In a context where patient recruitment for clinical trials relies on a myriad of channels—social media, healthcare professionals (HCPs) referrals, online communities, and print materials—the dispersion of efforts hampers both agility and compliance.

In the face of this fragmentation, sponsor and CRO teams struggle to measure and optimize acquisition costs, inclusion timelines, and return on investment per channel, all while remaining compliant with regulatory requirements (GDPR, HIPAA). A structured approach—from segment mapping to a real-time management dashboard—can transform this diversity into a measurable, secure, and high-performing pipeline.

Map Channels and Segment Your Audiences

Precisely map channels and segment your audiences. This foundational step reveals the relative value of each recruitment source.

Identifying and Analyzing Existing Channels

To establish an accurate overview, it is essential to inventory all patient touchpoints: social media platforms, HCP newsletters, specialized forums, and in-office brochures. Each channel should be characterized by lead volume, quality—such as the rate of eligible pre-screenings—and compliance constraints. Without this step, you operate in the dark, incurring costs without measurable impact.

Cross-channel analysis also helps identify redundant or underutilized channels. For example, a dedicated LinkedIn page may generate substantial clicks but yield a low conversion rate if the messaging is not tailored to inclusion criteria. This data-driven evaluation, consolidated into a unified report, serves as the foundation for any budget-allocation strategy.

By pinpointing specific friction points—response time to inquiries, overly complex forms, or regulatory hurdles—you can then develop targeted actions to increase the eligible-lead ratio. This pragmatic approach contrasts with overly broad strategies that dilute budgets and extend enrollment timelines.

Patient-Centered Segmentation and Prioritization

Beyond channel categorization, segmenting audiences by sociodemographic profiles, clinical criteria, and digital behaviors refines targeting through structuring raw data for better business decisions. For instance, you can distinguish patients active in specialized forums from caregivers reached via dedicated newsletters or support networks. Each segment uncovers specific expectations and engagement rates, informing tailored messaging and creative assets.

This level of granularity enables you to prioritize investments based on potential conversion rates and average time-to-enrollment per segment. For example, a “young adult patients” segment identified on Instagram may offer a quick start but require a simplified eConsent workflow, whereas a “seniors referred by HCPs” segment may demand more clinical coordination time but offset this with a higher inclusion rate.

Example of a Mid-Sized Hospital Sponsor

A mid-sized hospital sponsor conducted a detailed mapping of its recruitment channels, revealing that internal HCP referrals generated 60% of leads while accounting for only 20% of the budget. Conversely, social media campaigns consumed 35% of the budget but yielded only 15% of eligible pre-screenings. This analysis highlighted the benefit of reallocating 30% of the social budget toward HCP referral partnerships, improving the lead-to-inclusion ratio by 25% and shortening the average time-to-enrollment by two weeks.

This example underscores the importance of precise segmentation and data-driven prioritization rather than relying on assumptions or traditional budget-allocation practices.

Unify Cross-Channel Tracking with a Consent-First, Privacy-by-Design Approach

Unify cross-channel tracking with a consent-first, privacy-by-design approach. Granular tracking ensures auditability and regulatory compliance.

Informed Consent and Privacy Compliance

Before any data collection, each patient must provide explicit consent detailing the use of their information for campaign tracking and journey analysis. The tracking architecture incorporates consent-management mechanisms—GDPR and HIPAA–compliant by design—to record opt-in/opt-out histories and uphold operational data erasure rights.

This process goes beyond a mere checkbox: patients must receive clear information on each data use and have the ability to withdraw consent at any time. Integrated consent management platforms (CMPs) ensure consistency across the CRM, pre-screening tool, and management dashboard.

The consent-first approach builds participant trust, reduces legal risks, and safeguards the sponsor’s reputation in a market where health data confidentiality is paramount.

Modular and Scalable Technical Infrastructure

Multichannel data collection and aggregation rely on an independent, open-source tracking layer—whenever possible—capable of ingesting events from varied sources (web pixel, HCP API, eConsent forms, paper barcodes). This layer normalizes data, assigns a unique patient identifier, and feeds a secure data warehouse.

With a microservices architecture, each tracking module can evolve or be replaced without impacting the entire pipeline, minimizing vendor lock-in. Automated ETL pipelines ensure data freshness and availability for real-time dashboards.

The robustness of this infrastructure ensures transparent, traceable, and audit-proof tracking—an essential element for regulatory audits and internal requirements of pharmaceutical sponsors.

Data Governance and Regular Audits

Establishing clear governance of roles and responsibilities (Data Protection Officer, IT team, clinical trial marketing managers) ensures continuous adherence to security and privacy policies. Periodic audit processes validate the compliance of data flows, access logs, and consent systems.

Audit reports include indicators such as consent rate, refusal rate, consent withdrawal time, and number of data access requests—ensuring vigilant oversight and the necessary documentation in the event of an inspection.

This proactive governance significantly reduces legal and reputational risks while enhancing the sponsor’s credibility with health authorities and ethics committees.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Orchestrate an End-to-End Ops Workflow: From Pre-Screening to Randomization

Orchestrate an end-to-end ops workflow—from pre-screening to randomization. A digitalized process streamlines enrollment and secures every step.

Online Pre-Screening Automation

The digital pre-screening relies on dynamic questionnaires embedded in the patient journey, filtering eligibility criteria in real time. Adaptive questions ensure a streamlined path, preventing ineligible patients from proceeding unnecessarily. Responses trigger automated notifications to the research center or CRO for clinical validation.

This automation reduces human errors, accelerates lead processing, and maintains candidate motivation, which is often sensitive to delays. Collected data is instantly validated and archived in the system, ready for the eConsent phase.

The workflow’s modularity allows for adding or modifying pre-screening criteria as the protocol evolves, without a complete platform overhaul.

Secure eConsent and Randomization Traceability

The eConsent features a validated multimedia, explanatory, and interactive interface to meet regulatory requirements. Each step—information review, comprehension quiz, electronic signature—is timestamped and encrypted. A unidirectional link to the electronic clinical record ensures full traceability.

Once consent is approved, the patient is automatically assigned to the randomization phase according to the defined algorithm. All transactions are timestamped, digitally signed, and stored in a secure environment, ready for any audit or inspection.

This digital process minimizes transcription errors and strengthens compliance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP).

Case Study: Mid-Sized Clinical Network

A mid-sized clinical network deployed a digitalized workflow integrating automated pre-screening and eConsent, reducing the average time from first contact to randomization by 20%. Recruitment teams could monitor progress in real time and address pending cases precisely, avoiding time-consuming back-and-forths.

This case demonstrates that end-to-end digitalization of ops processes does not eliminate the human element but optimizes its contribution, reducing administrative tasks and focusing clinical expertise on high-value cases.

Drive Real-Time Oversight with a Dedicated Dashboard and Advanced Analytics

Drive real-time oversight with a dedicated dashboard and advanced analytics. A unified dashboard reveals ROI, time-to-enrollment, and channel-specific performance.

Real-Time Key Indicator Monitoring

The dashboard centralizes data from all channels, continuously displaying cost per lead, click-through rate (CTR), conversion rate (CVR), and average time-to-enrollment. Filters by segment, clinical site, or trial phase provide a granular view for instant budget and messaging adjustments. Designing an effective dashboard further strengthens data-driven decision-making.

Configurable alerts notify you of deviations—excessive cost per inclusion, CTR drops, or unusually long inclusion times. This responsiveness is essential to keep the trial pipeline afloat and continuously optimize the channel mix.

Intuitive graphical visualizations facilitate weekly reviews and strategic trade-offs, reinforcing data-driven decision-making.

Attribution and Lightweight Mix Modeling

Multi-touch attribution, combined with lightweight mix modeling, sheds light on each channel’s impact on the patient journey. For example, you can measure the incremental effect of an email campaign versus a sponsored post or a print advertisement. Attribution coefficients are recalculated regularly to account for evolving behaviors.

Lightweight mix modeling, based on a few key variables, avoids overfitting and preserves model interpretability. It estimates how reallocating 10% of the budget from one channel to another would affect inclusion volume and overall time-to-enrollment.

This pragmatic approach promotes continuous optimization rather than chasing a perfect model, which is often too costly and time-consuming for marginal gains.

Creative Optimization and Continuous A/B Testing

Each segment undergoes message, visual, and format testing (text, video, infographic). Real-time A/B experiments conducted via the dashboard allow you to immediately measure impacts on CTR, CVR, and cost per inclusion. UX best practices further enhance the effectiveness of the tested variants.

Results guide the creation of new assets, call-to-action refinements, and targeting adjustments, establishing a continuous improvement loop. This dynamic reduces marketing spend inefficiencies and maximizes the patient pipeline’s performance.

By progressively deploying the highest-performing variants, you capitalize on field feedback and enhance message relevance for each patient profile.

Optimize Your Multichannel Patient Recruitment

By combining rigorous channel mapping, privacy-respecting tracking, an automated workflow from pre-screening to randomization, and real-time management, you can transform a fragmented environment into a high-performing, compliant patient recruitment ecosystem. Data-driven orchestration optimizes budgets, accelerates enrollment, and ensures regulatory traceability.

Regardless of your context—pharma sponsor, CRO, or research institution—our experts can guide you in implementing this modular and scalable approach, combining open source, secure architecture, and intuitive reporting. Schedule a consultation to discuss your challenges and co-create a recruitment dashboard aligned with your clinical and business priorities.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In an industry where every millimeter of concrete and every hour of labor comes with rising costs, budget estimation is no longer a mere formality. Faced with material price volatility, labor tensions, and growing project complexity, relying on isolated spreadsheets and fixed assumptions proves insufficient.

Construction companies now gain efficiency and responsiveness by adopting integrated technological solutions. BIM, cloud computing, AI, and mobile tools are transforming the traditional estimation approach, shortening decision cycles and strengthening margin control. When every percentage point of cost matters, making technology a strategic lever becomes a decisive competitive factor.

The BIM Revolution: Upfront Precision and Integration

BIM revolutionizes estimation by linking geometry and costs from the design phase. Automatically extracted quantities reduce errors and accelerate decision-making.

Building Information Modeling (BIM) is no longer reserved for architects and engineers: it has become a cornerstone of budget estimation. By associating each geometric component with a parametrized price database, BIM enables precise takeoffs directly from initial models. This unified approach eliminates manual entries and ensures consistency between the 3D model, quantities, and costs.

During the conceptual phase, changes to the model are automatically reflected in financial calculations. Teams can quickly evaluate multiple layout or structural scenarios, immediately comparing the budgetary impact of technical choices. Collaboration between architects, engineering offices, and estimators flows seamlessly, with every modification tracked and validated continuously.

Parametrizing BIM files also allows for different levels of detail (LOD), moving from a rough estimate to a detailed cost breakdown at the end of the preliminary design phase, without duplicating effort.

Cloud and Real-Time Collaboration

Cloud platforms provide instant access to estimation data, wherever teams are located. Digital workflows eliminate silos and ensure a single source of pricing truth.

Moving to the cloud is reshaping construction cost estimation. Gone are disparate spreadsheets and email exchanges: all contributors work on one platform accessible 24/7. Pricing updates, labor rates, and supplier schedules are centralized and versioned.

Whether it’s an engineering office in Zurich, a project manager on-site in Geneva, or a subcontractor in Basel, everyone accesses the same up-to-date data. Changes appear instantly, ensuring total alignment between financial proposals and technical requirements.

Centralizing Proposals and Version Control

Cloud-based estimation solutions include document management and workflow modules. Each proposal version is timestamped, linked to its author, and enriched with contextual comments.

This rigorous tracking facilitates internal audits and contract reviews, while allowing comparison of different versions of the same project. Decision-makers can revert to a prior state or merge multiple bid scenarios with a few clicks.

Comprehensive traceability ensures structured responses to RFIs (Requests for Information) and protects against disputes over discrepancies between initial estimates and final invoicing.

Site Monitoring and Continuous Adjustments

The cloud extends collaboration to the field: surveys, photos, and remarks can be uploaded directly to the platform from any connected device.

These on-site updates continuously feed into estimates for extra costs (floor repairs, unforeseen reinforcements, additional delays), enabling budget forecasts to be updated during construction.

Visibility into actual versus planned variances helps manage margins and anticipate provisioning needs, reducing the risk of unexpected overruns.

Example of a Consortium of Zurich SMEs

Several construction SMEs in the canton of Zurich pooled a cloud platform to share price lists, standard contracts, and lessons learned. They saw a 20% reduction in pricing inconsistencies between engineering offices and field teams.

This example demonstrates that data sharing—without technical complexity—strengthens cohesion among partners and safeguards the consortium’s overall margins.

The collaborative model also accelerated proposal approvals by 15%, delivering a notable competitive edge in public and private tenders.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

AI and Predictive Analytics: Anticipating Cost Volatility

Artificial intelligence leverages project history to detect trends and anomalies. Forecasts rely on algorithms that continuously refine estimates.

In a context of rapid material and labor cost fluctuations, AI becomes a major asset. Estimation platforms integrate machine learning modules that analyze past project databases, identify correlations, and suggest tailored risk coefficients.

These predictive models flag budget items with historically largest variances, enabling stronger budget provisions and more effective supplier negotiations.

Leveraging Project History

Algorithms ingest millions of historical entries: delivery surcharges, delay penalties, wholesale price adjustments, and seasonal variations. They learn to distinguish systematic factors from isolated incidents.

With each new estimate, the AI adjusts safety margins based on project profile: size, location, soil type, and architectural complexity. It provides a confidence interval to guide decision-makers in their trade-offs.

This approach limits systematic underestimation or overestimation and enhances the reliability of budget forecasts.

Machine Learning Models for Risk Management

Classification models identify high-risk projects for cost overruns by combining technical and operational variables: seasonality, exchange rates, and resource availability.

Simulated scenarios reveal the financial impact of concurrent risks: transport strikes, material shortages, or adverse weather. The tool then calculates the probability of overruns and proposes mitigation strategies.

These analyses help optimize contract terms, delivery schedules, and payment conditions, balancing budget security with bid competitiveness.

Example of a Major Swiss Civil Engineering Firm

A railway network builder deployed an AI engine to forecast steel and ready-mix concrete prices. Based on predictions, teams synchronized bulk orders and secured volume discounts.

The pilot project demonstrated a 5% reduction in risk provisions and improved payment-term negotiations with suppliers. This example highlights the benefit of combining historical data with predictive models to optimize costs.

Equipping estimators with intelligent tools enhanced agility and precision—essential assets for competing on high-stakes projects.

Mobility and Field Data Integration

Mobile apps bring estimation closer to operational reality. Instant synchronization of field surveys validates budgets and speeds up adjustments.

Accessing estimation data from a smartphone or tablet transforms the office-to-site relationship. Managers can immediately report actual quantities, specific measurements, and on-site contingencies. This virtuous loop between field and estimate ensures budget control in near real time.

Mobile tools include structured forms, geolocation, and photo capture, drastically reducing transcription errors and late data submissions.

Real-Time Mobile Data Collection

Survey applications record dimensions, quantities, and observations directly on a tablet, even offline. Data is cached locally and synchronized once the connection is restored.

Georeferenced photos and voice notes automatically enrich takeoffs with contextual details, useful for qualifying risks or specifying special requirements.

This secure, standardized collection eliminates paper site notebooks and provides a precise history for each work package, simplifying project reviews and interim billing.

Automatic Sync of Site Reports and Budget Updates

When a survey is validated in the field, it triggers an automatic update of the cost estimate in the cloud platform. Variances between estimated and actual figures are reported in real time to financial managers.

Budget dashboards reconfigure instantly, highlighting overrun items and those still under control. Configurable alerts notify stakeholders of critical thresholds, prompting prompt decisions.

This transparency reduces reliance on generic provisions and allows safety margins to be fine-tuned without waiting for the end of a phase or package.

Example of a Structural Work Consortium in German-speaking Switzerland

A consortium of five structural contractors equipped their site managers with a mobile survey app. Daily updates on poured concrete, reinforcement, and formwork were uploaded.

After three months, the group saw a 10% improvement in budget forecast accuracy, reducing late overruns and acceptance disputes by 25%. This example demonstrates the concrete impact of seamless field-to-estimate integration.

The granular data also optimized just-in-time material orders, generating cash-flow benefits while controlling on-site inventory.

Turning Estimation into a Sustainable Competitive Advantage

By combining BIM, cloud, AI, and mobility, construction companies transform cost estimation into an agile, precise, and collaborative process. Parametric models integrate with shared platforms, predictive analytics, and field surveys to secure margins and accelerate decisions.

The convergence of these technologies not only produces more reliable figures, but also shortens response cycles to tender requests, anticipates budgetary risks, and optimizes on-site resources.

Our experts, backed by open-source solutions, modular architectures, and contextual integration, are at your disposal to co-build a scalable and secure estimation strategy.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

Agility is not just about role-playing: it’s above all a mindset shift that begins with clear rules, total transparency and candid feedback. In an environment where IT projects span multiple departments, collaboration can’t succeed unless every stakeholder understands their scope, processes are visible and communication is regulated.

Through a series of workshops, teams challenge their operating modes, co-create role descriptions aligned with agile principles, and establish a dialogue framework designed to prevent latent conflicts. The result? A concrete action plan, operational tools and renewed cohesion ready to be put into practice daily.

Role and Responsibility Clarity

Precisely defining roles fosters both individual and collective accountability. A clear framework eliminates overlaps and grey areas.

Identifying and Formalizing Responsibilities

Clarifying responsibilities starts with mapping out each person’s tasks. It means describing what belongs to each profile, the decisions they can make and their expected deliverables.

In a dedicated workshop, participants list their own responsibilities, then compare perceptions to optimize cross-functional collaboration.

For example, a Swiss manufacturing SME discovered that two teams were tracking the same performance indicators without coordinating. By formalizing their respective scopes, they reduced unnecessary iterations and gained three days per sprint.

Process and Expectation Transparency

Making operational processes visible builds trust and supports continuous improvement. Exposing expectations prevents misinterpretations.

Mapping and Visualizing Workflows

The first step is to make each sequence of work graphically accessible. Participants diagram the steps, deliverables and associated deadlines. This collective visualization highlights bottlenecks.

At the end of this workshop, the team has a clear reference model. They can identify where delays accumulate and which tasks are critical to project success.

Defining Shared Success Criteria

Every stakeholder must express their expectations in terms of quality, timing and scope. During the workshop, teams establish measurable, mutually agreed indicators.

This collaborative work helps avoid the “tunnel effect,” where a completed phase doesn’t meet the needs of the next team. Shared criteria serve as benchmarks for each iteration.

Implementing Regular Reviews

Transparency alone isn’t enough without periodic governance. Workshops recommend instituting weekly or biweekly reviews to compare actual progress against initial commitments.

These synchronization moments provide opportunities to adjust priorities, flag risks and document decisions taken.

A banking institution introduced this ritual within its project team, enabling them to detect a regulatory compliance risk early and address it before the sprint ended, thereby preventing a freeze on deliveries.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Courageous and Respectful Communication

A secure dialogue space encourages honest expression of needs and challenges. Structured feedback prevents the buildup of silent frustrations.

Establishing Feedback Rituals

To anchor the feedback practice, teams hold dedicated sessions at the end of each iteration. Everyone can share what worked well and what they’d like to improve.

Guided by a facilitator, these sessions follow precise rules: factual observation, felt impact, concrete suggestion.

To refine their exchanges, they can use estimation techniques like planning poker.

Defining Dialogue Rules and Conflict Management

A workshop on communication sets principles: speak in the first person, don’t interrupt, consider the other’s viewpoint. These rules form a code of conduct.

The group also develops a procedure for handling disagreements, from internal mediation to structured escalation if needed.

Using Visual Tools and the Team Canvas

Leveraging the Team Canvas enriches discussions. Each team jointly defines its mission, values, communication rules and strengths.

Canvases remain displayed at all times, reminding everyone of their commitments and easing the onboarding of new members.

An e-commerce company adopted this approach to structure new-hire integration. Within a month, ramp-up time was reduced by 30%.

Formalizing a Shared Vision and an Operational Action Plan

A shared vision guides daily trade-offs and strengthens collective engagement. A structured action plan turns ambition into tangible results.

Vision-Setting Workshop

In this workshop, participants translate strategic objectives into concrete use scenarios.

To frame this process, they rely on a four-step digital roadmap guide.

This vision becomes a compass for validating every feature and technical decision.

Aligning on Strategic Objectives

After defining the vision, teams link each pillar to measurable goals. They prioritize initiatives based on their impact on business value.

This alignment prevents scattered efforts and ensures every task contributes to overall performance.

Formalizing and Tracking the Action Plan

The action plan details deliverables, responsibilities, milestones and success indicators. It’s shared via a dashboard accessible to all.

Each week, a status meeting allows for deadline adjustments based on contingencies and celebrates quick wins.

At a healthcare provider in German-speaking Switzerland, this formalized tracking accelerated the launch of an appointment-management app, reducing go-live time by 40%.

Behavioral Agility: Lasting Transformation

Agility reaches its full potential when fueled by clear roles, transparent processes and authentic communication. The workshops described lay a solid foundation, translating principles into observable behaviors every day.

By emerging with a shared vision, an operational plan and concrete tools (Team Canvas, feedback rituals, responsibility maps), teams gain cohesion and responsiveness. They cultivate a culture of continuous improvement, essential for tackling complex IT challenges.

Our experts are by your side to design and facilitate these workshops, helping you anchor genuine behavioral agility. Together, let’s turn your collaboration methods into a lasting advantage for your organization.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

When a company rolls out a new IT tool, success is not measured solely by the technical quality of the solution but also by the teams’ ability to adopt it quickly and effectively. Training thus becomes a crucial lever to turn a mere deployment into a performance driver.

By anticipating user needs, designing tailored learning paths and establishing continuous support, organizations maximize engagement and reduce resistance to change. This article offers concrete tips for structuring an internal training approach, boosting the adoption of business software and generating sustainable return on investment.

Understanding Needs and Preparing the Ground

A thorough analysis of user profiles and usage patterns is essential to align training with your business objectives. Careful context preparation makes it easier for teams to buy in.

Mapping Users and Their Expectations

Before defining a training program, it is crucial to inventory current skills and specific needs for each profile.

Analyzing Business and Technical Challenges

Well-designed training must be based on a clear understanding of operational processes and strategic goals. Each tool feature should be linked to business priorities, whether productivity, compliance or service quality.

Engaging Stakeholders from the Start

To ensure sustainable adoption, business leaders, IT managers and future users must be involved in designing the training plan. This co-creation of the digital solution promotes collective ownership and allows content to be adjusted based on field feedback.

Designing a Multimodal Training Path

A mix of instructor-led sessions, e-learning modules and practical workshops maximizes engagement and effectiveness. Integrating collaborative tools and active learning methods enhances retention and autonomy.

Structuring Progressive Modules

For example, a manufacturing company segmented its modules into “Introduction,” “Business Functions” and “Advanced Optimization.” By ordering the progression in this way, its online course completion rate reached 95%.

This breakdown also enables micro-learning, short sequences focusing on a specific skill, supporting learning on the job and limiting cognitive overload.

Combining E-learning and Instructor-Led Sessions

E-learning offers on-demand access and replay capability, while in-person training fosters direct interaction and collaborative problem-solving. The two formats complement each other when orchestrated coherently.

Implementing Contextualized Practical Workshops

Workshops in real-world conditions, where participants work on cases drawn from their daily tasks, validate the immediate applicability of new skills. These sessions encourage peer support and collective skill building.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Establishing Ongoing Support and Follow-up

A continuous support and knowledge-sharing framework sustains user engagement and cements adoption. Appointing internal champions and conducting post-training follow-up ensure lasting skill development.

Appointing Internal Champions

Identifying “super-users” within business teams creates a local training relay. These champions receive advanced certification and host regular meet-ups with their colleagues.

By appointing five ambassadors per department, informal self-training initiatives multiplied. These champions organized “digital cafés” and shared best practices, reinforcing a culture of mutual support.

Building a Shared Resource Repository

An internal centralized platform brings together tutorials, FAQs, demonstration videos and best-practice feedback. Quick access and smart search promote autonomy and reduce reliance on the help desk.

A Swiss SME in the healthcare sector implemented an internal wiki, kept up to date by user contributions. Within six months, its daily consultation rate exceeded 70%, significantly easing the support team’s workload.

Scheduling Follow-up and Feedback Sessions

Beyond the initial phase, it is essential to schedule experience-sharing workshops at regular intervals. These sessions measure tool usage, identify roadblocks and gather suggestions for improvement, such as tracking key performance indicators.

Measuring Effectiveness and Fostering Continuous Improvement

Tracking key metrics and analyzing usage data demonstrates training impact and informs adjustments to the learning strategy. An iterative approach ensures the tool’s ROI is optimized.

Defining Relevant KPIs

To evaluate effectiveness, monitor indicators such as adoption rate, reduction in support tickets and task completion speed in the new tool. These metrics provide a quantifiable view of progress.

Conducting Qualitative Assessments

Beyond numbers, satisfaction surveys and one-on-one interviews shed light on user perceptions, pain points and motivating factors.

Embracing a Continuous Improvement Loop

Training never truly ends: each new tool version or business process change should be accompanied by content updates and pedagogical refreshers.

Turn Training into an Adoption and Performance Accelerator

A structured approach—grounded in needs analysis, multimodal design, ongoing support and impact measurement—makes training a genuine adoption and performance lever. By engaging stakeholders, appointing internal champions and fostering a culture of continuous improvement, organizations maximize ROI and ensure the longevity of their digital tools.

Our experts guide companies through context-sensitive, evolving training solutions that empower users and strengthen their digital ecosystem. To turn your deployment into a lasting success, let’s talk.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

Legacy software interfaces inherited from the web—made up of menus, dashboards, and complex trees—struggle to meet users’ current expectations. Thanks to the rise of Large Language Models (LLMs), a new “intention-first” paradigm is emerging, where AI becomes the interface and anticipates needs without forcing rigid navigation.

For CIOs, CTOs, and heads of digital transformation, this shift requires rethinking UX from the ground up to unlock AI’s full potential. This article explores why tomorrow’s AI products won’t resemble today’s applications, the strategic stakes of this transition, and best practices for designing truly AI-native experiences.

The End of the Traditional Interface

Dashboards and multiple menus are the result of logic inherited from the web. This “interface-first” approach creates complexity and frustration rather than fluidity.

A Web Legacy Breeding Complexity

Back when websites were limited to static pages, trees and menus were the only way to structure information. Dashboards became standard to consolidate metrics, but their proliferation has weighed down navigation. Dashboards

Every new feature adds another tab, button, or sub-section, forcing users to memorize multiple paths. This cognitive overload distracts from the business objective.

As a result, the learning curve lengthens and the risk of errors grows. Even minor updates become a challenge for product and support teams, limiting delivered value.

AI as the Main Interface

Prompts and contextual suggestions are gradually replacing buttons. AI becomes the interface, adapting UX in real time.

Prompts and Contextual Suggestions

The first “AI-enhanced” products simply added “Generate” or “Suggest” buttons to a classic UX. Today, the approach goes further: AI automatically offers options based on business context, without manual action.

For example, in a writing tool, AI anticipates the next sentence or refines style in real time, with no menu clicks. The prompt becomes invisible and seamlessly integrated.

This conversational design reduces cognitive effort and accelerates decision-making. The user retains control while benefiting from proactive assistance.

Conversational Memory and Chat/GUI Hybridization

Contextual memory enables AI to maintain the conversation flow, remember preferences, and deliver coherent interactions. It becomes an essential asset for complex workflows.

Hybridizing chat and GUI combines the best of both worlds: the flexibility of a text interface and the clarity of targeted graphical components. Users can switch at any time between free text input and structured results display. To learn more about creating a voice assistant.

This hybrid approach meets diverse needs: free exploration followed by synthetic visualization. UX builds dynamically according to intent, without locking users into a fixed tree.

Example: A Swiss Industrial SME

A Swiss industrial SME specializing in equipment manufacturing replaced its inventory management dashboard with an intent-entry module. Instead of navigating five screens to generate a report, managers now enter requests in natural language.

This simplification cut average report creation time by 60% and reduced related support tickets by 40%. The example demonstrates how a menu-free approach directly boosts team productivity.

It also confirms that shifting to an “intention-first” model can be implemented without a full back-end overhaul, thanks to an AI layer placed at the front end.

Why This Transition Is Strategic for Businesses

Embracing an AI-first UX answers an unprecedented acceleration in AI usage. It’s a key differentiator in a saturated market.

Accelerated AI Adoption and User Expectations

The maturity of LLMs and the democratization of APIs have exploded AI use cases in just a few months. Understanding the importance of API idempotence is crucial to ensuring interaction reliability.

Failing to meet these expectations leads to frustration and adoption of third-party solutions. Conversely, an AI-first interface fosters loyalty and positions a company as innovative.

In a market where speed of adoption makes the difference, anticipating these usages becomes a strategic priority to maintain a competitive edge.

Product Differentiation in a Crowded Market

In an environment where every vendor claims to be “AI-enhanced,” it’s vital to go beyond mere feature integration. True innovation lies in reworking UX around intelligence.

A conversational or contextual suggestion system becomes a unique value proposition, hard to replicate without expertise in prompt engineering, conversational design, and modular architecture.

Early adopters of this approach position themselves as leaders and capture attention from both end users and IT decision-makers.

Example: A Swiss Logistics Provider

A logistics services provider replaced its order-tracking portal with an integrated voice and text assistant linked to ERP and WMS systems. Operators make requests in everyday language, AI extracts relevant data, and replies instantly.

This project not only cut helpdesk tickets by 70% but also improved the accuracy of shared information. It illustrates how hiding complexity simplifies the experience and creates a competitive advantage.

It also shows that an AI-first approach can apply to demanding industrial contexts with heterogeneous systems and high security requirements.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

How to Design a Truly AI-Native Experience

The key to AI-native UX lies in fine-grained user intent modeling and a modular architecture. Safeguards ensure trust and control.

Modeling User Intent

First, define business intents: what requests will users make most frequently? This analysis enables designing an optimized and relevant use case mapping.

A use case map should specify entities, constraints, and expected outcomes to guide the LLM and limit semantic or functional drift.

This initial phase requires close collaboration among business stakeholders, UX designers, and AI experts to capture intent diversity and calibrate responses.

Conversation-Driven Journeys

Instead of fixed workflows, create adaptive dialogues. Each AI response opens new branches based on the request and context, with dynamic suggestions to guide the user.

These conversation flows include validation checkpoints and feedback loops to ensure coherence and transparency of automated actions.

The result is a modular, evolvable experience that grows with user feedback and maturity.

Adding Safeguards (User-In-The-Loop)

To build trust, every AI action should be validated or adjusted by the user before execution. This “user-in-the-loop” system limits risks associated with LLM hallucinations.

You can offer writing suggestions, corrections, or operational decisions, while keeping the final control in human hands.

These validations also serve as opportunities to gather feedback and continuously improve the models.

Combining Generative AI, Business Logic, and Progressive UX

Generative AI provides the interaction surface, while business logic, implemented in microservices, ensures coherence and traceability of actions.

Progressive UX exposes features gradually as user proficiency grows: start with simple queries, then unveil advanced options based on usage.

This model promotes adoption and enriches the experience without creating discontinuities or surprises.

Designing a Modular, Scalable System

A microservices and serverless architecture makes it easy to add or modify AI modules while ensuring isolation and scalability. Each component can be updated independently.

Using open-source models and container orchestrators ensures both flexibility and cost control. You avoid vendor lock-in and maintain data ownership.

Such a design allows rapid integration of new use cases, performance optimization, and solution longevity.

Embrace an AI-Native UX to Gain Agility

Transforming from an “interface-first” to an “intention-first” model represents as much a cultural shift as a technological one. By making AI the main interface, companies simplify the experience, accelerate adoption, and stand out in an increasingly competitive market.

To succeed, you must precisely model intents, design conversational journeys, implement safeguards, and build a modular, scalable architecture. AI-native projects rely on a synergy of generative AI, business logic, and progressive design.

Our experts at Edana guide organizations through this transformation—from identifying use cases to deployment—focusing on open-source, scalable, and secure solutions. Discover our proven strategies for digital transformation.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In an environment where customer experience has become a key differentiator, understanding the unresolved frustrations that hinder satisfaction and loyalty is essential. Identifying and addressing these “pain points” aligns offerings with real expectations, optimizes processes, and strengthens long-term relationships. This article presents the four major types of pain points, outlines concrete methods to prioritize and resolve them, and provides practical advice for cultivating a continuous customer listening culture.

The Main Types of Customer Pain Points

Pain points manifest in four complementary forms, each having a distinct impact on overall experience. Categorizing them enables precise identification of challenges and the adaptation of solutions.

Productivity Pain Points

When users waste time on repetitive tasks or navigating complex interfaces, their perception of the solution deteriorates. These operational frustrations lead to decreased adoption and trust, as each additional step feels like an obstacle.

For example, a Swiss logistics company implemented a customer portal for shipment tracking. The lack of automation in report generation required tedious manual entry—nearly 30 minutes per file—causing widespread dissatisfaction. This example highlights the importance of optimizing workflows and eliminating redundant tasks.

By adopting modular interfaces based on open-source components and clear APIs, it is possible to automate workflows, making the ecosystem more scalable and efficient.

Financial Pain Points

Businesses react poorly to unexpected costs or complex pricing models. Opaque billing can be perceived as a lack of transparency and erode trust in the vendor-client relationship.

This type of frustration often arises when an additional pay-as-you-go service leads to budget overruns. It discourages the adoption of new features and hinders future investment.

By offering modular, clear solutions without vendor lock-in, it becomes easier to manage expenses. Transparent pricing communication is essential for reassuring and retaining customers.

Internal Process Breakdowns

Discrepancies between documented processes and actual practices create misalignments. Teams turn to support services to fill the gaps, increasing touchpoints and processing times.

Fragmented support or lengthy approval chains cause bottlenecks and reduced responsiveness. Project managers spend time mediating between stakeholders instead of driving business value.

Documenting clear, standardized workflows while retaining contextual flexibility ensures smoother operations. Hybrid solutions combining existing modules with custom developments better address specific business needs.

Customer Support Dissatisfaction

Slow, unresponsive, or hard-to-access support intensifies dissatisfaction. Customers expect immediate guidance, and every open ticket increases the risk of churn.

For example, a Swiss IT service firm in the German-speaking region experienced an incident escalation rate of over 40% due to the lack of a dedicated communication channel and automated follow-up. This case shows that implementing alerts and transparent reporting reduces resolution times and builds trust.

Incorporating a multichannel strategy, automating request routing, and defining service quality metrics helps anticipate issues and respond quickly.

Methods for Identifying Pain Points

Several complementary approaches facilitate the uncovering of unexpressed frustrations, from market analysis to direct listening. Each provides unique insights into unmet needs.

Competitive Analysis and Market Research

Comparing your offering with competing solutions reveals functional or pricing gaps. This analysis includes benchmarking features, pricing, and user experience.

Reviewing public feedback and testimonials on specialized platforms helps identify recurring trends. Negative feedback on a competitor can become an opportunity to position a better-suited offering.

Creating a consolidated matrix of market strengths and weaknesses, built using open-source alternatives and agile methodologies, enables quick visualization of improvement areas and innovation without vendor lock-in.

Customer Feedback Collection and Analysis

Satisfaction surveys, qualitative interviews, and in-app or email forms provide direct feedback. Automated sentiment analysis of verbatim responses reveals keywords and associated emotions.

A Swiss financial services firm implemented a post-interaction feedback system that achieved response rates above 30%. Aggregated comments highlighted a need for real-time reporting, demonstrating the importance of personalized, responsive follow-up.

Establishing continuous satisfaction indicators and NPS (Net Promoter Score) metrics ensures an up-to-date view of pain points and guides product priorities.

Sales Team Observation and Feedback

Sales representatives are on the front lines, capturing objections, specific requests, or reasons for churn. Systematically collecting their reports feeds the internal knowledge base.

Holding regular reviews (monthly or quarterly) to share these insights fosters collaboration between business and IT teams. Use cases gathered from the field guide the development of high-value features.

Using CRM tools integrated with data modeling analytics modules centralizes this feedback and quickly identifies the most frequent pain points without relying on a single vendor.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Prioritization and Internal Resolution Organization

A structured, business-aligned approach ensures efficient resource allocation and quick wins. Prioritization is based on impact and risk.

Impact and Risk Assessment

Each pain point should be scored based on its influence on revenue, satisfaction, and operational risk. A quantitative scoring system allows for ranking these irritants.

A Swiss distribution company noted that order processing delays led to a high volume of complaints. By assigning a score to this issue, it was able to justify reallocating resources to optimize the process, demonstrating the effectiveness of data-driven prioritization.

This framework enables the creation of a clear roadmap, anticipates skill requirements, and plans development efforts in line with strategic objectives, while maintaining a modular and scalable vision.

Brainstorming Sessions and Internal Focus Groups

Bringing together business, IT, and support stakeholders around pain points fosters idea generation. Collaborative workshops promote a shared vision of possible solutions.

Some ideas can be quickly tested through prototypes or proofs of concept, minimizing risk and creating a virtuous cycle of rapid iterations. This agile format emphasizes contextual expertise over one-size-fits-all solutions.

This approach supports hybrid architectures, combining open-source components with custom development to precisely meet needs while minimizing vendor lock-in.

Establishing an Action Plan and Iterative Follow-Up

The action plan outlines quick wins and medium-term initiatives. Each item is assigned an owner, a deadline, and validation criteria.

Implementing dynamic dashboards that integrate performance and satisfaction indicators enables tracking of metrics related to pain points. Regular reviews ensure continuous reassessment.

This agile setup, supported by adaptive project management tools, guarantees transparency, traceability, and ongoing improvement of the customer experience.

Fostering a Customer Listening Culture and Encouraging Regular Feedback

Retention depends on continuous dialogue and responsiveness. Structuring open and incentivized listening channels strengthens engagement.

Loyalty Programs and Targeted Incentives

Loyalty programs reward the submission of feedback or suggestions. Offering early access to new features or exclusive perks increases participation.

A Swiss healthcare institution set up a user club that provided dedicated workshops for active members. The feedback collected enabled adjustments to its patient application interface, illustrating the power of an engaged community.

Such programs create a virtuous cycle where co-creation boosts satisfaction while feeding the product roadmap with real needs.

Proactive Listening via Social Media

Social media is a rich source of informal feedback. Setting up automated monitoring enables the identification of brand mentions and sentiment analysis.

Open-source semantic analysis models facilitate sorting and categorizing comments. A rapid response to negative posts demonstrates responsiveness and attention to the customer’s voice.

This continuous listening complements formal surveys and provides a real-time barometer of customer experience.

Personalized Communication and Continuous Follow-Up

Personalizing communications based on profile, history, and interactions strengthens the sense of being heard. Segmented email campaigns and targeted in-app notifications sustain engagement.

Deploying a CRM system integrated with modular, secure components ensures message consistency and feedback traceability. Automated reminders encourage responses without overloading teams.

Regular content and feature updates based on this feedback demonstrate effective responsiveness to expectations, building trust and loyalty.

Turning Customer Pain Points into Growth Drivers

Mapping and analyzing customer frustrations across the four main categories (productivity, financial, internal processes, support) helps shape priorities. The methods described—competitive analysis, feedback collection, social listening, and field insights—provide a holistic view of unmet needs.

Scoring-based prioritization, collaborative workshops, and the implementation of iterative follow-up ensure a structured resolution aligned with business objectives. Finally, establishing loyalty programs, social monitoring, and personalized communication strengthens the listening culture and sustains continuous improvement.

While digital transformation requires in-depth handling of these pain points, our experts are available to support every step from diagnosis to implementation, prioritizing open-source, modular, and scalable solutions without vendor lock-in.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In the landscape of collaborative solutions, Microsoft SharePoint is often presented as the universal tool to centralize documents and business processes. Yet its effectiveness is largely determined by the nature and complexity of real-world needs.

This article offers an objective analysis to help IT and business decision-makers understand where SharePoint excels, where it stalls, and which pitfalls emerge after prolonged use. We also present open source alternatives and the benefits of custom development to ensure cost control, scalability, and freedom from a single vendor. You’ll gain a clear perspective to choose the document management platform best suited to your organization.

Real Advantages of SharePoint for Document Collaboration

SharePoint provides centralized document management with robust version control and built-in compliance. Its native integration with Microsoft 365 makes collaborative work seamless for organizations already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem.

Document Management and Compliance

SharePoint offers a document management engine that tracks every change, automatically archives versions, and defines retention rules according to regulatory requirements. This traceability is crucial for companies subject to ISO 27001 or financial audits.

Structured metadata enables classification of documents by project, department, or content type, and generates compliance reports via PowerShell or the admin center. These features largely eliminate the need for third-party extensions to meet legal obligations.

A financial services company standardized its document retention policy on SharePoint to satisfy regulatory demands. After six months, the team saw a 40% reduction in time spent on internal audits, demonstrating SharePoint’s ability to streamline compliance processes.

Native Microsoft 365 Integration

SharePoint libraries sync automatically with Teams, OneDrive, and Office. Users can co-edit a Word document in real time, add comments, and assign tasks without switching interfaces. This convergence reduces friction and encourages adoption among teams familiar with Microsoft 365.

Outlook allows emails to be saved directly to a SharePoint library, with a unified search index covering mail, Teams files, and intranet sites. This technical consistency enhances usability and limits the need for third-party search tools.

Flexible Sharing and Permissions

SharePoint offers a granular permissions system, allowing rights to be configured at the site, library, folder, or even document level. You can delegate management to business owners without exposing the entire repository.

External sharing relies on one-time links or password-protected links with scheduled expiration. These options enable collaboration with partners or subsidiaries while maintaining strict control over sensitive information.

In an industrial SME, engineers worked with external suppliers on technical drawings. Thanks to SharePoint’s secure links, they reduced repetitive access requests by 25%, showing that the solution can simplify inter-company collaboration when properly configured.

Structural Constraints and Hidden Costs of SharePoint

SharePoint’s architecture can become complex to configure and maintain, increasing IT dependency. License fees and third-party extension costs quickly add to the total cost of ownership (TCO), often underestimated during the decision phase.

Configuration Complexity and Maintenance

Setting up a multi-site architecture, defining content types, and creating Power Automate flows require specialized skills. Without an internal documentation repository and formal governance, operational upkeep becomes a constant challenge.

Each update to SharePoint Online or SharePoint Server may require extensive testing to validate customization compatibility. This phase prolongs deployment cycles and introduces regression risks.

Indirect Costs and Additional Licenses

Beyond Microsoft 365 subscriptions, organizations often turn to third-party solutions to fill missing functionality: advanced metadata management, complex workflows, or richer intranet interfaces. These costs stack on top of the base price and are not always anticipated.

The services of a specialized integrator quickly become indispensable to deploy complementary solutions or address functional gaps. A SharePoint consultant’s hourly rate can reach 150 CHF/hour, which heavily impacts the overall budget.

A financial institution invested in a third-party UI module, increasing its TCO by 30% over two years, confirming the necessity to evaluate all costs before committing.

Vendor Lock-in and Structural Rigidity

SharePoint enforces architectural choices that can be rigid: maximum library size, metadata column limits, storage quotas, and restrictive server configurations. Exceeding these thresholds requires refactoring or partial migration.

Deep customization via SPFx or the Power Platform can become fragile with each publisher update, leading to technical debt when scripts and web parts become incompatible.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Pitfalls and Drift After 12–24 Months of Use

Over time, SharePoint can turn into a behemoth, generating functional debt and stifling innovation. Internal adoption often wanes, resulting in knowledge loss and a static intranet beyond its original scope.

Behemoth and Functional Debt

An accumulation of workflows and Power Automate scripts, combined with web parts and heavy customizations, quickly creates an ecosystem that’s hard to document. Each update carries regression risk, and any partial overhaul can become an endless project.

Functional debt mounts when quick fixes pile up without a strategic plan. Teams ultimately bypass official tools, resorting to Excel files or traditional folder shares, undermining the initial centralization goal.

Low Adoption and Knowledge Loss

Although improving, SharePoint’s interface is still seen as austere by some business users. Limited training, a shortage of internal champions, and incomplete documentation lead to reluctance in daily use.

When a team abandons the portal, documents accumulate in untracked storage, and project knowledge disperses. Reactivating an inactive SharePoint site then becomes a challenge, as processes and permissions have fallen into disuse.

A Swiss healthcare SME saw half its users abandon SharePoint in favor of alternative solutions after one year. This decline highlighted the need for ongoing change management to maintain engagement.

Static Intranet and Document Management Misuse

Rather than evolving, some SharePoint intranets remain static, limited to a document library and a few home pages. The site then loses its added value, as it’s no longer aligned with business processes and evolving needs.

Organizations may also misuse SharePoint as a pseudo-ERP, creating lists to manage inventory, quotes, or HR — use cases for which the platform was not designed. These workarounds result in poorly optimized interfaces and nonstop maintenance.

Open Source Alternatives and Custom Development

Open source solutions like Nextcloud, Alfresco, or OnlyOffice offer similar document management features without vendor lock-in. Custom development lets you align the platform precisely with your business processes and control its long-term evolution.

Nextcloud, Alfresco, and OnlyOffice for Modular DMS

Nextcloud provides an ecosystem for storage, sharing, and document co-editing, with mobile apps and desktop sync. Its open source model frees you from licensing costs and allows deep customization of workflows.

Alfresco Community Edition delivers a rich document management engine, lifecycle rules, and an archiving system. Coupled with OnlyOffice for co-editing, this stack rivals SharePoint while ensuring full control over your data.

A Geneva institution migrated its document archives from SharePoint to Alfresco Community Edition, cutting license costs by 45%. This example highlights the appeal of an open source foundation for organizations seeking both scalability and cost control.

Elastic and Business Search Solutions

For advanced search and document analytics, Elastic offers a powerful engine capable of massive indexing, semantic queries, and integration with Kibana for dynamic dashboards.

Complementing an open source DMS, Elastic enables the creation of a tailor-made document directory with full-text search, custom filters, and automated report generation.

Custom Platforms and Avoiding Vendor Lock-in

Building a custom document platform lets you implement exactly your internal processes: approvals, workflows, dashboards, and ERP or CRM integrations, without vendor-imposed constraints.

By choosing an open source technology stack (Node.js, Spring Boot, PostgreSQL), you retain the freedom to host wherever you wish and optimize code to meet performance and security requirements.

A major logistics group entrusted its document portal overhaul to a ground-up custom development. The result: a 60% reduction in request processing time and complete independence from a third-party provider. This case demonstrates the value of a thoughtful bespoke solution.

Toward a Flexible, Controlled Document Platform

SharePoint remains a robust solution for document collaboration within a Microsoft ecosystem but quickly reveals its limitations when business processes become mission-critical over the medium and long term. Hidden costs, functional debt, and structural dependency can impede innovation and inflate maintenance.

In contrast, leveraging open source solutions or custom development ensures precise alignment with your needs, cost control over time, and freedom to evolve. Modularity, scalability, and data ownership then become genuine competitive levers.

Our experts are available to review your current platform, assess SharePoint-related risks, and guide you to a document management solution tailored to your business challenges. Whether migrating to open source alternatives or implementing custom development, we help you secure your transformation.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

Monolithic architectures, long synonymous with stability, are now a major barrier to agility. In the face of shifting markets, growing regulations, and exponential data volumes, every improvement demands weeks of development, extensive testing cycles, and increases technical debt.

To remain competitive, a company must be able to reconfigure its processes, adapt its business rules, and integrate new services in hours rather than weeks. That’s the heart of transitioning to a composable, modular, configuration-driven system—one that keeps pace with the business, not the other way around.

Isolate Critical Functions with Packaged Business Capabilities

Packaged Business Capabilities segment your key processes into independent modules. They reduce interdependencies and speed up enhancements without impacting the entire system.

Understanding the Principle of Packaged Business Capabilities

Packaged Business Capabilities (PBCs) are self-contained functional blocks dedicated to a specific business capability. Each PBC includes its own logic, data storage, and interface.

This approach relies on the principle of separation of concerns (Domain-Driven Design): by decoupling functionalities, you avoid side effects and simplify maintenance. The scope of each PBC is defined according to the company’s strategic objectives.

Concretely, a PBC can handle billing, inventory management, or authentication. Teams can improve or replace a PBC without verifying compatibility across the entire platform.

Advantages of Functional Isolation

Isolation through PBCs enhances flexibility: each module can be deployed independently and evolve at its own pace. Unit and integration tests target a narrow scope, reducing regression risk.

Scalability is also optimized: you can allocate dedicated resources to the most in-demand modules without overprovisioning the whole system. This granularity facilitates scaling and peak-load management.

Finally, this approach follows an open-source, vendor-neutral logic, avoiding closed proprietary solutions. PBCs encourage reusing existing building blocks and limit vendor lock-in.

Concrete Example: A Mid-Sized Manufacturing Company

A Swiss precision-machining firm segmented its customer order management into a dedicated PBC. Previously, every sales-flow update disrupted its monolithic ERP and halted production.

After decomposition, the order-management PBC was deployed independently and connected via an API-first approach to the existing ecosystem. Teams could adjust manufacturing priority rules in half a day instead of three weeks.

This case shows how PBC modularity can transform a rigid platform into an agile ecosystem that quickly integrates new business rules and supports growth.

Externalize Business Rules with a Dedicated Engine

Business rules should reside in a dedicated engine, not in code. This ensures responsiveness and adaptability without redeployment.

Rules Engines at the Heart of Composability

A centralized rules engine lets you define, store, and execute business logic outside the application code. Rules are modeled via a business user interface and stored in a single repository.

This decoupling accelerates updates: simply modify or activate a rule through the interface—no redeployment or service interruption required. Rules can be hierarchized and versioned to ensure traceability.

A configuration-driven design approach reduces developers’ burden and entrusts rule evolution to business experts, while automated testing maintains rigorous control.

Continuous Update Process

Updating business rules follows an agile cycle: proposal, validation, versioning, and production deployment. Each change undergoes auditing and automated quality checks.

Rules engines integrate via API-first into the ecosystem, orchestrated by open middleware. They can notify affected systems in real time and trigger workflows or alerts based on defined scenarios.

By centralizing rules, a company gains a unified view of its business logic, facilitates impact simulations, and drastically reduces risks associated with traditional deployments.

Concrete Example: A Cantonal Bank

A regional bank externalized its pricing and credit-approval rules into a dedicated engine. Previously, each new rate table required the IT team to recompile and redeploy multiple microservices.

After migration, retail-banking managers adjust scoring criteria and commission rules directly in the engine’s interface. New rules take effect within hours, complete with history tracking and impact assessments.

This experience demonstrates that centralizing business rules enhances responsiveness to regulatory changes and delivers measurable competitive advantage.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Configuration-Driven Workflows and Flexible Orchestrations

A configured workflow engine removes the need for custom development for each business sequence. A configuration-first approach shortens lead times and reduces validation complexity.

Configuration-Driven Workflow Concept

In a configuration-driven approach, business sequences (web business workflows) are defined through a visual editor. Each scenario is stored in a human-readable, editable format.

Administrators can activate, deactivate, or modify steps without changing a single line of code. Scenario tests run automatically on the same platform, ensuring compliance with business processes.

This method fosters collaboration between technical and functional teams while maintaining up-to-date documentation and a complete evolution history.

Process Orchestration and Monitoring

The orchestration engine connects PBCs, the rules engine, and external services via APIs. It handles error retries, timeouts, and approval loops based on configured rules.

A monitoring dashboard displays real-time executions, latencies, and bottlenecks. Proactive alerts notify stakeholders immediately of any anomalies or threshold breaches.

This oversight enables rapid intervention, configuration adjustments, and performance optimization without affecting the user experience.

API-First Middleware and Technical-Functional Governance

Open, API-first middleware is the backbone of a composable architecture. Technical-functional governance tracks and secures every modification.

Principles of an API-First Architecture

The API-first approach treats every service as a consumable, documented, and versioned API. Interface contracts are defined in initial workshops with business stakeholders.

Each team builds services according to these specifications and exposes them through a secured API portal. Third-party developers and partners can integrate functionality without knowing the internal system.

This method ensures technological independence, simplifies multi-layer alignments, and allows services to be replaced or added without impacting the broader ecosystem.

Governance and Evolution Auditing

Technical-functional governance relies on an API repository where every change requires approval. Modifications are tracked, versioned, and documented automatically.

Approval workflows involving IT leadership, architects, and business owners ensure compliance with security standards and regulatory requirements. Each API version is archived to facilitate auditing.

This mechanism boosts transparency around changes, enables controlled production releases, and reduces service-interruption risks.

Concrete Example: A National Retail Chain

A retail group implemented API-first middleware to connect its POS systems, ERP, and e-commerce platform. Previously, every update demanded point-to-point development and lengthy integration tests.

The new middleware centralizes APIs and orchestrates commercial flows. Business teams draft specifications and approve API contracts via a portal—no coding required.

This case illustrates how open, governed middleware can deploy new omnichannel features in hours while ensuring data security and consistency.

The Benefits of a Composable Architecture

By isolating critical functions into PBCs, externalizing business rules, driving workflows by configuration, and adopting API-first middleware, you transform your system into an agile, modular ecosystem. Each evolution becomes faster, safer, and more cost-effective, while minimizing technical debt and vendor lock-in.

Our experts are ready to assess your current architecture, define the strategy best suited to your context, and guide you step by step toward a composable enterprise that moves at the speed of your business, supported by effective change management.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

A custom software project involves much more than technical expertise: it fundamentally shapes an organization’s structure, teams and trajectory. Adopting a clear stance on what we refuse to do is part of our professional responsibility.

By refusing certain practices—deliveries without proper scoping, vendor lock-in, low-cost offers, rushed projects or unrealistic promises—we lay the groundwork for healthy collaboration. This approach ensures relevant, sustainable solutions aligned with the business objectives of Swiss stakeholders, whether they are IT Directors, CIOs/CTOs, COOs or executive management.

In-Depth Understanding of Business Needs

We refuse to deliver software without a thorough understanding of business challenges. We believe every project demands a robust scoping phase and a critical review of requirements.

Scoping and Functional Alignment

A project built without a detailed scoping phase often relies on incomplete or outdated assumptions. This lack of overall vision prevents anticipating friction points between existing processes and the future software solution. It also denies decision-makers a clear map of priorities, risks and critical milestones.

Scoping is not just a documentation exercise: it is a collaborative session among business experts, IT leaders and stakeholders aimed at identifying operational constraints and formalizing strategic objectives. This phase must rely on analyses of real use cases, workshops and sometimes validation prototypes.

By integrating regular feedback from end users from the very beginning, we avoid major discrepancies between the delivered product and actual needs. The investment made during scoping then results in smoother development cycles, increased adoption and a significant reduction in post-deployment adjustments.

Consequences of Insufficient Understanding

When business objectives are not clarified, software may appear technically compliant yet remain unsuitable for daily use. Teams may bypass the tool, maintain parallel manual processes or apply local workarounds to compensate for perceived shortcomings.

This situation creates functional technical debt: every quick customization becomes a breaking point during future upgrades, inflating maintenance costs and complicating updates. In the long run, the tool survives more by inertia than by delivering real added value.

Lack of user buy-in can also boomerang on project sponsorship, undermining trust among IT Directors, management and the service provider. Once this trust is eroded, it becomes very difficult to restore without starting new audit and redesign phases.

Concrete Example of Inadequate Scoping

A Swiss SME in the logistics sector launched an internal portal without a thorough scoping workshop. Business teams discovered too late that certain storage rules and delivery-deadline constraints were not taken into account. Each omission led to several additional hours of manual work per week.

In the end, although the software was technically complete, it was set aside pending a full redesign of business rules. This example demonstrates that not allocating time to formalize requirements can result in double investment: the initial development and a full project restart a few months later.

It also highlights the importance of valuing the scoping phase upfront, recognizing it in the commercial proposal as a standalone stage essential for project success and team adoption.

Opposition to Vendor Lock-In

We refuse all forms of vendor lock-in, whether technological, contractual or operational. We favor open, well-documented and reversible architectures that ensure independence and longevity.

Dangers of Vendor Lock-In

Choosing a proprietary solution without an exit plan exposes the company to heavy reliance on a vendor or service provider. Every update or modification becomes a tacit renegotiation of rates and terms. This leads to vendor lock-in, longer development timelines and rising costs due to the complexity of interfacing with other systems.

Vendor lock-in can also hinder innovation, as adding new components often requires adopting the vendor’s ecosystem, even if it does not fully meet the needs. This leads to license inflation and a heterogeneous portfolio of applications that is hard to maintain.

Open and Reversible Architectures

To avoid these pitfalls, prioritize modular, standardized solutions. A hybrid approach combining open-source building blocks with well-isolated proprietary components ensures an evolving platform while keeping license costs under control.

Comprehensive documentation of data flows, APIs and exchange formats is essential. It helps limit technological disruptions and facilitates switching to another provider or technology if needs evolve.

Reversibility can also rely on clear contracts: data portability clauses, source code delivery guarantees or split-billing provisions for licenses. This contractual transparency builds trust and commits the provider to long-term support.

Example of Technological Lock-In

A Swiss training organization had invested in a proprietary SaaS platform to manage registrations, billing and assessments. After two years, upgrade costs had tripled and adapting to new course curricula became prohibitive.

Migration to an open-source solution orchestrated by another provider proved complex because the data could not be exported in bulk. Several tables had to be recreated manually and billing processes rewritten.

This case illustrates that unanticipated vendor lock-in generates significant extra costs and undermines organizational agility. It also shows that implementing open standards and interchangeable formats is key to long-term autonomy.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Rejecting Price-Focused Proposals

We refuse to sell projects based solely on price or billable-days. We favor a value-driven, governance-focused and sustainable approach.

Drawbacks of the Cost-Per-Day Model

A proposal based on the daily rate often conceals a project’s real complexity. It creates an illusion of budget control while generating hidden technical debt whose bill surfaces after kickoff.

Teams under pressure to stay within budget may be tempted to cut test coverage, skimp on documentation or favor ill-suited standard components. Ultimately, the software becomes costly to maintain and hard to evolve.

In a Swiss context where software-driven processes are often critical, this approach frequently backfires, generating hidden costs and extending deployment timelines for each new version.

Governance and Long-Term Vision

Rather than focusing on billable days, it’s better to clarify expected deliverables, success criteria and business milestones. This shared governance allows measuring the actual value produced at each stage.

Implementing indicators—time to production, number of incidents, adoption rate—makes project performance more transparent. It also encourages informed trade-offs between delivery speed and code quality.

A long-term vision includes planning for future evolutions and identifying consolidation points in advance. This limits the proliferation of disparate tools and maintains a coherent, enduring foundation.

Example of an Ill-Fitting Low-Cost Offer

A Swiss financial company chose the cheapest offer to overhaul its reporting module. Under time pressure, the developers delivered an “MVP” with no documentation or load testing.

Two months after go-live, the platform maxed out during a semi-annual closing period, causing delays of several days and regulatory penalties. Bringing it up to standard cost three times the initial budget.

This experience shows that an initially attractive price can lead to overruns and jeopardize the company’s compliance and reputation. It underscores the importance of a value-based proposal and comprehensive project governance.

Uncompromising Stand on Poorly Scoped Projects and Unrealistic Promises

We refuse to take on rushed projects based on vague assumptions and embellished pitches aimed solely at securing a signature.

Preventing Poorly Scoped Projects

Starting without a clear vision merely shifts risk rather than absorbing it. Unverified assumptions can lead to cascading change requests, lengthening timelines and increasing complexity.

To limit these deviations, an audit and prioritization phase is indispensable. It allows needs to be tested against real processes and identifies critical functionalities that justify early investment.

This step, often seen as an unnecessary cost, is actually a protective investment. It limits surprises and aligns expectations of business units, IT teams and the provider on a shared ground of truth.

Integrity in Communication and Realistic Promises

Software projects always involve uncertainties: validation timelines, integration complexity, regulatory or business changes. Hiding these uncertainties undermines mutual trust.

A clear and transparent discussion of risks, necessary trade-offs and available leeway fosters a sustainable partnership. It allows scope adjustments based on real constraints and anticipates potential bottlenecks.

Stating upfront what cannot be guaranteed—performance under heavy load, fixed deadlines without retrospection or exhaustive coverage without an appropriate budget—strengthens the relationship and avoids “broken promise” scenarios.

Technical Rigor and Critical Thinking

Being an agile provider doesn’t mean lacking rigor. Technology choices must be challenged based on context and risk. Adopting a methodology without critical thinking can lead to failure.

We believe a digital transformation project requires continuous dialogue, regular code reviews and honest progress checkpoints. Any deviation between requirement and implementation must be raised, documented and prioritized.

This demanding stance fosters a shared responsibility dynamic: each participant is encouraged to challenge decisions in the interest of quality, security and the solution’s longevity.

Example of an Abandoned Rigid Project

A cantonal administration had approved a monolithic architecture and an inflexible timeline. Despite technical warnings, the project began and accumulated delays.

Midway, the IT Director decided to halt the project due to lack of flexibility and identified security risks. Restarting required a full audit and technological reorientation toward a modular foundation.

This case shows that accepting a project without adaptability is more dangerous than suspending it right away. The timely halt avoided years of cost overruns and premature obsolescence.

Building Robust and Sustainable Software Projects

Turning down certain practices isn’t about rigidity, but about professional responsibility. By demanding an in-depth understanding of business challenges, ensuring technological independence, prioritizing value creation over cost alone, and maintaining transparent communication, we lay the foundation for enduring projects.

These requirements are the guarantee of adopted, scalable and secure software that supports the growth and agility of Swiss organizations. Our experts are at your disposal to assess your challenges, challenge your choices and guide you on the most suitable digital trajectory.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

In an environment where every document becomes strategic, manual version control quickly reaches its limits. Historically applied to code, versioning logic is now essential for structuring and securing all types of content.

As a unified platform, GitLab enables marketing, HR, legal, and finance teams to adopt version control workflows, collaborate with greater confidence, and boost productivity. By professionalizing change tracking and ensuring flawless traceability, modern organizations reduce operational errors and bring business units closer to IT—the cornerstone of a successful digital transformation.

Structuring Document Work with Versioning

The creation of unified document repositories transforms the management of internal procedures. Teams gain clarity and avoid duplicates.

Basic Principles of Versioning Beyond Code

Versioning is based on preserving every state of a document along with a descriptive message. Thanks to commits, it’s possible to revert to a previous stage in just a few clicks, regardless of the content type.

This systematic approach eliminates uncertainty from concurrent edits and strengthens metadata management. With every change, the history is automatically enriched, guaranteeing a comprehensive view of all evolutions.

By contextualizing each update, teams quickly understand who made which change and why. This makes internal and external audits much simpler.

Creating Shared Repositories for Business Teams

GitLab lets you set up dedicated repositories for each department, governed by specific management rules. Branches correspond to work versions, for example “HR-payroll-v2” or “marketing-print-campaign”.

Each team member can create a personal branch to test changes without affecting the main content. Once approved, that branch is merged into the primary repository via a merge request.

These standardized workflows ensure document consistency and smooth coordination among contributors, regardless of their location or technical skill level.

Illustration: Centralizing Financial Processes

A financial institution migrated all its reports and procedures to GitLab. Each year, the department updates analysis reports, financial statements, and compliance reports.

Previously, documents circulated by email, creating multiple versions and confusion during financial audits. With a GitLab repository, every change is tracked, approved by compliance officers, and then published.

This example shows how versioning structures content, eliminates duplicates, and strengthens the reliability of financial archives.

Securing and Tracing Every Change

Traceability and security become core benefits from day one of using GitLab. Every action is timestamped and attributed.

Detailed Traceability for Audits and Compliance

In regulated industries, keeping a detailed history of document changes is indispensable. GitLab records the author, date, and reason for each commit.

During an inspection, you simply extract the repository’s history to demonstrate adherence to processes and the team’s responsiveness to regulatory requirements.

This transparency reduces error risks and potential disputes while providing a reliable foundation for any certification or external audit.

Granular Access and Permission Management

GitLab provides fine-grained control over roles and permissions: contributor, maintainer, reporter, or reader. Each profile has rights tailored to its document responsibilities through user identity management.

Protected branches ensure that no critical changes can be merged without prior approval. This restriction prevents unwanted alterations and preserves content integrity.

Centralized user management simplifies onboarding new team members and immediately revokes access for those leaving the organization.

{CTA_BANNER_BLOG_POST}

Collaborating Seamlessly between IT and Business Units

GitLab fosters dialogue between technical teams and business services. Shared workflows break down silos.

Project-Specific Branches for Cross-Functional Initiatives

For each project—whether a new marketing website or a quality manual—an isolated branch consolidates all changes. Contributions can originate from business users without direct IT involvement.

IT handles the initial repository setup and defines validation pipelines. From that point on, domain experts manage their own content and versioning via CI/CD pipelines.

This approach significantly shortens document production timelines, allowing IT to focus on automating and maintaining the GitLab platform.

Asynchronous Reviews and Approvals

Merge requests (MRs) have become a collaborative ritual: the contributor submits changes, business reviewers comment, and IT verifies pipeline compliance.

Each comment ties to a specific commit, enabling clear justification for every adjustment. All feedback loops are visible in the history, and no change gets lost in informal channels.

This asynchronous workflow reduces in-person meetings and lets teams approve content according to their own schedules.

Illustration: E-Commerce Content Management

An e-commerce platform empowered its marketing teams to manage product pages and visual assets. Through GitLab, every update to a page, image, or description is handled via a dedicated branch.

Internal reviewers add comments directly on the merge request, eliminating email exchanges and scattered versions. IT now focuses solely on running PDF conversion pipelines.

This example demonstrates how GitLab streamlines collaboration between business units and IT while maintaining rigorous tracking of each iteration.

Managing Versions at Scale Without Chaos

When dozens of collaborators edit simultaneously, GitLab structures and orchestrates each delivery. Conflicts become manageable.

Modeling Validation Workflows

GitLab allows you to define pipeline templates for different document types: guides, manuals, instructions. Each template includes verification steps, consistency checks, and final document generation.

Approvals can be sequenced: business reviewer, quality manager, then automated publication. Each stage validates compliance before proceeding.

This modeling standardizes document production regardless of project complexity, ensuring uniform and reliable outputs.

Automating Document Releases

On every merge to the main branch, GitLab triggers automated generation of final documents (PDF, HTML, internal formats) via CI/CD pipelines. The resulting assets are stored in the repository for instant access.

Publication notifications are sent automatically to stakeholders, eliminating manual tasks and shortening delivery times.

This ensures a continuous, reproducible publishing cycle even when multiple teams work in parallel.

Illustration: Industrial Documentation Management

A large Swiss industrial group maintains over 200 up-to-date safety procedures each year. Documents are organized into multiple repositories by site and equipment.

GitLab orchestrates validation workflows from the safety engineer to the plant director. Each version is tagged to guarantee compliance during inspections.

This example shows that at scale, versioning with GitLab eliminates chaos and enforces rigorous documentation control.

Versioning for Everyone: A Catalyst for Efficiency and Compliance

By adopting GitLab for document management, organizations gain structure, security, and agility. Systematic versioning reduces errors, simplifies traceability, and enhances collaboration between business units and IT. Modular workflows and automated pipelines enable large-scale version control without added complexity.

Whether you oversee HR, marketing, legal, or industrial documentation, mastering version control systems becomes a lever for internal performance and a competitive advantage. Our experts are ready to assess your maturity, define tailored workflows, and support your GitLab deployment.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert