subcontractor-reported non-conformities. Logistics timelines extend and handling disparate data generates unintentional compliance risks.

Subcontracting agreements stipulate traceability requirements, but without true automation and interconnection, compliance remains theoretical. Site audits become tedious cross-checks, leaving blind spots in the device journey.

Traceability of Quality and Associated Data

Beyond batch tracking, Medtech traceability encompasses test records, quality controls, equipment qualifications and maintenance histories. Each data point must link to a batch and a serial number, adding complexity to manual or fragmented management.

Heterogeneous report formats—paper, PDF, spreadsheet—make data retrieval and report generation laborious. Teams spend hours converting, reformatting and manually validating files, increasing the risk of omissions or errors.

Example: At a Swiss manufacturing site, microbiological test results were entered into proprietary software and then exported as CSV for integration into a global spreadsheet. A format mismatch led to the loss of critical data and a two-month audit delay. This case demonstrates the impossibility of ensuring reliable traceability without an automated, unified system.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Centralized Architecture: Foundation of Robust Traceability

A modernized ERP, enhanced with industry-specific modules and interconnected via APIs, forms the backbone of a high-performance traceability system. Combined with bespoke automations and an MES/PLM, it ensures bidirectional tracking from raw materials to patients, in real time.

Modernized ERP and Industry Modules

Integrating an ERP tailored to the medical sector standardizes receipt, production, packaging and shipment workflows. Modules dedicated to batches, serial numbers and document management centralize all traceability data without relying on external spreadsheets.

API Integrations and Bespoke Automations

APIs link the ERP to production equipment, sterilization systems and subcontractor applications. Automated data transmissions ensure accuracy, synchronize batch statuses and maintain continuous traceability—eliminating manual re-entry.

Role of MES/PLM in Bidirectional Tracking

The MES (Manufacturing Execution System) orchestrates production processes by collecting machine, operator and quality data. It feeds versioning, formulation and maintenance history information to the PLM (Product Lifecycle Management), ensuring product lifecycle coherence.

Operational Benefits and Audit-Ready Compliance

A centralized solution optimizes processes, reduces human errors and accelerates the management of non-conformities and recalls. It also provides continuous auditability, meeting the demands of regulators and customers.

Reducing Human Errors and Saving Time

By automating traceability data entry and consolidation, transcription errors vanish. Operators focus on quality control and process improvement instead of repetitive administrative tasks. Lot processing times shrink, boosting overall productivity.

Digital workflows include cross-validations and mandatory checkpoints. Each validated step is timestamped and electronically signed, safeguarding data integrity throughout the product lifecycle. Manual interventions are reserved for exceptions and in-depth analyses.

Traceability becomes available in just a few clicks, without laborious searches through paper archives or multiple spreadsheets. Lot closure cycles shrink from days to hours, freeing resources for higher-value activities.

Responsiveness to Non-Conformities and Recalls

Automatic alerts configured for critical thresholds (temperature, pressure, test results) instantly trigger corrective workflows. Quality managers receive real-time notifications, enabling immediate action and rapid isolation of suspect batches.

In the event of a recall, the system generates the list of affected customers and batches, along with documented procedures to follow. Coordination among production, quality, logistics and communications is orchestrated through a single platform, avoiding information gaps and unnecessary delays.

Digital tracking logs and archives every step of the recall, streamlining case closure and reporting to health authorities. Incident reports are generated automatically, complete with the history of checks and corrective actions taken.

Auditability and Real-Time Reporting

Integrated reporting tools provide real-time dashboards of key performance and compliance indicators. Data is drawn directly from the single source of truth, ensuring reliability and freshness.

Internal and external audits benefit from instant access to histories, validation evidence and digital records. Regulators can review digital workflows without consulting multiple databases or requesting additional files.

Example: A Swiss health authority provided all traceability reports—from raw materials to shipped batches—in under 48 hours during a comprehensive audit. This display of transparency and operational control strengthened regulators’ and clinical partners’ trust.

Industrialize Traceability to Secure Your Medical Devices

The digitalization of Medtech traceability has become a sine qua non for meeting ISO 13485, FDA 21 CFR and GMP requirements. Centralized architectures—combining modernized ERP, APIs, automations, MES and PLM—offer a unified, responsive and auditable view of production flows. They eliminate risky manual processes, enhance patient safety and optimize operational efficiency.

Regardless of company size or site complexity, our experts design hybrid, modular and scalable ecosystems based on open source and custom developments to avoid vendor lock-in. We support you from traceability audit through implementation of robust, secure and fully compliant Medtech solutions.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

The QR invoice is the new mandatory payment standard in Switzerland, permanently replacing the old orange and red payment slips. It relies on the Swiss QR Code, a two-dimensional code that integrates both payment references and banking details.

Its adoption has been compulsory since September 30, 2022, requiring the exclusive use of IBAN or QR-IBAN to ensure uniformity and security of payment flows. This article provides a pragmatic overview of how the QR invoice works, its benefits for payers and creditors, and the rules you need to follow to succeed in the transition and automate your financial processes.

How the QR Invoice Works

The QR invoice defines a structured, universal, and secure format for all payments in Switzerland. It embeds all necessary data in a single Swiss QR Code, eliminating manual entry errors. This standard relies on IBAN/QR-IBAN usage and guarantees interoperability among banks and billing systems.

Nature and Structure of the QR Invoice

The QR invoice consists of a graphical panel displaying a Swiss QR Code and a payment slip containing the textual details. Mandatory data include the IBAN or QR-IBAN account number, the amount, the currency, the structured payment reference, and the beneficiary’s and payer’s addresses. This standardized structure removes free-text fields that could cause errors and disputes.

The Swiss QR Code encodes all these elements, allowing banking applications to automatically scan the information and initiate the payment without any manual intervention. The absence of grey areas reduces fraud risk and improves transaction reliability.

The technical specification for the QR invoice is defined by SIX Interbank Clearing and complies with ISO standards. Optional fields, such as the payer’s IBAN, can be used to prefill data in banking applications, further speeding up processing.

Payment Elements and Security

Switching to IBAN/QR-IBAN is a key step in strengthening transaction security. The IBAN guarantees the validity and integrity of banking details, and many banks perform strict checksum verification during processing. Any error in the IBAN or payment reference is immediately detected.

The QR invoice incorporates a checksum mechanism and an internal verification algorithm. This dual verification prevents fraudulent modifications of amounts or beneficiaries, securing the entire end-to-end process.

Issuers can also include an “Additional Information” field for free-form messages, while preserving payment reliability. However, this field must never replace essential data, as that could compromise readability by banking systems.

Real-World Use Case of QR Invoice Implementation

A medium-sized public entity migrated its fee invoices to the QR invoice format in early 2023. Previously, it processed thousands of red slips, which caused manual entry errors and payment delays. After integrating the Swiss QR Code into its open-source ERP, the organization saw a 90% reduction in incidents related to incorrect banking details.

This case demonstrates that standardization and automation of the QR invoice minimize manual interventions and accelerate settlement times. The entity was able to reallocate its financial resources to higher-value tasks, such as rights analysis and budget planning.

The integration was carried out through a custom module compatible with the existing hybrid ecosystem, avoiding any vendor lock-in. The project leveraged open-source libraries to generate and validate QR codes, ensuring long-term scalability and security.

Concrete Benefits for Payers

The QR invoice makes life easier for payers by offering a single code to scan for an accurate payment, without tedious retyping. It delivers a significant reduction in errors and faster transaction processing. Payers also benefit from mobile options and increased automation in their management software, improving the smoothness of financial workflows.

Faster Payments and Elimination of Errors

With the QR invoice, payers no longer have to manually copy the IBAN, payment reference, or amount. A simple scan of the Swiss QR Code in their banking app prepopulates all fields, eliminating the risk of transposing digits or entering incorrect references.

This accuracy reduces the rate of rejected or misallocated payments, minimizing reminders and penalties. Organizations report decreased administrative costs related to payment processing and fewer calls to the finance department.

Settlement deadlines are met more consistently, enhancing supplier-customer relationships and preserving both parties’ cash flow.

Mobile Experience and Speed of Execution

The rise of mobile banking apps makes the QR invoice particularly suited to modern use cases. The code can be scanned directly with a smartphone camera, and the transaction completes in a few clicks, even on the go.

An IT service provider implemented the QR invoice on its bills, enabling clients to pay their monthly subscriptions from their mobile devices. As a result, off-hours payments tripled, demonstrating the impact of mobile on speed and availability of settlements.

This example highlights the importance of user experience: the more intuitive the payment, the faster it is made, with no risk of forgetfulness or delays.

Automation of Reconciliation and Tracking

Accounting and ERP systems can automatically ingest incoming QR invoices, including bank reconciliation. Payment statuses update without human intervention, providing real-time visibility into financial positions.

Accounting teams become more efficient, spending less time on data entry and verification. They can focus on data analysis and cash-flow forecasting.

Thanks to a modular, API-driven architecture, information from bank statements and invoices is synchronized continuously, ensuring reliable, instant reporting.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Benefits for Creditors and Software Integration

For invoice issuers, the QR invoice offers direct generation from ERP or billing systems, without external gateways or manual entry. Processing costs drop significantly. Creditors also benefit from enriched data and a smoother end-to-end process, from invoice issuance to accounting.

Native Generation in Billing Systems

Integrating the QR invoice into business software allows simultaneous generation of the PDF invoice and the Swiss QR Code. Dedicated modules retrieve banking details from a master source, ensuring data consistency.

A Swiss logistics provider automated its client invoice generation via an open-source ERP plugin. Every document now includes a QR invoice, with no heavy internal development or additional licensing.

This contextual approach, combining proven components and custom development, reflects a hybrid-ecosystem philosophy, ensuring a modular and scalable process.

Cost Reduction and Workflow Optimization

Eliminating traditional payment slips reduces postage and paper-processing costs. Teams spend less time printing, folding, and mailing invoices.

A financial services firm achieved annual savings of over CHF 30,000 on mailing costs. It also halved manual interventions in its accounts payable department by using a direct-import API for QR invoices.

By avoiding exclusive reliance on a single vendor, the company maintains control over its evolution and avoids vendor lock-in risks.

Utilization of Enriched Data

The QR invoice standard carries the payment reference, which often corresponds to an order or project number. Management systems can automatically link the invoice to the correct file, improving traceability and transparency.

Financial managers gain reliable dashboards where each payment ties back to its budget or operational source. This facilitates analysis of billing cycles, identification of delays, and calculation of Days Sales Outstanding (DSO).

With a microservices-based architecture, reports are generated continuously and can be consumed by any BI tool without additional technical complexity.

Essential Rules and Best Practices for Transition

Adoption of the QR invoice has been mandatory in Switzerland since 2022, with exclusive use of IBAN or QR-IBAN and prohibition of replacements for domestic payments. Compliance is non-negotiable. To succeed in migration, plan the integration into existing systems, train your teams, and test processes end to end.

Legal Adoption and Standard Constraints

Since September 30, 2022, all invoices circulated in Switzerland must be issued in QR format. Orange (BVR) and red (BVR ISR) slips are no longer accepted by banks for domestic payments. This rule also applies to public organizations and companies with more than 20 employees.

Using IBAN or QR-IBAN is imperative. QR-IBAN allows routing payments to reference or treasury pool accounts. Invoices issued with non-IBAN accounts will be rejected automatically.

It is crucial to verify the banking details stored in your systems and ensure they are valid and ISO-compliant. Conduct generation and reading tests of the Swiss QR Code before going live.

Limitations for International Payments

The QR invoice applies only to Swiss franc or euro payments destined for accounts held with a Swiss bank or an institution adhering to the standard. For international transactions in other currencies, maintain a separate format, such as SEPA or SWIFT.

An international NGO based in Switzerland had to keep two invoice formats: the QR invoice for Swiss donors and SEPA transfers for European contributions. This duality illustrates the importance of segmenting processes according to legal requirements.

It is advisable to create distinct workflows in your billing system for each geographic area to avoid errors and ensure regulatory compliance wherever you operate.

Migration Strategy and Tailored Integration

Transitioning to the QR invoice should be part of a broader digitalization project for payments. Start by mapping your current processes, identifying pain points, and defining functional and technical requirements.

Next, select modules or open APIs for generating and validating Swiss QR Codes, prioritizing open-source solutions to promote modularity and limit vendor lock-in. Test in a sandbox environment with your banking partners.

Finally, train your accounting and business teams on the new formats, integrate end-to-end tests into your CI/CD pipelines if you use an extensible ERP, and provide post-go-live support to quickly resolve any incidents.

Optimize Your Move to the QR Invoice

The QR invoice is more than a graphical update: it transforms your payment processes into faster, more reliable, and automatable workflows. Payers enjoy a seamless mobile experience and error-free data entry. Creditors generate QR codes directly in their systems, reduce costs, and leverage enriched data for precise reporting.

Compliance with legal requirements—particularly the exclusive use of IBAN/QR-IBAN and distinct handling of international payments—is essential. A well-orchestrated migration strategy based on open-source building blocks and a modular architecture ensures adaptability and long-term viability of your solution.

Our experts are ready to support you in implementing a high-performance, scalable, and secure digital invoicing process. With a contextual, vendor-agnostic approach, you’ll benefit from a hybrid ecosystem aligned with your business needs while adhering to Swiss standards.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert