Blockchain has now established itself as a strategic technological lever rather than just a buzzword. In business, it provides tamper-proof traceability, process automation via smart contracts, enhanced data protection, and asset tokenization for controlled digitalization. For C-level executives, IT directors, and digital transformation leaders, it is essential to distinguish relevant use cases, choose the right architectures and protocols, and anticipate scalability, governance, and security challenges. This article presents concrete applications, compares public, private, Layer 1 and Layer 2 technologies, and details best practices to manage risks and maximize the value of your blockchain projects.
Concrete Use Cases of Blockchain in Business
Blockchain is first and foremost an immutable distributed ledger, ideal for guaranteeing the provenance of information. It also enables automatic execution of business conditions via smart contracts.
At the heart of blockchain is a decentralized validation mechanism, ensuring no data can be modified without consensus. This operation meets the needs for traceability and transparency in highly complex supply or production chains.
In addition, smart contracts transform manual processes into automated workflows that are reliable and audited by all participants, without intermediaries.
Traceability and Provenance
Blockchain records every step of a logistics flow—from raw material to finished product—with timestamped, tamper-proof entries. Each transaction is verified and linked to the previous one, creating a continuous chain of information.
This transparency benefits both distributors and end customers, who can access a product’s complete history, boosting trust and regulatory compliance.
Example: An agri-food trading company deployed a private blockchain to trace coffee batch origins, cutting investigation time by 40% in quality-alert situations and improving responsiveness during sanitary inspections.
Automation via Smart Contracts
Smart contracts encode business rules (triggering payments, transferring access rights) as soon as predefined conditions are met. They execute automatically and are recorded on the blockchain.
This automation eliminates repetitive tasks and reduces human errors while ensuring a full and continuous audit of operations by all stakeholders.
For example, in the shared mobility sector, a smart contract can release payment for a vehicle reservation once check-in is validated and automatically calculate penalties for late returns.
Asset Tokenization
Tokenization represents a physical or financial asset (real estate, artwork, financial securities) as digital tokens on a blockchain. Each token embodies a fraction of the asset and can be securely transferred, sold, or managed.
This approach enhances liquidity and portfolio diversification while providing detailed traceability of successive owners and their associated rights.
For example, a real estate infrastructure consortium experimented with tokenizing co-ownership shares, enabling institutional and private investors to access traditionally illiquid assets more easily.
Technology Choices: Public, Private, L1, L2, and Hybrid Architectures
Selecting the right type of blockchain is fundamental to balancing security, performance, and governance. Public blockchains offer maximum transparency, while private ones guarantee participant control.
Beyond the public/private distinction, Layer 1 blockchains handle core storage and consensus but sometimes struggle with scaling. Layer 2 solutions attach to them to improve scalability and reduce transaction costs.
Finally, in many contexts, a hybrid architecture combining traditional databases with decentralized ledgers provides the best of both worlds, where a pure blockchain solution would not be cost-effective or necessary.
Public vs. Private Blockchains
Public blockchains (Ethereum, Avalanche, Solana) are open to everyone, ensure high decentralization, and offer complete transparency. They fit ecosystems where participants have no prior trust relationships.
In contrast, private blockchains (Hyperledger Fabric, Corda) restrict access to authorized members only, ensuring controlled governance and higher transaction throughput for organizations or business consortia.
Example: A mid-sized bank recently piloted a Hyperledger Fabric network to automate and secure interbank guarantee exchanges, achieving several thousand transactions per second while meeting confidentiality and internal governance requirements.
Layer 1 and Layer 2 for Scalability
Layer 1 blockchains implement the consensus layer and maintain the full transaction history. Their security is robust, but costs and latency can rise with more users.
Layer 2 solutions (optimistic rollups, zk-rollups, sidechains) offload some transactions off the main chain and periodically submit proofs or batches of transactions to Layer 1, reducing fees and speeding up confirmations.
This combination handles high volumes (micropayments, online gaming, IoT) while preserving the integrity of the underlying ledger.
Traditional Databases and Hybrid Architectures
For use cases that do not require full immutability or deep decentralization, a relational database or NoSQL system may suffice at low cost with proven maturity.
A hybrid architecture pairs these traditional databases with a blockchain module used only for critical data (certificates, compliance proofs, secure timestamps), limiting the transaction volume on the decentralized ledger.
From an ROI perspective, this strategy ensures performance and maintainability while securing the key components of the value chain.
Edana: strategic digital partner in Switzerland
We support companies and organizations in their digital transformation
Mature Protocols and Selection Criteria
Ethereum post-Merge, Avalanche, Hyperledger and Corda are now proven pillars, each addressing specific needs in governance, EVM compatibility, and performance.
When choosing a protocol, examine ecosystem maturity, developer community, EVM smart contract compatibility, governance model, and technical roadmap.
Cybersecurity concerns, transaction costs, and energy consumption are also critical factors in validating a protocol’s suitability for an enterprise or consortium setting.
Ethereum Post-Merge and the EVM Ecosystem
Ethereum’s shift to Proof of Stake (Merge) has significantly reduced energy consumption and opened the door to more flexible governance. The EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine) remains the reference for interoperable smart contracts.
With a rich ecosystem (dev tools, frameworks, wallets, oracles), Ethereum attracts a wide range of projects, from decentralized finance to enterprise NFTs.
However, transaction fees can remain volatile during peak demand, highlighting the value of coupling Ethereum with Layer 2 solutions or EVM-compatible sidechains.
Enterprise Solutions: Hyperledger Fabric and Corda
Hyperledger Fabric uses a channel model to segment exchanges between actor groups within a private network, ensuring modularity and fine-grained access control. It supports various consensus plug-ins and transforms existing processes into blockchain workflows.
Corda, originating in the financial sector, relies on a states & contracts object model and stands out for handling confidential transactions between peers without global data broadcast.
Example: A Swiss agricultural insurer implemented a Corda network to automate compensation payments after extreme weather events, reducing processing times and disputes by 60%.
New Approaches: Avalanche and Starknet
Avalanche combines fast, energy-efficient consensus with native EVM compatibility, enabling immediate deployment of existing dApps and near-instant transaction finality.
Starknet uses zero-knowledge proof cryptography (zk-rollups) to aggregate thousands of off-chain transactions while mathematically guaranteeing the validity of each batch submitted to the main chain.
These alternatives meet growing scalability and privacy needs while offering a more predictable cost model for very high-volume use cases.
Best Practices and Pitfalls to Avoid for Your Blockchain Project
A successful blockchain project relies on clear governance, rigorous cost evaluation, and an iterative implementation strategy. Rushed protocol choices or insufficient audits are risks not to underestimate.
Governance must define roles, voting rights, and network update mechanisms before launch. A cross-functional steering committee—covering IT, business and security—is indispensable.
Meanwhile, smart contract modeling should be audited by external experts to prevent vulnerabilities, and a phased scaling plan ensures network stability in production.
Governance and Security
Setting up governance, whether centralized or consortium-based, determines the network’s longevity. Anticipate evolving consensus rules, software updates, and private key management.
On the security front, smart contract code reviews by multiple independent teams, along with automated testing and load simulations, are essential steps.
Incident response procedures must be documented and rehearsed, with a remediation plan ready in case of a breach or targeted attack.
Costs and Auditability
The economic model of a blockchain project must cover transaction fees, infrastructure costs (nodes, storage), as well as audit and application maintenance expenses.
It is advisable to set up test and simulation environments to refine costing before production deployment. Real-time monitoring tools help track usage and optimize consensus parameters.
Auditability remains a major advantage: thanks to intrinsic traceability, regulators or internal auditors can validate business processes without resorting to costly external reports.
Scalability and Performance Management
The modular approach, with dedicated blockchain micro-services for each use case (payments, certification, document exchange), limits bottlenecks and facilitates scaling.
Leveraging Layer 2 solutions or specialized sidechains for low-value transactions boosts responsiveness and contains costs.
Finally, optimizing smart contract code (reducing algorithmic complexity, minimizing on-chain calls) lowers confirmation times and resource consumption.
Implementation Strategy and Support
An agile approach, in short cycles, allows you to quickly experiment with proof-of-concepts and adjust the roadmap based on operational feedback.
Managing internal and external communication ensures stakeholder buy-in and prepares the ecosystem to onboard new users and partners.
Expert support covering design, engineering, architecture, cybersecurity, and product strategy ensures overall coherence and a gradual upskilling of internal teams.
Leverage Blockchain as a Strategic Lever
Blockchain today offers proven applications for traceability, process automation, data protection, and asset tokenization. Technology choices (public, private, Layer 1/2, hybrid) should rely on a rigorous analysis of needs, expected performance, and governance constraints.
Mature protocols such as Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric, or Avalanche—combined with an agile approach and security audits—guarantee sustainable deployment. By avoiding governance missteps, hidden costs, and scalability issues, blockchain projects can become true competitive advantages.
Whatever your maturity level, our Edana experts are here to design, develop, and secure your solution, from strategy to operational execution.