Categories
Featured-Post-IA-EN IA (EN)

AI in Business: Why Speed Without Governance Fails (and Governance Without Speed Does Too)

Auteur n°3 – Benjamin

By Benjamin Massa
Views: 15

Summary – Without clear governance and high-quality pipelines, AI POCs remain costly demos unable to reach production, suffering from business-data-IT silos and non-industrializable models. Success depends on cross-functional alignment via dedicated roles, a hybrid model combining a center of excellence with operational squads, and an MLOps platform ensuring traceability and continuous monitoring.
Solution: establish agile, secure governance, define responsibilities, standardize data, and integrate AI into business workflows to accelerate industrialization while managing risks.

The enthusiasm for AI promises spectacular proofs of concept and rapid gains, but the real challenge lies neither in computing power nor in model accuracy. It is in the ability to transform these isolated prototypes into reliable, maintainable systems integrated into business processes.

Without clear decisions on governance, accountability, and data quality, AI remains an expensive demonstrator. The key is to quickly deliver an initial measurable outcome, then industrialize with an agile, secure framework that ensures scalability and continuous compliance, fostering sustainable value creation.

From PoC to Production: the Organizational Chasm

Most organizations excel at experimentation but stumble on industrialization. Without alignment between business, data, and development teams, prototypes never make it into production.

This gap is not technological but organizational, revealing the absence of a structure capable of managing the entire lifecycle.

Moving from Prototype to Production: an Underestimated Pitfall

PoCs often benefit from a small team and a limited scope, making deployment fast but fragile. Data volume grows, availability requirements increase, and the robustness of compute pipelines becomes critical. Yet few organizations anticipate this shift in context.

Code written for demonstration then requires refactoring and optimization. Automated testing and monitoring were not integrated initially, often delaying scaling. The skills needed for industrialization differ from those of experimentation, and they are rarely mobilized from the start.

The result is a painful iterative cycle where each new bug calls the feasibility of the deployment into question. Time spent stabilizing the solution erodes the competitive advantage that AI was supposed to deliver.

Misaligned Business Processes

For an AI model to be operational, it must integrate into a clearly defined business process with decision points and performance indicators. All too often, data teams work in silos without understanding operational stakes.

This lack of synchronization leads to unusable deliverables: ill-suited data formats, response times that don’t meet business requirements, or no automated workflows to activate recommendations.

A cross-functional governance involving the IT department, business units, and end users is therefore essential to define priority use cases and ensure AI solutions are adopted in employees’ daily routines.

Case Study: a Swiss Financial Services Firm

A Swiss financial institution quickly developed a risk scoring engine but then stagnated for six months before any production launch. The absence of a governance plan led to fragmented exchanges between risk management, the data team, and IT, with no single decision-maker. This example underlines the importance of appointing a functional lead from the outset to validate deliverables and coordinate regulatory approvals.

The solution was to establish an AI governance committee that brings together the IT department and business units to arbitrate priorities and streamline deployment processes. Within one quarter, the model was integrated into the portfolio management platform, improving time-to-market and decision reliability.

By implementing this approach, an isolated experiment was transformed into an operational service, demonstrating that a clear organizational structure is the key to industrialization.

Implementing Agile, Secure AI Governance

Effective governance does not slow execution; it structures it. Without a framework, AI projects can derail over accountability, algorithmic bias, or compliance issues.

It is essential to define clear roles, ensure data traceability, and secure each stage of the model lifecycle.

Defining Clear Roles and Responsibilities

For each AI project, identify a business sponsor, a data steward, a technical lead, and a compliance officer. These roles form the governance core and ensure proper tracking of deliverables.

The business sponsor validates priorities and ROI metrics, while the data steward monitors the quality, granularity, and provenance of the data used for training.

The technical lead oversees integration and production release, manages maintenance, and coordinates model updates, whereas the compliance officer ensures regulatory adherence and transparency of algorithmic decisions.

Data Quality and Traceability

Responsible AI governance depends on defining data quality rules and robust collection pipelines. Without them, models feed on erroneous, biased, or obsolete data.

Traceability requires preserving versions of datasets, preprocessing scripts, and hyperparameters. These artifacts must be accessible at any time to audit decisions or reconstruct performance contexts.

Implementing data catalogs and approval workflows guarantees information consistency, limits drift, and accelerates validation processes while ensuring compliance with security standards.

Case Study: a Swiss Public Institution

A cantonal authority launched an anomaly detection project on tax data without documenting its pipelines. The statistical series lacked metadata and several variables had to be manually reconstructed, delaying the regulatory audit.

This case highlights the importance of a robust traceability system. By deploying a data catalog and formalizing preparation workflows, the institution reduced audit response time by 40% and strengthened internal stakeholders’ trust.

Monthly dataset reviews were also instituted to automatically correct inconsistencies before each training cycle, ensuring the reliability of reports and recommendations.

Edana: strategic digital partner in Switzerland

We support companies and organizations in their digital transformation

The Hybrid Model: Combining Speed and Control

The hybrid model separates strategy and governance from the AI specialist teams. It blends business-driven oversight with rapid execution by technical squads.

This architecture ensures coherence, prevents vendor lock-in, and enables controlled industrialization at scale.

Blending Centralized Teams and Field Squads

In this model, an AI Center of Excellence defines strategy, standards, and risk frameworks. It oversees governance and provides shared platforms and open-source tools.

At the same time, dedicated teams embedded in business units implement concrete use cases, testing and iterating models at small scale quickly.

This dual structure accelerates execution while ensuring technological coherence and compliance. Squads can focus on business value without worrying about core infrastructure.

Benefits of a Unified MLOps Platform

An MLOps platform centralizes pipeline orchestration, artifact tracking, and deployment automation. It simplifies continuous model updates and performance monitoring in production.

By using modular open-source tools, you can freely choose best-of-breed components and avoid vendor lock-in. This flexibility optimizes costs and protects system longevity.

Integrated traceability and dashboards allow you to anticipate performance drift, manage alerts, and trigger retraining cycles per defined rules, ensuring continuous, secure operations.

Case Study: a Swiss Manufacturing Group

A manufacturing conglomerate established an AI Center of Excellence to standardize pipelines and provide isolated environments. Squads embedded in production teams deployed predictive maintenance models in two weeks, compared to three months previously.

This hybrid model quickly replicated the solution across multiple sites while centralizing governance of data and model versions. The example shows that role separation improves speed while maintaining control and compliance.

Using an open-source platform also reduced licensing costs and eased integration with existing systems, underscoring the benefit of avoiding single-vendor solutions.

Ensuring Continuous Operation of AI Models

An AI model in production requires constant monitoring and proactive maintenance. Without it, performance degrades rapidly.

Continuous operation relies on monitoring, iteration, and business process integration to guarantee long-term value.

Monitoring and Proactive Maintenance

Monitoring must cover data drift, key metric degradation, and execution errors. Automated alerts trigger inspections as soon as a critical threshold is reached.

Proactive maintenance includes scheduled model rotation, hyperparameter reevaluation, and dataset updates. These activities are planned to avoid service interruptions.

Dashboards accessible to business units and IT ensure optimal responsiveness and facilitate decision-making in case of anomalies or performance drops.

Iteration and Continuous Improvement

Models should be retrained regularly to reflect evolving processes and environments. A continuous improvement cycle formalizes feedback collection and optimization prioritization.

Each new version undergoes A/B testing or a controlled rollout to validate its impact on business metrics before full deployment.

This iterative approach prevents major disruptions and maximizes adoption. It also ensures AI evolves in line with operational and regulatory needs.

Integrating AI into Business Processes

Integration involves automating workflows: embedding recommendations into business applications, triggering tasks on events, and feeding user feedback directly into the system.

Mapping use cases and using standardized APIs simplifies adoption by business units and provides unified tracking of AI-driven performance.

By locking each decision step within a governed framework, organizations maintain risk control while benefiting from smooth, large-scale deployment. Integration into business processes.

Accelerate Your AI Without Losing Control

To succeed, move from experimentation to industrialization by structuring governance, ensuring data quality, and deploying a hybrid model that balances speed and control. Monitoring, continuous iteration, and business integration guarantee sustainable results.

Facing AI challenges in business, our experts are ready to support you from strategy to production with an agile, secure, and scalable framework.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

By Benjamin

Digital expert

PUBLISHED BY

Benjamin Massa

Benjamin is an senior strategy consultant with 360° skills and a strong mastery of the digital markets across various industries. He advises our clients on strategic and operational matters and elaborates powerful tailor made solutions allowing enterprises and organizations to achieve their goals. Building the digital leaders of tomorrow is his day-to-day job.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions on AI Governance and Agility

Why does the lack of governance hinder the industrialization of AI POCs?

The absence of clear governance creates misalignment between business, data, and IT teams. Without a dedicated committee or defined roles, POCs remain isolated demonstrations, lacking a deployment plan and KPI tracking. This organizational disconnect prevents the transition to a reliable, maintainable industrial solution that integrates with existing processes.

How do you structure agile AI governance without delaying projects?

Agile AI governance requires a minimal framework: a business sponsor, data steward, technical lead, and compliance officer. By defining responsibilities and lightweight workflows for approval and traceability, you avoid bottlenecks. Short, regular committees ensure quick decision-making while maintaining buy-in and compliance.

What roles are essential in an AI governance committee?

An effective AI committee brings together a business sponsor to validate value and KPIs, a data steward to ensure data quality and traceability, a technical lead to handle model integration and maintenance, and a compliance officer to manage algorithmic and regulatory risks. Together, these roles cover the entire lifecycle.

How do you ensure data quality and traceability in AI?

Implementing robust pipelines and data catalogs, with versioned datasets and preprocessing scripts, ensures traceability. Predefined data quality rules prevent the use of biased or outdated data. Periodic reviews and streamlined approval workflows enhance validation and build trust.

Which organizational model combines speed of execution and control?

The hybrid model combines a centralized AI center of excellence, which defines standards and open-source tools, with business-integrated squads for rapid deployment. This dual approach allows you to steer strategy and governance globally while benefiting from agile, value-focused local execution.

What benefits does a unified MLOps platform bring to AI governance?

A unified MLOps platform centralizes pipeline orchestration, artifact tracking, and deployment automation. It simplifies continuous model updates, performance monitoring, and alert management. Using modular open-source tools prevents vendor lock-in and optimizes costs.

How do you anticipate and manage the scaling of an AI model?

To handle increased volume and availability demands, anticipate code modularity, automated testing, and monitoring from the POC phase. A scalable architecture and isolated environments make refactoring and optimization easier. Planned iteration cycles prevent production delays.

What monitoring and proactive maintenance practices should you adopt?

Monitoring should cover data drift, KPI degradation, and execution errors, with automatic alerts triggering interventions. Proactive maintenance includes scheduled model retraining, data updates, and controlled A/B testing. Shared dashboards ensure responsiveness from business and IT teams.

CONTACT US

They trust us for their digital transformation

Let’s talk about you

Describe your project to us, and one of our experts will get back to you.

SUBSCRIBE

Don’t miss our strategists’ advice

Get our insights, the latest digital strategies and best practices in digital transformation, innovation, technology and cybersecurity.

Let’s turn your challenges into opportunities

Based in Geneva, Edana designs tailor-made digital solutions for companies and organizations seeking greater competitiveness.

We combine strategy, consulting, and technological excellence to transform your business processes, customer experience, and performance.

Let’s discuss your strategic challenges.

022 596 73 70

Agence Digitale Edana sur LinkedInAgence Digitale Edana sur InstagramAgence Digitale Edana sur Facebook