Views: 6
Summary – Banks face a major challenge: deploying generative AI to enrich customer experience and automate support while ensuring PSD2/GDPR compliance and data security through traceability and strong authentication.
To do so, they are revamping their architecture in favor of custom instances (on-premise or hybrid) with tokenization, zero-trust isolation, and compliance copilots to monitor, filter, and log every interaction.
Solution: conduct a regulatory and technical audit, deploy modular authentication and consent-management workflows, then launch an agile modernization plan to combine sovereignty, innovation, and ROI.
In a landscape where artificial intelligence is swiftly transforming banking services, the challenge is significant: innovate to meet customer expectations while adhering to stringent regulatory frameworks and ensuring data privacy. Banks must rethink their architectures, processes and governance to deploy generative AI responsibly. This article outlines the main challenges, the technical and organizational solutions to adopt, and illustrates each point with concrete examples from Swiss players, demonstrating that innovation and security can go hand in hand.
Context and Stakes of Generative AI in Digital Banking
Generative AI is emerging as a lever for efficiency and customer engagement in financial services. However, it requires strict adaptation to meet the sector’s security and traceability demands.
Explosive Growth of Use Cases and Opportunities
Over the past few years, intelligent chatbots and virtual assistants and predictive analytics tools have inundated the banking landscape. The ability of these models to understand natural language and generate personalized responses offers real potential to enhance customer experience, reduce support costs and accelerate decision-making. Marketing and customer relations departments are eagerly adopting these solutions to deliver smoother, more interactive journeys.
However, this rapid adoption raises questions about the reliability of the information provided and the ability to maintain service levels in line with regulatory expectations. Institutions must ensure that every interaction complies with security and confidentiality rules, and that models neither fabricate nor leak sensitive data. For additional insight, see the case study on Artificial Intelligence and the Manufacturing Industry: Use Cases, Benefits and Real Examples.
Critical Stakes: Security, Compliance, Privacy
Financial and personal data confidentiality is a non-negotiable imperative for any bank. Leveraging generative AI involves the transfer, processing and storage of vast volumes of potentially sensitive information. Every input and output must be traced to satisfy audits and guarantee non-repudiation.
Moreover, the security of models, their APIs and execution environments must be rigorously ensured. The risks of adversarial attacks or malicious injections are real and can compromise both the availability and integrity of services.
Need for Tailored Solutions
While public platforms like ChatGPT offer an accessible entry point, they do not guarantee the traceability, auditability or data localization required by banking regulations. Banks therefore need finely tuned models, hosted in controlled environments and integrated into compliance workflows.
For example, a regional bank developed its own instance of a generative model, trained exclusively on internal corpora. This approach ensured that every query and response remained within the authorized perimeter and that data was never exposed to third parties. This case demonstrates that a bespoke solution can be deployed quickly while meeting security and governance requirements.
Main Compliance Challenges and Impacts on AI Solution Design
The Revised Payment Services Directive (PSD2), the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Fast IDentity Online (FIDO) standards impose stringent requirements on authentication, consent and data protection. They shape the architecture, data flows and governance of AI projects in digital banking.
PSD2 and Strong Customer Authentication
The PSD2 mandate requires banks to implement strong customer authentication for any payment initiation or access to sensitive data. In an AI context, this means that every interaction deemed critical must trigger an additional verification step, whether via chatbot or voice assistant.
Technically, authentication APIs must be embedded at the core of dialogue chains, with session expiration mechanisms and context checks. Workflow design must include clear breakpoints where the AI pauses and awaits a second factor before proceeding.
For instance, a mid-sized bank implemented a hybrid system where the internal chatbot systematically requests a two-factor authentication challenge (2FA) whenever a customer initiates a transfer or profile update. This integration proved that the customer experience remains seamless while ensuring the security level mandated by PSD2.
GDPR and Consent Management
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requires that any collection, processing or transfer of personal data be based on explicit, documented and revocable consent. In AI projects, it is therefore necessary to track every data element used for training, response personalization or behavioral analysis.
Architectures must include a consent registry linked to each query and each updated model. Administration interfaces should allow data erasure or anonymization at the customer’s request, without impacting overall AI service performance. This approach aligns with a broader data governance strategy.
For example, an e-commerce platform designed a consent management module integrated into its dialogue engine. Customers can view and revoke their consent via their personal portal, and each change is automatically reflected in the model training processes, ensuring continuous compliance.
FIDO and Local Regulatory Requirements
The Fast IDentity Online (FIDO) protocols offer biometric and cryptographic authentication methods more secure than traditional passwords. Local regulators (FINMA, BaFin, ACPR) increasingly encourage its adoption to strengthen security and reduce fraud risk.
In an AI architecture, integrating FIDO allows a reliable binding of a real identity to a user session, even when the interaction occurs via a virtual agent. Modules must be designed to validate biometric proofs or hardware key credentials before authorizing any sensitive action.
Edana: strategic digital partner in Switzerland
We support companies and organizations in their digital transformation
The Rise of AI Compliance Agents
Automated compliance agents monitor data flows and interactions in real time to ensure adherence to internal and legal rules. Their integration significantly reduces human error and enhances traceability.
How “Compliance Copilots” Work
An AI compliance agent acts as an intermediary filter between users and generative models. It analyzes each request, verifies that no unauthorized data is transmitted, and applies the governance rules defined by the institution.
Technically, these agents rely on rule engines and machine learning to recognize suspicious patterns and block or mask sensitive information. They also log a detailed record of every interaction for audit purposes.
Deploying such an agent involves defining a rule repository, integrating it into processing pipelines and coordinating its alerts with compliance and security teams.
Anomaly Detection and Risk Reduction
Beyond preventing non-compliant exchanges, compliance agents can detect behavioral anomalies—such as unusual requests or abnormal processing volumes. They then generate alerts or automatically suspend the affected sessions.
These analyses leverage supervised and unsupervised models to identify deviations from normal profiles. This ability to anticipate incidents makes compliance copilots invaluable in combating fraud and data exfiltration.
They can also contribute to generating compliance reports, exportable to Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) systems to facilitate discussions with auditors and regulators.
Use Cases and Operational Benefits
Several banks are already piloting these agents for their online services. They report a significant drop in manual alerts, faster compliance reviews and improved visibility into sensitive data flows.
Compliance teams can thus focus on high-risk cases rather than reviewing thousands of interactions. Meanwhile, IT teams benefit from a stable framework that allows them to innovate without fear of regulatory breaches.
This feedback demonstrates that a properly configured AI compliance agent becomes a pillar of digital governance, combining usability with regulatory rigor.
Protecting Privacy through Tokenization and Secure Architecture
Tokenization enables the processing of sensitive data via anonymous identifiers, minimizing exposure risk. It integrates with on-premises or hybrid architectures to ensure full control and prevent accidental leaks.
Principles and Benefits of Tokenization
Tokenization replaces critical information (card numbers, IBANs, customer IDs) with tokens that hold no exploitable value outside the system. AI models can then process these tokens without ever handling the real data.
In case of a breach, attackers only gain access to useless tokens, greatly reducing the risk of data theft. This approach also facilitates the pseudonymization and anonymization required by GDPR.
Implementing an internal tokenization service involves defining mapping rules, a cryptographic vault for key storage, and a secure API for token issuance and resolution.
A mid-sized institution adopted this solution for its AI customer support flows. The case demonstrated that tokenization does not impact performance while simplifying audit processes and data deletion on demand.
Secure On-Premises and Hybrid Architectures
To maintain control over data, many banks prefer to host sensitive models and processing services on-premises. This ensures that nothing leaves the internal infrastructure without passing validated checks.
Hybrid architectures combine private clouds and on-premises environments, with secure tunnels and end-to-end encryption mechanisms. Containers and zero-trust networks complement this approach to guarantee strict isolation.
These deployments require precise orchestration, secret management policies and continuous access monitoring. Yet they offer the flexibility and scalability needed to evolve AI services without compromising security.
Layered Detection to Prevent Data Leakage
Complementing tokenization, a final verification module can analyze each output before publication. It compares AI-generated data against a repository of sensitive patterns to block any potentially risky response.
These filters operate in multiple stages: detecting personal entities, contextual comparison and applying business rules. They ensure that no confidential information is disclosed, even inadvertently.
Employing such a “fail-safe” mechanism enhances solution robustness and reassures both customers and regulators. This ultimate level of control completes the overall data protection strategy.
Ensuring Responsible and Sovereign AI in Digital Banking
Implementing responsible AI requires local or sovereign hosting, systematic data and model encryption, and explainable algorithms. It relies on a clear governance framework that combines human oversight and auditability.
Banks investing in this approach strengthen their competitive edge and customer trust while complying with ever-evolving regulations.
Our Edana experts support you in defining your AI strategy, deploying secure architectures and establishing the governance needed to ensure both compliance and innovation. Together, we deliver scalable, modular, ROI-oriented solutions that avoid vendor lock-in.
