Categories
Featured-Post-Software-EN Software Engineering (EN)

Business Analysis: The Essential Link Between Strategy and Software Development

Auteur n°3 – Benjamin

By Benjamin Massa
Views: 17

Summary – The gap between strategic vision and technical execution often derails digital transformation; business analysis bridges this divide by structuring discovery, requirements elicitation, SRS drafting, business-IT coordination, agile governance, and continuous improvement to manage budget, quality, and timelines. By embedding business analysis at the heart of the lifecycle, you get a prioritized backlog, precise user stories, tracked non-functional requirements, and continuous feedback to accelerate time-to-market and maximize ROI.
Solution: deploy a dedicated business analyst to frame your project, formalize requirements, and orchestrate communication between strategy and IT.

In a landscape where digital transformation is a competitive imperative, the gap between a project’s strategic vision and its technical execution often spells failure. Business analysis serves as the key link to bridge this divide by orchestrating requirements gathering, formalizing expectations, and coordinating between business stakeholders and technical teams.

By placing business analysis at the heart of the software lifecycle, every delivered feature precisely addresses business needs while adhering to budget, schedule, and quality constraints. This structured support drives innovation, anticipates risks, and ensures the long-term viability of deployed solutions.

Discovery Phase for a Solid Project Foundation

The discovery phase lays the groundwork for a robust software project by preventing early misunderstandings.

A business analyst acts as a translator, turning business strategy into a clear technical roadmap.

Understanding Context and Objectives

Before a single line of code is written, the business analyst conducts investigations during the discovery phase to grasp the company’s overarching strategy and performance goals. This assessment includes analyzing existing processes, identifying friction points, and prioritizing business needs. Coupled with an industry benchmark, it evaluates innovation levers and associated risks.

Beyond simple workshops, this phase relies on interviews with decision-makers, the collection of quantitative data, and sometimes field observations. It fosters a shared vision among stakeholders and establishes concrete success criteria. This rigorous approach minimizes rework during development.

The expected deliverable is a validated project framework, represented by an overall project diagram and often formalized in an IT requirements specification, detailing scope, objectives, and monitoring indicators. This creates a transparent decision-making framework and streamlines trade-offs throughout the project.

Requirements Elicitation Techniques

The business analyst selects appropriate techniques: user interviews, collaborative workshops, field observations, or rapid prototyping. Each method addresses a specific need: resolving ambiguities, stimulating creativity, or validating a technology choice.

For example, wireframe prototyping quickly tests business hypotheses against operational reality. Early validation reduces misunderstandings and speeds up decision-making.

Finally, these intermediate deliverables (mockups, storyboards) foster user buy-in by creating a sense of co-creation. They become anchor points for writing detailed specifications.

Use Case: Strategic Alignment

A large Swiss public organization aimed to modernize its internal portal but had unclear expectations, leading to scattered priorities. The business analyst facilitated a series of workshops with business leads, legal counsel, and IT teams to map requirements and set measurable KPIs. This work revealed redundant requests and highlighted minor issues that directly impacted user satisfaction.

The outcome was a prioritized backlog with a minimum viable product aligned to the most critical use cases, structured as user stories. This clarity enabled a controlled development kickoff, reducing the initial scope by 25% and improving time-to-market.

This example demonstrates how a structured analysis approach drives efficiency and focuses efforts on genuine business challenges.

Writing a Clear and Effective SRS

Drafting the software requirements specification (SRS) transforms business needs into detailed functional and non-functional requirements.

A clear and structured document guides development and validation teams.

Organizing Functional Specifications

The business analyst produces a document detailing each feature as a user story, accompanied by acceptance criteria. This granularity ensures each sprint’s scope is controlled and developments precisely match identified needs.

Each user story includes context, a description of the requirement, input/output data, and associated business rules. Edge cases and error scenarios are explicitly documented to avoid ambiguity.

Formalizing these elements structures the backlog and feeds into test planning, enhancing traceability between the initial request and the delivered solution.

Non-Functional Requirements and Constraints

Beyond features, the SRS incorporates performance, security, scalability, and compatibility requirements. The business analyst collaborates with the architect to define latency thresholds, expected data volumes, and availability levels.

These constraints become development milestones and are validated through load testing, security audits, and architectural reviews. They protect the project from technical drift late in the process.

The document also includes governance rules, infrastructure prerequisites, and production quality indicators.

Use Case: SRS for an Inventory System

A Swiss logistics SME engaged a business analyst to define a new inventory system after several failed attempts. The SRS was modularized: item management, location tracking, and real-time reporting. Each module included data flow diagrams and test scenarios.

The precision of the specifications enabled developers to deliver a first functional increment in three weeks, validated by operations on the initial iteration. This modular approach also eased future integration of a mobile application without disrupting the existing system.

This case illustrates how a comprehensive, pragmatic SRS secures development and anticipates evolution needs.

Edana: strategic digital partner in Switzerland

We support companies and organizations in their digital transformation

Seamless Communication Between Business and IT

Seamless communication ensures stakeholder buy-in and frictionless execution.

The business analyst maintains ongoing coordination among business users and technical teams.

Liaison Between Business and IT Teams

At the project’s core, the business analyst acts as a facilitator. They organize sprint reviews, draft meeting minutes, and update the backlog based on feedback. This continuous oversight prevents misunderstandings and keeps objectives aligned.

By clarifying priorities after each demo, they adjust scope and negotiate necessary trade-offs to meet deadlines. This structured process averts functional and financial drift.

Centralizing exchanges via a collaborative tool ensures decision traceability and reduces information loss.

Stakeholder Management

Identifying, analyzing, and engaging stakeholders are key activities. The business analyst lists contributors, assesses their influence, and schedules validation points tailored to their decision-making level.

This governance model fosters sponsors’ progressive upskilling and broad buy-in. Milestones are selected to maximize impact and avoid redundant meetings.

Transparent deliverables and performance indicators build trust and limit downstream adjustments.

Agile Cycles and Continuous Feedback

In agile mode, the business analyst manages the backlog, prepares user stories, and ensures delivery quality. They coordinate demos and retrospectives, driving continuous learning and incremental product improvement.

Each sprint benefits from rapid field feedback, allowing course corrections before developments become costly. This virtuous cycle reduces surprises and optimizes time-to-market.

A test-driven approach and evolving documentation ensure constant alignment between development and testing.

Structured Continuous Improvement for Greater Value

Structured continuous improvement evolves the software based on feedback and emerging challenges.

The business analyst measures feature impact and guides optimizations to maximize value.

Collecting and Analyzing Post-Delivery Feedback

Once in production, the business analyst centralizes user feedback, tracks tickets, and analyzes usage data. This detailed monitoring reveals areas for enhancement and extension opportunities.

Key metrics (adoption rate, average processing time, error frequency) feed regular reports. They form the basis of an action plan for future iterations.

This data-driven approach ensures software evolves according to real needs, not assumptions.

Agile Process Optimization

With each release cycle, the business analyst adjusts internal workflows, refines acceptance criteria, and revisits backlog priorities. This continual flexibility addresses urgent business needs without compromising long-term vision.

A modular architecture and open-source components facilitate adding features or partially refactoring a component without major ripple effects.

By embracing agile rituals, the team gains responsiveness and performance, keeping the digital ecosystem aligned with market demands.

Use Case: Continuous Improvement and Measurable ROI

A Swiss financial services firm engaged a business analyst to optimize its client portal. Post-initial deployment, usage data revealed high abandonment in the subscription workflow. The analyst rewrote the user stories, simplified the interface, and adjusted business rules to cut steps.

Six weeks after the update, conversion rates rose by 18%, and processing time per file dropped by 40%. These immediate gains were reinvested in adding new strategic features.

This case shows how a continuous approach creates a virtuous circle between technical performance and return on investment.

Ensuring Consistency Between Strategy and Execution

Business analysis structures every phase of the software development cycle—from discovery through continuous improvement—via SRS drafting and stakeholder coordination. It ensures each delivered feature addresses a clearly defined business need while respecting technical and budgetary constraints. This balance of strategic vision and operational rigor is the foundation of successful digital transformation.

Whether you’re launching a product, overhauling an existing system, or optimizing in agile mode, our experts are ready to contextualize the approach, prioritize open-source and modular solutions, and avoid vendor lock-in. Benefit from tailored support focused on ROI, performance, and longevity.

Discuss your challenges with an Edana expert

By Benjamin

Digital expert

PUBLISHED BY

Benjamin Massa

Benjamin is an senior strategy consultant with 360° skills and a strong mastery of the digital markets across various industries. He advises our clients on strategic and operational matters and elaborates powerful tailor made solutions allowing enterprises and organizations to achieve their goals. Building the digital leaders of tomorrow is his day-to-day job.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about Business Analysis

What is the difference between discovery and SRS in business analysis?

Discovery is the initial scoping phase of a software project. It involves analyzing existing processes, identifying pain points, and formalizing business priorities through workshops and interviews. The SRS, on the other hand, is a detailed functional and non-functional specification document: user stories, acceptance criteria, business rules, and technical constraints. While discovery defines the overall scope and objectives, the SRS translates these needs into operational specifications to guide developers and testing.

How does the discovery phase help reduce technical risks?

By promoting precise scoping before any development, the discovery phase anticipates and limits technical risks. It involves process mapping, industry benchmarking, and validating business hypotheses through workshops and prototypes. This work identifies technical dependencies, architectural constraints, and risk areas from the start. The result: a clarified specification that avoids costly adjustments during development and ensures better control of timelines and budget.

Which elicitation methods should be chosen for a custom project?

The choice of elicitation methods depends on the project context and objectives. User interviews clarify individual needs, collaborative workshops foster co-creation, and field observation uncovers actual usage. Rapid prototyping (wireframes or mockups) allows early validation of functional hypotheses. By combining these techniques, the business analyst resolves ambiguities, secures technological choices, and promotes stakeholder buy-in around concrete solutions.

How to prioritize business needs in a backlog?

Prioritization is based on business value analysis and effort level. Frameworks like MoSCoW or WSJF help classify features as must-have, should-have, and nice-to-have. The business analyst assesses the impact on strategic KPIs, potential return on investment, and technical complexity. Stakeholders then validate this prioritized backlog in workshops, ensuring each sprint focuses on the highest value features.

How to define effective acceptance criteria for user stories?

Effective acceptance criteria describe the context, preconditions, input and output data, and associated business rules. They also include edge cases and error scenarios to cover all situations. Written with the QA team and developers, they serve as the basis for automated and manual testing. This precision prevents misinterpretation and ensures each user story delivers the expected value.

What is the business analyst's role in stakeholder management?

The business analyst identifies and maps stakeholders according to their role and influence. They schedule validation checkpoints tailored to each profile, organize sprint reviews, and distribute clear meeting notes. By adapting their communication (technical or business-oriented), they ensure shared understanding and progressive upskilling of sponsors. This structured governance optimizes decision-making, strengthens engagement, and reduces change resistance.

How to ensure consistency between business requirements and technical constraints?

To guarantee consistency and feasibility, the business analyst collaborates closely with the architect and technical teams. They incorporate non-functional requirements (performance, security, scalability) into the specification and define measurable thresholds. Architecture reviews and load testing validate these constraints. This approach prevents technical drift and ensures developed solutions meet business needs without compromising system robustness.

Which KPIs should be tracked to measure the impact of business analysis?

Key KPIs include adoption rate, user story completion rate, time-to-market, and reduction in test-phase rework. Upon delivery, the business analyst also monitors the number of post-deployment tickets and resolution times to adjust priorities. These measurable indicators, collected via analytics tools, demonstrate the impact of business analysis and guide future iterations toward better ROI.

CONTACT US

They trust us for their digital transformation

Let’s talk about you

Describe your project to us, and one of our experts will get back to you.

SUBSCRIBE

Don’t miss our strategists’ advice

Get our insights, the latest digital strategies and best practices in digital transformation, innovation, technology and cybersecurity.

Let’s turn your challenges into opportunities

Based in Geneva, Edana designs tailor-made digital solutions for companies and organizations seeking greater competitiveness.

We combine strategy, consulting, and technological excellence to transform your business processes, customer experience, and performance.

Let’s discuss your strategic challenges.

022 596 73 70

Agence Digitale Edana sur LinkedInAgence Digitale Edana sur InstagramAgence Digitale Edana sur Facebook