Views: 10
Summary – In the face of growing cyber threats, a four-layer architecture from Presentation to Infrastructure is essential for structuring a comprehensive, responsive defense. It combines front-end filtering and encryption, strong authentication, SAST/DAST, automated dependency management, business isolation and traceability, network segmentation with IAM, data encryption, and centralized monitoring. Solution: deploy this model using modular open-source components, automated CI/CD pipelines, and regular audits to strengthen and sustain your security posture.
In a landscape where cyberattacks are increasing in both frequency and sophistication, it has become imperative to adopt a systemic approach to security. Rather than relying exclusively on ad hoc solutions, organizations are better protected when they structure their defenses across multiple complementary layers.
The four-layer security architecture—Presentation, Application, Domain, and Infrastructure—provides a proven framework for this approach. By integrating tailored mechanisms at each level from the design phase, companies not only enhance incident prevention but also strengthen their ability to respond quickly in the event of an attack. This holistic methodology is particularly relevant for CIOs and IT managers aiming to embed cybersecurity at the heart of their digital strategy.
Presentation Layer
The Presentation layer constitutes the first line of defense against attacks targeting user interactions. It must block phishing attempts, cross-site scripting (XSS), and injection attacks through robust mechanisms.
Securing User Inputs
Every input field represents a potential entry point for attackers. It is essential to enforce strict validation on both the client and server sides, filtering out risky characters and rejecting any data that does not conform to expected schemas. This approach significantly reduces the risk of SQL injections or malicious scripts.
Implementing centralized sanitization and content-escaping mechanisms within reusable libraries ensures consistency across the entire web application. The use of standardized functions minimizes human errors and strengthens code maintainability. It also streamlines security updates, since a patch in the library automatically benefits all parts of the application.
Lastly, integrating dedicated unit and functional tests for input validation allows for the rapid detection of regressions. These tests should cover normal use cases as well as malicious scenarios to ensure no vulnerability slips through the cracks. Automating these tests contributes to a more reliable and faster release cycle in line with our software testing strategy.
Implementing Encryption and Security Headers
TLS/SSL encryption ensures the confidentiality and integrity of exchanges between the browser and the server. By correctly configuring certificates and enabling up-to-date protocols, you prevent man-in-the-middle interceptions and bolster user trust. Automating certificate management— for example, through the ACME protocol—simplifies renewals and avoids service interruptions.
HTTP security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options) provide an additional shield against common web attacks. The Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) header forces the browser to use HTTPS only, while the Content Security Policy (CSP) restricts the sources of scripts and objects. This configuration proactively blocks many injection vectors.
Using tools like Mozilla Observatory or securityheaders.com allows you to verify the robustness of these settings and quickly identify weaknesses. Coupled with regular configuration reviews, this practice ensures an optimal security posture and aligns with a defense-in-depth strategy that makes any attack attempt more costly and complex.
Example: A Swiss Manufacturing SME
A Swiss manufacturing SME recently strengthened its Presentation layer by automating TLS certificate deployment through a CI/CD pipeline. This initiative reduced the risk of certificate expiration by 90% and eliminated security alerts related to unencrypted HTTP protocols. Simultaneously, enforcing a strict CSP blocked multiple targeted XSS attempts on their B2B portal.
This case demonstrates that centralizing and automating encryption mechanisms and header configurations are powerful levers to fortify the first line of defense. The initial investment in these tools resulted in a significant decrease in front-end incidents and improved the user experience by eliminating intrusive security alerts. The company now has a reproducible and scalable process ready for future developments.
Application Layer
The Application layer protects business logic and APIs against unauthorized access and software vulnerabilities. It relies on strong authentication, dependency management, and automated testing.
Robust Authentication and Authorization
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) has become the standard for securing access to critical applications. By combining something you know (a password), something you have (a hardware key or mobile authenticator), and, when possible, something you are (biometric data), you create a strong barrier against fraudulent access. Implementation should be seamless for users and based on proven protocols like OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect.
Role-based access control (RBAC) must be defined early in development at the database schema or identity service level to prevent privilege creep. Each sensitive action is tied to a specific permission, denied by default unless explicitly granted. This fine-grained segmentation limits the scope of any potential account compromise.
Regular reviews of privileged accounts and access tokens are necessary to ensure that granted rights continue to align with business needs. Idle sessions should time out, and long-lived tokens must be re-evaluated periodically. These best practices minimize the risk of undetected access misuse.
SAST and DAST Testing
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools analyze source code for vulnerabilities before compilation, detecting risky patterns, injections, and data leaks. Integrating them into the build pipeline enables automatic halting of deployments when critical thresholds are exceeded, complementing manual code reviews by covering a wide range of known flaws.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) tools assess running applications by simulating real-world attacks to uncover vulnerabilities not visible at the code level. They identify misconfigurations, unsecured access paths, and parameter injections. Running DAST regularly—especially after major changes—provides continuous insight into the attack surface.
Strict Dependency Management
Third-party libraries and open-source frameworks accelerate development but can introduce vulnerabilities if versions are not tracked. Automated dependency inventories linked to vulnerability scanners alert you when a component is outdated or compromised. This continuous monitoring enables timely security patches and aligns with technical debt management.
Be cautious of vendor lock-in: prefer modular, standards-based, and interchangeable components to avoid being stuck with an unmaintained tool. Using centralized package managers (npm, Maven, NuGet) and secure private repositories enhances traceability and control over production versions.
Finally, implementing dedicated regression tests for dependencies ensures that each update does not break existing functionality. These automated pipelines balance responsiveness to vulnerabilities with the stability of the application environment.
Edana: strategic digital partner in Switzerland
We support companies and organizations in their digital transformation
Domain Layer
The Domain layer ensures the integrity of business rules and transactional consistency. It relies on internal controls, regular audits, and detailed traceability.
Business Controls and Validation
Within the Domain layer, each business rule must be implemented invariantly, independent of the Application layer. Services should reject any operation that violates defined constraints—for example, transactions with amounts outside the authorized range or inconsistent statuses. This rigor prevents unexpected behavior during scaling or process evolution.
Using explicit contracts (Design by Contract) or Value Objects ensures that once validated, business data maintains its integrity throughout the transaction flow. Each modification passes through clearly identified entry points, reducing the risk of bypassing checks. This pattern also facilitates unit and functional testing of business logic.
Isolating business rules in dedicated modules simplifies maintenance and accelerates onboarding for new team members. During code reviews, discussions focus on the validity of business rules rather than infrastructure details. This separation of concerns enhances organizational resilience to change.
Auditing and Traceability
Every critical event (creation, modification, deletion of sensitive data) must generate a timestamped audit log entry. This trail forms the basis of exhaustive traceability, essential for investigations in the event of an incident or dispute. Logging should be asynchronous to avoid impacting transactional performance.
Audit logs should be stored in an immutable or versioned repository to ensure no alteration goes unnoticed. Hashing mechanisms or digital signatures can further reinforce archive integrity. These practices also facilitate compliance with regulatory requirements and external audits.
Correlating application logs with infrastructure logs provides a holistic view of action chains. This cross-visibility accelerates root-cause identification and the implementation of corrective measures. Security dashboards deliver key performance and risk indicators, supporting informed decision-making.
Example: Swiss Financial Services Organization
A Swiss financial services institution implemented a transaction-level audit module coupled with timestamped, immutable storage. Correlated log analysis quickly uncovered anomalous manipulations of client portfolios. Thanks to this alert, the security team neutralized a fraud attempt before any financial impact occurred.
This example demonstrates the value of a well-designed Domain layer: clear separation of business rules and detailed traceability reduced the average incident detection time from several hours to minutes. Both internal and external audits are also simplified, with irrefutable digital evidence and enhanced transparency.
Infrastructure Layer
The Infrastructure layer forms the foundation of overall security through network segmentation, cloud access management, and centralized monitoring. It ensures resilience and rapid incident detection.
Network Segmentation and Firewalls
Implementing distinct network zones (DMZ, private LAN, test networks) limits intrusion propagation. Each segment has tailored firewall rules that only allow necessary traffic between services. This micro-segmentation reduces the attack surface and prevents lateral movement by an attacker.
Access Control Lists (ACLs) and firewall policies should be maintained in a versioned, audited configuration management system. Every change undergoes a formal review linked to a traceable ticket. This discipline ensures policy consistency and simplifies rollback in case of misconfiguration.
Orchestration tools like Terraform or Ansible automate the deployment and updates of network rules. They guarantee full reproducibility of the infrastructure modernization process and reduce manual errors. In the event of an incident, recovery speed is optimized.
Access Management and Data Encryption
A centralized Identity and Access Management (IAM) system manages identities, groups, and roles across both cloud and on-premises platforms. Single sign-on (SSO) simplifies the user experience while ensuring consistent access policies. Privileges are granted under the principle of least privilege and reviewed regularly.
Encrypting data at rest and in transit is non-negotiable. Using a Key Management Service (KMS) ensures automatic key rotation and enforces separation of duties between key operators and administrators. This granularity minimizes the risk of a malicious operator decrypting sensitive data.
Example: A Swiss social services association implemented automatic database encryption and fine-grained IAM controls for production environment access. This solution ensured the confidentiality of vulnerable user records while providing complete access traceability. Choosing a vendor-independent KMS illustrates their commitment to avoiding lock-in and fully controlling the key lifecycle.
Centralized Monitoring and Alerting
Deploying a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution that aggregates network, system, and application logs enables event correlation. Adaptive detection rules alert in real time to abnormal behavior, such as brute-force attempts or unusual data transfers.
Centralized dashboards offer a consolidated view of infrastructure health and security. Key indicators, such as the number of blocked access attempts or network error rates, can be monitored by IT and operations teams. This transparency facilitates decision-making and corrective action prioritization.
Automating incident response workflows—such as quarantining a suspicious host—significantly reduces mean time to respond (MTTR). Combined with regular red-team exercises, it refines procedures and prepares teams to manage major incidents effectively.
Embrace Multi-Layered Security to Strengthen Your Resilience
The four-layer approach—Presentation, Application, Domain, and Infrastructure—provides a structured framework for building a proactive defense. Each layer contributes complementary mechanisms, from protecting user interfaces to securing business processes and underlying infrastructure. By combining encryption, strong authentication, detailed traceability, and continuous monitoring, organizations shift from a reactive to a resilient posture.
Our context-driven vision favors open-source, scalable, and modular solutions deployed without over-reliance on a single vendor. This foundation ensures the flexibility needed to adapt security measures to business objectives and regulatory requirements. Regular audits and automated testing enable risk anticipation and maintain a high level of protection.
If your organization is looking to strengthen its security architecture or assess its current defenses, our experts are available to co-create a tailored strategy that integrates technology, governance, and best practices. Their experience in implementing secure architectures for organizations of all sizes ensures pragmatic support.
