Summary – Competitive pressure, claims volatility and regulatory requirements force insurers to ensure sovereignty over their IT systems while boosting agility and cost control. By combining cloud and AI, they anticipate activity peaks, automate claims management, continuously optimize IT resources and secure data through robust, multi-AZ or controlled multi-cloud governance compliant with DORA.
Solution: build a sovereign platform with clear business objectives, team training, proven frameworks and a documented exit plan.
Competitive pressure, claim volatility, and regulatory demands are driving insurers to rethink their information systems. Merging cloud and artificial intelligence within a sovereign digital platform now appears to be the key to anticipating peaks in activity, automating claim handling, and optimizing IT resources.
However, this transition must rest on solid foundations: defining coherent business objectives, training teams, establishing clear governance, and strengthening security. At the same time, the question of digital sovereignty requires balancing multi-cloud flexibility with control over dependencies. This article offers a pragmatic approach to reconciling agility, compliance, and IT resilience for insurance providers.
Cloud and AI: Catalysts for Resilient IT
The cloud–AI duo automatically anticipates workload variations and streamlines business processes. It provides the agility essential for coping with claim seasons and unforeseen crises.
With scalable services and integrated predictive models, the infrastructure becomes an intelligent platform that self-adjusts in real time.
Anticipating Activity Peaks
Claims often follow seasonal or contextual patterns: spring floods, winter storms, or pandemics. By combining historical data, weather, and behavioral data, AI models predict periods of high demand.
Cloud elasticity then automatically provisions additional capacity, without locking in resources during slow periods. This planned scaling reduces saturation risks and ensures a smooth user experience.
Dynamic sizing also curbs waste and controls infrastructure costs. Instead of purchasing physical servers for rare peaks, insurers pay only for the resources they actually consume.
Example: An e-commerce site integrated a weather and traffic forecasting engine to adjust its cloud resources daily. This automatic provisioning cut peak-related overcharges by 35% while maintaining an API response rate above 99.8%.
Resource Optimization
Beyond scaling, cloud platforms offer managed services for databases, storage, and compute. These components, optimized by hyperscalers, deliver scalable performance and cost-efficiency.
AI leverages these services to continuously recalibrate clusters and redistribute compute tasks based on business priority. Non-critical workloads run in spot mode—an even more cost-effective option.
This automated orchestration frees operations teams from tuning and monitoring tasks, allowing them to focus on developing new services or improving predictive algorithms.
By precisely adjusting each resource, insurers achieve a balance between performance, cost, and environmental footprint, also supporting their CSR objectives.
Automating Claims Management
AI applied to claim categorization accelerates sorting and routes files to the right teams. Classification models, trained on hundreds of thousands of historical cases, assess severity and prioritize urgent matters.
Claim bots can automatically extract attachments, verify file completeness, and trigger workflows. Agents concentrate on complex cases, while the rest are processed in near-instant batches.
This end-to-end streamlining shortens average processing times and boosts policyholder satisfaction. Key performance indicators, such as time to settlement offer, improve by several days.
Ultimately, automation reduces claims management costs and enhances the insurer’s responsiveness—a differentiator in a highly competitive market.
Essential Foundations for a Sovereign, Scalable Platform
To fully leverage cloud and AI, insurers must build on solid pillars: clear business objectives, continuous training, and structured governance. Without these, transformation remains superficial and risky.
Implementing proven standards and recognized methodological frameworks ensures consistent, repeatable deployments, offering traceability and cost control.
Defining Clear Business Objectives
Every cloud–AI initiative must start with a specific business challenge, whether reducing the average cost per claim or accelerating response times.
Aligning these goals with the insurer’s overall strategy helps prioritize high-value initiatives and avoid low-ROI experiments.
Measurable KPIs (response time, automation rate, total cost of ownership) should be defined upfront to steer the project effectively.
This approach also prevents a proliferation of isolated proofs of concept and creates a coherent roadmap for the entire IT department.
Continuous Team Training
Cloud and AI evolve rapidly, making skills obsolete in a matter of months. Regularly training teams ensures optimal use of new services.
Training cycles must cover both technical aspects (infrastructure as code, MLOps, data engineering) and governance and security issues.
Hands-on workshops and internal certifications promote tool adoption and the spread of best practices.
This skills development prevents configuration errors, reduces potential vulnerabilities, and builds confidence in the digital transformation.
Enhanced Security and Transparent Governance
Protecting customer data and ensuring infrastructure resilience requires strict security policies: encryption, granular identity and access management, cloud firewalls, and continuous monitoring.
Centralized governance, with architecture and change review committees, ensures traceability of decisions and compliance with regulations (General Data Protection Regulation, Digital Operational Resilience Act).
Regularly tested disaster recovery plans guarantee service continuity in the event of major incidents.
This security-by-design posture reassures regulators and partners, reinforcing digital sovereignty.
Adopting Recognized Frameworks
Frameworks such as the AWS Well-Architected Framework, Microsoft Cloud Adoption Framework, and Google Cloud Architecture Framework provide best-practice guidelines for robustness, performance, security, and cost optimization.
They cover the full cloud project lifecycle: strategy, design, deployment, operation, and continuous improvement.
These frameworks facilitate evaluating existing architectures and defining action plans to close gaps with industry best practices.
Example: A mid-sized financial institution leveraged the AWS Well-Architected Framework to overhaul its back-office infrastructure. This review reduced annual cloud costs by 20% while improving SLAs for critical APIs.
Edana: strategic digital partner in Switzerland
We support companies and organizations in their digital transformation
Pragmatic Approaches to Digital Sovereignty
Rather than a multi-cloud dogma, most insurers benefit from choosing a primary provider backed by resilience guarantees. A controlled lock-in paired with a clear exit strategy under the Digital Operational Resilience Act is often more pragmatic.
While multi-cloud offers flexibility and regional compliance, it also multiplies complexity, integration costs, and governance needs.
Multi-Cloud: Benefits and Challenges
Multi-cloud allows workload distribution based on each provider’s strengths and meets data residency requirements.
However, managing multiple environments requires specialized skills, multi-platform management tools, and rigorous operational standardization.
Tooling, licensing, and training costs can quickly offset initial advantages, especially if use cases aren’t clearly defined.
In highly regulated contexts, multi-cloud remains relevant but must be supported by robust governance to avoid IT silos.
Controlled Lock-In and Resilience
Selecting a primary cloud provider doesn’t mean relinquishing digital sovereignty. Multi-availability-zone and multi-region architectures ensure high availability and rapid recovery in case of an outage.
Using infrastructure as code and standardized containers (Kubernetes) limits technological lock-in and eases cross-cloud deployments.
This partial lock-in enables centralized cost and operations management while preserving the ability to export workloads if needed.
Example: A mid-sized industrial manufacturer deployed on a single cloud across two European regions. This strategy achieved 99.99% availability while maintaining the flexibility to switch to a secondary provider if contract terms change.
Digital Operational Resilience Act Compliance and Exit Strategy
The Digital Operational Resilience Act imposes strict requirements on third-party ICT risk management and operational continuity plans.
To comply, insurers must document dependencies, regularly test recovery plans, and define clear exit clauses with cloud providers.
Implementing a pull-based model and provider-independent backups ensures minimum data and workload portability.
This preparation prevents surprises in case of failures or contract changes, safeguarding operational sovereignty.
Increased Complexity and Stronger Governance
Maintaining a multi-cloud architecture or controlled lock-in requires detailed oversight: continuous resource inventory, cost monitoring, and security audits.
A centralized cloud management platform consolidates logs, metrics, and alerts in one place.
Dedicated committees regularly review cloud sourcing strategies, adjust budgets, and reevaluate workload distribution.
This cross-functional governance ensures adherence to internal policies and regulatory frameworks while optimizing load and investment allocation.
AI Governance and Transparency to Avoid a Black Box
To control AI and preserve digital sovereignty, dedicated governance is crucial, ensuring explainability and regular audits. Without transparency, AI remains a high-risk black box.
Integrating models into the IT service catalog and continuously supervising them ensures shared understanding and coherent management.
AI Model Management and Monitoring
Every deployed model must be registered in a central repository, including versions, parameters, and performance metrics.
MLOps pipelines automate training, testing, and deployment while generating reports on data drift and predictive quality.
A unified dashboard monitors real-time metrics—accuracy rate, rejection rate, and business impact—facilitating interpretation by IT and risk teams.
This observatory prevents algorithmic drift and enables rapid response to performance drops or detected biases.
Explainability and Regular Audits
Explainability techniques (SHAP, LIME) break down variable influences on final decisions, providing clarity for data scientists, legal experts, and auditors.
Quarterly reviews assess dataset validity, regulatory compliance, and model update impacts.
This ongoing audit process bolsters confidence among executives and regulators, while minimizing legal and reputational risks.
It also identifies improvement opportunities, such as adding business variables to refine fraud or complex claim predictions.
Use Cases and Business Adaptation
Governance must remain pragmatic: each AI use case is evaluated on business value, risk level, and maintenance cost.
Lessons learned feed iterative improvement cycles, ensuring platform longevity and scalability.
Ensure the Resilience and Sovereignty of Your Insurance IT
By combining cloud and AI within a governed, secure infrastructure compliant with the Digital Operational Resilience Act, insurers can anticipate claim peaks, automate processes, and optimize costs. Foundations rest on clear business objectives, continuous training, transparent governance, and adoption of recognized frameworks. Rather than a complex multi-cloud setup, a controlled lock-in with multi-AZ guarantees and a documented exit strategy often better addresses sovereignty needs.
Facing these challenges, our experts are ready to assess your architecture, define a tailored action plan, and guide your organization toward resilient, sovereign IT. Together, let’s turn your challenges into strategic opportunities.







Views: 36