Categories
Featured-Post-UX-Design (EN) UI/UX Design EN

Do You Really Need to Draft a Specification Document for Your Digital Project?

Auteur n°4 – Mariami

By Mariami Minadze
Views: 748

Summary – A bulky requirements document creates rigidity, endless validation delays, stakeholder disengagement, and rising management costs, while stifling innovation and detaching the project from real needs. With heavy approval cycles and untested assumptions, time-to-market lengthens and ROI erodes.
Solution: implement design-first co-design workshops, rapid prototyping, value-focused MVPs, light governance, and a Lean roadmap to stay agile, reduce risks, and continuously align IT and business.

Drafting a comprehensive specification document is often regarded as the cornerstone of any digital project. Yet this bulky document can sometimes create gaps between actual needs and initial specifications, weigh down decision-making processes, and slow your teams’ responsiveness. For decision-makers seeking a SaaS solution, a mobile app, business software, or a digital platform, the challenge is to balance agility with discipline. This guide proposes moving beyond the myth of the specification document as a mandatory step by prioritizing collaboration, rapid concept visualization (design-first), and strategic prioritization. With this approach, you quickly define a relevant MVP, focus your resources on delivering real value, and significantly reduce your time-to-market. We illustrate each point with concrete examples from Swiss companies to inspire your strategy.

The Limitations of the Traditional Specification Document

The specification document can sometimes become a too-rigid foundation, incapable of evolving in response to field discoveries. Its creation mobilizes significant resources before the first prototypes even exist, risking an unnecessary extension of your time-to-market.

Rigid Specifications

The specification document sets an exhaustive framework from the outset, detailing every feature, user scenario, and technical constraint. But this approach doesn’t always incorporate insights from early feedback or user testing.

When new requirements emerge, integrating them demands formal revisions, approval cycles, and extra meetings. Each change becomes a project in itself.

Ultimately, this approach can leave the project trapped in dated specification lists, ignoring evolving business needs or market opportunities.

Approval Delays and Time-to-Market

Drafting and approving the specification document often involves multiple countries and departments, generating back-and-forth exchanges and unexpected delays. Scoping meetings pile up, slowing decision-making.

The delays accumulated before development even begins directly impact time-to-market, reducing the company’s ability to seize early opportunities.

This can trigger a domino effect, where a delayed launch of an application or digital platform benefits your more agile competitors.

Lack of Stakeholder Buy-In

Engaging end users, marketing teams, or operations too late in a fixed document reduces their commitment. Stakeholders may perceive the specification as imposed, without real consideration for their specific needs.

Without collective ownership, stakeholders may not engage in testing or validation phases, resulting in late feedback and costly revisions at the end of the project.

For example, a mid-sized Swiss watchmaker spent over three months finalizing its customer platform specification. During the acceptance phase, internal teams flagged major gaps, necessitating two redefinition cycles. The project was pushed back six months, impacting the marketing schedule and user satisfaction.

Risks of a Specification Document: When Formalism Stifles Innovation

The need to comply with a strict specification can suffocate creativity and risk-taking. Obsessing over initial details often disconnects the project from the market’s actual and fluid needs.

Blocking Emerging Ideas

The specification document defines features before any user exploration or design sprint has even been conducted. This rigid anticipation limits the emergence of innovative ideas discovered during product discovery.

When new concepts appear, they’re often deemed out of scope, requiring amendments or budget renegotiations. Teams become reluctant to propose alternative approaches.

As a result, the project stalls on preconceived solutions, missing out on collective intelligence and on-the-ground feedback.

Disconnect from Real User Needs

A static document cannot capture the dynamic evolution of user needs or emerging usage patterns. The personas and use cases initially described quickly become obsolete.

Without regular feedback, development rests on assumptions, increasing the risk of delivering non-priority or poorly adopted features.

This disconnect often leads to low adoption rates and business teams feeling alienated from technological decisions.

Hidden Cost of Rigorous Compliance

Ensuring compliance with the specification document requires tools and monitoring processes (committees, reports, acceptance tests). These resources can account for up to 20% of a digital project’s total budget.

Teams spend more time in meetings and reporting than on development and innovation. Cushions to satisfy every line of the document drag down velocity.

A Swiss financial institution preparing an internal portal found that 18% of its project budget was consumed by validation committees and change management. This overrun delayed the launch and increased the TCO.

Edana: strategic digital partner in Switzerland

We support companies and organizations in their digital transformation

Collaboration and Design-First: An Alternative Approach

Co-design and design-first workshops align business needs and technical solutions. Rapid prototyping enables continuous experimentation, validation, and refinement before any large-scale development.

UX and Design Thinking Workshops

Workshops bring business teams, IT, and end users together around a whiteboard. This rapid pooling of ideas fosters mutual understanding and identification of real priorities.

In just a few hours, teams generate empirical user journeys, test hypotheses, and refine functional requirements before formalizing anything in writing.

This collective engagement builds co-ownership and ensures better buy-in during later development phases.

Rapid Prototyping to Validate Concepts

A clickable prototype or interactive wireframe lets you envision the final product without writing a single line of code. Feedback is immediate and easy to integrate.

Adjustments happen in real time, drastically reducing revision cycles compared to textual specification feedback.

In practice, teams quickly identify misunderstood flows, secondary features, and friction points before any heavy budget commitment.

Iterative Feedback and Continuous Refinement

Based on the prototype, sprints follow with frequent demos to stakeholders. Each iteration progressively enriches the truly useful scope.

This Lean product approach ensures the project stays connected to business objectives and field realities, avoiding variances from initial assumptions.

A Swiss pharmaceutical company used this approach to overhaul its internal training portal. In three successive workshops, it invalidated two secondary features and focused development on an interactive reporting module, cutting the backlog by 40% by the MVP stage.

Strategic Prioritization and Launching an Agile MVP

Defining an MVP (Minimum Viable Product) focuses efforts on the most critical business value. A lightweight governance model ensures agile management, ROI orientation, and continuous adaptation.

Product Discovery and Lean Roadmap

The product discovery phase merges user insights, market data, and technical constraints to rank features. Prioritization workshops (MoSCoW, Kano) guide decisions.

A Lean roadmap is built, segmented into short releases aligned with business strategy, avoiding exhaustive specification gathering.

This balance of long-term vision and quick iterations supports agility while ensuring overall project coherence.

Defining a Value-Driven MVP

The MVP concentrates development on features essential to validate key hypotheses: user acquisition, engagement, and retention.

This approach mitigates financial and technical risk by testing the product’s relevance early on a limited segment.

A retail chain launched its mobile app as an MVP in three months. It validated the basic ordering flow before investing in the advanced payment module, optimizing resources and limiting initial investment.

Agile Management and Lightweight Governance

The project is tracked via a single product backlog, fueled by prioritized user stories reviewed each sprint. Performance indicators (KPIs, OKRs) measure the real impact of new features.

Lightweight governance relies on short rituals (stand-up, sprint review, retrospective) and transparent communication between IT, business teams, and vendors. This replaces the multi-monthly committees of the classic specification approach.

Adjustments are made continuously, allowing course corrections at the first sign of deviation, without waiting for the end of a traditional specification phase.

Launch Your Digital Project by Unleashing Innovation

The specification document remains useful for aligning stakeholders on an initial vision, but its formality must not hinder creativity or responsiveness. By combining co-design workshops, rapid prototyping, and a value-focused MVP, you optimize development cycles, reduce risks, and engage your teams from the first deliverables.

Whether you’re steering a process transformation, launching a SaaS, a business tool, or creating a mobile app, our Edana experts will support you in adapting this agile, context-driven approach to your business challenges. They’ll help you harness collective intelligence and deploy a scalable, secure solution perfectly aligned with your strategy.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

By Mariami

Project Manager

PUBLISHED BY

Mariami Minadze

Mariami is an expert in digital strategy and project management. She audits the digital presences of companies and organizations of all sizes and in all sectors, and orchestrates strategies and plans that generate value for our customers. Highlighting and piloting solutions tailored to your objectives for measurable results and maximum ROI is her specialty.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about Specification Documents

What are the main drawbacks of relying solely on a traditional specification document?

A traditional specification document can be rigid and slow to adapt to new insights. Its exhaustive detail often leads to lengthy approval cycles, inflated budgets for compliance, and outdated feature lists that ignore evolving user needs. This approach can delay time-to-market and stifle innovation as each change requires formal revisions, risking your project becoming disconnected from real-world feedback and competitive opportunities.

How can co-design workshops replace or complement a specification document?

Co-design workshops unite business teams, IT experts, and end users to explore requirements in a collaborative setting. Through rapid sketching and shared whiteboard sessions, participants align on priorities and validate core user journeys before drafting detailed documents. This real-time engagement accelerates decision-making, builds stakeholder ownership, and ensures any subsequent specification reflects actual needs rather than hypothetical scenarios.

How does rapid prototyping reduce development risks and costs?

Rapid prototyping leverages clickable mockups or interactive wireframes to test concepts without writing code. Teams gather immediate feedback on usability, detect friction points, and iterate on flows in hours instead of weeks. By validating key interactions early, you avoid expensive redevelopment, narrow the scope of the MVP, and allocate resources to features that deliver real value rather than speculative additions.

When is a lightweight specification document still useful?

A lightweight specification remains valuable to outline high-level objectives, compliance requirements, or integration constraints before development begins. It serves as a reference for critical milestones, aligns distributed teams on architectural boundaries, and provides a minimal guardrail. However, it should remain flexible, focusing on core hypotheses rather than exhaustive lists, and be updated continuously based on user testing and business evolution.

How can we ensure stakeholder commitment without a formal specification?

Secure stakeholder buy-in through frequent touchpoints such as workshops, prototype demonstrations, and sprint reviews. Involve representatives from marketing, operations, and end-user groups early to co-create user stories and acceptance criteria. This transparent collaboration fosters ownership, fosters timely feedback, and reduces resistance by validating decisions with real input instead of relying on a static document imposed from above.

What governance model works best in an agile MVP approach?

An agile MVP thrives under lightweight governance centered on a prioritized product backlog and cross-functional teams. Replace bulky committees with short rituals—daily stand-ups, sprint planning, reviews, and retrospectives. Use clear KPIs and OKRs to measure progress and pivot quickly. A single product owner steers priorities, ensuring decisions are data-driven, aligned with business objectives, and responsive to market feedback.

Which KPIs should we track during an agile MVP launch?

Focus on metrics that validate your core hypotheses: time-to-market for feature delivery, user activation rates, engagement frequency, and retention curves. Monitor cycle time per iteration to gauge team velocity. Qualitative feedback from usability tests can highlight friction points. These KPIs provide clear signals on product-market fit and inform whether to invest in scaling or iterate further.

What common pitfalls should we avoid when moving away from a full specification?

Beware of unclear vision leading to scope creep, insufficient user feedback causing misaligned features, and over-iteration on minor improvements. Without a shared reference document, teams may diverge on priorities. To mitigate this, maintain a living roadmap, enforce clear acceptance criteria, and schedule regular alignment sessions to keep stakeholders and developers on the same page.

CONTACT US

They trust us for their digital transformation

Let’s talk about you

Describe your project to us, and one of our experts will get back to you.

SUBSCRIBE

Don’t miss our strategists’ advice

Get our insights, the latest digital strategies and best practices in digital transformation, innovation, technology and cybersecurity.

Let’s turn your challenges into opportunities.

Based in Geneva, Edana designs tailor-made digital solutions for companies and organizations seeking greater competitiveness.

We combine strategy, consulting, and technological excellence to transform your business processes, customer experience, and performance.

Let’s discuss your strategic challenges:

022 596 73 70

Agence Digitale Edana sur LinkedInAgence Digitale Edana sur InstagramAgence Digitale Edana sur Facebook