Views: 8
Summary – Facing exploding volumes and increasingly complex Oracle licenses, CIOs struggle to control budgets and data sovereignty, hindering IT agility. Open source databases (PostgreSQL, MariaDB) have reached enterprise maturity, offering performance, cost transparency, and architectural freedom—provided you budget for the migration and establish clear governance.
Solution: launch a comprehensive audit, define a phased migration plan with agile governance, and build a center of excellence to secure skills and deployments.
For decades, Oracle Database has reigned supreme over critical systems, combining robustness with advanced features. Yet the rise of open source alternatives, led by PostgreSQL, MariaDB, and MySQL, is changing the landscape in large organizations and the public sector.
Today, migrating from Oracle to open databases raises a question far broader than mere cost savings: it represents a strategic decision for the sustainability, sovereignty, and resilience of your IT environment. This article explores why this debate is resurfacing, what open source truly offers, how to assess the actual costs, and which pitfalls to avoid for a successful transition.
Why Choose Oracle or Open Source
Exponential data growth and budgetary pressure are reigniting the debate over database engine selection. The pursuit of transparency, sovereignty, and flexibility is prompting CIOs to redefine their strategy.
Data Volume Explosion and Financial Constraints
Over the past decade, some organizations have seen their data volumes increase more than thirtyfold, forcing a complete rethink of database architecture. This explosion requires optimizing storage and licensing costs, especially when each new partition can incur substantial additional fees.
Today’s CIOs must balance investments in hardware, licensing fees, and feature development. The question is no longer simply “Which engine should we choose?” but “How can we ensure scalability without blowing the budget?”
In this context, the temptation to shift to open source is growing, as licensing models are more predictable and transparent, easing medium- and long-term budget planning.
Increasing Complexity of Proprietary Licenses
Oracle contracts are notorious for their opacity and complexity, with usage rights, add-on options, and virtualization-related adjustments. Every major update can reopen negotiations on existing agreements, creating extra work for legal and finance teams.
This complexity hinders agility, as forecasting evolution costs becomes a true challenge. CIOs spend considerable time deciphering license clauses instead of focusing on delivering business value.
Vendor lock-in often stems less from technical features than from contractual commitments, which can tie an organization to a single provider for several years.
PostgreSQL’s Rise as a Credible Alternative
PostgreSQL has earned its status as an enterprise-grade database management system, thanks to advanced features (JSON support, logical replication, partitioning) and an active community. Open source extensions now deliver high availability and scalability on par with proprietary solutions.
A large Swiss public administration migrated its test data to a PostgreSQL cluster to validate compatibility with its analytics tools. The trial revealed that read-write performance was at least equivalent to Oracle, and the ecosystem proved ready for production workloads.
This example demonstrates that during prototyping, open source alternatives can integrate seamlessly without sacrificing reliability, while offering greater transparency into the codebase and technical roadmap.
The Real Promises of Open Source Databases
Open source provides full control over costs and technical roadmap without sacrificing performance. Modern ecosystems allow you to align your architecture with cloud and microservices standards.
Cost Transparency and Budget Predictability
With an open source license, expenses focus on hosting, professional support, and training, rather than per-core or per-volume pricing. This clarity simplifies budget management by limiting threshold effects and unexpected adjustments during operations.
The Apache or PostgreSQL license lets you size your infrastructure according to business load, without fearing contract revisions after a traffic spike or functional expansion. The impact on the TCO becomes clearer and more manageable. (Learn more about TCO.)
This financial transparency frees up resources to invest in performance optimization, security, or analytics, rather than redirecting budgets to license scaling.
Technical Maturity and Operational Quality
Open source engines like PostgreSQL have become synonymous with reliability, featuring regular release cycles and rigorous validation processes. Audit, encryption, and replication capabilities are available natively or via extensions maintained by active communities.
Several Swiss fintechs illustrate this: after a testing phase, one institution migrated its customer data repository to PostgreSQL, observing stability equivalent to Oracle while reducing maintenance window durations.
This case shows that open source can support core financial services, delivering resilience and compliance guarantees that meet industry standards.
Architectural Freedom and Rich Ecosystems
Open source databases naturally integrate into distributed, microservices, and cloud-native architectures. The absence of licensing constraints encourages adoption of complementary tools (Kafka, Elasticsearch, TimescaleDB) to build high-performance data pipelines.
A Geneva-based industrial company piloted a PostgreSQL cluster on Kubernetes to manage its real-time production flows. This approach allowed deployment of ephemeral instances based on load, without contractual lock-in or additional costs for activating new software components.
This example demonstrates that open source can be a lever for architectural agility, providing a modular framework to combine various components and meet evolving business needs.
Edana: strategic digital partner in Switzerland
We support companies and organizations in their digital transformation
The Myth of “Cheaper” Open Source
Open source is not synonymous with free, but rather with shifting costs to expertise and governance. Real value is measured in sustainability, agility, and the ability to evolve your architecture over time.
Costs Shift, They Don’t Disappear
Migration requires initial investments: auditing the existing environment, rewriting stored procedures, adapting data schemas, and performance testing. These costs are often underestimated during the scoping phase.
Effort focuses on upskilling teams, setting up dedicated CI/CD pipelines, and governing schema versions. Professional support may be necessary to secure the transition.
Over the long term, these investments translate into lower licensing bills, but they must be anticipated and budgeted like any large-scale project.
Value Beyond Acquisition Cost
The real gain goes beyond licensing savings. It’s about gaining the flexibility to choose providers, adjust your architecture, and integrate new features quickly, without contract renegotiations.
An open IT environment facilitates innovation, enabling teams to prototype modules or integrate third-party services without connection fees or additional licenses. This autonomy enhances responsiveness to market changes.
ROI measurement should include time to deployment, reduced time-to-market, and the ability to meet new business needs without hidden financial constraints.
Governance and Expertise are Essential
Managing an open source fleet requires a clear policy for versions, patches, and security. Without governance, each team might deploy different engine variants, generating technical debt and operational risks.
Establishing an internal Center of Excellence or partnering with an integrator ensures a single reference standard and best practices. This approach harmonizes deployments and controls upgrade trajectories.
Internal expertise is crucial to reduce vendor dependence and steer IT evolution autonomously and securely.
Risks of Migrating from Oracle to Open Source
Transitioning from Oracle to open source databases is a transformation project, not a simple lift & shift. Without rigorous preparation, it can lead to delays, cost overruns, and a new form of vendor lock-in.
Migration Complexity and Effort
Oracle schemas, complex PL/SQL procedures, and proprietary features (specific data types, materialized views) are not always natively compatible. Data migration to PostgreSQL demands a precise inventory and methodical rewriting effort. Migration best practices.
A Swiss insurance institution had to spend over six months adapting its analytics function catalog. The lack of reliable automated conversion tools required significant manual work and reinforced project teams.
This case highlights that migration is a major endeavor, requiring strict governance, phased implementation, and continuous validation to avoid regressions.
Risk of New Lock-In
A poor integrator choice or a proprietary cloud platform can recreate a lock-in similar to Oracle’s. For example, some managed services charge extra for access to extensions or advanced backups.
Selecting a public cloud or managed service must be based on a comparative study of support levels, SLAs, and exit terms. Without vigilance, an organization may become dependent on another single provider.
The sought-after sovereignty could turn into partial dependency, impacting the ability to optimize architecture and negotiate pricing.
Support and Key Skills
Successful transition requires skills in open source database administration, performance tuning, and automated deployment orchestration. Internal teams must upskill or engage an experienced partner.
Agile governance with short iterations and automated integration tests reduces risks and allows rapid correction of functional or performance deviations.
Support also includes training operational teams for maintenance, administration, and monitoring of the new environment, ensuring long-term autonomy.
Turn Your Database Strategy into a Sovereignty Lever
Choosing between Oracle and open source is not a decision to take lightly. It’s a trade-off between costs, risks, autonomy, and agility, which must align with your overall IT trajectory. Mature open source alternatives, led by PostgreSQL and its ecosystems, now offer technical credibility and flexibility that deserve consideration as strategic options.
Migration to open source is an ongoing transformation project, requiring agile governance and expert involvement at every stage. If you want to assess your options, build a phased migration plan, and align your database strategy with your sovereignty and sustainability goals, our experts are here to help.
