Views: 19
Summary – In the era of AI democratization, IT teams must balance structured workflow control with low-code agility to ensure quality, traceability, and rapid iteration. LangGraph (code-first) delivers full control, retries, and auditability for critical processes, while LangFlow (low-code) accelerates linear flow prototyping at the cost of flexibility. Open WebUI adds a sovereign UX layer to make your graphs and flows accessible to business users.
Solution: opt for LangGraph for complex use cases, LangFlow for quick POCs, and deploy Open WebUI for business access.
In an era where AI is democratizing, IT teams must balance flexibility with control. Structured workflows remain pillars for managing data completeness and quality, while agents promise agility decoupled from pure code.
This article draws on Liip’s experience and illustrates how to choose between LangGraph, a code-first framework for task graphs, and LangFlow, a low-code tool for rapid prototyping. Through concrete examples, discover how to align your technology choice with your business objectives—whether that’s robustness, iteration speed, or AI sovereignty.
Understanding the Useful Difference Between AI Workflows and Agents
AI workflows provide a predictable, controlled structure for critical processes. AI agents rely on flexibility, at the expense of reliability when data is imperfect.
AI Workflow: Structure and Reliability
An AI workflow is a sequence of deterministic steps defined at design time. Each node represents a specific task, from calling an API to processing a response. With validation loops and retry mechanisms, you can ensure each piece of data is correctly handled before moving on.
This approach is particularly well suited when data completeness is crucial—for example, regulatory reporting or automated billing processes. Behavior remains explainable because every path through the graph is known in advance.
By structuring steps and transition conditions, you minimize the risk of silent failures and can audit every transaction. Explicit control also allows you to integrate business validations, such as tolerance thresholds or cross-checks.
AI Agent: Adaptability and Uncertainty
An AI agent receives an overarching goal and a list of available tools. It decides in real time which action to take—whether calling a service, reviewing a document, or interacting with a database.
This method is valued for exploratory or loosely structured tasks, where a fixed sequence of functions would be too restrictive. The agent can react to unexpected events and choose the best tool for the context.
However, the lack of predefined structure can lead to erratic behavior, especially when input data is incomplete or poorly formatted. Errors may surface late—long after the agent has veered off an anticipated path.
Summary and Concrete Use Case
For an IT leader, the key question is whether governance of the processing chain outweighs flexibility. If quality depends on systematic validations, the rigor of a workflow will trump an agent’s agility.
An industrial equipment manufacturer needed to automate compliance checks on its parts. The agent-based approach generated too many false positives and lacked traceability. By adopting a workflow with recalculation loops and evaluation nodes, it cut its error rate by 30% while ensuring full process tracking.
This case demonstrates that beyond marketing rhetoric, the choice must hinge on your business requirements: rules, retries, and completeness versus exploratory agility.
When to Prioritize LangGraph: Maximum Control and Robustness
LangGraph offers a code-first framework to model your workflows as graphs, giving you total freedom. It’s ideal when complex business logic and data quality are strategic priorities.
Overview of LangGraph
LangGraph is an open source library for Python or JavaScript that lets you build task graphs. Each node can call an API, execute a Large Language Model (LLM), or evaluate results.
The graph structure enables explicit implementation of loops, conditions, and retry mechanisms. Everything is defined in code, giving you full control over execution flow.
This requires development expertise, but you gain complete traceability and explainability. Every transition is coded, testable, and versioned in your Git repository.
Case Study: Public Agency
A project for a government service aimed to answer questions about the legislative process without using a vector database or intrusive crawling. Client-side rendering made scraping impractical.
The solution was to describe all OData entities in the prompt, then ask the LLM to generate valid URLs. One node called the OData API, and an evaluator checked data completeness before producing a structured response.
If data was missing, the graph looped back to the API call without creating duplicates. This explicit loop would have been nearly impossible to implement cleanly with a conventional agent.
Best Practices and Limitations to Consider
LangGraph delivers maximum control but requires you to manage latency and explicitly handle every error path. The code can become complex if your graph has many branches.
There’s no automatic semantic search: prompts must be highly precise, and context variables rigorously defined. The prototype wasn’t intended for production, but it demonstrated stable quality and explainable behavior.
In summary, LangGraph shines when security, traceability, and robustness are non-negotiable and when you have developer resources to absorb complexity.
Edana: strategic digital partner in Switzerland
We support companies and organizations in their digital transformation
LangFlow for Rapid Prototyping: Mastering Low-Code
LangFlow provides a web-based drag-and-drop interface to assemble workflows and agents without leaving the browser. It accelerates iteration while still allowing code where needed.
Overview of LangFlow
LangFlow isn’t no-code. It’s a low-code tool that lets you embed code within a visual interface. Components include LLM calls, custom tools, and modular sub-flows.
The environment features an editor for fine-tuning prompts and writing lightweight scripts, although it diverges from a traditional IDE like Git/Eclipse. Its advantage lies in rapid prototyping and swift collaboration between IT and business teams.
However, flows remain essentially linear, without true backtracking. Sub-flows used as tools can complicate debugging and introduce hidden dependencies.
Case Study: Internal Organization
A large institution wanted to automate transcription and summarization of meetings in Swiss German. The goal was to use a sovereign stack, without cloud or SaaS.
The LangFlow workflow involved uploading the audio file, calling Whisper for transcription, polling the API until completion, retrieving the text, and then passing it to the LLM for summarization. All components were hosted locally.
In a few clicks, a working prototype was ready for team testing. The tool proved reliable enough for internal use, with setup time under a day.
Challenges and Workarounds
The inability to revert to a previous step forced teams to duplicate nodes or create sub-flows as workarounds. This cluttered the diagram and reduced readability.
For more complex processes, they had to embed agents within LangFlow or offload code modules externally, which diluted technical coherence.
Thus, LangFlow remains ideal for quick proofs of concept and simple flows but shows its limits when business logic demands multiple validations and dynamic corrections.
Open WebUI: Towards a Sovereign Interface for Your Workflows
Open WebUI provides an open source platform to expose your workflows as a chatbot, supporting multiple LLMs and tools. It converts your graphs or flows into a user-friendly interface.
Open WebUI Features
Open WebUI delivers an experience similar to ChatGPT, but self-hosted. It accepts plugins, external tools, files, and multiple LLM models—local or cloud-based.
This UX layer makes workflows created with LangGraph or LangFlow accessible to business users through a comfortable entry point.
You can deploy Open WebUI on-premises, ensuring data sovereignty and avoiding vendor lock-in.
Example: Integration in a Government Administration
A government administration deployed Open WebUI to centralize legal FAQs powered by a LangGraph workflow. Internal agents can ask questions and see the exact path taken by each answer.
This transparency reassures users, particularly for regulatory inquiries. LangGraph’s robust workflows ensure data validity, while Open WebUI delivers a seamless experience.
Outlook for Sovereign AI
Layering Open WebUI onto your workflows paves the way for key business applications such as internal assistants or AI-enhanced customer portals.
By combining LangGraph for robustness, LangFlow for prototyping, and Open WebUI for UX, you create a modular, secure, and scalable ecosystem.
Master Your AI Workflows to Combine Control and Agility
Experience shows it’s not agents vs. workflows, but an arbitration between explicit control and iteration speed. Choose LangGraph when your use cases demand complex logic, intelligent retries, and full traceability. Opt for LangFlow when you need to prototype linear flows quickly or deploy low-criticality internal tools.
Agents still have their place in exploratory scenarios but should be framed within clear workflows. Open WebUI completes this toolkit by offering a sovereign product layer—accessible to business teams and aligned with your security constraints.
Our AI experts at Edana are here to help you define the optimal combination—from POC to sovereign deployment—always favoring open source, modular, and scalable solutions.
