In an environment where data has become organizations’ most valuable asset, the format chosen for its storage often remains a secondary technical consideration. Yet, faced with ever-increasing volumes and more sophisticated analytical use cases, this choice directly affects operational costs, query performance, and the long-term viability of your data architecture.

Apache Parquet, an open-source columnar format, now stands as the cornerstone of modern decision-making ecosystems. Designed to optimize compression, selective reading, and interoperability between systems, Parquet delivers substantial financial and technical benefits, essential for meeting the performance and budget-control requirements of Swiss enterprises. Beyond the promises of BI tools and data lakes, it is the file structure itself that dictates processing efficiency and the total cost of ownership for cloud infrastructures.

The Economic Imperative of Columnar Storage

A significant reduction in storage and scan costs becomes achievable when you adopt a columnar data organization. This approach ensures you pay only for the data you query—rather than entire records—fundamentally transforming the economic model of cloud platforms.

Storage and Scan Costs

In cloud environments, every read operation consumes resources billed according to the volume of data scanned. Row-oriented formats like CSV force you to read every record in full, even if only a few columns are needed for analysis.

By segmenting data by column, Parquet drastically reduces the number of bits moved and billed. This columnar slicing lets you access only the relevant values while leaving untouched blocks idle.

Ultimately, this targeted scan logic translates into a lower TCO, billing proportional to actual usage, and more predictable budgets for CIOs and finance teams.

Minimizing Unnecessary Reads

One of Parquet’s major advantages is its ability to load only the columns requested by an SQL query or data pipeline. The query engine’s optimizer thus avoids scanning superfluous bytes and triggering costly I/O.

In practice, this selective read delivers double savings: reduced response times for users and lower data transfer volumes across both network and storage layers.

For a CFO or a CIO, this isn’t a marginal gain but a cloud-bill reduction engine that becomes critical as data volumes soar.

Use Case in Manufacturing

An industrial company migrated its log history from a text format to Parquet in just a few weeks. The columnar structure cut billed volume by 75% during batch processing.

This example illustrates how a simple transition to Parquet can yield order-of-magnitude savings without overhauling existing pipelines.

It also shows that the initial migration investment is quickly recouped through recurring processing savings.

Performance and Optimization of Analytical Queries

Parquet is intrinsically designed to accelerate large-scale analytical workloads through columnar compression and optimizations. Data-skipping and targeted encoding mechanisms ensure response times that meet modern decision-making demands.

Column-Level Compression and Encoding

Each column in a Parquet file uses an encoding scheme tailored to its data type—Run-Length Encoding for repetitive values or Dictionary Encoding for short strings. This encoding granularity boosts compression ratios.

The more redundancy in a column, the greater the storage reduction, without any loss in read performance.

The outcome is a more compact file, faster to load into memory, and cheaper to scan.

Data-Skipping for Faster Queries

Parquet stores per-column-block statistics (min, max, null count). Analytical engines use these statistics to skip blocks outside the scope of a WHERE clause.

This data-skipping avoids unnecessary block decompression and concentrates resources only on the partitions relevant to the query.

All those saved I/O operations and CPU cycles often translate into performance gains of over 50% on large datasets.

Native Integration with Cloud Engines

Major data warehouse and data lake services (Snowflake, Google BigQuery, AWS Athena, Azure Synapse) offer native Parquet support. Columnar optimizations are enabled automatically.

ETL and ELT pipelines built on Spark, Flink, or Presto can read and write Parquet without feature loss, ensuring consistency between batch and streaming workloads.

This seamless integration maintains peak performance without developing custom connectors or additional conversion scripts.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Sustainability and Interoperability of Your Data Architecture

Apache Parquet is an open-source standard widely adopted to ensure independence from cloud vendors or analytics platforms. Its robust ecosystem guarantees data portability and facilitates evolution without vendor lock-in.

Adoption by the Open-Source and Cloud Ecosystem

Parquet is supported by the Apache Foundation and maintained by an active community, ensuring regular updates and backward compatibility. The specifications are open-source and fully auditable.

This transparent governance allows you to integrate Parquet into diverse processing chains without functional disruptions or hidden license costs.

Organizations can build hybrid architectures—on-premises and multicloud—while maintaining a single, consistent data format.

Limiting Vendor Lock-In

By adopting a vendor-agnostic format like Parquet, companies avoid vendor lock-in for their analytics. Data can flow freely between platforms and tools without heavy conversion.

This freedom simplifies migration scenarios, compliance audits, and the deployment of secure data brokers between subsidiaries or partners.

The resulting flexibility is a strategic advantage for controlling costs and ensuring infrastructure resilience over the long term.

Example: Data Exchange between OLTP and OLAP

An e-commerce site uses Parquet as a pivot format to synchronize its real-time transactional system with its data warehouse. Daily batches run without conversion scripts—simply by copying Parquet files.

This implementation demonstrates Parquet’s role as the backbone connecting historically siloed data systems.

It also shows that a smooth transition to a hybrid OLTP/OLAP model can occur without a major architecture overhaul.

Moving to Reliable Data Lakes with Delta Lake

Delta Lake builds on Parquet to deliver critical features: ACID transactions, versioning, and time travel. This superset enables the creation of scalable, reliable data lakes with the robustness of a traditional data warehouse.

ACID Transactions and Consistency

Delta Lake adds a transaction log layer on top of Parquet files, ensuring each write operation is atomic and isolated. Reads never return intermediate or corrupted states.

Data pipelines gain resilience even in the face of network failures or concurrent job retries.

This mechanism reassures CIOs about the integrity of critical data and reduces the risk of corruption during large-scale processing.

Progressive Schema Evolution

Delta Lake allows you to modify table schemas (adding, renaming, or dropping columns) without disrupting queries or old dataset versions.

New schema objects are automatically detected and assimilated, while historical versions remain accessible.

This flexibility supports continuous business evolution without accumulating technical debt in the data layer.

Use Case in Healthcare

A healthcare provider implemented a Delta Lake data lake to track patient record changes. Each calculation regime update is versioned in Parquet, with the ability to “travel back in time” to recalculate historical dashboards.

This scenario showcases time travel’s power to meet regulatory and audit requirements without duplicating data.

It also illustrates how combining Parquet and Delta Lake balances operational flexibility with strict data governance.

Turn Your Data Format into a Strategic Advantage

The choice of data storage format is no longer a mere technical detail but a strategic lever that directly impacts cloud costs, analytical performance, and architecture longevity. Apache Parquet, with its columnar layout and universal adoption, optimizes targeted reads and compression while minimizing vendor lock-in. Enhanced with Delta Lake, it enables the construction of reliable data lakes featuring ACID transactions, versioning, and time travel.

Swiss organizations dedicated to controlling budgets and ensuring the durability of their analytics platforms will find in Parquet the ideal foundation for driving long-term digital transformation.

Our experts are available to assess your current architecture, define a migration roadmap to Parquet and Delta Lake, and support you in building a high-performance, scalable data ecosystem.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

On November 18, a simple file change in Cloudflare’s Bot Management module triggered a cascade of errors, rendering a significant portion of the Internet inaccessible.

This global outage underscored the massive reliance on content delivery platforms and web application firewalls, exposing the single points of failure inherent in a centralized web infrastructure. For IT leaders and C-suite executives, this incident is not an isolated event but a wake-up call: should digital architecture be rethought to prevent a third-party error from paralyzing operations?

Exploring the Global Cloudflare Outage

The malfunction originated from an incomplete update of a critical file related to bot management. This configuration error removed thousands of network routes from Cloudflare’s monitoring scope.

On the morning of November 18, deploying a patch to the Bot Management service corrupted the internal routing table of several data centers. Mere minutes after rollout, Cloudflare’s global network began rejecting legitimate traffic, triggering a wave of time-outs and 503 errors across protected sites and applications.

Almost immediately, the anomaly’s spread revealed the complexity of interconnections between points of presence (PoPs) and the private backbone. Mitigation efforts were hampered by the automatic propagation of the flawed configuration to other nodes, demonstrating how quickly a local failure can impact an entire content delivery network (CDN).

Full restoration took nearly two hours—an unusually long period for an infrastructure designed to guarantee over 99.99% availability according to the principles of web application architecture. Engineering teams had to manually correct and redeploy the proper file while ensuring that caches and routing tables were free of any remnants of the faulty code.

Technical Cause of the Failure

At the heart of the incident was an automated script responsible for propagating a Bot Management update across the network. A bug in the validation process allowed a partially empty file through, which reset all filtering rules.

This removal of rules instantly stripped routers of the ability to distinguish between legitimate and malicious traffic, causing a deluge of 503 errors. The internal failover system could not engage properly due to the absence of predefined fallback rules for this scenario.

Without progressive rollout mechanisms (canary releases) or manual approval gates, the update was pushed simultaneously to several hundred nodes. The outage escalated rapidly, exacerbated by the lack of environmental tests covering this exact scenario.

Propagation and Domino Effect

Once the routing table was compromised, each node attempted to replicate the defective configuration to its neighbors, triggering a snowball effect. Multiple regions—from North America to Southeast Asia—then experienced complete unavailability.

Geographic redundancy mechanisms, intended to divert traffic to healthy PoPs, were crippled because the erroneous routing rules applied network-wide. Traffic had nowhere to fall back to, even though healthy data centers should have taken over.

At the outage peak, over a million requests per second were rejected, impacting critical services such as transaction validation, customer portals, and internal APIs. This interruption highlighted the immediate fallout of a failure at the Internet’s edge layer.

Example: An E-Commerce Company Hit by the Outage

An online retailer relying solely on Cloudflare for site delivery lost access to its platform for more than an hour. All orders were blocked, resulting in a 20% drop in daily revenue.

This case illustrates the critical dependence on edge service providers and the necessity of alternative failover paths. The company discovered that no multi-CDN backup was in place, eliminating any option to reroute traffic to a secondary provider.

It shows that even a brief outage—measured in tens of minutes—can inflict major financial and reputational damage on an organization without a robust continuity plan.

Structural Vulnerabilities of the Modern Web

The Cloudflare incident laid bare how web traffic concentrates around a few major players. This centralization creates single points of failure that threaten service availability.

Today, a handful of CDNs and web application firewall vendors handle a massive share of global Internet traffic. Their critical role turns any internal error into a systemic risk for millions of users and businesses.

Moreover, the software supply chain for the web relies heavily on third-party modules and external APIs, often without full visibility into their health. A weak link in a single component can ripple through the entire digital ecosystem.

Finally, many organizations are locked into a single cloud provider, making the implementation of backup solutions complex and costly. A lack of portability for configurations and automation hampers true multi-cloud resilience, as discussed in this strategic multi-cloud guide.

Concentration and Critical Dependencies

The largest CDN providers dominate the market, bundling caching, DDoS mitigation, and load balancing in one service. This integration pushes businesses to consolidate content delivery and application security under a single provider.

In an outage, saturation swiftly extends from the CDN to all backend services. Alternative solutions—developed in-house or from third parties—often require extra skills or licenses, deterring their preventive adoption.

The risk is underscored when critical workflows—such as single-sign-on or internal API calls—traverse the same PoP and go offline simultaneously.

Exposed Software Supply Chain

JavaScript modules, third-party SDKs, and bot-detection services integrate into client and server code, yet often escape internal audit processes. Adding an unverified dependency can open a security hole or trigger a cascading failure.

Front-end and back-end frameworks depend on these components; a CDN outage can cause execution errors or script blocks, disabling key features like payment processing or session management.

This growing complexity calls for strict dependency governance, including version tracking, failure-tolerance testing, and scheduled updates outside critical production windows.

Example: A Hospital Confronted with the Outage

A hospital with an online patient portal and teleconsultation services relied on a single CDN provider. During the outage, access to medical records and appointment systems was down for 90 minutes, compromising patient care continuity.

This incident revealed the lack of a multi-vendor strategy and automatic failover to a secondary CDN or internal network. The facility learned that every critical service must run on a distributed, independent topology.

It demonstrates that even healthcare organizations, which demand high continuity, can suffer service disruptions with severe patient-impact without a robust continuity plan.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Assess and Strengthen Your Cloud Continuity Strategy

Anticipating outages through dependency audits and simulations validates your failover mechanisms. Regular exercises ensure your teams can respond swiftly.

Before reacting effectively, you must identify potential failure points in your architecture. This involves a detailed inventory of your providers, critical services, and automated processes.

Audit of Critical Dependencies

The first step is mapping all third-party services and assessing their functional and financial criticality. Each API or CDN should be ranked based on traffic volume, call frequency, and transaction impact.

A scoring system using metrics like traffic load, call rates, and affected transaction volumes helps prioritize high-risk providers. Services deemed critical require recovery tests and a fail-safe alternative.

This approach must extend to every Infrastructure as Code component, application module, and network layer to achieve a comprehensive view of weak links.

Failure Scenario Simulations

Chaos engineering exercises—drawn from advanced DevOps practices—inject disruptions into pre-production and controlled production environments. For instance, cutting access to a PoP or live-testing a firewall rule (blue/green) validates alerting and escalation processes.

Each simulation is followed by a debrief to refine runbooks, correct playbook gaps, and improve communication between IT, security, and business support teams.

These tests should be scheduled regularly and tied to resilience KPIs: detection time, failover time, and residual user impact.

Adoption of Multi-Cloud and Infrastructure as Code

To avoid vendor lock-in, deploy critical services across two or three distinct public clouds for physical and logical redundancy. Manage configurations via declarative files (Terraform, Pulumi) to ensure consistency and facilitate failover.

Infrastructure as Code allows you to version, validate in CI/CD, and audit your entire stack. In an incident, a dedicated pipeline automatically restores the target environment in another cloud without manual intervention.

This hybrid approach, enhanced by Kubernetes orchestration or multi-region serverless solutions, delivers heightened resilience and operational flexibility.

Example: A Proactive Industrial Company

An industrial firm implemented dual deployment across two public clouds, automating synchronization via Terraform. During a controlled incident test, it switched its entire back-office in under five minutes.

This scenario showcased the strength of its Infrastructure as Code processes and the clarity of its runbooks. Teams were able to correct a few misconfigured scripts on the fly, thanks to instantaneous reversibility between environments.

This experience demonstrates that upfront investment in multi-cloud and automation translates into unmatched responsiveness to major outages.

Best Practices for Building Digital Resilience

Multi-cloud redundancy, decentralized microservices, and automated failover form the foundation of business continuity. Proactive monitoring and unified incident management complete the security chain.

A microservices-oriented architecture confines outages to isolated services, preserving overall functionality. Each component is deployed, monitored, and scaled independently.

CI/CD pipelines coupled with automated failover tests ensure every update is validated for rollback and deployment across multiple regions or clouds.

Finally, continuous monitoring provides 24/7 visibility into network performance, third-party API usage, and system error rates, triggering remediation workflows when thresholds are breached.

Multi-Cloud Redundancy and Edge Distribution

Deliver your content and APIs through multiple CDNs or edge networks to reduce dependence on a single provider. DNS configurations should dynamically point to the most available instance without manual intervention.

Global load-balancing solutions with active health checks reroute traffic in real time to the best-performing PoP. This approach prevents bottlenecks and ensures fast access under any circumstances.

Complementing this with Anycast brings services closer to end users while maintaining resilience against regional outages.

Infrastructure as Code and Automated Failover

Declaring your infrastructure as code lets you replicate it across clouds and regions without configuration drift. CI/CD pipelines validate each change before deployment, reducing the risk of human error.

Automated failover playbooks detect incidents (latency spikes, high error rates) and trigger environment restoration within minutes, while alerting teams.

This automation integrates with self-healing tools that correct basic anomalies without human intervention, ensuring minimal mean time to repair (MTTR).

Microservices and Distributed Ownership

Breaking your application into autonomous services limits the attack and failure surface. Each microservice has its own lifecycle, scaling policy, and monitoring.

Distributed ownership empowers business and technical teams to manage services independently, reducing dependencies and bottlenecks.

If one microservice fails, others continue operating, and a circuit breaker stops outgoing calls to prevent a domino effect.

24/7 Monitoring and Centralized Incident Management

Establishing a centralized observability platform—integrating logs, metrics, and distributed traces—provides a consolidated view of IT health.

Custom dashboards and proactive alerts, linked to digital runbooks, guide teams through quick incident resolution, minimizing downtime.

A documented escalation process ensures immediate communication to decision-makers and stakeholders, eliminating confusion during crises.

Turning Digital Resilience into a Competitive Advantage

The November 18 Cloudflare outage reminded us that business continuity is not optional but a strategic imperative. Auditing dependencies, simulating failures, and investing in multi-cloud, Infrastructure as Code, microservices, and automation significantly reduce downtime risk.

Proactive governance, coupled with 24/7 monitoring and automated failover plans, ensures your services remain accessible—even when a major provider fails.

Our experts are available to evaluate your architecture, define your recovery scenarios, and implement a tailored digital resilience strategy. Secure the longevity of your operations and gain agility in the face of the unexpected.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

Mobility today goes far beyond simply viewing KPIs on a tablet: it has become the primary driver of agile, responsive industrial manufacturing. By combining mobile ERP, the Internet of Things (IoT), field sensors and automated workflows, Swiss companies can connect shop floors, operations and back-office functions.

This mobile-first approach modernizes the production chain without relying on a single vendor, thanks to custom applications, standardized APIs and centralized data governance. Sensors deliver real-time data, operators interact via progressive web apps or specialized devices, and executives access consolidated dashboards—boosting overall performance.

Mobile-First Architectures: Connectivity and Agility on the Shop Floor

Adopting a mobile-first architecture creates a unified entry point into your entire production ecosystem. It ensures smooth data flow between ERP, IoT platforms and field applications.

ERP–IoT Convergence for an Agile Factory

The convergence of ERP and industrial IoT is revolutionizing data collection on the production floor. Smart sensors communicate directly with the management system, eliminating manual entries and associated delays.

By leveraging real-time connectors, every event—machine breakdown, cycle completion or quality alert—triggers an immediate ERP update. Manufacturing orders adjust dynamically to actual throughput and inventory levels, enhancing responsiveness. IT teams benefit from consistent APIs that simplify maintenance and upgrades.

This integration narrows gaps between forecasts and actual production, reduces scrap and optimizes resource utilization. Internal logistics flows gain reliability and traceability while enabling better preventive maintenance planning. The result: shorter cycle times and a high overall equipment effectiveness (OEE).

Custom Field Mobile Applications

Tailored mobile business apps are designed to match the unique industrial processes of each site. They account for field ergonomics—gloves, noise, dust—and operators’ specific workflows. Deployment via progressive web apps or native applications depends on needs for speed and offline access.

By decoupling the user interface from the ERP core, screens and user journeys can evolve quickly without impacting data governance. Modules can be activated or deactivated on the fly, offering flexibility as processes change or teams upscale. An integrated automated workflow engine ensures operational consistency.

This adaptability eliminates redundant tasks and minimizes downtime. Operators enjoy intuitive navigation, guided by checklists and contextual notifications. Continuous feedback loops allow rapid application improvements, boosting on-site satisfaction.

Data Governance and Mobile Cybersecurity

The proliferation of mobile devices and IoT sensors raises critical data security and centralization issues. A mobile-first architecture requires a clear governance plan defining access rights and data flows between back office and field devices. This ensures traceability and compliance with Swiss availability standards.

For example, an SME specializing in precision parts manufacturing deployed a quality control solution on industrial tablets. Each inspection writes to a centralized database via a secure API. This unified governance prevented version discrepancies and maintained data consistency across diverse devices.

This case shows that controlling access and standardizing ERP–IoT exchanges protects the production chain from security breaches. The solution evolves through patches and updates without interrupting operations, delivering high resilience and uptime.

Workflow Automation & Real-Time Predictive Maintenance

Automating workflows frees teams from repetitive manual tasks and accelerates operational responsiveness. IoT-driven predictive maintenance anticipates failures and extends equipment life.

Automated Production Workflows

Automated workflows orchestrate each step according to configurable business rules. Once a manufacturing order is released, every phase—procurement, assembly, inspection—is managed by the system. Notifications automatically reach relevant stations, ensuring end-to-end synchronization.

This orchestration reduces human error, improves quality and speeds up time-to-production. Managers can redefine workflow rules based on volume and customer priorities without heavy development. A browser-based console—accessible on mobile or desktop—streamlines these adjustments.

Traceability is complete: every action is timestamped, linked to the mobile user and logged in the ERP. In case of an anomaly, alerts trigger immediate intervention and initiate corrective or escalation processes according to incident severity.

IoT-Based Predictive Maintenance

IoT sensors continuously monitor vibration, temperature and power consumption of machinery. Data flows to a predictive analytics engine hosted on a private or on-premises cloud, detecting early warning signs of failure. Maintenance is scheduled before breakdowns occur, preventing unplanned downtime.

A Swiss food processing plant equipped its grinders with load and speed sensors. Mobile alerts predicted an imminent imbalance in a critical motor. The company avoided several hours of line stoppage, demonstrating the direct impact of predictive maintenance on business continuity.

This approach optimizes in-house resources and lowers costs associated with machine downtime. It also ensures consistent product quality and strengthens collaboration between production and maintenance teams.

Instant Stock and Work Order Synchronization

Real-time updates of inventory and work orders rely on automatic identification—barcode or RFID. Every movement recorded from a mobile device or industrial scanner immediately adjusts ERP levels. This prevents stockouts, overstocking and optimizes scheduling.

Logistics managers receive dynamic dashboards on their smartphones, allowing them to reallocate materials or trigger receipts without delay. Collaboration between the shop floor and warehouse becomes seamless, and picking errors are drastically reduced thanks to mobile-integrated validation steps.

Instant synchronization creates a virtuous cycle: forecasts are continuously refined, production runs on reliable data and customer satisfaction improves thanks to higher finished-goods availability.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

ERP Integration and IoT Connectors Without Vendor Lock-In

Implementing open APIs and modular IoT connectors prevents technological lock-in and simplifies system evolution. Interoperability ensures freedom of component choice and ecosystem longevity.

Standardized APIs for Heterogeneous ERP Systems

RESTful or GraphQL APIs expose core ERP services—inventory, work orders, maintenance, quality—in a uniform manner. They follow open specifications for fast compatibility with any system, whether SAP, Odoo, Microsoft Dynamics or a custom ERP. Development focuses on business logic rather than reinventing core capabilities.

Each endpoint is auto-documented via Swagger or OpenAPI, facilitating onboarding for internal teams and third-party integrators. This transparency shortens time-to-deployment and ensures predictable scalability. Automated integration tests validate updates without disrupting existing operations.

These standardized APIs demonstrate how legacy ERPs can be enhanced with modern IoT and mobile services without rewriting the core. They provide a stable, agile foundation ready for secure future extensions.

Real-Time IoT Connectors

IoT connectors ensure instant data transmission from field sensors to the central system. They normalize, format and enrich raw messages from LoRaWAN, MQTT or OPC-UA sensors. Acting as buffers, these gateways adjust data flow rates based on criticality.

An event bus (Kafka, RabbitMQ) manages message sequencing and resilience. During traffic spikes, non-critical data is queued to preserve bandwidth for vital information. This fine-tuned orchestration maintains quality of service and data integrity.

The modular connector approach allows protocols to be added on the fly without impacting mobile apps or the ERP, while preserving high performance and reliability.

BYOD and Industrial Device Compatibility

The system supports both personal devices (BYOD smartphones, tablets) and rugged industrial terminals. A mobile device management (MDM) layer separates personal and corporate data, ensuring security compliance without compromising user experience.

A logistics company deployed a mixed fleet of Android smartphones and RFID readers. Mobile apps are distributed through a secure internal store. This example shows that hardware flexibility can coexist with centralized security management, without overburdening IT maintenance.

Multi-device compatibility proves that a connected factory doesn’t require excessive infrastructure upgrades: it relies on a robust software layer orchestrating data flows and access rights in a unified manner.

Mobile Dashboards and Cross-Functional Collaboration

Mobile dashboards deliver consolidated, actionable performance insights at every level. They strengthen collaboration between shop floor, management and support functions, streamlining decision-making.

Mobile Dashboards for Executives

Decision-makers access key indicators (OEE, throughput, production costs) continuously via mobile apps or PWAs. Data is consolidated from ERP, Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) and IoT streams, offering a 360° operational view. Clean interfaces highlight essentials for easy reading on the move.

Critical alerts—delays, quality issues, stock risks—are pushed via notifications or SMS, enabling immediate response. Reports can be exported or shared in one click with stakeholders, ensuring full transparency and smooth collaboration.

This real-time visibility empowers executives to oversee the factory remotely, make informed decisions and rapidly implement corrective actions.

Connected Sales Force

The field sales team enjoys mobile access to the CRM module integrated with the ERP, enriched with real-time production and inventory data. They can check availability, place orders and schedule deliveries directly in the app—no separate back office needed. This integration eliminates delays and manual errors.

This scenario highlights how connecting sales to the information system boosts customer satisfaction, accelerates ordering cycles and optimizes routing while providing full transaction traceability.

Shop Floor / Back-Office Collaboration on the Go

Communication between the shop floor and support functions is enhanced by integrated chat and document-sharing features in mobile apps. Operators can attach photos, videos or digital forms to illustrate issues or validate production steps. Information reaches back office instantly.

Part requests, maintenance tickets or quality approvals are managed via a mobile workflow, avoiding phone calls and paper forms. Tickets are tracked, prioritized and assigned in a few taps, ensuring precise, transparent follow-up.

Cross-functional collaboration drastically cuts back-and-forth, speeds up issue resolution and strengthens cohesion between field teams and support services, boosting overall performance.

Industrial Mobility: A Catalyst for Agility and Performance

Mobile ERP combined with IoT and automated workflows redefines modern manufacturing by providing unified visibility, predictive interventions and instant resource management. Open-source architectures, standardized APIs and custom applications ensure scalability without vendor lock-in. Mobile dashboards streamline decision-making and enhance collaboration across all stakeholders.

Transforming your factory into a connected, mobile-first environment requires deep expertise to design a secure, modular solution tailored to your business challenges. Our specialists can support you with audits, architecture definition, development and deployment of your industrial mobile system.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

As cyber threats grow ever more sophisticated and Swiss IT environments evolve in complexity (cloud, hybridization, remote work), having a cybersecurity architect becomes a strategic asset. This role ensures the overarching coherence of your information system’s protection, from infrastructure to applications and data, while guaranteeing compliance with both regulatory and business requirements.

Beyond technical expertise, the architect acts as a conductor, validating every technological choice and guiding IT and business teams to implement robust and scalable security. Discover why, when and how to embed this role at the heart of your information security governance.

Why Hire a Cybersecurity Architect

A cybersecurity architect ensures a unified vision for protecting your information system that aligns with your business priorities. They anticipate risks, validate each technological component, and maintain overall security governance.

Their role extends beyond mere technical expertise to cover infrastructure, applications, data, and networks for increased resilience.

Cross-Functional Responsibility

The cybersecurity architect serves as the permanent link between infrastructure, development, and executive teams, ensuring that every technical decision meets security and governance objectives. This cross-functional approach anticipates interactions between components and prevents the silos where vulnerabilities tend to proliferate.

They develop master plans and frameworks for integration of IT systems, from firewalls to APIs and data encryption. Their holistic approach reduces redundancies and ensures consistent protection, even during scaling or migration to new environments.

For example, an industrial SME explored standardizing access controls and centralizing log management, enabling the detection and remediation of structural flaws before they became critical, while also optimizing maintenance operations.

Security Orchestrator

The cybersecurity architect coordinates all protection initiatives, from defining security policies to operational implementation. They ensure that every component of the information system is compatible and compliant with internal and external standards.

By orchestrating activities across various vendors and service providers, they guarantee seamless integration of open-source solutions or proprietary solutions, limiting dependence on exclusive technologies to avoid vendor lock-in.

Using a proven methodology, they monitor threat evolution and continuously adapt the security strategy. This agile governance enables rapid deployment of patches or updates while maintaining a high level of operational security.

Structural Certifications

International certifications provide solid benchmarks for assessing an architect’s maturity. CISSP offers a comprehensive view across eight domains (CBK), while SABSA aligns the architecture with business objectives, ensuring a direct link between strategy and security.

TOGAF delivers a robust framework for enterprise governance and architecture, guaranteeing coherence between the information system and strategic objectives. CCSP, meanwhile, validates deep expertise in securing cloud environments (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS), essential given the increasing adoption of cloud services.

This set of certifications helps identify an architect capable of structuring a scalable, auditable security policy aligned with international best practices, while remaining pragmatic and ROI-focused.

When to Recruit a Cybersecurity Architect

Several scenarios make recruiting a cybersecurity architect indispensable to avoid costly structural vulnerabilities. These critical milestones ensure built-in security from the design phase.

Without this profile, decisions made under pressure may lack coherence and leave the organization exposed.

Information System Redesign or Modernization

During an architecture overhaul or the update of an existing information system, security considerations must be integrated from the impact analysis stage. The architect defines the technical framework and standards to follow, anticipating risks related to obsolescence and tooling changes. System architecture redesign

Their involvement ensures that updates meet security requirements without compromising performance or scalability. They provide clear roadmaps for data migration and control implementation.

By organizing regular reviews and design workshops, they ensure that each modernization phase incorporates security best practices, reducing remediation costs and accelerating time-to-market.

Cloud Migration and Hybridization

Adopting the cloud or moving to a hybrid model introduces additional complexity: expanded perimeters, shared responsibility models, and configuration requirements. Lacking dedicated expertise, projects can quickly become vulnerable. Selecting the right cloud provider is crucial.

The cloud security architect validates IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS choices based on CCSP principles, establishes encryption and authentication schemes, and defines network segmentation policies. They anticipate functional and legal implications.

For example, a financial institution migrating part of its information system to multiple public clouds engaged an architect to standardize security rules and exchange protocols. This initiative highlighted the need for a single governance framework to ensure traceability, reduce the attack surface, and comply with sector-specific regulations.

Compliance Requirements and Security Incidents

In the face of stricter regulatory audits (GDPR, Swiss Federal Data Protection Act, industry standards), security governance must be unimpeachable. An architect formalizes processes and compliance evidence, facilitating external audits. They rely on privacy by design.

After a security incident, they conduct a root cause analysis, propose a remediation plan, and redefine a more resilient architecture. Their expertise prevents ineffective stopgap solutions and limits operational impact.

Whether facing a data breach or increased phishing attempts, the architect implements automated detection and response mechanisms, ensuring an information security posture suited to your risk level.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

How to Hire a Cybersecurity Architect

Recruiting a security architect requires a structured approach: assess your maturity, verify certifications, and evaluate their ability to collaborate and deliver actionable architectures.

Each step helps you target profiles that will bring direct value to your information system and governance.

Define Your Maturity Level and Priorities

Before launching the recruitment process, analyze your information system’s complexity, risk exposure, and ongoing projects (cloud, API, digital transformation). This precise assessment determines the appropriate architect profile: generalist or cloud specialist, for example.

Identify your primary business priorities (continuity, performance, compliance) and align them with the expected responsibilities. A clear scope enables interviews to focus on concrete cases rather than generalities.

Finally, position the architect within your organization: their reporting line, role in steering committees, and decision-making autonomy. These elements structure the job offer and attract candidates suited to your culture.

Verify Key Certifications and Skills

CISSP, SABSA, TOGAF, and CCSP certifications are strong indicators of an architect’s maturity and vision. Tailor your selection to your context: cloud or on-premises, global governance or business-focused.

Beyond certifications, ensure the candidate can concretely explain how they have implemented the associated best practices. Detailed feedback on similar projects provides additional assurance.

Request practical exercises: architecting a critical data flow, defining an encryption policy, or designing network segmentation. These scenarios reveal their ability to structure a response tailored to your needs.

Evaluate Collaboration and Actionable Deliverables

The architect must be able to communicate proposals clearly to IT teams, business stakeholders, and executives. Assess their ability to facilitate workshops, challenge assumptions constructively, and drive change.

Require examples of detailed deliverables: diagrams, functional specifications, deployment guides. An actionable architecture is well-documented, aligned with your constraints, and immediately usable by your developers.

For instance, a public sector organization hired an architect to formalize its security plan. Their deliverables reduced project validation times by 40%, demonstrating the direct impact of clear, structured documentation on execution speed.

Align Recruitment and Governance for Sustainable Security

The success of integrating a cybersecurity architect depends on aligning their role with your information security governance and decision-making processes.

Defining scopes, responsibilities, and success criteria ensures effective collaboration and continuous maturity growth.

Define Scopes and Responsibilities

Formalize the functional scope (cloud, network, applications) and the architect’s delegation level. Clear responsibilities lead to swift, controlled action.

Map interactions with internal and external teams: who makes technical decisions, who approves budgets, and who oversees production deployment. This clarity prevents bottlenecks.

In a Swiss digital services company, precisely defining the architect’s responsibilities reduced unplanned change requests by 30%, illustrating the importance of a structured framework to curb deviations.

Clarify Decision-Making Authority

Grant the architect decision-making authority on technology choices, vendor contracts, and deviations from internal standards. This empowerment facilitates critical real-time decisions.

Schedule regular steering committee meetings where they present security status, emerging risks, and recommendations. Visibility builds trust and accelerates action.

A proper balance of authority and oversight prevents responsibility overlaps and ensures the architecture remains aligned with the company’s strategy.

Measure Success Criteria

Define clear KPIs: percentage of critical vulnerabilities remediated, incident detection time, on-time deployment rate, audit compliance. These metrics quantify the architect’s contribution.

Monitor your information security maturity using recognized frameworks (ISO 27001, NIST). Include these measures in your monthly or quarterly IT reporting.

By establishing formal tracking, you spotlight improvements and continuously adjust your governance, ensuring lasting protection of your information system.

Secure Your Information System for the Long Term with a Cybersecurity Architect

Hiring a cybersecurity architect means investing in coherent and scalable protection that aligns with your business goals, compliance requirements, and operational resilience. From cross-functional responsibility to agile governance, this role anticipates risks and drives technical decisions to secure your information system for the long term.

Whether you’re modernizing your infrastructure, migrating to the cloud, or strengthening compliance, our experts are here to help you define priorities, assess skills, and structure your information security governance.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

For decades, Oracle Database has reigned supreme over critical systems, combining robustness with advanced features. Yet the rise of open source alternatives, led by PostgreSQL, MariaDB, and MySQL, is changing the landscape in large organizations and the public sector.

Today, migrating from Oracle to open databases raises a question far broader than mere cost savings: it represents a strategic decision for the sustainability, sovereignty, and resilience of your IT environment. This article explores why this debate is resurfacing, what open source truly offers, how to assess the actual costs, and which pitfalls to avoid for a successful transition.

Why Choose Oracle or Open Source

Exponential data growth and budgetary pressure are reigniting the debate over database engine selection. The pursuit of transparency, sovereignty, and flexibility is prompting CIOs to redefine their strategy.

Data Volume Explosion and Financial Constraints

Over the past decade, some organizations have seen their data volumes increase more than thirtyfold, forcing a complete rethink of database architecture. This explosion requires optimizing storage and licensing costs, especially when each new partition can incur substantial additional fees.

Today’s CIOs must balance investments in hardware, licensing fees, and feature development. The question is no longer simply “Which engine should we choose?” but “How can we ensure scalability without blowing the budget?”

In this context, the temptation to shift to open source is growing, as licensing models are more predictable and transparent, easing medium- and long-term budget planning.

Increasing Complexity of Proprietary Licenses

Oracle contracts are notorious for their opacity and complexity, with usage rights, add-on options, and virtualization-related adjustments. Every major update can reopen negotiations on existing agreements, creating extra work for legal and finance teams.

This complexity hinders agility, as forecasting evolution costs becomes a true challenge. CIOs spend considerable time deciphering license clauses instead of focusing on delivering business value.

Vendor lock-in often stems less from technical features than from contractual commitments, which can tie an organization to a single provider for several years.

PostgreSQL’s Rise as a Credible Alternative

PostgreSQL has earned its status as an enterprise-grade database management system, thanks to advanced features (JSON support, logical replication, partitioning) and an active community. Open source extensions now deliver high availability and scalability on par with proprietary solutions.

A large Swiss public administration migrated its test data to a PostgreSQL cluster to validate compatibility with its analytics tools. The trial revealed that read-write performance was at least equivalent to Oracle, and the ecosystem proved ready for production workloads.

This example demonstrates that during prototyping, open source alternatives can integrate seamlessly without sacrificing reliability, while offering greater transparency into the codebase and technical roadmap.

The Real Promises of Open Source Databases

Open source provides full control over costs and technical roadmap without sacrificing performance. Modern ecosystems allow you to align your architecture with cloud and microservices standards.

Cost Transparency and Budget Predictability

With an open source license, expenses focus on hosting, professional support, and training, rather than per-core or per-volume pricing. This clarity simplifies budget management by limiting threshold effects and unexpected adjustments during operations.

The Apache or PostgreSQL license lets you size your infrastructure according to business load, without fearing contract revisions after a traffic spike or functional expansion. The impact on the TCO becomes clearer and more manageable. (Learn more about TCO.)

This financial transparency frees up resources to invest in performance optimization, security, or analytics, rather than redirecting budgets to license scaling.

Technical Maturity and Operational Quality

Open source engines like PostgreSQL have become synonymous with reliability, featuring regular release cycles and rigorous validation processes. Audit, encryption, and replication capabilities are available natively or via extensions maintained by active communities.

Several Swiss fintechs illustrate this: after a testing phase, one institution migrated its customer data repository to PostgreSQL, observing stability equivalent to Oracle while reducing maintenance window durations.

This case shows that open source can support core financial services, delivering resilience and compliance guarantees that meet industry standards.

Architectural Freedom and Rich Ecosystems

Open source databases naturally integrate into distributed, microservices, and cloud-native architectures. The absence of licensing constraints encourages adoption of complementary tools (Kafka, Elasticsearch, TimescaleDB) to build high-performance data pipelines.

A Geneva-based industrial company piloted a PostgreSQL cluster on Kubernetes to manage its real-time production flows. This approach allowed deployment of ephemeral instances based on load, without contractual lock-in or additional costs for activating new software components.

This example demonstrates that open source can be a lever for architectural agility, providing a modular framework to combine various components and meet evolving business needs.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

The Myth of “Cheaper” Open Source

Open source is not synonymous with free, but rather with shifting costs to expertise and governance. Real value is measured in sustainability, agility, and the ability to evolve your architecture over time.

Costs Shift, They Don’t Disappear

Migration requires initial investments: auditing the existing environment, rewriting stored procedures, adapting data schemas, and performance testing. These costs are often underestimated during the scoping phase.

Effort focuses on upskilling teams, setting up dedicated CI/CD pipelines, and governing schema versions. Professional support may be necessary to secure the transition.

Over the long term, these investments translate into lower licensing bills, but they must be anticipated and budgeted like any large-scale project.

Value Beyond Acquisition Cost

The real gain goes beyond licensing savings. It’s about gaining the flexibility to choose providers, adjust your architecture, and integrate new features quickly, without contract renegotiations.

An open IT environment facilitates innovation, enabling teams to prototype modules or integrate third-party services without connection fees or additional licenses. This autonomy enhances responsiveness to market changes.

ROI measurement should include time to deployment, reduced time-to-market, and the ability to meet new business needs without hidden financial constraints.

Governance and Expertise are Essential

Managing an open source fleet requires a clear policy for versions, patches, and security. Without governance, each team might deploy different engine variants, generating technical debt and operational risks.

Establishing an internal Center of Excellence or partnering with an integrator ensures a single reference standard and best practices. This approach harmonizes deployments and controls upgrade trajectories.

Internal expertise is crucial to reduce vendor dependence and steer IT evolution autonomously and securely.

Risks of Migrating from Oracle to Open Source

Transitioning from Oracle to open source databases is a transformation project, not a simple lift & shift. Without rigorous preparation, it can lead to delays, cost overruns, and a new form of vendor lock-in.

Migration Complexity and Effort

Oracle schemas, complex PL/SQL procedures, and proprietary features (specific data types, materialized views) are not always natively compatible. Data migration to PostgreSQL demands a precise inventory and methodical rewriting effort. Migration best practices.

A Swiss insurance institution had to spend over six months adapting its analytics function catalog. The lack of reliable automated conversion tools required significant manual work and reinforced project teams.

This case highlights that migration is a major endeavor, requiring strict governance, phased implementation, and continuous validation to avoid regressions.

Risk of New Lock-In

A poor integrator choice or a proprietary cloud platform can recreate a lock-in similar to Oracle’s. For example, some managed services charge extra for access to extensions or advanced backups.

Selecting a public cloud or managed service must be based on a comparative study of support levels, SLAs, and exit terms. Without vigilance, an organization may become dependent on another single provider.

The sought-after sovereignty could turn into partial dependency, impacting the ability to optimize architecture and negotiate pricing.

Support and Key Skills

Successful transition requires skills in open source database administration, performance tuning, and automated deployment orchestration. Internal teams must upskill or engage an experienced partner.

Agile governance with short iterations and automated integration tests reduces risks and allows rapid correction of functional or performance deviations.

Support also includes training operational teams for maintenance, administration, and monitoring of the new environment, ensuring long-term autonomy.

Turn Your Database Strategy into a Sovereignty Lever

Choosing between Oracle and open source is not a decision to take lightly. It’s a trade-off between costs, risks, autonomy, and agility, which must align with your overall IT trajectory. Mature open source alternatives, led by PostgreSQL and its ecosystems, now offer technical credibility and flexibility that deserve consideration as strategic options.

Migration to open source is an ongoing transformation project, requiring agile governance and expert involvement at every stage. If you want to assess your options, build a phased migration plan, and align your database strategy with your sovereignty and sustainability goals, our experts are here to help.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

Selecting a cloud model today goes beyond just technical considerations; it becomes a genuine strategic lever. Whether you choose a public, private, or hybrid offering, each option impacts data security, cost control, governance, and the scalability of your IT systems.

For Swiss organizations operating in regulated or multi-site sectors, this decision determines operational performance and compliance. This article offers a pragmatic overview of the three cloud architectures, illustrated with real-life examples from Swiss companies. You will gain the insights you need to align your cloud strategy with your business goals, with complete peace of mind.

Public Cloud: Flexibility, Agility, and Cost Optimization

The public cloud provides exceptional flexibility with ready-to-use managed services. This approach enables you to launch projects quickly while significantly reducing infrastructure expenses.

Elasticity and Instant Scalability

Thanks to the native elasticity of the public cloud, you can adjust compute, storage, and network capacity in just a few clicks. This agility is essential for handling traffic spikes or seasonal marketing campaigns without hardware procurement delays.

Major providers’ multi-tenant partnerships guarantee virtually limitless scaling, without physical intervention, leveraging CloudOps best practices. IT teams can thus focus on application architecture rather than server management.

For a startup in its launch phase or an innovation project, this responsiveness allows rapid validation of business hypotheses and immediate resource deallocation once the need disappears. Consumption aligns precisely with demand.

Pay-As-You-Go Pricing Model

Usage-based billing eliminates any upfront hardware investment by turning infrastructure into a flexible operational expense and facilitating migration to the cloud. You pay only for the capacity you actually use, with reservation options or per-second billing.

Example: A Swiss e-commerce SME migrated its front end to a public provider to handle year-end peaks. This transition showed that real-time capacity adjustment reduced its monthly costs by 40% compared to static on-site hosting.

This model encourages experimenting with new cloud services, such as artificial intelligence or analytics, without committing heavy upfront budgets. Expense control becomes more predictable and manageable.

Vendor Lock-In Risks and Compliance Requirements

Standardized public cloud environments can limit customization or integration of specific proprietary components. Switching providers often requires rethinking certain architectures, increasing dependency risk.

Moreover, the physical location of data centers directly affects compliance with local regulations (Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection – FADP, General Data Protection Regulation – GDPR). It is essential to verify precisely where your data is hosted and which certifications each region holds.

Highly regulated sectors may also require advanced encryption mechanisms and proof of residence. Without complete control of the infrastructure, ensuring auditability and traceability can become complex.

Private Cloud: Control, Compliance, and Customization

The private cloud provides full control over the infrastructure, ensuring strict isolation of sensitive data. This architecture is custom-designed to meet the most stringent security and performance requirements.

Total Control and Data Isolation

In a private environment, each instance is dedicated and isolated, eliminating multi-tenancy risks. You define network rules, encryption mechanisms, and data segmentation policies with precision.

Example: A Swiss university hospital deployed an on-premises private cloud to host its patient records. This solution demonstrated that complete isolation can fully comply with FADP and HIPAA standards while maintaining consistent performance for critical applications.

This granular control reassures executive management and compliance teams, providing full traceability of access and modifications made to the infrastructure.

Investments and Maintenance

Implementing a private cloud requires an initial budget for server and storage acquisition and virtualization tools, as detailed in cloud hosting vs. on-premises. Maintenance, hardware refresh, and internal monitoring costs must also be anticipated.

Specialized skills—whether in DevOps, security, or networking—are often required. This internal expertise, however, ensures rapid incident response and fine-tuned environment customization.

Advanced Customization

Private clouds enable you to configure the environment according to very specific business requirements, whether advanced network QoS policies, hyperconverged architectures, or tailored containerization solutions.

Companies can deploy proprietary tools, optimized database engines, or analytics solutions tailored to their processes without compromise.

This design freedom facilitates legacy system integration and avoids functional compromises often imposed by public cloud standards.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Hybrid Cloud: Balancing Agility and Control

The hybrid cloud combines private and public environments to intelligently distribute workloads based on criticality. This approach offers the flexibility of the public cloud while preserving control over sensitive data on-premises.

Optimal Application Placement

With a hybrid cloud, each application resides in the most suitable infrastructure. High-variability services operate in the public cloud, while critical systems remain private.

Example: A Swiss financial institution uses a private cloud for sensitive transaction processing and a public cloud for near real-time reporting and analytics. This setup ensures back-office performance while optimizing the costs of analytical workloads.

This distribution also allows rapid testing of new services without impacting day-to-day operations or compromising strategic data security.

Resilience Strategies and Business Continuity

Multi-environment redundancy enhances fault tolerance. If an internal data center fails, services can failover to the public cloud within minutes using automated replication mechanisms.

Disaster recovery plans leverage distributed infrastructures, reducing recovery time objectives (RTOs) and ensuring service continuity, as described in our change management guide.

For organizations with high-availability requirements, this hybrid approach provides a structured response to risks associated with unexpected outages or security incidents.

Integration Challenges and Multi-Environment Governance

Managing identities, security policies, and billing across multiple clouds requires advanced governance tools. Orchestrating workflows and unified monitoring is essential to avoid operational fragmentation.

IT teams must develop multi-cloud skills to manage distributed architectures, automate deployments, and ensure configuration consistency.

Implementing consolidated dashboards and centralized alerting rules remains a prerequisite for controlling costs and maintaining a global performance overview.

How to Choose the Right Cloud Model for Your Organization

The right choice depends on your business requirements, regulatory obligations, and internal capabilities. An informed decision balances security, cost, scalability, customization, and available skills.

Security and Compliance

The nature of the data—personal, financial, or sensitive—often dictates the required level of isolation. Regulated industries enforce strict standards for encryption, data residency, and auditability.

Based on your FADP, GDPR, or sector-specific obligations, integrate the necessary technical and organizational measures from the design phase.

Cost Model and Financial Optimization

The CAPEX-to-OPEX ratio varies by model. Public cloud emphasizes OPEX and flexibility, while private cloud demands significant upfront investment but offers stable billing.

For hybrid cloud, analysis involves placing critical workloads on a fixed-cost foundation while varying operational expenses according to scaling needs.

Accurate financial flow modeling and forecasting are essential for selecting the most cost-effective option over your infrastructure’s lifecycle.

Scalability and Performance Needs

Stable, predictable workloads may suit a private cloud, while highly variable services require public cloud elasticity. Identify traffic peaks and anticipate activity surges.

For web and mobile applications with fluctuating traffic, public cloud remains the benchmark. Critical transactional systems demand consistent performance, often best served by private or hybrid environments.

Also evaluate latency and bandwidth requirements to determine the model that ensures optimal response times for your users.

Customization and Control Level

When complex network configurations, hardware optimizations, or specific development are necessary, private cloud proves most suitable. On-premises or dedicated-hosting offers complete design freedom.

Public cloud nevertheless provides advanced configuration options within a standardized framework. The choice depends on the balance between deployment speed and business adaptation needs.

In a hybrid setup, you can dedicate a private segment for bespoke components and offload the rest to the public cloud, leveraging the best of both worlds.

Technological Maturity and Internal Skills

Project success relies on your teams’ ability to design, deploy, and operate the chosen infrastructure. DevOps, security, and cloud governance skills are critical.

If your organization is new to the cloud, structured support will facilitate best practice adoption and gradual skill building. Conversely, an experienced IT department can leverage open-source tools and avoid vendor lock-in.

Assess your maturity in these areas to select a model that is both ambitious and realistic, ensuring a controlled transition.

Adopt the Cloud Strategy That Drives Your Business Growth

Public, private, or hybrid—each model carries its advantages and constraints. Public cloud stands out for rapid deployment and elasticity, private cloud for full control and compliance, and hybrid for combining the strengths of both.

Your decision should rest on a detailed analysis of security requirements, budget, scalability needs, customization level, and internal maturity. This approach ensures an infrastructure aligned with your operational and strategic objectives.

Our experts are available to guide you through this process, craft a tailored cloud roadmap, and deploy a robust, scalable, and compliant architecture that meets your business challenges.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In digital environments where performance and latency make all the difference, AWS DynamoDB remains a preferred choice for Swiss companies. However, when read request volumes rise, even DynamoDB can exhibit latencies that fall short of near-real-time expectations.

It is in this context that DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) comes into play—a managed, distributed, in-memory cache by AWS capable of reducing the latency of simple operations. This article details the key mechanisms of DAX, its benefits and constraints, before comparing it with open-source and cloud-native alternatives. It also offers criteria to balance latency, consistency, technological openness, and total cost of ownership.

When to Use AWS DAX

DAX significantly speeds up simple read operations on DynamoDB by leveraging a multi-Availability Zone distributed in-memory cache. These performance gains are optimal for read-heavy workloads such as e-commerce or real-time personalization.

Understanding the three caching strategies built into DAX enables you to quickly determine if this managed service meets your project’s latency and consistency requirements.

How DAX Works and Its Multi-AZ Architecture

The DAX cluster is deployed across multiple Availability Zones to ensure high availability and fault tolerance. Each node keeps data in RAM, enabling millisecond response times. This architecture eliminates disk storage for reads, offering speed unmatched by direct DynamoDB queries.

Communications between the application and the DAX cluster occur through the standard DynamoDB API, with no major code changes required. The client extension integrates easily into Java, .NET, or Python environments, while maintaining compatibility with GetItem, Query, and Scan requests. This approach simplifies adding a cache without overhauling the existing architecture.

In case of a node failure, DAX automatically reroutes requests to the remaining instances, ensuring continued service. The cluster can be scaled up or down on the fly to adapt to traffic changes, while AWS manages maintenance and security updates, relieving the operations team from cache administration tasks.

Built-in Caching Strategies

The read-through strategy queries the DAX cache first for every read operation. If the data is missing, DAX fetches it from DynamoDB, stores it in memory, and returns it to the application. This drastically reduces the number of direct database calls, lightening the load on DynamoDB.

The write-through strategy ensures consistency between the cache and the database. On each write, DAX simultaneously propagates the update to DynamoDB and updates its local cache. This real-time synchronization prevents divergence, at the cost of a slight increase in write latency.

The write-back strategy, on the other hand, allows a delay before data is persisted in DynamoDB. Writes are held in the cache for a configurable period, then batch-replicated to the database. This mode reduces write pressure on DynamoDB but must be used cautiously to avoid data loss in case of disaster.

Typical Read-Intensive Use Cases

E-commerce sites with large product catalogs benefit from an in-memory cache to speed up product page loading, even during traffic spikes. Similarly, real-time personalization platforms leverage DAX to display recommendations or promotions without introducing visible latency for the user.

Example: A mid-sized e-commerce company integrated DAX for its product recommendation flows. Before DAX, response times for dynamic queries exceeded 25 milliseconds, affecting the customer journey. After enabling the cache, average latency dropped to 4 milliseconds, while cutting DynamoDB read capacity unit costs by 60%. This example shows that a managed service can quickly boost performance without a complete infrastructure overhaul.

In practice, DAX is especially relevant when serving a high volume of GetItem or Query requests on partitioned tables. In these scenarios, the cache acts as a memory-powered turbocharger, freeing the direct query pool to DynamoDB and optimizing overall infrastructure cost.

Constraints and Limitations of DAX to Consider

Despite its efficiency for simple reads, DAX has functional limitations and technical incompatibilities that restrict its universal adoption. Some advanced operations and secondary indexes are not supported, leading to complex workarounds.

Moreover, using DAX can introduce consistency risks and increased operational complexity, while adding recurring costs for an additional managed service.

Unsupported Operations and Incompatibilities

DAX does not support UpdateItem, BatchWriteItem, BatchGetItem, or scans with complex filters. Developers often have to implement additional application logic to work around these restrictions, which increases code maintenance overhead.

Similarly, certain local or global secondary indexes do not work with DAX, forcing table design revisions or multiple direct queries to DynamoDB. This can result in a hybrid pattern where some queries bypass the cache, complicating the read-write management scheme.

Example: A Swiss public organization had counted on DAX for its event logs with TTL on items. Since DAX does not support automatic in-memory TTL deletions, the team had to deploy an external purge process. This implementation highlighted that the native DAX ecosystem does not cover all needs and sometimes requires additional components to ensure data compliance and freshness.

Consistency Risks and Architectural Complexity

Although attractive for reducing write load, the write-back strategy can introduce a temporary delta between the cache and the source of truth. In the event of a cluster reboot or extended failover, some data may be lost if it has not been synchronized. This fragility necessitates monitoring and recovery mechanisms.

Adding a third-party managed service also requires revisiting network topology, managing IAM authentication or security groups, and setting up specific metrics to monitor cache health. The infrastructure becomes heavier and demands advanced DevOps skills to operate continuously without service disruption.

Overall, DAX remains a specialized component that must be integrated carefully into already complex architectures. Teams spend time documenting where the cache is used, orchestrating autoscaling, and controlling consistency during simultaneous data updates.

Additional Costs and Vendor Lock-In

Using DAX incurs additional costs proportional to the number of nodes and instance types chosen. For a 4-node, multi-AZ cluster, monthly fees can add up quickly, not to mention the impact on network bills in a private VPC. To estimate total cost of ownership, see our article on Capex vs Opex in Digital Projects: What It Means for Swiss Companies.

Relying on DAX strengthens a company’s dependency on a specific AWS service that is less flexible than an open-source cache deployed on EC2 or Kubernetes. Migrating later to an alternative solution involves complex changes at both code and infrastructure levels, representing a non-negligible transition cost.

Therefore, financial trade-offs must include Total Cost of Ownership, taking into account managed service fees, associated operational costs, and vendor lock-in risks. In some scenarios, a self-hosted solution or a hybrid approach may be more attractive in the medium to long term.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Scalable, Less Locked-In Alternatives to Consider

To maintain technological flexibility and avoid severe vendor lock-in, other open-source and cloud-native solutions offer comparable or superior performance depending on the context. Redis or KeyDB, ElastiCache, and more scalable databases allow architecture adaptation to business requirements.

Architectural patterns like CQRS with event sourcing or distributed application caches also help separate read and write concerns, optimizing both scalability and maintainability.

Redis, KeyDB, and ElastiCache for a Flexible In-Memory Cache

Redis and its fork KeyDB provide a versatile in-memory solution capable of storing complex data structures and handling high concurrency. Their active communities ensure frequent updates, enhanced security, and compatibility with various languages and frameworks. For an overview of database systems, see our Guide to the Best Database Systems for Swiss Companies.

ElastiCache, AWS’s managed version of Redis, strikes a balance between reduced maintenance and optimization freedom. Snapshots, read scaling, cluster modes, and Redis Streams support are all features that allow fine-tuning based on business needs.

Unlike DAX, Redis natively supports disk persistence, TTL management, transactions, and Lua scripting, offering either strong or eventual consistency depending on configuration. This flexibility lets you tailor the cache to varied use patterns and minimize application workarounds.

Implementing CQRS and Event Sourcing Patterns

The CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) pattern separates read and write paths, allowing each to be optimized independently. Leveraging an event-driven architecture, commands feed a persistent event stream that can be replicated to a read-optimized datastore, such as Redis, ScyllaDB, or a relational database with read replicas.

Combining CQRS with event sourcing, state changes are stored as events. This approach facilitates auditing, replaying, and reconstructing historical states. The read system can then supply ultra-fast materialized views without directly impacting the transactional database.

Companies can handle millions of events per second while maintaining excellent read responsiveness. The clear separation of responsibilities simplifies schema evolution and horizontal scalability, avoiding overloading transactional tables with analytical queries or wide scans.

Cloud-Native Databases for Global Scalability

PostgreSQL with read replicas, offered by RDS or Aurora, provides a robust relational foundation while offloading part of the read workload. Combined with sharding and partitioning, it can handle large data volumes without resorting to a separate cache for every simple operation.

For massively distributed workloads, NoSQL databases like ScyllaDB or Cassandra ensure uniform latency and fast writes thanks to their decentralized architecture. These open-source solutions can be deployed on Kubernetes or in managed cloud mode, minimizing lock-in risks.

Adopting these complementary databases requires adjusting application logic and data workflows but offers a broader innovation path for companies seeking cost control and autonomy over their tech stack.

Criteria for Balancing Latency, Consistency, and Technological Openness

Every project must define its priorities in terms of response time, consistency guarantees, and degree of technological freedom. This trade-off phase determines the architecture’s longevity and total cost of ownership.

Partnering with a strategic advisor capable of proposing a contextual approach and integrating open-source components, managed services, and custom development makes all the difference.

Defining Key Indicators for the Trade-Off

The analysis should focus on the target latency in milliseconds, the volume of concurrent requests to support, and the required consistency level (strong, eventual, or configurable). These parameters drive the choice between an in-memory cache, a distributed database, or a mix of both.

Total Cost of Ownership should include the direct cost of managed services or licenses, operational maintenance costs, and long-term migration expenses. Additionally, indirect costs related to architectural complexity and vendor dependency risk must be considered.

Finally, technological flexibility—the ability to switch solutions without a major overhaul—is an essential factor for organizations looking to control their roadmaps and anticipate future market evolution.

Hybrid Architecture and Modularity

A modular approach combines an in-memory cache for critical reads and a distributed database for persistence. Microservices or serverless functions can query the most appropriate component based on the transactional context and performance objectives.

Clearly defined responsibilities promote reuse of open-source modules, integration of managed services, and custom development of specific modules. This hybrid architecture limits change propagation and simplifies scaling by adding targeted nodes.

With this modularity, teams can test various technology combinations, compare results, and adjust cache or database configurations without impacting the entire system.

Contextual Approach and Strategic Support

Defining an optimal solution relies on a precise assessment of business context, data volume, traffic peaks, and security requirements. This audit phase enables recommending a mix of DAX, Redis, CQRS patterns, or distributed databases according to identified priorities.

Example: A Swiss company in financial services sought ultra-fast response for near-real-time dashboards. After evaluation, the team favored a managed Redis cluster paired with a CQRS pattern over a DAX cluster. This choice ensured strong consistency while guaranteeing scalability and controlled total cost of ownership. This example demonstrates the importance of thorough contextual analysis and strategic partnership in guiding the decision.

Choosing the Right Caching Strategy for DynamoDB

AWS DAX is a high-performance accelerator for read-intensive use cases, but its limited feature coverage and additional cost reserve it for specific scenarios. Open-source alternatives like Redis or KeyDB, more open managed services, and CQRS patterns offer greater flexibility and better control over Total Cost of Ownership. The trade-off between latency, consistency, and technological openness should be based on precise indicators and contextual analysis.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

The rise in cyberattacks in Switzerland is redefining the selection criteria for a cloud ERP. Beyond a simple functional evaluation, the decision now hinges on solution architecture, governance, and resilience. SMEs and mid-sized enterprises must question the provider’s cyber maturity, data location and sovereignty, the shared responsibility model, and the degree of integration with the existing ecosystem.

An expert systems integrator can audit these risks, design a secure architecture (IAM, MFA, encryption, DRP/BCP) and manage a migration without compromising control or continuity. This insight helps both executive and IT teams align digital transformation with long-term structural security.

Assess the Cyber Maturity of the Cloud Provider

The robustness of a cloud ERP is measured by the provider’s ability to prevent and remediate vulnerabilities. Verifying certifications, internal processes, and penetration testing gives a clear view of its cyber maturity.

Certification and Standards Audit

Reviewing certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2, Swiss IT Security Label – LSTI) provides a concrete indicator of the controls in place. These frameworks formalize risk management, access control, and data protection practices.

A manufacturing SME commissioned an audit of its three potential cloud providers. The exercise revealed that only one maintained an annual penetration-testing program, demonstrating an ability to quickly identify and patch vulnerabilities.

This approach highlighted the importance of choosing a partner whose security governance relies on regular external audits.

Vulnerability Management Process

Each provider should document a clear cycle for detecting, prioritizing, and remediating vulnerabilities. Best DevSecOps Practices strengthen the effectiveness of these processes.

This responsiveness shows that rapid patching and transparent vulnerability reporting are essential for ongoing resilience.

Provider’s Internal Governance and Responsibilities

The presence of a dedicated cybersecurity steering committee and a Chief Security Officer ensures strategic oversight of cyber matters. Formal links between IT, risk, and compliance must be established.

This underscores the importance of confirming that security is not just a technical department but a forward-looking pillar embedded in governance.

Ensuring Data Sovereignty and Localization

Choosing the right data centers and encryption mechanisms determines both legal and technical resilience. Swiss and EU legal requirements mandate full control over hosted data.

Choosing Data Centers in Switzerland

Physically locating servers in Swiss data centers ensures compliance with the Federal Act on Data Protection (FADP). It avoids foreign jurisdiction risks and reassures oversight authorities.

This choice shows that a nationally based, geographically redundant infrastructure strengthens service continuity and the confidentiality of sensitive information.

Regulatory Compliance and Data Protection Act

The upcoming Revised Federal Act on Data Protection (rFADP) strengthens transparency, notification, and security obligations. Cloud ERP vendors must demonstrate comprehensive reporting and traceability capabilities.

This highlights the need to favor a provider offering automated reports to respond quickly to authorities and auditors.

Encryption and Key Management

Encrypting data at rest and in transit, coupled with secure key management (HSM or KMS), protects information from unauthorized access. Allowing clients to hold and control their own keys increases sovereignty.

A financial services SME required an encryption scheme where it held the master keys in a local HSM. This configuration met extreme confidentiality requirements and retained full control over the key lifecycle.

This real-world example shows that partial delegation of key management can satisfy the highest standards of sovereignty and security.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Understanding the Shared Responsibility Model and Ensuring Resilience

Migrating to a cloud ERP implies a clear division of responsibilities between provider and client. Implementing a Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP), a Business Continuity Plan (BCP), and a Zero Trust approach strengthens continuity and defense in depth.

Clarifying Cloud vs. User Responsibilities

The Shared Responsibility Model defines who manages what—from physical infrastructure, hypervisors, and networking, to data and access. This clarification prevents grey areas in the event of an incident.

During an audit, a mid-sized healthcare enterprise misinterpreted its administrative scope and left inactive accounts unprotected. Redefining the responsibility framework explicitly assigned account management, updates, and backups.

This shows that a clear understanding of roles and processes prevents security gaps during a cloud migration.

Implementing DRP/BCP

A Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP) and a Business Continuity Plan (BCP) must be tested regularly and updated after each major change. They ensure rapid recovery after an incident while minimizing data loss.

This underlines the importance of practical exercises to validate the relevance of resilience procedures.

Adopting a Zero Trust Approach

The Zero Trust principle mandates that no component—internal or external to the network—is trusted by default. Every access request must be verified, authenticated, and authorized according to a granular policy.

This demonstrates that segmentation and continuous access control are major levers for strengthening cloud security.

Verifying Integration and Operational Security

The security perimeter encompasses all interfaces, from IAM to proactive alerting. Smooth, secure integration with the existing information system (IS) ensures performance and continuity.

Integration with IAM and MFA

Consolidating identities through a centralized IAM solution prevents account silos and duplicates. Adding MFA significantly raises the access barrier.

This case shows that unified identity management and strict MFA enforcement are indispensable for controlling critical access.

Secure Interfaces and Data Flows

APIs and web services must adhere to secure standards (OAuth2, TLS 1.3) and be protected by API gateways. Implementing middleware and IDS/IPS strengthens malicious traffic detection and filtering.

This approach demonstrates the necessity of segmenting and protecting each flow to prevent compromise risks.

Proactive Monitoring and Alerting

A centralized monitoring system (SIEM) with real-time alerts enables detection of abnormal behavior before it becomes critical. Operations should be supervised 24/7.

Implementing KPIs to Govern Your IS illustrates the importance of continuous monitoring and immediate response capability to contain incidents.

Secure Your ERP Cloud Migration by Ensuring Continuity and Performance

This overview has highlighted the need to assess provider cyber maturity, data sovereignty, responsibility allocation, operational resilience, and secure integration. Each of these dimensions ensures that your ERP migration becomes a structuring project aligned with risk and continuity objectives.

Faced with these challenges, support from cybersecurity and cloud architecture experts—capable of auditing, designing, and orchestrating each step—is a guarantee of control and sustainability. Our team assists organizations in defining, implementing, and validating best practices for data protection and governance.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

The migration of your ERP to the Cloud transforms this management tool into a critical pillar of your overall security. With centralized financial, HR, production, and supply chain data, the attack surface expands significantly.

To protect the integrity and confidentiality of your information system, it is imperative to rethink access governance, Zero Trust segmentation, encryption, monitoring, and business continuity. In this article, discover the essential best practices for securing a Cloud ERP—whether off the shelf or custom-built—and understand why collaborating with an expert systems integrator makes all the difference.

Access Governance and Zero Trust for Cloud ERP

Implementing fine-grained access governance ensures that only legitimate users interact with your ERP. Zero Trust segmentation limits the spread of any potential intrusion by compartmentalizing each service.

Developing a Granular Identity and Access Management Policy

Defining an Identity and Access Management (IAM) policy starts with an accurate inventory of every role and user profile associated with the ERP. This involves mapping access rights to all critical functions, from payroll modules to financial reporting.

An approach based on the principle of least privilege reduces the risk of excessive permissions and makes action traceability easier. Each role should have only the authorizations necessary for its tasks, with no ability to perform unauthorized sensitive operations.

Moreover, integrating an open-source solution that meets your standards avoids vendor lock-in while offering flexibility for future evolution. This adaptability is essential to quickly adjust access during organizational changes or digital transformation projects.

MFA and Adaptive Authentication

Enabling Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds a robust barrier against phishing and identity-theft attempts. By combining multiple authentication factors, you ensure that the user truly owns the account.

Adaptive authentication adjusts the verification level based on context—location, time, device type, or typical behavior. Access from an unknown device or outside normal hours triggers a stronger authentication step.

This reactive, context-based approach fits perfectly within a Zero Trust strategy: each access request is dynamically evaluated, reducing the risks associated with stolen passwords or sessions compromised by an attacker.

Privilege Management and Zero Trust Segmentation

At the heart of Zero Trust strategy, network segmentation isolates access to different ERP modules. This containment prevents an intrusion in one service from spreading to the entire Cloud environment.

Each segment must be protected by strict firewall rules and undergo regular integrity checks. Deploying micro-segments restricts communications between components, thereby shrinking the attack surface.

One manufacturing company recently implemented Zero Trust segmentation for its Cloud ERP. After the audit, it discovered obsolete administrator accounts and reduced inter-service exposure by 70%, demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach in limiting lateral threat movement.

Encryption and Hardening of Cloud Environments

Systematic encryption protects your data at every stage, whether at rest or in transit. Hardening virtual machines and containers strengthens resistance against attacks targeting operating systems and libraries.

Encrypting Data at Rest and in Transit

Using AES-256 to encrypt data at rest on virtual disks ensures a robust level of protection against physical or software breaches. Keys should be managed via an external Key Management System (KMS) to avoid internal exposure.

For exchanges between the ERP and other applications (CRM, BI, supply chain), TLS 1.3 ensures confidentiality and integrity of the data streams. End-to-end encryption should be activated on APIs and real-time synchronization channels.

Encryption keys must be regularly rotated and stored in a dedicated Hardware Security Module (HSM). This practice limits the risk of key theft and complies with the Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection (FADP) and the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

Hardening Operating Systems and Containers

Hardening starts by reducing the attack surface: removing unnecessary services, applying a minimal kernel configuration, and promptly installing security updates. Each container image should be built from packages verified by a vulnerability scanner.

Enforce strong security policies for Docker or Kubernetes (Pod Security Policies, AppArmor, SELinux) to prevent unauthorized code execution. Controlling read/write permissions and forbidding privileged containers are essential to avoid privilege escalation.

A Swiss logistics company faced multiple attack attempts on its test containers. After hardening the images and implementing a CI/CD pipeline with automated vulnerability checks, it cut critical alerts by 90% and secured its entire production environment.

Securing Mobile and Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Environments

The rise of BYOD means treating mobile endpoints as potential attack vectors. The Cloud ERP should be accessible only through applications managed by Mobile Device Management (MDM).

Local data encryption, screen-lock policies, and remote wipe capabilities in case of loss or theft ensure sensitive information remains safe. Anonymous or non-compliant access must be blocked via conditional access policies.

Combining MDM and IAM allows delegation of certificate and access-profile management, ensuring that no ERP data is permanently stored on an unsecured device.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Continuous Monitoring and API Security

Implementing 24/7 monitoring with SIEM and XDR enables early detection and correlation of incidents before they escalate. Securing APIs, the junction points of your applications, is crucial to prevent abuse and code injection.

SIEM and XDR Integration

Aggregating logs from your Cloud ERP, network, and endpoints into a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution facilitates correlated event analysis. Alerts should be tailored to the functional specifics of each ERP module. For guidance, see our cybersecurity for SMEs guide.

API Call Monitoring and Anomaly Detection

Every API call must be authenticated, encrypted, and subject to rate limits to prevent denial-of-service attacks or mass data extraction. API access logs provide a valuable history to trace actions and identify malicious patterns.

Behavioral analysis, based on normalized usage models, reveals abnormal calls or injection attempts. Learn how API-first integration strengthens your data flows.

DevSecOps Automation for Application Security

Integrating security tests into the CI/CD pipeline (SAST, DAST scans, automated penetration tests) ensures every ERP code change is validated against vulnerabilities. Read our article on the enhanced software development lifecycle (SDLC) to secure your pipeline.

GitOps workflows combined with mandatory pull-request policies allow for code reviews and automated attack simulations on each change. This process prevents misconfigurations, the primary source of Cloud ERP incidents.

This DevOps-security synergy reduces delivery times while raising reliability. Teams operate in a mature environment where secure automation is the norm, not an added burden.

Redundancy, DRP/BCP, and Regulatory Compliance

Implementing a redundant architecture and recovery plans ensures business continuity in the event of an incident. Compliance with the FADP and GDPR builds trust and avoids penalties.

Redundant Architecture and Resilience

A distributed infrastructure across multiple Cloud regions or availability zones guarantees high availability of the ERP. Data is replicated in real time, minimizing potential information loss if a data center fails.

Automated failover, orchestrated by an infrastructure controller, maintains service without noticeable interruption to users. This mechanism should be regularly tested through simulated failure drills to verify its effectiveness.

Using stateless containers also promotes scalability and resilience: each instance can be routed and recreated on the fly, with no dependence on local state that could become a failure point.

Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity Planning (DRP/BCP)

The Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP) outlines technical procedures to restore the ERP after a disaster, while the Business Continuity Plan (BCP) organizes the human and organizational resources to maintain a minimum service level.

These plans must align with the criticality of business processes: financial transactions, inventory management, or payroll. For more details, consult our guide to designing an effective DRP/BCP step by step.

Periodic updates to the DRP/BCP incorporate ERP evolutions, architectural changes, and lessons learned. This exercise prevents surprises and secures the company’s operational resilience.

FADP, GDPR Compliance, and Audits

Centralizing data in a Cloud ERP requires enhanced protection of personal data. The Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection (FADP) and the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) impose proportionate security measures: encryption, access traceability, and retention policies.

A periodic audit by an independent third party validates procedure adherence and identifies gaps. Audit reports provide tangible proof of compliance for regulators and clients.

Documenting approaches and recording security tests facilitate responses to regulatory inquiries and reinforce stakeholder confidence. Effective document governance is an asset in preventing sanctions.

Strengthen Your Cloud ERP Security as a Competitive Advantage

Securing a Cloud ERP requires a combination of Cloud architecture, DevSecOps, automation, encryption, and continuous monitoring. Each domain—access governance, hardening, APIs, redundancy, and compliance—contributes to building a resilient and compliant foundation.

In the face of increasingly complex threats, partnering with an experienced provider enables you to audit your environment, remediate vulnerabilities, adopt secure practices, and train your teams. This comprehensive approach ensures business continuity and stakeholder trust.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In today’s manufacturing environment, an ERP is no longer just a repository for financial and logistical data. It has become the technological heart of a connected value chain, driving production, maintenance and the supply chain in real time. By combining modular cloud architectures, microservices and open APIs, companies build a scalable foundation that hosts predictive AI services, real-time analytics and industrial IoT. This digital transformation delivers agility, transparency and continuous optimization.

For industrial small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and mid-tier companies, the challenge is to build a data-driven cloud ERP platform capable of integrating with the Manufacturing Execution System (MES), Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), Customer Relationship Management (CRM) and Business Intelligence (BI) ecosystems, while supporting the ongoing innovation of Industry 4.0.

Cloud Architecture and Microservices: The Foundation of ERP 4.0

Hybrid cloud architectures and microservices form the basis of a scalable, resilient ERP. They ensure elasticity, fault tolerance and independence from evolving technologies.

Public, Private and Hybrid Cloud

Manufacturers adopt hybrid models that combine public cloud for peak workloads and private cloud for sensitive data. This dual approach ensures regulatory compliance while offering unprecedented elasticity.

Operationally, hybrid cloud lets you distribute workloads: critical, legacy processes reside in a controlled environment, while innovation or AI developments run on public environments on demand.

Such a setup reduces the risk of vendor lock-in by enabling gradual service migration and abstracting infrastructure through open-source multi-cloud management tools.

Modularity and Microservices

Breaking down functionality into microservices isolates domains—inventory, production, finance, maintenance—into independent services. Each microservice can be updated, redeployed or scaled on its own.

Thanks to orchestrators and containers, these microservices deploy rapidly under centralized monitoring, ensuring performance and availability to Industry 4.0 standards.

Implementation Example

An electronics component SME migrated its ERP to a hybrid cloud to host operational data on-premises and AI services in a public environment. This architecture reduced downtime by 30% and enabled automatic scaling during new product launches, validating the benefits of a modular, cloud-native ERP platform.

Security and Compliance

In a hybrid model, security relies on next-generation firewalls, encryption of data at rest and in transit, and granular identity management via open-source solutions.

Zero-trust architectures reinforce protection of ERP-API interfaces, reducing attack surfaces while maintaining business-critical data access for IoT and analytics applications.

By adopting DevSecOps practices, teams embed security into microservice design and automate vulnerability testing before each deployment.

Data Orchestration and Industrial IoT

Integrating IoT sensors and real-time streams turns the ERP into a continuous automation platform. Instant collection and processing of operational data optimize production and maintenance.

IoT Connectivity and Edge Computing

Industrial sensors record temperature, vibration or flow continuously. With edge computing, this data is filtered and preprocessed locally, reducing latency and bandwidth usage.

IoT streams are then sent to the cloud ERP via secure gateways, ensuring consistency of production data and archiving of critical metrics.

This distributed infrastructure automatically triggers restocking workflows, machine calibrations or maintenance alerts based on predefined thresholds.

Real-Time Ingestion and Processing

Event platforms (Kafka, MQTT) capture IoT messages and publish them to processing pipelines. Real-time ETL microservices feed the ERP and analytical modules instantly.

This orchestration provides live KPIs on overall equipment effectiveness, quality variances and production cycles, all displayed on dashboards accessible from the ERP.

Correlating IoT data with work orders and maintenance history optimizes scheduling and reduces scrap.

Predictive Maintenance

From collected time series, predictive AI models assess equipment failure probabilities. Alerts are generated directly in the ERP, triggering work orders and real-time procurement of spare parts.

This approach significantly reduces unplanned downtime and improves line availability, while optimizing maintenance costs by focusing only on necessary interventions.

Feedback loops continually refine the algorithms, improving forecast accuracy and adapting tolerance thresholds to real-world operating conditions.

Industrial Case Example

A machine-tool production unit deployed vibration and current sensors on its spindles. IoT-edge processing detected misalignment before any machine stoppage, cutting maintenance costs by 25% and extending equipment lifespan by 15%. This case illustrates the power of an IoT-connected ERP to secure production.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

AI and Real-Time Analytics in the ERP

Embedded predictive and generative AI in the ERP enhances decision-making and automates high-value tasks. Real-time analytics deliver clear insights into operational and strategic performance.

Predictive AI for the Supply Chain

Machine learning algorithms forecast product demand from order history, market trends and external variables (seasonality, economic conditions).

These forecasts feed procurement planning functions, reducing stockouts and minimizing overstock.

The cloud ERP incorporates these predictions into purchasing workflows, automatically placing supplier orders based on adaptive rules and providing real-time KPI dashboards.

Generative AI for Design and Documentation

Natural Language Processing (NLP) models automatically generate technical datasheets, training materials and compliance reports from product and process data stored in the ERP.

This accelerates documentation updates after each configuration change, ensuring consistency and traceability of information.

An integrated virtual assistant within the ERP allows users to ask questions in natural language and instantly access procedures or key metrics.

Intelligent Reporting and Dynamic Dashboards

The ERP’s built-in analytics engines provide custom dashboards for each function—production, finance, supply chain. Visualizations update by the second via real-time streams.

Proactive alerts flag critical deviations, such as delivery delays or energy spikes, enabling teams to act before performance is impacted.

These dashboards use configurable, exportable widgets accessible on desktop or mobile, fostering cross-disciplinary collaboration.

Process Optimization Example

A medical device manufacturer integrated a predictive AI engine into its ERP to adjust assembly lines based on demand forecasts. Service levels rose by 12% and logistics costs fell by 8%, demonstrating the direct impact of real-time AI on operational performance.

Integration and Interoperability via APIs and Ecosystems

Open, secure APIs enable the cloud ERP to interface with MES, PLM, CRM and e-commerce platforms. Removing silos ensures a continuous information flow and a unified view of the product lifecycle.

API-First and Security

An API-first strategy exposes every ERP function as a RESTful web service or GraphQL endpoint. Business developers can consume or extend these services without modifying the core system.

Implementing API gateways and OAuth 2.0 policies secures data access while providing monitoring and traceability of exchanges between systems.

This approach avoids bottlenecks and vendor lock-in by relying on open, non-proprietary standards.

Interoperability with MES, PLM, CRM and E-Commerce

The PLM supplies product data (BOM, specifications) to the ERP and receives production feedback to enrich future releases. The MES synchronizes work orders and reports shop-floor metrics in real time.

The CRM feeds customer and order information into the ERP for automated invoicing and optimized contract management. E-commerce platforms connect to manage inventory, dynamic pricing and promotions.

This multi-system orchestration eliminates duplicate entries, reduces errors and ensures data consistency at every step of the value chain.

Transform Your ERP into an Industry 4.0 Innovation Engine

Combining a modular cloud ERP, microservices architecture, IoT streams and real-time AI creates a continuous automation and innovation platform. By connecting the ERP to the MES, PLM, CRM and BI ecosystems through secure APIs, manufacturers gain agility, performance and predictability.

Projects must remain contextual, avoid vendor lock-in and favor open source to ensure long-term scalability and security. A hybrid, data-driven approach delivers fast ROI and a foundation ready to absorb future technological and business evolutions.

Our experts are available to design, integrate or modernize your cloud ERP and orchestrate your Industry 4.0 architecture. Together, let’s turn your information systems into growth and competitiveness levers.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert