Categories
Digital Consultancy & Business (EN) Featured-Post-Transformation-EN

Succeeding in a New ERP Transition: Avoid Pitfalls and Build Sustainable Performance Gains

Auteur n°4 – Mariami

By Mariami Minadze
Views: 14

Summary – Switching to a new ERP reshapes your processes, data flows, and growth capacity; failure often stems from inadequate planning and governance, not the solution. Identify real needs through business mapping and collaborative workshops, define KPIs, prioritize high-ROI modules, and adopt an iterative agile approach for a rapid, controlled rollout.
Solution: shared governance, master data management, modular architecture, and agile oversight to turn your migration into a sustainable performance driver.

Switching to a new ERP goes beyond simply updating an IT tool. This strategic decision shapes processes, data flows, and the organization’s ability to meet growth challenges. For SMEs, the main risk lies less in choosing the right solution and more in how the transition is planned and managed.

This article presents the essential principles for succeeding in this digital transformation: identifying real needs, engaging stakeholders, adopting an agile approach, and rethinking processes. The goal is to turn this project into a sustainable performance lever, ensuring scalability, security, and operational efficiency. By relying on a pragmatic, business-centered approach, it becomes possible to achieve tangible ROI and ensure a fast, controlled deployment.

Clarify actual requirements without overengineering

Identifying fundamental requirements prevents the project from being diluted in unnecessary specifications. Defining an appropriate scope facilitates alignment with business objectives and shortens deployment timelines.

Before selecting an ERP, a detailed mapping of existing processes helps distinguish indispensable features from those that stem from excessive customization. This step relies on collaborative workshops involving key users and process owners. The goal is to achieve a shared understanding of real needs before drafting an ERP requirements document.

A thorough analysis of current workflows often uncovers discrepancies between official procedures and actual practices. These gaps can reveal hidden needs or redundant tasks to eliminate. By rethinking the scope without adding unnecessary technical layers, the company gains clarity and agility.

Finally, limiting functional requirements upfront allows better control of the budget and project duration. A streamlined scope delivers faster ROI, while leaving room for future enhancements.

Understanding existing business processes

The review phase must involve both financial managers and field operators. Interviews and on-site observations bring to light informal practices often unknown to management. These discrepancies can lead to complex, costly configurations in an over-specified ERP.

Documenting data flows and interaction methods helps identify redundancies and bottlenecks. This holistic view serves as the foundation for defining a coherent functional scope. Each validated process will translate into a standard module or configuration in the future system.

For example, a mid-sized manufacturing company discovered it was using five parallel spreadsheets to manage procurement, resulting in stock variances of over 15% each month. This finding made complex custom modules unnecessary and demonstrated that a basic procurement configuration was sufficient to stabilize inventory management.

Defining clear business objectives

An ERP transition gains relevance when each objective is tied to a performance indicator (KPI). Whether it’s billing cycle time, inventory turnover rate, or financial close duration, linking a KPI to each requirement ensures precise framing. This avoids developing features whose business impact remains unclear.

Involving business managers in defining these KPIs fosters ownership of the project. Each technical requirement is then connected to a measurable benefit, enabling realistic budgeting and swift trade-offs. This approach aims to limit scope creep and steer the solution toward value creation.

Gathering quantified objectives also enables planning acceptance tests in advance. Teams receive a clear checklist to validate the new ERP against business expectations, boosting confidence and minimizing costly rework.

Prioritizing essential features

Focusing first on high-impact operational modules is a lever for accelerating time-to-value. Critical features go live first, while secondary options can wait for later phases. This prioritization is based on process mapping and the defined KPIs.

Breaking the project into phases allows rapid deployment of core functions, then gradual expansion of usage. This approach reduces the risk of overload and provides opportunities to adjust course after each phase. It is one of the key principles of a successful ERP transition.

By limiting the initial scope to indispensable modules, the company better controls its budget and reduces the effort required for initial training. Users gain confidence with a stable, scalable system before tackling additional functionalities.

Involve stakeholders early to ensure buy-in

Engaging users, executives, and technical teams from the outset ensures a shared vision of the project. Involving sponsors and business liaisons facilitates decision-making and strengthens commitment.

A multidisciplinary steering committee—bringing together the IT department, finance, operations, and business representatives—promotes alignment on objectives and responsiveness to obstacles. Executive sponsors provide the necessary legitimacy to rapidly resolve blockers.

Regular workshops ensure coherence between technical constraints and business challenges. These meetings validate configuration choices, anticipate training needs, and adjust the roadmap.

Active participation by future users in validation sessions helps identify resistance early and address it before deployment. This reduces the risk of data transfer issues and low adoption rates.

Align IT and business teams

Alignment between the IT department and business units relies on a common language centered on processes rather than technologies. Emphasizing business value over technical features fosters mutual understanding. This approach enables IT to propose well-suited solutions and business teams to express priorities without undue complexity.

Moreover, simple project governance models—integrated into a collaborative tool—provide full transparency on progress and decisions. This visibility prevents misunderstandings and ensures smooth deployment.

Mobilize executive sponsors

Appointing an executive sponsor streamlines budgetary and functional decision-making. This top-level advocate addresses strategic priorities and unlocks the internal resources needed. Without such support, the project may stall amid competing interests or business imperatives.

The sponsor approves key milestones and communicates with senior leadership. This stance enhances project credibility and enables swift handling of schedule deviations or additional funding requests.

For example, an industrial player appointed its COO as the ERP migration sponsor, overcoming resistance related to reorganizing logistics flows. The project stayed on its initial timeline and met its objectives.

Ensure continuous communication

A structured communication plan includes frequent status updates, concise materials, and user feedback. This practice maintains engagement and uncovers early signs of dissatisfaction or confusion.

Internal newsletters or dedicated collaboration spaces offer transparent channels to share progress, successes, and challenges. Pilot user testimonials enhance project legitimacy and encourage gradual adoption.

Finally, systematically feeding back insights into governance bodies establishes a continuous improvement loop.

Edana: strategic digital partner in Switzerland

We support companies and organizations in their digital transformation

Accept functional flexibility and adopt agility

Building flexibility into configuration reduces the risk of deadlocks caused by excessive requirements. The agile approach promotes regular deliverables and adjustments based on user feedback.

Adopting an agile methodology for an ERP project means dividing deployment into functional sprints, each delivering a coherent set of modules. This approach quickly gathers user feedback and allows real-time scope adjustments.

Functional flexibility means not freezing processes in the initial requirements document. On the contrary, adjustments are an integral part of the project, enabling responsiveness to regulatory or business changes.

This approach ensures better control over timelines and costs while enhancing implementation quality through regular user input.

Agile configuration approach

Iterative implementation first deploys core modules (accounting, procurement, inventory), then progressively adds extensions. Each cycle includes planning, development, validation, and deployment.

This agility reduces the “big bang” effect and limits the risk of widespread user rejection. Training and documentation follow naturally in step with module deliveries.

For instance, a retail distributor chose a four-phase delivery. This breakdown allowed for adjusting discrepancies and refining configurations while maintaining a stable ERP. The example demonstrates that agility improves quality and secures deadlines.

Value-driven iterations

Each iteration must be defined by a clearly identified business value: shorter billing cycles, reliable inventory, or improved financial reporting. Sprint objectives align with these targeted gains.

By prioritizing features with high ERP project ROI, companies can justify investments to leadership and quickly adjust priorities in case of variances. This logic directs every deliverable toward a measurable operational benefit.

Functional adjustments stem directly from performance indicators, ensuring the ERP truly serves the company strategy. This value-driven control limits unnecessary developments and boosts team buy-in.

Change management and feedback loops

Capturing feedback from each partial deployment feeds the project team’s backlog. Identified issues are resolved before the next phase, continuously stabilizing the system.

Steering committees include a review of lessons learned—both functional and organizational—ensuring constant alignment of expectations.

At the end of each sprint, a formal retrospective validates gains and plans adjustments. This short loop between production and feedback increases business confidence and maintains project momentum.

Optimize processes and plan for system scalability

Rethinking workflows during migration boosts efficiency and eliminates redundant tasks. Data governance and anticipating technical evolution ensure long-term robustness.

Migrating to a new ERP is a unique opportunity to redesign workflows and automate manual tasks. This optimization relies on analyzing process maps and real-world operations.

Concurrently, data governance must be defined to guarantee quality, traceability, and security. Clear rules for rights management and data retention support scalability and regulatory compliance.

Finally, anticipating the ERP’s technical scalability is essential to avoid technology lock-in. The chosen architecture should be modular, open, and aligned with open-source principles.

Redesigning workflows for greater efficiency

Each process identified during scoping is revisited to eliminate low-value tasks. Automating data entry, integrating in real time with logistics or financial modules, and implementing streamlined approval workflows all enhance operational flow.

Data governance and security

Establishing a single master data repository ensures consistency and reliability of shared information. Governance rules must define roles, responsibilities, and validation cycles for each data type.

Security measures include encrypting sensitive data, fine-grained rights management, and access traceability. These practices protect the company from non-compliance risks and external threats.

Anticipating scalability and avoiding vendor lock-in

Choosing a modular, open-source solution limits reliance on a single vendor. This approach allows adding extensions or modifying modules without prohibitive licensing costs or compatibility constraints.

Planning for a service-oriented or microservices architecture from the outset simplifies third-party tool integration and system evolution. Updates can then be conducted independently, without global impact.

Turn your ERP transition into a lasting competitive advantage

The success of an ERP migration rests on four pillars: precise needs scoping, shared governance between business and IT, an agile approach for scope adjustments, and workflow redesign for enhanced efficiency. By mastering data governance and choosing an evolutionary architecture, you can limit vendor lock-in risks and secure future upgrades.

SMEs that approach their ERP transition as a strategic initiative, rather than merely a software upgrade, transform this challenge into a performance lever. Whether you are a CIO, IT director, or CEO, our open-source and hybrid solutions experts are ready to support you at every stage, from strategy through operational execution.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

By Mariami

Project Manager

PUBLISHED BY

Mariami Minadze

Mariami is an expert in digital strategy and project management. She audits the digital ecosystems of companies and organizations of all sizes and in all sectors, and orchestrates strategies and plans that generate value for our customers. Highlighting and piloting solutions tailored to your objectives for measurable results and maximum ROI is her specialty.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about ERP Migration

How do you avoid oversizing when selecting an ERP?

To avoid oversizing, start with an accurate mapping of business processes and identify the essential features. Conduct workshops with key users to distinguish real needs from superficial options. Limit the initial scope to the essentials and plan for future enhancements. This approach ensures a quick ROI, a controlled deployment, and maintains flexibility to adapt the system as your business grows.

What role does analyzing existing processes play before migration?

Analyzing existing processes highlights the gaps between official procedures and daily practices. By documenting data flows and manual tasks, you detect duplicates, bottlenecks, and hidden needs. This comprehensive view serves as a foundation to define a coherent functional scope and limit unnecessary customizations. It also makes it easier to choose suitable standard modules.

How do you define and track relevant KPIs for an ERP migration?

Associate each objective with a measurable indicator (invoicing time, inventory turnover rate, financial closing cycle). Involve business stakeholders to validate these KPIs and set realistic targets. Integrate them into the specifications and use them as a basis for acceptance testing. Continuous monitoring of these indicators ensures the ERP delivers tangible value from deployment onward.

How do you ensure stakeholder buy-in for the project?

Create a multidisciplinary steering committee bringing together IT, business units, and executive sponsors. Organize regular workshops to validate configuration choices and gather feedback. Active user involvement from the testing phase and transparent communication on progress strengthen engagement. The executive sponsor provides legitimacy and will quickly unblock strategic decisions.

Why prioritize an open source and modular solution?

An open source, modular solution reduces the risk of vendor lock-in and prohibitive license costs. It offers a scalable architecture, facilitates the integration of new extensions, and allows bespoke developments aligned with your business specifics. This approach ensures autonomy, flexibility, and long-term budget control.

How do you structure an ERP project in agile mode?

Break the deployment into functional sprints, starting with core modules (accounting, procurement, inventory). At each iteration, plan, develop, test, and deploy a coherent set of features. This cadence encourages rapid feedback, scope adjustments, and minimizes the risk of a 'big bang'. Agile enhances implementation quality and eases adoption.

How do you ensure scalability and avoid vendor lock-in?

Choose a SOA or microservices architecture with open APIs and a modular solution. Adopt open standards and rely on open source to develop and integrate third-party components without depending on a single vendor. This strategy provides the flexibility to add features or migrate to new technologies.

What success indicators should you use to measure ROI after migration?

Measure tangible gains such as reduced processing times, stock accuracy, fewer data entry errors, and efficient financial closings. Compare these KPIs before and after deployment. Also include user satisfaction and time to proficiency. These indicators demonstrate the operational and financial impact of the migration.

CONTACT US

They trust us for their digital transformation

Let’s talk about you

Describe your project to us, and one of our experts will get back to you.

SUBSCRIBE

Don’t miss our strategists’ advice

Get our insights, the latest digital strategies and best practices in digital transformation, innovation, technology and cybersecurity.

Let’s turn your challenges into opportunities

Based in Geneva, Edana designs tailor-made digital solutions for companies and organizations seeking greater competitiveness.

We combine strategy, consulting, and technological excellence to transform your business processes, customer experience, and performance.

Let’s discuss your strategic challenges.

022 596 73 70

Agence Digitale Edana sur LinkedInAgence Digitale Edana sur InstagramAgence Digitale Edana sur Facebook