Views: 11
Summary – In healthcare, legacy software bogs down clinical processes, causing slowdowns, crashes and exposing regulatory (LPD/GDPR, HIPAA) and interoperability (HL7, FHIR) risks. A structured audit of documentation, user flows, code and security (OWASP, CI/CD) maps technical debt, identifies critical modules (EHR, LIS, PACS) and pinpoints performance and compliance bottlenecks.
Solution: a costed MVP roadmap to choose between rehosting, refactoring, rebuilding or COTS, enriched with clinical AI (diagnostics, flow prediction, RPA) to ensure performance, compliance and care continuity.
In the healthcare sector, legacy software slows down clinical workflows and exposes patients and teams to operational and regulatory risks. Before making any decision, a structured audit maps documentation, features, code, and security to choose between maintenance, modernization, or replacement.
By focusing on critical systems—EHR, LIS, RIS, PACS, HIS, or telehealth platforms—this approach uncovers warning signs: sluggish performance, repeated outages, degraded user experience, rising costs, and limited integrations. At the end of the audit, a detailed, cost-estimated, clinically oriented MVP roadmap ensures uninterrupted care and lays the groundwork for AI-driven innovation.
Application Audit to Assess Your Healthcare Legacy System
A comprehensive audit documents and analyzes every layer of your medical application, from functional scope to code quality. It uncovers security and compliance risks and bottlenecks before any modernization project.
The first step is to inventory existing documentation, user flows, and use cases to understand the system’s actual usage. This mapping highlights critical features and poorly documented gaps.
Analyzing the source code, its dependencies, and test coverage helps estimate the technical debt and software fragility. Automated and manual reviews identify obsolete or overly coupled modules.
The final audit phase evaluates the system against regulatory requirements and interoperability standards (HL7, FHIR). It verifies operation traceability, log management, and the robustness of external interfaces.
Documentary and Functional Inventory
The inventory begins by collecting all available documentation: specifications, diagrams, user guides, and technical manuals. It reveals discrepancies between actual practices and official instructions.
Each feature is then categorized by clinical impact: patient record access, medication prescribing, imaging, or teleconsultation. This classification aids in prioritizing modules to preserve or refactor.
Feedback from clinical users enriches this assessment: response times, daily incidents, and manual workarounds indicate pain points affecting care quality.
Code Analysis and Security
Static and dynamic code analysis identifies vulnerabilities (SQL injections, XSS, buffer overflows) and measures modules’ cyclomatic complexity. These metrics guide the risk of regressions and security breaches.
Reviewing the build chain and the CI/CD pipeline verifies the automation of unit and integration tests. Lack of coverage or regular code reviews increases the risk of flawed deployments.
A Swiss regional hospital audit revealed that 40% of prescribing modules relied on an outdated framework, causing monthly incidents. The audit underscored the need to segment code to isolate critical fixes.
Compliance and Interoperability Assessment
LPD/GDPR and HIPAA requirements mandate strict controls over access, consent, and data retention. The audit checks role separation, cryptography, and session management.
HL7 and FHIR interfaces must guarantee secure, traceable exchanges. Evaluation measures FHIR profile coverage and the robustness of adapters for radiology or laboratory devices.
Fine-grained traceability, from authentication to archiving, is validated through penetration tests and regulatory scenarios. Missing precise timestamps or centralized logs poses a major risk.
Modernization Options: Maintain, Refactor, or Replace
Each modernization option offers advantages and trade-offs in cost, time, and functional value. The right choice depends on system criticality and the extent of technical debt.
Rehosting involves migrating infrastructure to the cloud without altering code. This quick approach reduces infrastructure TCO but yields no functional or maintainability gains.
Refactoring or replatforming restructures and modernizes code gradually. By targeting the most fragile components, it improves maintainability and performance while minimizing disruption risk.
When debt is overwhelming, rebuilding or replacing with a COTS solution becomes inevitable. This higher-cost option provides a clean, scalable platform but requires a migration plan that ensures uninterrupted service.
Rehosting to the Cloud
Rehosting transfers on-premise infrastructure to a hosted cloud platform, keeping the software architecture unchanged. Benefits include scalable flexibility and lower operational costs.
However, without code optimization, response times and application reliability remain unchanged. Patches stay complex to deploy, and the user experience is unaffected.
In a Swiss psychiatric clinic, rehosting cut server costs by 25% in one year. This example shows the approach suits stable systems with minimal functional evolution.
Refactoring and Replatforming
Refactoring breaks the monolith into microservices, redocuments the code, and introduces automated tests. This method enhances maintainability and lowers MTTR during incidents.
Replatforming migrates, for example, a .NET Framework application to .NET Core. Gains include higher performance, cross-platform compatibility, and access to an active community ecosystem.
A Swiss medical eyewear SME migrated its EHR to .NET Core, reducing clinical report generation time by 60%. This case demonstrates optimization potential without a full rewrite.
Rebuild and COTS Replacement
A complete rewrite is considered when technical debt is too heavy. This option guarantees a clean, modular foundation compliant with new business requirements.
Replacing with a medical-practice-oriented COTS product can suit non-critical modules like administrative management or billing. The challenge lies in adapting to local workflows.
A university hospital chose to rebuild its billing module and replace appointment management with a COTS solution. This decision accelerated compliance with tariff standards and reduced proprietary license costs.
Edana: strategic digital partner in Switzerland
We support companies and organizations in their digital transformation
Security, Compliance, and Interoperability: Regulatory Imperatives
Modernizing healthcare software must strictly adhere to LPD/GDPR and HIPAA frameworks while complying with interoperability standards. Security principles from OWASP and SOC 2 requirements should be integrated from the design phase.
LPD/GDPR compliance requires documenting every step of personal data processing. Anonymization, consent, and right-to-be-forgotten processes must be auditable and traceable.
HIPAA further tightens rules for health data. Multi-factor access controls, identifier obfuscation, and encryption at rest and in transit are verified during audits.
A medical imaging clinic implemented homomorphic encryption for DICOM exchanges. This example shows it’s possible to maintain confidentiality without hindering advanced imaging processing.
LPD/GDPR and HIPAA Compliance
Every personal data request must be logged with timestamp, user, and purpose. Deletion processes are orchestrated to ensure the effective destruction of obsolete data.
Separating environments (development, test, production) and conducting periodic access reviews control exfiltration risks. Penetration tests validate resistance to external attacks.
Implementing strict retention policies and monthly access statistics feeds compliance reports and supports audits by competent authorities.
HL7, FHIR Standards, and Traceability
HL7 adapters must cover v2 and v3 profiles, while FHIR RESTful APIs provide modern integration with mobile apps and connected devices.
Validating incoming and outgoing messages, resource mapping, and strategic error handling ensures resilient exchanges between EHR, LIS, and radiology systems.
An independent lab deployed a FHIR hub to centralize patient data. This example shows how automatic report interpolation speeds up result delivery.
OWASP and SOC 2 Standards
Incorporating OWASP Top 10 recommendations from the design phase reduces critical vulnerabilities. Automated code reviews and regular penetration tests maintain a high security level.
SOC 2 demands organizational and technical controls: availability, integrity, confidentiality, and privacy must be defined and measured by precise KPIs.
A telehealth provider achieved SOC 2 certification after implementing continuous monitoring, real-time alerts, and documented incident management processes.
Maximize Modernization with Clinical AI
Modernization paves the way for clinical AI services to optimize decision-making, patient flow planning, and task automation. It creates fertile ground for innovation and operational performance.
Decision support modules use machine learning to suggest diagnoses, treatment protocols, and early imaging alerts. They integrate seamlessly into clinician workflows.
Predictive models forecast admission peaks, readmission risks, and bed occupancy times, enhancing planning and reducing overload-related costs.
RPA automation handles reimbursement requests, appointment slot management, and administrative data entry, freeing up time for higher-value tasks.
Decision Support and Imaging
Computer vision algorithms detect anomalies in radiological images and provide automated quantifications. They rely on neural networks trained on specialized datasets.
Integrating these modules into existing PACS ensures seamless access without manual exports. Radiologists validate and enrich results through an integrated interface.
A telemedicine startup tested a brain MRI analysis prototype, cutting first-read time in half. This example illustrates accelerated diagnostic potential.
Patient Flow and Readmission Prediction
By aggregating admission, diagnosis, and discharge data, a predictive engine forecasts 30-day readmission rates. It alerts staff to adjust post-hospital follow-up plans.
Operating room and bed schedules are optimized using simulation models, reducing bottlenecks and last-minute cancellations.
A regional hospital tested this system on 6,000 records, improving forecast accuracy by 15% and increasing planned occupancy by 10%. This example demonstrates direct operational value.
Automation and RPA in Healthcare
Software robots automate repetitive tasks: entering patient data into the HIS, generating consent forms, and sending invoices to insurers.
Integration with the ERP and payment platforms creates a complete loop from invoice issuance to payment receipt, with anomaly tracking and automated reminders.
A clinical research center deployed RPA for grant applications. By eliminating manual errors, the process became 70% faster and improved traceability.
Modernize Your Healthcare Legacy Software for Safer Care
A thorough audit lays the foundation for a modernization strategy tailored to your business and regulatory needs. By choosing the right option—rehosting, refactoring, rebuild, or COTS—you enhance maintainability, performance, and security of your critical systems. Integrating LPD/GDPR, HIPAA, HL7/FHIR, OWASP, and SOC 2 requirements ensures compliant and reliable health data exchanges.
Enriching your ecosystem with clinical AI, predictive modules, and RPA multiplies operational impact: faster diagnostics, optimized planning, and administrative task automation. Key metrics—cycle time, error rate, MTTR, clinician and patient satisfaction—enable you to measure tangible gains.
Our experts help define your project vision and scope, establish a prioritized clinical MVP backlog, develop a disruption-free migration plan, and produce a detailed WBS with estimates. Together, let’s turn your legacy into an asset for faster, safer, and more innovative care.
